Hi Fabrizio,

Since you already have an OSE account, just enter that URL, and then click on the "Just-Discovered beta" tab on the far-right.  You'll see 350 links to that URL.

Alternately, ahrefs has 195 domains that link to the URL you provided, but of course you'll need an account to see all the data.

Hope that helps!

Matt Cutts has stated that within Google, "Web Spam and Search Quality does not use Google Analytics in ranking.  It won't affect your ranking within Google search results".  You can watch the Google Webmaster Help video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLmO1GE4GvI

He made a point of qualifying his answer at the end by saying that his answer was accurate "as of today, May 17, 2010", so take that how you will

Hi Anthony,

I use a combination of tools for audits.  SEOmoz is great for client-facing reports, and tracking issues over time.  The downside is that you don't have that "on-demand" capability to crank out a full audit the instant you need it.

For on-demand audits, I use Screaming Frog, which is free for 500 URLs, and $99 for an unlimited license - it's worth every penny, and returns a full range of technical SEO data, which you can export and manipulate in Excel.

Hi Alex,

Matt is absolutely right - engines ignore everything to the right of the hash (properly called a "named anchor" or "URL fragment").

They ignore fragments for the reason you just described.  Fragments have traditionally been used in web design to build "table of contents" navigation that drops a user down the page to a specific position on the page, whether a different section, or a specific user's comment, etc.  If a page has 10 sections with 10 corresponding fragments, obviously the engine just wants to index the root URL, rather than waste time and money indexing all the fragments, which would be duplicates of the root URL.

Fragments can be very useful for visitors who want to link to a specific part of a long article, or directly to a comment they made.

There is no problem whatsoever with using lots of fragments for in-page navigation.

You're correct that it's a GA hack.  Avoid it.

Google has publicly stated that they don't use your site-specific GA metrics to influence organic search rankings.  E.g., they're not taking data from your GA profile, and feeding that to the Search Quality team to determine if your site should rank better or worse.  They have MANY better ways to accurately track anonymous user interactions with sites at scale (e.g. Chrome).

The only thing that you'll accomplish with this code is making all of your own internal metrics turn to garbage.  Accurate metrics are important.  If you bounce rate is high, knowing that allows you to take action to improve your site and reduce it.

The more people who stay on your site for more than 1 pageview, the more money your business is likely to make. Improve your bounce rate to improve the profitability of your website, not for some supposed correlation between bounce rate and organic search ranking.

You're correct that it's a GA hack.  Avoid it.

Google has publicly stated that they don't use your site-specific GA metrics to influence organic search rankings.  E.g., they're not taking data from your GA profile, and feeding that to the Search Quality team to determine if your site should rank better or worse.  They have MANY better ways to accurately track anonymous user interactions with sites at scale (e.g. Chrome).

The only thing that you'll accomplish with this code is making all of your own internal metrics turn to garbage.  Accurate metrics are important.  If you bounce rate is high, knowing that allows you to take action to improve your site and reduce it.

The more people who stay on your site for more than 1 pageview, the more money your business is likely to make. Improve your bounce rate to improve the profitability of your website, not for some supposed correlation between bounce rate and organic search ranking.

Hi Anthony,

I use a combination of tools for audits.  SEOmoz is great for client-facing reports, and tracking issues over time.  The downside is that you don't have that "on-demand" capability to crank out a full audit the instant you need it.

For on-demand audits, I use Screaming Frog, which is free for 500 URLs, and $99 for an unlimited license - it's worth every penny, and returns a full range of technical SEO data, which you can export and manipulate in Excel.

Hi Alex,

Matt is absolutely right - engines ignore everything to the right of the hash (properly called a "named anchor" or "URL fragment").

They ignore fragments for the reason you just described.  Fragments have traditionally been used in web design to build "table of contents" navigation that drops a user down the page to a specific position on the page, whether a different section, or a specific user's comment, etc.  If a page has 10 sections with 10 corresponding fragments, obviously the engine just wants to index the root URL, rather than waste time and money indexing all the fragments, which would be duplicates of the root URL.

Fragments can be very useful for visitors who want to link to a specific part of a long article, or directly to a comment they made.

There is no problem whatsoever with using lots of fragments for in-page navigation.