Understanding why our new page doesn't rank. Internal link structure to blame? + understand canonical pages more.
-
Hi guys. Sorry it's an essay...BUT, i think a lot of you will find this an interesting question.
This question is in 2 (related) parts, and I imagine it would be an 'advanced' SEO question. Hoping you guys can help bring some real insight Always amazed at the quality for this forum/ community.
**Context... **
We had a duplicate content issue caused by this page and it's product permutations, so we placed canonical tags on all the product permutations to solve it. Worked a treat.
However, we now have more **product ranges. **We now sell Diaries, Notebooks & Music books, which are clearly different from one another. So...we've placed canonical tags on all the product permutations leading back to the 'parent' theme.
In other words, all the diary permutations 'lead back' to the diary page. All the notebooks permutations 'lead back' to the main notebook page. So on and so forth.
Make sense so far?
Context end.....
Issue.
Amazingly our Diary page outranks our notebook pagefor the search term 'Design your own Notebook'. The notebook page is well optimised for this search term, and the diary page avoids the word 'notebook' altogether (so no keyword cannibalisation going on).
Possible reason?
Our Diary page has a vast amount of internal links to it throughout our site. The notebook page has only a few. Could this be the issue? If so, what reading/ blogs/ content/ tools would you recommend to help understand and solve this problem? i.e) Better understanding internal link structure for SEO.
2nd part of the question (in the context of internal linking for SEO).
When there are internal links to a page with a conical tag does that 'count' towards the 'parent page', or simply towards that specific page?
I really hope that makes sense. If it's clear as mud just shout.
Isaac.
EDIT: All pages in question have been indexed since we added these changes to the site.
-
Ok yes. Thank you! All makes sense.
Long term we'd love to have people landing on the notebook page for the appropriate search term. It would make a nicer customer journey, and the user would feel like they were 'in the right place'.
But short term as you say, we'll focus on what's ranking and go with that momentum.
Thanks again!
Isaac.
-
Google definitely sees "design your own notebook" and "design your own diary" as two different searches, but Google looks at the "intent" behind a search, not just the keywords behind the search. The "intent" for the "design your own notebook" and "design your own diary" are very similar, both are related to getting a type of custom designed book that you can write in (the Knowledge Graph video discusses this).
Though your diary page may not have any external links pointing to it that's not the only thing google's Algorithm looks for. Maybe your diary page has more user data showing a positive experience behind it? Maybe your link structure has identified it as more important than your notebook page? There really could be a lot of reasons why it's identifying the diary page as better than your notebook page.
I used Moz's Open Site Explorer tool and took a quick look at your different pages and I found that your diary page has a page authority of 21 and your notebook page has a page authority of 1 (which is automatically given no matter what). So there's quite a bit of difference as far as Moz is concerned (and you can pretty confidently say "as far as Google is concerned") between which should be shown.
From a pure marketing perspective (I'm going to take off the SEO hat and just talk about driving results now), you want to look at the end goal. If I was in your shoes, I wouldn't forget about your notebook page (I'd definitely keep working on helping it rank better) but I would focus most of my efforts on maximizing the potential of your page that's ranking. Focus on conversion optimization, get yourself some gold stars using schema/reviews, work on getting more links to that page. It's about using the current momentum you instead of stopping and trying to start from scratch.
Hopefully that helps!
-Jacob
-
Canonical answer makes perfect sense.... thank you so much!
Can I just clarify something?
What do you mean by the diary page has more authority than the notebook page? From back links? Or from internal link structure? (I didn't think we had any back links to these pages you see).
I'm personally convinced that Google sees 'design your own notebook' and 'design your own diary' as significantly different searches. 2 reasons. The huge difference in the SERP results for those two searches, and, that they belong to different groups in Ad words.
One problem I've identified is that we do technically have a keyword cannibalisation issues. We have the word notebook in the 'Diary - Notebook' drop down.
Out side of removing these words, is there anything else we should look at on site to help the notebook page rank for appropriate search terms? Or would you suggest optimising the diary page for both notebook and diaries terms? Perhaps as a more short term solution?
Again, thank you for your response. This is such an empowering place
Isaac.
-
Answer to why diary page is showing up instead of notebook:
I would say that the reason your diary page is showing up in the SERPS (even when people are searching for "notebooks") is because the keywords "notebook" and "diary" are part of the same Knowledge Graph and can sometimes be synonyms.
Beyond this your http://www.toaddiaries.co.uk/design-your-own/diaries page seems to have more authority then your notebook page, so it really is "cannibalizing" the "notebook" keyword. It's not a horrible thing to happen, we have the same thing occurring with our website (our "lawn mowing" page cannibalizes our "lawn care" page). Because the "intent" can be very similar for the two keywords our conversion rate doesn't suffer, I'd assume the same (or something similar) for yours.
Answer to the canonical tag/internal linking situation:
When you place a canonical tag on a page you're directing google's crawlers to identify it the same as the page it's pointing to. So if Google's algorithm is identifying your internal linking as a positive it will count towards the page your canonical tag is pointing to. Here's a pretty solid article on it (link).
Hopefully that helps.
-Jacob
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Which page will rank higher, my main article or the sub article linking from it?
Hi all, Can you help me figure this one out? I'm currently creating content for my website and I very badly want to know which page will rank higher in Google, my main article that has some keywords that are and links to my sub-article, or my sub-article which is optimized for those keywords? I will demonstrate with an example since I'm not sure my question is clear: If I have an article that talks about different kinds of candy and it links to a sub-article that will elaborate on specific candies like a mint candy ,which page will rank for mint candies. Until today I believed that if my sub-article which is linked from my main-article will rank for mint candies since it gets the support from my main article.Lately when experimenting this I found my thoughts to be wrong. Can anyone help me with this one?Any insights? Thanks, Leebi
On-Page Optimization | | Leebi0 -
We have new website abexpress.ae. The website is not ranking in the first page when I search with the Domain name itself. Any tips to improve the SEO for a new website?
We have launched a website abexpress.ae. The website is not ranking well even if we search with the Domain name. The Domain authority of the website it 10. How to increase this?
On-Page Optimization | | AlliedTransport0 -
Crawl Report shows Internal links as zero
We have recently updated our website (https://www.payumoney.com/) and created new pages like "https://www.payumoney.com/free-payment-gateway-India.html". we have internally linked all the pages, but when I check the crawl report from MOZ it shows internal links as 0 and these pages have the PA of 1 and not increasing. I am unable to find out the reason why is it happening?
On-Page Optimization | | payu_india0 -
How to improve On-Page Grades for Top Ranking Pages
please help me - i dont know or understand how to improve on-Page Grades for Top Ranking Pages
On-Page Optimization | | pwwukpw0 -
Too Many On-Page Links
Hi All, New to SEOMoz, so thanks in advance for any answers! Looking at our Crawl Diagnostics and "Too Many On-Page Links" is first on the list. The site was build with the intention of users being able to quickly get to where they want to go with drop down menus (sub nav), so we built the navigation using bullet points/css. Yes, agreed there are too many links on each page from our navigation, main nav cats are 4 with sub nav about 40, but what is the best way to resolve the problem other then removing most of the links (from the sub nav drop down)? Could we just use the attribute rel=nofollow for the sub nav links? TIA
On-Page Optimization | | bmmedia0 -
2 canonical tags on the same page
When using the 'on-page optimizer' tool, I continue to get the same recommendation on every page to only use 1 canonical tag on the page. I'm not sure why there are 2 tags on each page in the first place so I don't know how to remove the one that's not needed. Our site is on a WP blog and a sample page to view the source code would be: http://www.shilohstreet.com/blog/is-flipping-houses-smart-real-estate-investing.html Does anyone know why this is happening, how to fix it and/or if I should even be concerned with it? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | shilohstreet0 -
Almost all pages showing under Notices Rel Canonical - why???
Hi, I'm just going through my latest crawl since my new site launch and havce noticed almost all of my websites pages are listed under the notices rel canonical section, Why is this? All pages have the unique pages titles followed by the site name in the title, for example: Product | Site name All pages have unique meta descriptions and content (although we only offer lots of differt varients of the same product). Is this something I should be worried about?
On-Page Optimization | | EclipseLegal0 -
Why isn't SEOMoz using File Extensions (*.html etc) on any of their web page URLs?
...and what is the SEO benefit of this? This video from Matt Cutts suggests using file extentions, except for a directory.
On-Page Optimization | | magicrob0