Google Plus Pages for Doctors, SUPER confusing..help!
-
Hi Moz community,
I carefully reviewed all info I could find and still cannot figure how to make this work. I am working for a medical practice that has 4 different office locations in my county. There are also 5-6 doctors and all of the doctors MOVE throughout the week from location to location.
I know (from reading Google's exact guidelines) that they suggest creating a page for the doctor using only their name in addition to creating a page for each location.
How do I set those doctor pages up? What location do I use? What contact info is okay to use etc?
Super lost.
Thanks all!
Ricky
-
Hey Miriam,
Thanks for the clarification. I've been treating Ricky's situation as if everything was in connection to the practice, not the doctors. To me the doctors are just employees that seem to transfer from office to office a lot. If the pages are for the doctors not the practice than I agree with you completely.
-
Hey Jacob!
Just to be clear - I am not talking about the practice. That can surely have a Google+ Local page ... 4 of them, in fact, if there are 4 branches. My remarks relate only to the doctors. I want to be sure that was super clear
-
Wouldn't this situation be similar to what Trugreen is doing? This page for example Trugreen NJ Webpage has a Google My Business page (link). They show up in the maps and I'm sure they sometimes have contractors go from one location to another.
I don't see why you can't think of doctors as just regular employees. They move from one location to another, but still the point of local search results is to show what local businesses are available in your area. As long as the Google My Business pages are for the practice and not for the specific doctor's it seems fine to me.
If the pages are for the doctors it would be different, I would agree that you shouldn't use Google My Business pages for that. But if it's for the practice then this guideline:
An ongoing service, class, or meeting at a location that you don't own or have the authority to represent. Please coordinate with your host to have your information displayed on the page for their business within their "Introduction" field.
Isn't really applicable.
-
Hi Ricky,
If the doctors are moving from place to place, that would seem to me like it might fall under Google's guidelines about ineligible business models including holding classes in someone else's building. Let me dig that up:
An ongoing service, class, or meeting at a location that you don't own or have the authority to represent. Please coordinate with your host to have your information displayed on the page for their business within their "Introduction" field.
So, it kind of sounds to me like your doctors are holding 'meetings' at various locations rather than having a permanent location, in which case, I would be hesitant to create Google+ Local pages for them. By that logic, the same doctor could have a Google+ Local page for 4 different locations ... and that doesn't sound right to me.
Regarding using an email address instead of a phone number ... I'm not sure what you mean. You can't put an email address in the phone number field of the GMB dashboard, so not sure what you are considering there.
-
Hi All,
Thanks for the feedback but I'm still a bit lost.
-
As I mentioned the doctors ALL move day to day from location to location. That's problem one..still not sure what address information to use for each.
-
In regard to contact info, the doctors don't have direct lines so the number would be the practice number..is that an issue? I obviously don't want to user their cellphones. Should/can I use their email address?
Thanks again!
Ricky
-
-
Hey Ricky,
Good answer from Travis, and the guidelines he links to exactly describe Google's preferences regarding naming conventions for multi-practitioners, etc. Things to be aware of:
-
Because doctors do leave practices on a regular basis, you need to be aware of the closed listing phenomenon: http://www.localsearchforum.com/google-local-important/27109-can-closed-google-local-listings-kill-ranking-important-new-troubleshooting-tip.html
-
Google does not delete duplicates for doctors: http://marketing-blog.catalystemarketing.com/google-places-duplicates-doctor-dentist-lawyer.html (recommend further research of Linda Buquet's work of doctor/dentist duplicates
-
If you're going to do a unique Google+ Local page for each doctor, be sure it links to a landing page on the site for the doctor ... not to the homepage for the practice.
I'm not saying you shouldn't create a unique Google+ Local page for each doctor, but if you decide to recommend this strategy, do fully research the issues of dr/dentist duplicates and closed listings before you make an official recommendation to the client. Hope this helps!
-
-
There are grey areas with a bit of wiggle room. That much is certain. I've worked with practices/doctors where you're always routed to a call center. I've also worked with practices/doctors that actually pick up the phone from time to time.
But business is business and people are people. Things can get difficult and messy quick. A lot of doctors are people, engaged in business, as well as medicine. Sometimes business relationships end on bad terms.
Sometimes another local SEO is actively throwing wrenches in your program. It's all local business, so it's always a small world. Say they somehow know Dr. Smith has left the practice.
"Hello, I would like to schedule an appointment with Dr. Smith."
"Dr. Smith has left the practice, may I schedule an appointment with Dr. Jones?"
"No thank you, have a nice day."
Goes on to edit all Dr. Smith listings as closed.
And that's just one potential outcome.
-
I'm sure the doctors are not personally answering the phones at these places. So using a phone number that's attached to a specific location and provides access to any of the doctors working at that location should be sufficient. That way when a doctor leaves the practice or stops working at any one of the locations you'd only have to update the website, instead of every Google listing that had a phone number.
-
It really and truly sounds like you're about to walk into a management nightmare. The main thing, according to Google's guidelines is; "He or she is directly contactable at the verified location during stated hours." So yes, it would appear that you can have a listing for each doctor at each location, provided the listings accurately represent when the doctors will be at each location.
One may think; "Hooray! I have so many shots at showing up in map packs!" Which may be true enough. But what happens when one of the doctors inevitably leaves for another practice? You may end up with a Closed listing. What if that Closed listing is the only one that displays for certain queries? Now spread that out over five or six locations.
The odds are that things can look pretty grim, given enough time.
If at all possible, select a doctor which is public facing and tends to stay at one location most of the week. The safest bet would be a doctor with some form of ownership. If you're already contractually obligated to provide a listing for every doctor at each location, it can and probably will get rough.
-
I would do it by office/location not by doctor. I'm not familiar with any specific Google + rules for doctors (that's not my industry) but if all the offices are working under a specific practice name (with one main website) and each office/location has it's own phone number then I would treat them as a type of "franchise" business.
I would create folders on your website (i.e., www.domainname.com/practicename-city-stateabbreviation) for each of the offices/locations and then on those pages provide information connected to the office such as name of doctors, address and phone numbers (connected to the office). Then follow this up by creating Google My Business pages for each of those pages.
After you get those pages set up you'll want to get your address verified (so it shows up on maps) and start pushing reviews for the specific locations, but overall that should do it for you so you start showing up locally.
Hopefully that helps!
-Jacob
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Page options under title tag: Can we set these?
Hi all, Under many title tags, you see a list of sub-pages that Google suggests. So, if you search for Amazon, for example, it'll show you 6 options: Full Shop Directory - Try Prime Books - CDs & Vinyl Your account - Today's deals Can you dictate these choices with markup? Cheers, Rhys
Local Listings | | SwanseaMedicine0 -
Google Business listing algorithm when listing the top 3 locations in Google Search
Hi, awhile back I decided to make separate website contact pages by location and Google Business listings(some being just a service location with no address displaying) for Greenshield Pest Control Inc to help better target per city key term searches. Please refer to screenshot A http://puu.sh/qxWjH/6153c0edf2.png and B http://puu.sh/qxWfJ/bff7ad02cf.png. A) Searching "pest control belleville" brings up the Belleville Greenshield business listing in the top 3 as desired. B) Searching "pest control brockville" brings up the Kingston Greenshield listing in the top 3. While they do provide service for the Brockville location we don't have a dedicated Brockville service location and listing setup. I'm happy the Greenshield listing shows up in the search for case B but my question is does anyone know why Google decided for two out of the top 3 listings(Greenshield and Enviro Guard Plus Inc) to use a non-Brockville business listing? Kingston is 45mins away from Brockville and Harrowsmith about 1 hour away. Is there a certain distance range a Google business listing has to be for it to have a chance to be included in the search besides the actual city I'm searching for?
Local Listings | | FPK0 -
URL Structure and Keyword Focus for location page
Our company has around 1,700 locations across the country. These are contract shops mind you but still locations in which we will be placing pages for on our website. I have been browsing through all of the Local SEO blogs and trying to define the strategy for these. Here are a couple of outstanding questions I still have: 1. What should the URL structure of the page be for these locations? Keep in mind that there are some cities that have multiple locations in them so I can just do "/city/brand-keyword." I am thinking it should be "www.url.com/state/city/location-name"where the location name would for example "TXBrandName." 2. How should I structure the keyword focus for these pages? I am thinking that these pages will probably rank for some variations and should definitely include the city name although the search volume is very low. Currently I am thinking that they would be "keyword city – brand name." 3. How do we handle the shops that are contract and have a primary business already listed? We plan on listing them on GMB using "located inside of {business name}" on those that are contract shops. We originally considered using a suite# but one of the articles in Moz recommended not doing that. I just know that places like "Starbucks" and "Banfield" seem to use the "located inside of" without any issues. Any input would be greatly appreciated as we about to set all these up and I want to make sure we are setup for success as much as possible.
Local Listings | | Smart_Start0 -
Placement of products in URL-structure for best category page rankings
Hi! I have some questions regarding the optimal URL-hierarchy placement of products in a marketplace setting where the end goal is to attract traffic to category pages. Let me start off with some background, thanks in advance for the help. TLDR Goal: Increase category page rankings. Alternative 1 - Products and category pages separated, flat product structure. Category page: oursite.com/category/subcategory Product / listing page: oursite.com/listing-1 Alternative 2 - Products and category pages separated, hierarchal product structure. Category page: oursite.com/category/subcategory Product / listing page: oursite.com/product/category/subcat/listing Alternative 3 - Products placed directly under category page. Category page: oursite.com/category/subcategory Product / listing page: oursite.com/category/subcategory/listing I run a commercial real estate marketplace, which means that our potential search traffic is _extremely _geographic. For example, some common searches are (not originally in english): Office space for lease {City X} Office space for lease {Neighborhood Y} Retail space {Neighborhood Z} And so on... These terms are already quite competitive, where the top results are our competitors geographic and type category pages. For example: _competitor.com/type/city/neighborhood , _is a top result, where the user reaches a landing page that shows all the {type} spaces for lease in {neighborhood}. These users are out to find which spaces are available for lease in these geographical areas, and not individual spaces. I.e. users do not search in the same extent for an individual product, in this case a specific empty space. Our approach has been to place an extreme bias towards a heavy geographical hierarchy. This means that basically any search, resulting in a category page, on our site results in a well structured URL like the following: _oursite.com/type/state/city/district/street, _since we are using Google Maps API's, this is easy and relevant for the user. Our geographical categorization beats our competitors both on extensiveness and usability, especially in long-tail search phrases where our competitors don't care to categorize where we are seeing real search volumes. The hierarchy only extends as far down as the user has searched, for example a lot of our searched just end up being _oursite.com/type/state/city/district. _ Now we are wondering how we should place our products, the empty spaces, in this URL structure. Our original hypothesis was that we should include the products in the original hierarchy, resulting in: oursite.com/category/subcategory/product. Our thinking was that we would both be serving the user with an understandable and relevant URL, and also provide search bots with a logical structure for our site and most importantly content for our category pages. Our landing pages are very dynamic, providing information by relaying graphical information on a map instead of in an SEO-friendly manner. I would however go as far as to say that these dynamic pages provide a ton of value for the user, much more so than our competitors, by describing relevant information about the neighborhood kind of like Trulia, just not in a bot-readable manner. This results in trying to rank them on their own merits being a challenge, whereas we were hoping we could create relevancy by placing products / listings and maybe even blog posts on the topic within the same URL-hierarchy. As of right now our current structure is oursite.com/products/category/subcategory/product. In other words, they are categorized in the same geographical fashion but under a separate URL-path. Our results so far is that we basically only rank for the product pages, and rank extremely poorly for our category pages, which is our ultimate goal to enhance. This is why we developed the above hypothesis. However, what we learned when we did some initial research is that very few e-commerce stores place their products directly below their categories. Most of the major websites we studied, and we looked at quite a few, just go for **alternative 1 **from above. The crux is that most of them choose alternative 1 but simultaneously implement bread crumbs that emulate alternative 3, just without the actual URL's. So, what I'm asking is, what are the actual benefits or downsides of the three alternatives? I feel as if I have a pretty firm grasp on how this could be done, I just need to better understand why most seem to choose to flatline their products or listings in the alternative 1 fashion. Thanks, Viktor
Local Listings | | Viktorsodd0 -
Is the new local 3-pack the death of Google+ as factor?
So now we have the new 3-pack local results, which obviously cut the listings Google+ link from the results. What I find strange is that is now even when searching the business name alone, there is no sign of the associated Google+ page in the results. I still get other local third party listings like Facebook, Yellowpages, and Yelp – but no link anywhere for the Google+ page. I noticed this today when I wanted to verify something on a client’s page. There was nothing I could do search wise to bring up this business Google+ page. I finally got it by clicking the link through Moz local. After exploring this with some other clients, when I do get a Google+ page in the search results some have produced a 500 error when clicked on. If Google wasn’t killing off Google+, why would they completely omit the pages from their own search results? Another extremely strange thing, the majority of my clients are independent local businesses inside a large national company. Their Google+ listings have always been managed corporately using a bulk listing feed. We could never gain access to these pages and would always manage our listings to match that of the corp. controlled page. Well the last week of July they announced they were giving us the option to take control of the page. This happened with two different companies, MAJOR national competitors in the same industry, within a couple days of each other. They now treat it just like another version of social media, instead of a major factor within search. I find it hard to believe that something isn’t going on…
Local Listings | | masonrj0 -
Why does Google only display a 3 pack of local business results for some terms?
We have seen a pattern in the Google UK SERPS where only three local listings are triggered for a query although they have a more local results to show but chose to only show three: Anyone else seen this? Anyone know why? Is there a magic number for them to trigger a six pack, does the data set they pull from need to be larger for them to trigger more local listings. "Solicitors Cambridge" = 3 listings https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=solicitors+cambridge&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=_vCwVc2mHMiAUZ-luZAE "solicitors kent" = 3 listings https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=solicitors+cambridge&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=_vCwVc2mHMiAUZ-luZAE#q=solicitors+kent "Solicitors Oxford" = 6 listings https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=solicitors+cambridge&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=_vCwVc2mHMiAUZ-luZAE Any thoughts?
Local Listings | | highwayfive1 -
My Google business show up on map but does not show up on list and local search on Google.com
Hello all, how are you doing ? When I merged two pages = one page " Sassy Nails" It was lost all ranking and traffic on my google plus My Google business show up on map but does not show up on list and local search on Google.com main keyword: nail salon in Sevierville tn nail salon in Sevierville Tn pedicure in Sevierville Tn nail salon in pigeo forge Tn my website : www.sassy-nails.com http://plus.google.com/+Sassy-nails please help me that search?num=100&safe=active&site=&source=hp&q=nail+salon+in+sevierville+tn&oq=nail+salon+in+sevierville+tn&gs_l=hp.3..0j0i22i30l8j38.1387.8317.0.8645.37.30.4.3.3.0.283.3120.4j18j2.24.0.msedr...0...1c.1.61.hp..8.29.2798.0.V2EADE1ATMU
Local Listings | | sassynailservice0 -
Right page to place the Schema code for global business
I have two questions: 1. Schema code for Global business: As a company which works with clients across the globe, we like to create a well defined schema that doesn't limit and appear as a Local Business to Google. I assume "http://schema.org/LocalBusiness" means a local business to Google. If we use it, will be be affecting the ranking in global searches? 2. Page and location to keep the code What could be the best place to keep the schema code in a web page? - Homepage/ About us page / contact us page and Footer links are the options. I hope applying CSS on it too wouldn't be an issue. Looking forward to learning your thoughts.
Local Listings | | macronimous0