undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • SEO Q&A
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • Case Studies

      Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
  4. Content Below the Fold

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Content Below the Fold

Intermediate & Advanced SEO
7
16
3.1k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • BeckyKey
    BeckyKey last edited by Sep 13, 2016, 5:48 AM

    Hi

    I wondered what the view is on content below the fold?

    We have the H1, product listings & then some written content under the products - will Google just ignore this?

    I can't hide it under a tab or put a lot of content above products - so I'm not sure what the other option is?

    Thank you

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • BlueCorona
      BlueCorona @BeckyKey last edited by Oct 10, 2016, 5:51 PM Oct 10, 2016, 5:51 PM

      Hi Becky,

      Here is what I found:

      The pros and cons of hiding content using JavaScript and CSS (display: none) has been a topic of some debate within the SEO industry, and Google’s comments over time have somewhat added to the confusion.

      • **November 2014 **– Google’s John Mueller stated that Google _“may not” _index or rank hidden content. In aGoogle+ Hangout the following month, John repeated this, stating that hidden content would be _“discounted”_and has been for a number of years
      • **21 July 2015 **– Google’s Gary Illyes, contributing to a Stack Overflow forum thread , provided clarification of this by stating that this type of content is given “way less weight in ranking”
      • **27 July 2015 **– In a separate Stack Overflow thread on the same topic, Gary Illyes again confirmed that _“[Google] will index that but the content’s weight will be lower since it’s hidden” _

      So the content will still be indexed, but deemed less important by the crawlers.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • BeckyKey
        BeckyKey @ThompsonPaul last edited by Sep 21, 2016, 4:55 AM Sep 21, 2016, 4:55 AM

        Yeh it's disappointing.

        I've tried having some content behind a tab and some under the products and I am not seeing either one as having much of an effect.

        Unless I remove it altogether, I'm not sure what else I can do with it?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • BeckyKey
          BeckyKey @ThompsonPaul last edited by Sep 16, 2016, 9:04 AM Sep 16, 2016, 9:04 AM

          Hi

          Yes I tried different pages and it's still the same. I think it's to do with things we have blocked in robots.txt...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ThompsonPaul
            ThompsonPaul @BeckyKey last edited by Sep 15, 2016, 1:47 PM Sep 15, 2016, 1:47 PM

            I'm not seeing a problem in my GoogleBot simulators, Becky, but the one within your Google Search Console is still the best judge. Have you tried reloading the Fetch as... a couple of times? And tried it on different pages?

            BeckyKey 1 Reply Last reply Sep 16, 2016, 9:04 AM Reply Quote 0
            • ThompsonPaul
              ThompsonPaul @BeckyKey last edited by Sep 15, 2016, 1:29 PM Sep 15, 2016, 1:29 PM

              Yup - Google still says content that can only be seen after a user interaction is given less importance. Kinda stupid, given that things like tabs/accordians are a major usability enhancement, but that's still where we are. 😞

              P.

              BeckyKey 1 Reply Last reply Sep 21, 2016, 4:55 AM Reply Quote 2
              • BeckyKey
                BeckyKey @Vijay-Gaur last edited by Sep 15, 2016, 12:34 PM Sep 15, 2016, 12:34 PM

                Hi

                So I did fetch as Google  - and I'm seeing the page quite differently if I'm Googlebot vs. visitors.

                It just sees a few big images, I can't see it rendering any product listings or content - do I now have a bigger problem?

                Thank you

                ThompsonPaul 1 Reply Last reply Sep 15, 2016, 1:47 PM Reply Quote 0
                • BeckyKey
                  BeckyKey @BlueCorona last edited by Sep 15, 2016, 11:30 AM Sep 15, 2016, 11:30 AM

                  Hi

                  Thank you for the replies. I don't want to hide it, I just can't have it pushing products down the page so they can't be seen..

                  I thought in Google webmaster guidelines they included a comment to say they will ignore content behind tabs?

                  Becky

                  ThompsonPaul BlueCorona 2 Replies Last reply Oct 10, 2016, 5:51 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • BlueCorona
                    BlueCorona last edited by Sep 14, 2016, 2:42 PM Sep 14, 2016, 2:42 PM

                    Any content below the fold will still be read. Are you trying to hide it but still get the SEO value? If that's the case, I would create a collapsible tab to keep the content on the page but hidden. If you want it to be visible, leave it as is and don't worry about Google not reading it—it will be read.

                    BeckyKey 1 Reply Last reply Sep 15, 2016, 11:30 AM Reply Quote 3
                    • ThompsonPaul
                      ThompsonPaul @Ria_ last edited by Sep 15, 2016, 1:30 PM Sep 14, 2016, 1:20 PM

                      While theoretically logical, Google's own John Mueller stated last week that code to text ratio has absolutely no effect on crawling of a site, and in a followup question, he directly told me text/code ratio has no effect as a ranking factor either.

                      These used to be very minor considerations back when the search engine crawlers weren't as powerful, but no longer.

                      Fully agree with Pia that the idea of "above the fold" influencing ranking is nonsense as well. Given that the sweet spot for consistently high-ranking pages is ~2200 words, the idea that only the first paragraph or two are more important is unsupportable.

                      Hope that helps?

                      Paul

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • Vijay-Gaur
                        Vijay-Gaur last edited by Sep 13, 2016, 10:00 PM Sep 13, 2016, 10:00 PM

                        Additionally, do check the content using Fetch as google in Google Search Console / Webmaster tools. It would really help you see how spiders see the content compared to users. This is an important aspect of SEO which a lot of people ignore, you are looking to find that whether the spiders see a structured view of the content and not messy. I hope this helps, if you have further questions, please feel free to ask. Regards, Vijay

                        BeckyKey 1 Reply Last reply Sep 15, 2016, 12:34 PM Reply Quote 1
                        • Ria_
                          Ria_ @BeckyKey last edited by Sep 13, 2016, 11:40 AM Sep 13, 2016, 11:40 AM

                          There's no manipulation whatsoever. In fact, Google encourage website developers and SEOs to optimise/tidy their code and keep a good code-to-content ratio. This is why Google gives us so many tools in order to do so. It makes our sites easier to crawl for Google, and in return Google may even like us more for it!

                          Just found an article that sums it up quite nicely:

                          "Essentially what is being stated is a fairly logical conclusion: reduce the amount of code on your page and the content (you know, the place where your keywords are) takes a higher priority. Additionally compliance will, by necessity, make your site easy to crawl and, additionally, allow you greater control over which portions of your content are given more weight by the search engines. The thinking behind validating code for SEO benefits is that, once you have a compliant site, not only will your site be a better user experience on a much larger number of browsers, but you’ll have a site with far less code, that will rank higher on the search engines because of it."

                          - http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/official-google-prefers-valid-html-css/

                          But going back to your original post, "above-the-fold is dead", yadda yadda... So long as your content in the source is metaphorically "above the fold" and not drowning in heavy code, on the page itself just worry about giving your users the "experience" that they're looking for. And not how many pixels from the top of the browser your content is. Hope that makes more sense!

                          ThompsonPaul 1 Reply Last reply Sep 14, 2016, 1:20 PM Reply Quote 0
                          • BeckyKey
                            BeckyKey @Ria_ last edited by Sep 13, 2016, 11:05 AM Sep 13, 2016, 11:05 AM

                            Great thank you, you read so many conflicting articles that it's difficult to know.

                            I'll see if we can look at our code, but I'd want to be mindful of not manipulating Google.

                            Thank you!

                            Ria_ 1 Reply Last reply Sep 13, 2016, 11:40 AM Reply Quote 0
                            • Ria_
                              Ria_ last edited by Sep 13, 2016, 9:32 AM Sep 13, 2016, 9:32 AM

                              I feel prioritising elements to be "above the fold" is a bit of an outdated concept these days.

                              Where is the fold? Different devices and screen resolutions will have different folds, and more websites are being designed now to make the traditional "above the fold" section more visually interesting and designed for user experience, rather than packed full of content.

                              The higher the content is in the source code itself, the more weight it will have on the page. This doesn't necessarily translate to the "visually higher the content is on the page". Google is going to be reading from top to bottom of your code, so naturally you want the most important content/links to be found first. As long as you meet (or exceed!) the user's expectation of the content upon arrival, and you keep the code tidy in terms of how much Google has to read before it gets to the real valuable content, I doubt Google's going to worry about whether users have to scroll a little to get to it.

                              BeckyKey 1 Reply Last reply Sep 13, 2016, 11:05 AM Reply Quote 0
                              • Mustansar
                                Mustansar last edited by Sep 13, 2016, 7:03 AM Sep 13, 2016, 7:03 AM

                                Hi Becky,

                                As far as i understand Google will not ignore however Google do treat some part of the page as more important than other. For instance, if you have written a description of the product and some of the description is been hide.
                                Google, will take that as the important piece of content been displayed for user and least important been hide.
                                I do not see any point for Google to ignore the fold one.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ThomasHarvey
                                  ThomasHarvey last edited by Sep 13, 2016, 7:02 AM Sep 13, 2016, 7:02 AM

                                  Content below the fold is still read, however less value is placed on it. So it is still worth having content that is produced for below the fold as it will still help that page rank.

                                  Show the user what they want to see when they land on the page, majority of the time in doing this you will actually show Google what they need to rank you.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • 1 / 1
                                  1 out of 16
                                  • First post
                                    1/16
                                    Last post

                                  Got a burning SEO question?

                                  Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                                  Start my free trial


                                  Browse Questions

                                  Explore more categories

                                  • Moz Tools

                                    Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                  • SEO Tactics

                                    Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                  • Community

                                    Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                  • Digital Marketing

                                    Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                  • Research & Trends

                                    Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                  • Support

                                    Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                  • See all categories

                                  Related Questions

                                  • yacpro13

                                    Duplicate content on URL trailing slash

                                    Hello, Some time ago, we accidentally made changes to our site which modified the way urls in links are generated. At once, trailing slashes were added to many urls (only in links). Links that used to send to
                                    example.com/webpage.html Were now linking to
                                    example.com/webpage.html/ Urls in the xml sitemap remained unchanged (no trailing slash). We started noticing duplicate content (because our site renders the same page with or without the trailing shash). We corrected the problematic php url function so that now, all links on the site link to a url without trailing slash. However, Google had time to index these pages. Is implementing 301 redirects required in this case?

                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Apr 26, 2016, 7:42 PM | yacpro13
                                    1
                                  • iQi

                                    Duplicate content on recruitment website

                                    Hi everyone, It seems that Panda 4.2 has hit some industries more than others. I just started working on a website, that has no manual action, but the organic traffic has dropped massively in the last few months. Their external linking profile seems to be fine, but I suspect usability issues, especially the duplication may be the reason. The website is a recruitment website in a specific industry only. However, they posts jobs for their clients, that can be very similar, and in the same time they can have 20 jobs with the same title and very similar job descriptions. The website currently have over 200 pages with potential duplicate content. Additionally, these jobs get posted on job portals, with the same content (Happens automatically through a feed). The questions here are: How bad would this be for the website usability, and would it be the reason the traffic went down? Is this the affect of Panda 4.2 that is still rolling What can be done to resolve these issues? Thank you in advance.

                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Oct 16, 2015, 5:57 PM | iQi
                                    0
                                  • J_Sinclair

                                    How to deal with URLs and tabbed content

                                    Hi All, We're currently redesigning a website for a new home developer and we're trying to figure out the best way to deal with tabbed content in the URL structure. The design of the site at the moment will have a page for a development and within that you can select your house type, then when on the house type page there will be tabs displayed for the user to see things like the plot map, availability and pricing, specifications, etc. The way our development team are looking at handling this is for the URL to use a hashtag or a query string at the end of it so we can still land users on these specific tabs for PPC for example. My question is really, has anyone had any experience with this? Any recommendations on how to best display the urls for SEO? Thanks

                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Aug 1, 2014, 1:02 PM | J_Sinclair
                                    0
                                  • Jenny1

                                    Partial duplicate content and canonical tags

                                    Hi - I am rebuilding a consumer website, and each product page will contain a unique product image, and a sentence or two about the product (and we tend to use a lot of the same words in different ways across products). I'd like to have a tabbed area below the product info that talks about the overall product line, and this content would be duplicate across all the product pages (a "Why use our products" type of thing). I'd have this duplicate content also living on its own URL's so they can be found alone in the SERP's. Question is, do I need to add the canonical tag to this page, since there's partial duplicate content on the product pages? And if I did that, would my product pages go un-indexed?? I understand how to handle completely duplicated content, it's the partial duplicate that I'm having difficulty figuring out.

                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 7, 2014, 6:18 PM | Jenny1
                                    0
                                  • MBASydney

                                    Duplicate content on sites from different countries

                                    Hi, we have a client who currently has a lot of duplicate content with their UK and US website. Both websites are geographically targeted (via google webmaster tools) to their specific location and have the appropriate local domain extension. Is having duplicate content a major issue, since they are in two different countries and geographic regions of the world? Any statement from Google about this? Regards, Bill

                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Aug 1, 2013, 11:08 AM | MBASydney
                                    0
                                  • team_tic

                                    International SEO - cannibalisation and duplicate content

                                    Hello all, I look after (in house) 3 domains for one niche travel business across three TLDs: .com .com.au and co.uk and a fourth domain on a co.nz TLD which was recently removed from Googles index. Symptoms: For the past 12 months we have been experiencing canibalisation in the SERPs (namely .com.au being rendered in .com) and Panda related ranking devaluations between our .com site and com.au site. Around 12 months ago the .com TLD was hit hard (80% drop in target KWs) by Panda (probably) and we began to action the below changes. Around 6 weeks ago our .com TLD saw big overnight increases in rankings (to date a 70% averaged increase). However, almost to the same percentage we saw in the .com TLD we suffered significant  drops in our .com.au rankings. Basically Google seemed to switch its attention from .com TLD to the .com.au TLD. Note: Each TLD is over 6 years old, we've never proactively gone after links (Penguin) and have always aimed for quality in an often spammy industry. **Have done: ** Adding HREF LANG markup to all pages on all domain Each TLD uses local vernacular e.g for the .com site is American Each TLD has pricing in the regional currency Each TLD has details of the respective local offices, the copy references the lacation, we have significant press coverage in each country like The Guardian for our .co.uk site and Sydney Morning Herlad for our Australia site Targeting each site to its respective market in WMT Each TLDs core-pages (within 3 clicks of the primary nav) are 100% unique We're continuing to re-write and publish unique content to each TLD on a weekly basis As the .co.nz site drove such little traffic re-wrting we added no-idex and the TLD has almost compelte dissapread (16% of pages remain) from the SERPs. XML sitemaps Google + profile for each TLD **Have not done: ** Hosted each TLD on a local server Around 600 pages per TLD are duplicated across all TLDs (roughly 50% of all content). These are way down the IA but still duplicated. Images/video sources from local servers Added address and contact details using SCHEMA markup Any help, advice or just validation on this subject would be appreciated! Kian

                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | May 23, 2013, 9:39 PM | team_tic
                                    1
                                  • CarlS

                                    Capitals in url creates duplicate content?

                                    Hey Guys, I had a quick look around however I couldn't find a specific answer to this. Currently, the SEOmoz tools come back and show a heap of duplicate content on my site. And there's a fair bit of it. However, a heap of those errors are relating to random capitals in the urls. for example. "www.website.com.au/Home/information/Stuff" is being treated as duplicate content of "www.website.com.au/home/information/stuff" (Note the difference in capitals). Anyone have any recommendations as to how to fix this server side(keeping in mind it's not practical or possible to fix all of these links) or to tell Google to ignore the capitalisation? Any help is greatly appreciated. LM.

                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jul 24, 2015, 10:50 AM | CarlS
                                    0
                                  • joseph.chambers

                                    Duplicate Content | eBay

                                    My client is generating templates for his eBay template based on content he has on his eCommerce platform. I'm 100% sure this will cause duplicate content issues. My question is this.. and I'm not sure where eBay policy stands with this but adding the canonical tag to the template.. will this work if it's coming from a different page i.e. eBay? Update: I'm not finding any information regarding this on the eBay policy's: http://ocs.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?CustomerSupport&action=0&searchstring=canonical So it does look like I can have rel="canonical" tag in custom eBay templates but I'm concern this can be considered: "cheating" since rel="canonical is actually a 301 but as this says: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/12/handling-legitimate-cross-domain.html it's legitimately duplicate content. The question is now: should I add it or not? UPDATE seems eBay templates are embedded in a iframe but the snap shot on google actually shows the template. This makes me wonder how they are handling iframes now. looking at http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/search-engine-simulator.shtml does shows the content inside the iframe. Interesting. Anyone else have feedback?

                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Dec 9, 2014, 11:02 AM | joseph.chambers
                                    1

                                  Get started with Moz Pro!

                                  Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                  Start my free trial
                                  Products
                                  • Moz Pro
                                  • Moz Local
                                  • Moz API
                                  • Moz Data
                                  • STAT
                                  • Product Updates
                                  Moz Solutions
                                  • SMB Solutions
                                  • Agency Solutions
                                  • Enterprise Solutions
                                  Free SEO Tools
                                  • Domain Authority Checker
                                  • Link Explorer
                                  • Keyword Explorer
                                  • Competitive Research
                                  • Brand Authority Checker
                                  • Local Citation Checker
                                  • MozBar Extension
                                  • MozCast
                                  Resources
                                  • Blog
                                  • SEO Learning Center
                                  • Help Hub
                                  • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                  • How-to Guides
                                  • Moz Academy
                                  • API Docs
                                  About Moz
                                  • About
                                  • Team
                                  • Careers
                                  • Contact
                                  Why Moz
                                  • Case Studies
                                  • Testimonials
                                  Get Involved
                                  • Become an Affiliate
                                  • MozCon
                                  • Webinars
                                  • Practical Marketer Series
                                  • MozPod
                                  Connect with us

                                  Contact the Help team

                                  Join our newsletter
                                  Moz logo
                                  © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                  • Accessibility
                                  • Terms of Use
                                  • Privacy

                                  Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.