I would love to get you all's take on Gotch SEO.  I am gearing up to link build for a site in the next several months, and have been reading up from sources other than Moz, in preparation.  (Need to re-read Moz's guide, too, but I have already read it last year)  I'm reading Gotch SEO's main link building method articles right now, and am wondering what you all think.  Do you think they have a good approach and are generally reliable?

Likewise, has anyone used their service for getting a link?  What was your experience?  Or if you haven't used the service, any quick takes on it?

Hi Sean -- Can you clarify for me how competitors in a campaign figure in to the 50,000 page limit?  Does the main page in the campaign get thoroughly crawled first and then competitors are crawled up to the limit?

Some examples:

If the main site is 100 pages, and I pick 2 competitors that are 100 to 1000 pages and a 3rd gargantuan competitor of 300,000 pages, what happens?  Does it matter in what order I enter competitors in this situation as to whether the 100-page and 1000-page competitors get crawled vs. whether the limit maxes out on the 300K competitor before crawling the smaller competitors?

If the main site is 300,000 pages, do any competitors in the campaign just not get crawled at all because the 50,000 limit gets all used up on the  main site?

What if the main site is 20,000 pages and a competitor is 45,000 pages?  Thorough crawl of main site and then partial crawl of competitor?

I feel like I have a direction to go in based on our previous discussion for the main site in the campaign, but now I'm still a little stumped and confused about how competitors operate within the crawl limit.

Thanks Patrick for the tip about ScreamingFrog!  I checked out the link you shared, and it looks like a powerful tool.  I'm going to put it on my list of additional tools I need to get going on using.

In the meantime, though, I still need a strategy for what to do in Moz.  Any opinions on whether I should set my Moz campaigns to the smaller sub-folders of a few thousand pages vs. the humongous full sites of 100,000+ pages?  I guess I'm leaning towards setting them to the smaller sub-folders.  Or maybe I should do a small sub-folder for one of the huge sites and do the full site for another campaign, and see what kind of results I get.

What happens if you have a site in your Moz Pro campaign that has more than 50,000 pages?

Would it be better to choose a sub-folder of the site to get a thorough look at that sub-folder?

I have a few different large government websites that I'm tracking to see how they are fairing in rankings and SEO.  They are not my own websites.  I want to see how these agencies are doing compared to what the public searches for on technical topics and social issues that the agencies manage.  I'm an academic looking at science communication.  I am in the process of re-setting up my campaigns to get better data than I have been getting -- I am a newbie to SEO and the campaigns I slapped together a few months ago need to be set up better, such as all on the same day, making sure I've set it to include www or not for what ranks, refining my keywords, etc.

I am stumped on what to do about the agency websites being really huge, and what all the options are to get good data in light of the 50,000 page crawl limit.  Here is an example of what I mean:

To see how EPA is doing in searches related to air quality, ideally I'd track all of EPA's web presence.

www.epa.gov has 560,000 pages -- if I put in www.epa.gov for a campaign, what happens with the site having so many more pages than the 50,000 crawl limit?  What do I miss out on?  Can I "trust" what I get?

www.epa.gov/air has only 1450 pages, so if I choose this for what I track in a campaign, the crawl will cover that subfolder completely, and I am getting a complete picture of this air-focused sub-folder ... but (1) I'll miss out on air-related pages in other sub-folders of www.epa.gov, and (2) it seems like I have so much of the 50,000-page crawl limit that I'm not using and could be using.  (However, maybe that's not quite true - I'd also be tracking other sites as competitors - e.g. non-profits that advocate in air quality, industry air quality sites - and maybe those competitors count towards the 50,000-page crawl limit and would get me up to the limit? How do the competitors you choose figure into the crawl limit?)

Any opinions on which I should do in general on this kind of situation?  The small sub-folder vs. the full humongous site vs. is there some other way to go here that I'm not thinking of?