Do facebook shares pass share juice the same way links pass link juice?
-
If i have a page on my domain say PAGE-A and let's say it's located at:
http://www.mydomain.com/something/page-a and this page has quite a lot of page authority from many many inbound links. It is my understanding that if i "sculpt" the internal links on PAGE-A to point at only my primary targets, let's call the PAGE-B, PAGE-C, and PAGE-D; then those pages would gain some benefit from this link juice flowing through.
Consider a similar situation where i have a page, say PAGE-F located at: http://www.mydomain.com/anotherpage/page-F
and page-F gets 150 facebook shares. would the links on page-F pass this benefit on in any way? Or is only the direct target of the facebook share gaining benefit from this facebook sharing?
Furthermore, lets consider a scenario where there are 30 or 40 similar pages like PAGE-F all with links out to my primary targets. Would these primary targets gain anything as these 30 or 40 pages gained facebook shares?
Repeat above question, replace 'facebook' with 'twitter'. repeat again for 'google+' ?
-
Exactly how and if Facebook shares affect ranking is the subject of speculation. The only hard facts are what Google tells us:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxTmZulcQZ0
Everything shared in the video is exactly what I mentioned in the initial reply.
Beyond this point we can only analyze, test and draw conclusions (i.e. best guesses). Some great analysis of the topic:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/does-google-use-facebook-shares-to-influence-search-rankings
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/facebook-twitters-influence-google-search-rankings
A conclusion drawn from the above, which I agree with is "Earning Facebook shares (probably) will not directly boost your Google rankings (though it may have positive effects that indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals Google may use)."
Based on the above sources, I maintain the position shared in the original reply. I absolutely could be wrong which I freely acknowledge. I am simply sharing the knowledge I have acquired on this topic.
-
Hmmm I see your point but it seems naive to assume that google can't see how many times a link has been shared on facebook. It seems like a pretty simple bit of code to hook into their API and return the total number of shares. Who's to say they wouldn't use this data?
Let's assume for a moment that there are T number of total shares, and X visible shares, while I invisible shares for a given link. We could say that T = X + I.
Further more if we assume that each share on facebook has an associated Page authority, lets call it Pa. And let's also assume that each page that is invisible to google has an unknown page authority Po. Then it would follow that the total link juice passed by a facebook share would be something like:
Link Juice = SUM-of-Pa-from-0-to-X + SUM-of-Po-from-X-to-T
If we were to assume that on average Po was equal to the average page authority of the visible share pages, then we could conclude that
Po = (Sum-of-Pa-from-0-to-X) / X = PAverage
So you'de get: Link Juice = SUM-of-Pa-from-0-to-X + PAverage*(T-X)
Since they are capable of caluculating both of these quantities (all known variables) then i think it follows they they would be able to calculate the rough value of a link shared via facebook.
If i can do this pseudo math on the back of a napkin, who's to say that Google's engineers couldn't figure this one out?
So can we still safely assume that google treats facebook shares the same way they treat other links? I highly doubt it. Espcially because of the fact that most of them, like you say, are nofollow, yet despite their nofollow and invisibility, they still effect rankings (at least they do in my experience).
-
The first question is, are the facebook shares visible? Try logging out of facebook and then viewing the link. Can you see it?
Many facebook shares are not visible due to various settings. If the sharer only shares links with friends, then you wont see the link. Another example is if the topic is flagged as adult by facebook, or if it has any age restriction, you wont see the link. By "you" I mean a user which is not logged in such as the Google crawler. Those links do not flow link juice.
Additionally, if the link is nofollow which they usually (?always) are, then they do not pass link juice.
In short, a facebook or twitter share is not different then any other web page. The basic questions are: can the crawler see the link? is the link followed? does the linking page have any PR? etc.
With respect to Google+, it is the newest server and only recently out of beta. Clearly Google crawlers can crawl their own site as they wish. With that said, in the past Matt Cutts has shared Google crawlers respected the privacy from other Google properties so my guess is the same website rules apply. I am not aware of any study which confirms or rejects this information.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How Social Shares on One Page Affects Sitewide Authority
If you have a great resource on your site that earns a lot of social shares, does that improve the authority of your entire site or just that single page in the eyes of Google?
Social Media | | Charlessipe0 -
Linking Facebook activity and your post
Hi everyone, I'm sure you know how images tend to do better in Facebook. The problem is, if I post an image on Facebook, and link to a blog post in the comment of that image, the activity of that Facebook post wouldn't be pulled into the blog post. That is, the blog would show 1 "like" when the post on Facebook is actually getting 150 "likes". That wouldn't be the case if I posted a link instead of an image. Does anyone know of a work-around? Thanks.
Social Media | | andrep0 -
Optimal Image Size For Social Sharing
Hi Everyone, I have just watch Rands latest whiteboard friday and in it he mentions that care should be taken to ensure that images are sized correctly for social sharing on facebook and Google+. Could anyone expand on what the ideal size for an image should be so that is sizes correctly when shared socially. Thanks Miles
Social Media | | easyrider20 -
Do you need legal rights to pictures in Facebook posts
When I add an image to a Facebook post (for a FanPage) does it need to be something I own or have credited, or can I use whatever images I like? Is this something that is at all monitored? Thanks!
Social Media | | theLotter0 -
Facebook Check-In Changes
Can someone please direct me to a good article on how the recent facebook changes to how check ins are calculated affect SEO? Or even give me an explanation here?
Social Media | | HamiltonIsland1 -
Anyone tried out facebook like services from Fiverr?
Fiverr offers services like 1000 likes for $5!!! (and they seem to deliver) Sounds great but what is the catch? Has anyone tried out these type of services and more importantly what are the potential penalties?
Social Media | | Wallander0 -
How to migrate "friends" to likes on a new facebook corporate account
Hi, My client, which is a university department, used a regular facebook page to manage some 800 friend on a personal Facebook page. How would you go about convincing the friends to switch to "likees" on a new corporate account? Is holding a giveaway my best bet? Any other ideas? Thanks!
Social Media | | michalseo0 -
Adding large facebook like box
How do you add a facebook like box to the home page here nlpca(dot)com It's a large like box with pictures. I added this below the body: and this on our site (Joomla site): http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-NLP-Coaching-Institute-of-California/187804434598142" data-width="217" data-show-faces="true" data-stream="false" data-header="true">
Social Media | | BobGW
What am I doing wrong?0