Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
XML Sitemap that updates daily/weekly?
-
Hi,
I have a sitemap on my site, that updates but it isn't a XML sitemap. See here: http://www.designerboutique-online.com/sitemap/
I have used some free software to crawl the site and create a sitemap of pages, however I think that if I were to upload the sitemap, it would be out of date as soon as I listed new products on the site, so would need to rerun it.
Does anyone know how I can get this to refresh daily or weekly?
Or any software that can do it?
I have a web firm that are willing to do one, but our relationship is at an all time low and I don't want to hand over £200 for them to do one.
Anyone with any ideas or advice?
Thanks
Will
-
Hi Will,
The time required for installation and testing could vary according to whether there are compatibility issues to resolve on the server.
As an example - if we were to install an updated version of Wordpress for a client, that could be a 5 minute job, but the new version requires an updated version of PHP on the server and the age and configuration of the server may require patching (or even moving to a newer server) in order to install the correct version of PHP.
Then, with all of the software updated and the new version of WP installed, we would need to check and test the installation to ensure that the template is still good and nothing has broken.
So, a 5 minute job could easily turn into a 1 or 2 hour job and the need for the additional work will only become known when the installation is attempted (sucks to be us sometimes!)
For this reason, most web development companies will probably quote you a minimum of an hour to do the work. Having said that, the hourly rate you have quoted would be considered extremely high by our company.
I hope that helps,
Sha
-
Basically no one wants to touch the site, so were stuck with them for now.
They have come back to me with £100 for an hours work of testing the script, because they do not know what it contains.
How long does it take to install on server and do what you have to do to test it?
They are ripping us off, I know they are.
Cheers
-
Hi Will,
Ouch! That is a lot of money for what should be a straightforward task.
I think you may have missed what I said earlier in that the Unlimited version of XML-Sitemaps is ONLY available as a server install. You do not get a piece of software that enables you to generate the sitemaps externally and upload them.
There are other services around that enable you to generate externally via a web interface and upload. The paid version of freesitemapgenerator.com is one of these, but does require a verification file to be uploaded to the server before it can run. It is a simple text file that verifies ownership of the site.
In the end, if you are not happy with the service you are getting, you have the option to find another web development company who are a better fit for you. If you decided to do that, then the new company should be able to negotiate the change with the old company to minimize disruption.
It makes me a little sad to hear of clients who feel the way you do and I'm sorry that you have had a bad experience with our industry. Thankfully, there are plenty of good companies out there if you should decide that the situation is untenable for your business. For most of us, making things right for a customer who has not had the best of it is a priority.
I hope you can work it out without too much more stress
Sha
-
Hi, thanks for that. The reason I do not want to go with the company is because I think they are taking me for a ride. The website they designed is a rip off, over paid and under delivered. Something like this should have been included when it was set up, they quoted me £1200 to install PayPal as a checkout option, whereas a highly respected e-commerce designer firm quoted me £250.
It is not 2 hours work for them, no way. I would be happy with just using my defined update schedule, maybe every 3 days would be sufficient, even once a week is fine.
I have asked them can they upload etc.. so I will see what they say. I am more than likely to buy the software, generate myself and then they can upload it.
I mean, what harm can doing it myself do? It will work, it will deliver, just the same as it would if the web firm done it. As I see the only benefit of using the firm is so can put in fancy update features.
Thanks for your input.
Cheers
Will
-
Hi Will,
If their preference is to write their own script it is likely that they EITHER have had previous experience with a 3rd party script which proved difficult to configure OR they intend to add features or changes which would require a hack anyway.
As I see it you have 3 options:
-
Accept their offer to write a custom script. Given the fluid nature of your update schedule, the advantage of this would be that they may be able to add a "manual fire" option. This would effectively give you the ability to click a button and manually generate sitemaps (xml & html) and ping the search engines if you make updates more frequently than the auto-run schedule. If this were the case, the script could be configured to run weekly and you could update as needed.
-
You could ask them to install and configure the 3rd party script for you instead of using theirs. Given their preference for writing their own script, it is likely they may have internal issues which would influence whether they are willing or able to do this.
-
IF your site has less than 500 pages you could run the free version whenever products are updated and email the xml sitemap to your web development company for upload. While the use of the generator is free, the company is likely to set a fee for this service. Although a file upload is a very simple task, it can be very disruptive to production schedules to have to do this if it happens often. As a project manager I well understand the issues that this kind of small task can cause. I generally end up doing them myself because the company resources required to allocate and track the task are more than it is worth. End up with two or three clients who want a file uploaded once or twice a week and the novelty can wear off very quickly!
If it were me I would work from the assumption that the company has valid reasons for preferring to write a custom script and just ask them to explain it for you. What will the script do? How will it work? What are the benefits for you and for them?
In the end, you will need to make a judgement on what will be best for your business. If you can repair your relationship with the existing company there is no danger of disruption to your business through server change etc. Disruption can be avoided or minimized if sites are moved , but this requires co-operation from your current company and parting on a poor relationship sometimes doesn't inspire co-operation
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
-
They said they would be writing a script so the £200 is 2 hours work for them.
They will not provide me with FTP details, so all edits go through them. Only if I take the site away from their hosting will I have access to FTP.
What would you advise? Is the XML completely fine with that software and all the web design company would need to do is have it refreshed every week?
What refresh frequency would I be best having, daily, weekly? We have new products more than likely 1 or 2 times a week.
T
-
Hi Will,
You can just pay for the script and have your web company install it on the server. If you want to have it create image sitemap in addition to page structure sitemap there is a $5 image sitemaps add-on. So cost for both would be $24.99 US dollars plus whatever your web company charges to install the script.
To get the XML-sitemaps people to install it, all you have to do is provide them with your ftp login information. The advantage of this is that they know the script and how everything needs to be configured to make it work correctly.
Once the script is installed it will auto generate the sitemaps as scheduled (you would get them to configure frequency when they install it). Each time new sitemaps are generated the script then pings the search engines to notify that new sitemap is available for download.
The unlimited version only works as a server install. If you have less than 500 pages in your site you can run the free version and upload as often as you wish for no cost at all (as long as you have ftp access).
Not sure what the 200 pounds price is for, but my guess would be that they are either planning to write a script for you OR buy a 3rd party script like XML-Sitemaps & install & configure it for you.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Hi, the server is owned by the people who designed the site, so they host it. So I would need to get them to put it up.
How would XML-Sitemaps handle the installation if it is on the web companies server? Would they be able to?
If I can get the XML file ready, then I am sure the web company would upload it for free or maybe a small charge.
Let me ask you this to see if I am reading you correctly.
If I buy that software (of which I used the free version to generate 500 lines), it will create a sitemap for me, then once hosted on the server, will update everytime a new product/page is added to the site? Once updated it pings Google etc...?
Would it be worth including the images in the sitemap, as we have over 1000 images on the site, maybe 3-5 images per product. Would that then enable us to get our images into google images a lot easier?
Do you know what the difference between me using this and uploading it to server and paying a web design company £200 to do everything? Is there any?
Cheers
Will
-
Hi Will,
There are several companies out there which provide paid sitemap generation services by installing a script on your server which is set to automatically generate sitemaps and to ping the search engines whenever a new sitemap completes.
Probably one of the best that I know is the unlimited version offfered by XML-Sitemaps.com. The cost is only US$20 and if you cannot install it yourself they will handle installation for an extra $10.
There are others around and may even be some free scripts out there if you have the ability to install on your own server. There are also modules etc available for standard ecommerce platforms like Oscommerce etc.
Hope that helps,
Sha
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Having a Subfolder/Subdirectory With a Different Design Than the Root Domain
Hi Everyone, I was wondering what Google thinks about having a subfolder/subdirectory with a different design than the root domain. So let's say we have MacroCorp Inc. which has been around for decades. MacroCorp has tens of thousands of backlinks and a couple thousand referring domains from quality sites in its industry and news sites. MacroCorp Inc. spins off one of its products into a new company called MicroCorp Inc., which makes CoolProduct. The new website for this company is CoolProduct.MacroCorp.com (a subdomain) which has very few backlinks and referring domains. To help MicroCorp rank better, both companies agree to place the MicroCorp content at MacroCorp.com/CoolProduct/. The root domain (MacroCorp.com) links to the subfolder from its navigation and MicroCorp does the same, but the MacroCorp.com/CoolProduct/ subfolder has an entirely different design than the root domain. Will MacroCorp.com/CoolProduct/ be crawled, indexed, and rank better as both companies think it would? Or would Google still treat the subfolder like a subdomain or even a separate root domain in this case? Are there any studies, documentation, or links to good or bad examples of this practice? When LinkedIn purchased Lynda.com, for instance, what if they kept the https://www.lynda.com/ design as is and placed it at https://www.linkedin.com/learning/. Would the pre-purchase (yellow/black design) https://www.linkedin.com/learning/ rank any worse than it does now with the root domain (LinkedIn) aligned design? Thanks! Andy
Web Design | | AndyRCWRCM1 -
Have Your Thoughts Changed Regarding Canonical Tag Best Practice for Pagination? - Google Ignoring rel= Next/Prev Tagging
Hi there, We have a good-sized eCommerce client that is gearing up for a relaunch. At this point, the staging site follows the previous best practice for pagination (self-referencing canonical tags on each page; rel=next & prev tags referencing the last and next page within the category). Knowing that Google does not support rel=next/prev tags, does that change your thoughts for how to set up canonical tags within a paginated product category? We have some categories that have 500-600 products so creating and canonicalizing to a 'view all' page is not ideal for us. That leaves us with the following options (feel it is worth noting that we are leaving rel=next / prev tags in place): Leave canonical tags as-is, page 2 of the product category will have a canonical tag referencing ?page=2 URL Reference Page 1 of product category on all pages within the category series, page 2 of product category would have canonical tag referencing page 1 (/category/) - this is admittedly what I am leaning toward. Any and all thoughts are appreciated! If this were in relation to an existing website that is not experiencing indexing issues, I wouldn't worry about these. Given we are launching a new site, now is the time to make such a change. Thank you! Joe
Web Design | | Joe_Stoffel1 -
How to split organic traffic for A/B testing
This might be a silly questions as I may be missing something completely obvious here, but we are completely new to A/B testing. Our site doesn't receive a phenomenal amount of traffic although we are looking to set up some A/B testing for our popular products. Is there a way to split organic traffic for a specific product page. I'm aware that we need to experiment which one performs better in Analytics but I'm unsure how to redirect 50% of the organic traffic.
Web Design | | Jseddon920 -
Do I need to 301 redirect www.domain.com/index.html to www.domain.com/ ?
So, interestingly enough, the Moz crawler picked up my index.html file (homepage) and reported duplicate content, of course. But, Google hasn't seemed to index the www.domain.com/index.html version of my homepage, just the www.domain.com version. However, it looks like I do have links going specifically to www.domain.com/index.html and I want to make sure those are getting counted towards my overall domain strength. Is it necessary to 301 redirect in the scenario described above?
Web Design | | Small_Business_SEO0 -
SEO strategy for UK / US websites
Hi, We currently have a UK-focused site on www.palmatin.com ; We're now targeting the North American market as well, but the contents of the site need to be different from UK. One option was to create another domain for the NA market but I assume it would be easier to rank with palmatin.com though. What would you suggest to do, if a company is targeting two different countries in the same language? thanks, jaan
Web Design | | JaanMSonberg0 -
Privacy Policy: index it/? And where to place it?
Hi Everyone, Two questions, first: should you allow google to index your privacy policy? Second: for a service based site (not e-commerce, not selling anything) should you put the policy in the footer so it's site wide or just on the "contact us" form page? Best, Ruben
Web Design | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Is it cloaking/hiding text if textual content is no longer accessible for mobile visitors on responsive webpages?
My company is implementing a responsive design for our website to better serve our mobile customers. However, when I reviewed the wireframes of the work our development company is doing, it became clear to me that, for many of our pages, large parts of the textual content on the page, and most of our sidebar links, would no longer be accessible to a visitor using a mobile device. The content will still be indexable, but hidden from users using media queries. There would be no access point for a user to view much of the content on the page that's making it rank. This is not my understanding of best practices around responsive design. My interpretation of Google's guidelines on responsive design is that all of the content is served to both users and search engines, but displayed in a more accessible way to a user depending on their mobile device. For example, Wikipedia pages have introductory content, but hide most of the detailed info in tabs. All of the information is still there and accessible to a user...but you don't have to scroll through as much to get to what you want. To me, what our development company is proposing fits the definition of cloaking and/or hiding text and links - we'd be making available different content to search engines than users, and it seems to me that there's considerable risk to their interpretation of responsive design. I'm wondering what other people in the Moz community think about this - and whether anyone out there has any experience to share about inaccessable content on responsive webpages, and the SEO impact of this. Thank you!
Web Design | | mmewdell0 -
Is it bad to have /index.php at the end of a uri?
Is it bad for SEO if traffic is directed to "http://www.example.com/someuri/index.php" instead of "http://www.example.com/someuri/" and would it be works setting up a redirect rule at htaccess level?
Web Design | | NoisyLittleMonkey1