Too Many On-Page Links
-
I'm getting the warning of "Too many on-page links".
I have a number of affiliate marketing sites, all Wordpress, all with sidebars.
In the header navigation bar is a link that offers "reviews" and links to each product/brand. This is not a drop down link but leads to a page with product links.
Also, in the sidebar I have links that also lead to the products/brands. Redundant yes, but in the beginning this seemed to be a good practice in site design.
It would be easy to simply remove the widget that contains the link process in the sidebar. The problem may simply be that the sidebar is the same for every page in the site(s).
Is this hurting total SEO as my sites are all over 95-percent indexed.
One site in particular does very well in traffic and sales so is removing these links potentially going to improve my SEO and ultimately by success?
Thanks,
Don
-
I will take your advise Ryan. The one site with numerous links was getting a little ugly so I'll let the navbar work for awhile and see what happens. Up to now people tend to find this site through long-tail keywords so the links in the sidebar is a moot subject as far as navigation.
All those warnings spooked me. When I built my first site many moons ago with Dreamweaver and even Frontpage there were tests built in to the software to analyze the site for broken links and a visual of your navigation.
My main site is that old and my linking system worked fine. If this was a real problem wouldn't an extensive sitemap be a problem? That could potentially be link loaded.
And you're absolutely correct - if they are helpful to the users than don't remove them - I always concentrate on ease of navigation for the user and page load speed. If you can't retain the visitor all the links in the world won't help or hinder.
-
I would recommend not removing any link which is useful to users. Don't remove a link in an effort to satisfy a SEO tool's warnings. The tool simply determines "too many links" as any page with over 100 links. It is possible to have a very successful page with 200+ links. There are many factors involved including the page's DA/PA and the useability of the links.
In summary, review your links and remove any links which are not helpful to users or otherwise are unnecessary. If you go over 100 links and get the warning, disregard it. You have investigated the issue and taken the appropriate action.
-
Hi Kieran, I answer above to Thomas that I may very well stick to the <100 threshold but I doubt if any one site would exceed that.
Thank you for the feedback and link.
-
Only one site actually had close to 100 links in the sidebar but this also happens to be my most successful site, it's also the oldest.
My backlinking efforts for this site has been extensive also, not so much with the others.
Since these niches have specific products they probably won't reach your threshold of 100 as I delete some products in favor of new ones so the net stays the same.
I will test a little without disrupting the navigation too much. Content is king in my book and I specialize in plenty of original content with matching products. That formula has been working I need to get busy on backlink efforts however.
-
All the links are unique to each product but because they are redundant I am beginning to remove them. I understand the point of having all pages linked to each other but with the sidebar redundancy and your example I suppose the link juice is better used elsewhere.
I really don't have related articles or most popular since these are niche sites I work very hard for original content to specific products. These aren't thin sites but they were created to provide relevant topics and reference with product that would exactly match the topics.
Adding value in information and driving traffic to the product for a sale. This formula has worked and since my indexing is very good I suppose I wasn't losing much.
The navigation bar is visible and leads users to specific criteria without misleading them.
-
Hi Don.
Think of your link juice as plumbing for your house. Your site has x-amount of water pressure coming in to your home. The links are pipes you create which allow the water (link juice) to flow throughout your site.
Each time you add a new link, the water has to come from somewhere. A tiny bit of water is taken from all the other links on your site so it can flow to the new link. One part of SEO is to ensure all pages on your site are linked so you don't have any island pages. Another important part of SEO is link optimization.
When you provide 50 sidebar links a relatively equal amount of juice flows to each of them.The question you need to answer is, are all those links worthy of an equal amount of attention? Ideally you should maximize the number of links to pages which are highly relevant to users such as "related articles" or "most popular". You can also increase links to your best selling products or services.
Perform some analysis to determine which links are not helpful. As an example, if you offer links to archived articles from 2010 which are hardly used, consider removing those links.
-
Don,
There is no set number for page links, but the general rule of thumb I've always used is 100 is the max. Typically I try to stay well below that. You also have to understand that your page rank and site authority will play a part into how many links google will "allow" on a page.
Will removing them improve your SEO and success? I have heard from individuals that have lowered their link count that their rankings do improve. Really, the best thing to do is test it. If you lose rankings then turn them back on. If you gain rankings then you have your own test positive that links should be limited.
If your site is doing well, then it doesn't sound like your site is hurting too much from your current linking structure. So if you like where you are then you don't have to worry about it. But if you want to improve, you will have to take some risks.
-
Hi Don
The rough (current) rule of thumb seems to be in the 150 range per page. If yours is really going way beyond this you may need to rethink your plan.
http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/internal-link
Indexation isn't the be all and end all though - you can always redirect them which isn't too bad
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO Effect of inserting No indexed Contents in normal Pages (Nextgen Gallery)
Hello Dear Community, I'm running a photography website and have a question about the indexability of "No indexed Content" inserted on indexable pages. Background : I read everywhere that best practice is to "no index" all useless pages with few content, what I did with Yoast plugin : I no indexed all my nextgen galleries and "ngg_tags" since they create single pages for every photo, tags or slideshow. I did the same for all my porfolio-posts, price lists, testimonials and so on... Nevertheless, I inserted these galleries and portfolios on SEO optimized page for my target keywords. + Nextgen plugin automatically adds these images in the page sitemap. My idea is to have only my Seo optimized page showing in Google and not the others. Problem: I've been checking the results in Google Search Console, filtering by images : I discovered that most of the images featured in these Masonry galleries are not showing in google, and actually almost all the images indexed are the Wordpress from media gallery. I double checked with Screaming Frog, and the software doesn"t see images on these pages. My question is: Is the low indexablilty of these contents are related to the No indexation of the original contents ??? Does somebody has experienced the same issue that these contents doesn't show on Google ? in advance many thanks for your help
Reporting & Analytics | | TristanAventure0 -
Find Pages with 0 traffic
Hi, We are trying to consolidate the amount of landing pages on our site, is there any way to find landing pages with a particular URL substring which have had 0 traffic? The minimum which appears in google analytics is 1 visit.
Reporting & Analytics | | driveawayholidays0 -
How can you tell if Google has already assessed a penalty against your site for spammy links?
Is there any way to tell for sure if there is a penalty? My client has a ton of low quality back links, and I think they are in danger of a Penguin penalty. Any way to know? The links are there for a business reason.... their clients mention them in the footer, with a backlink. It is not a link scheme. but folks are generally not clicking on a footer link, and so there is a pro/con of leaving it as it. Any way, to diagnose whether a Penguin penalty has already hit?
Reporting & Analytics | | DianeDP2 -
Can 500 errors hurt rankings for an entire site or just the pages with the errors?
I'm working with a site that had over 700 500 errors after a redesign in april. Most of them were fixed in June, but there are still about 200. Can 500 errors affect rankings sitewide, or just the pages with the errors? Thanks for reading!
Reporting & Analytics | | DA20130 -
Figuring Out the Source of "direct traffic" by looking at landing page parameters
I have a client who runs an e-commerce website, and I noticed that 40% of his traffic and 25% of his sales are all attributable to Direct Traffic. At first, I tried to solve this problem by tagging all of the previously untagged links in his e-newsletter, which I expect to be very helpful. However, then I looked at the landing pages for his direct traffic, and I see that it is almost entirely filled with thousands of unique URLs that begin with a question mark followed by the name of his e-newsletter or shopping cart vendor. It would be the equivalent of having a url like the following: "www.willmarlow.com/?constantcontact=keya;sldkfjsdlfkjdf;sldkjf" If we have this amount of information in the link, shouldn't there be a way to add additional parameters to the URL to move this traffic out of the Direct column? Has anyone encountered this before? Thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | williammarlow0 -
Analytics: How to see how many uniques viewed over X amount of pages in period
Hey guys, anyone any idea how to do the following in google analytics? I need a little help, I am looking at my traffic for a given month, I can see how many unique users visit over X amount of times, but can instead of visits, can I see how many unique users I had that looked at X amount of pages or more? Appreciate all help!! 🙂
Reporting & Analytics | | MirandaP0 -
Googlebot encountered extremely large numbers of links on your site??? How Do I resolve this?
I am working on a site with over 30 million pages. Every time I get about One Million indexed I get a Message in the Google Webmasters Tools saying "Googlebot encountered extremely large numbers of links on your site" The indexing then starts dropping like a Rock. I need to get the site indexed. Please Help!
Reporting & Analytics | | GlobalFlex0 -
For an optimized site, any available stats / guesstimates on what is avg % of traffic to homepage vs. second-level pages?
I'm interested in passing this info on to a client who experienced a period of time when an incorrect GA code was installed on their homepage. They were able to get Google stats on second level pages only. This is a site that gets 80 + % of visits from organic search engine referrals. They do minimal advertising. Thanks in advance.
Reporting & Analytics | | alankoen1230