Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
301 redirect subdirectory to new domain
-
I'm planning on using 301 redirects to spin out a subdirectory of my current website to be its own separate domain. For instance, I currently have a website www.website.com and my writers write tech news at www.website.com/news. Now I want to 301 redirect www.website.com/news to www.technews.com.
Will this have any negative impact on SEO? What are some steps that I can take to minimize these impacts?
-
Hi Guys,
I know this topic's a little old but my e-commerce website is basically at the verge of undergoing the same changes, and I've got a lot of ranking-based concerns here.
Our website ist called absinthes.com. It's available in 3 languages, so we created sub directories absinthes.com/de and absinthes.com/fr. The English version basically is always the default version when visiting absinthes.com.
For various reasons, our company decided to split absinthes.com into 3 separate shops: absinthes.com for English, absinthes.fr for French, and absinthes.de for German.
Now here's where I start getting worried: We're moving contents from a subdirectory (absinthes.com/de) via 301 page-by-page redirects to this new domain, absinthes.de. Am I supposed to let Google through Search Console know about this move, or will it think the entire site (absinthes.com, absinthes.com/fr) has then moved to absinthes.de?
Is it enough to put rel=canonical tags and 301 redirects in place to make sure we're not losing any of our rankings on both ends?
Would really appreciate your quick opinion on this, thanks so much!
-
Hi Chris,
Happy to be of help.
Thomas
-
Thanks for the thorough response Thomas!
-
Thank you Moosa,
I just took a look at where www.technews.com links to and that gave me the vastly more insight to what they are trying to accomplish and makes me believe that they will survive without the tech section
unfortunately, the non-www.version takes you to a dead page.
I would not worry too much about losing page rank based on the site it links to most likely being the new site you are speaking of I doubt this is a secret because you showed us the domain that points to it. of course I will not put that URL on here out of respect for you but I have placed the URL you mentioned above so people will know what you are referring to.
However, if you are going to go through with this I would place quality content on technews.com and take away the 301 redirect that points back to the main news site
I would then do something similar to what Moz did when they moved from SEOmoz.org to Moz.com they made http://moz.com/rand/ a live site that contained high-quality unique content in order to warm up the audience to the domain as well as Google
only if you are going to splice these things into two different sites would I go ahead and move your technology information over to technews.com domain and place all that content on it.
I would also want to inform your current readers of exactly what is going to occur.
In less you are going to really start going crazy on technology and have an entire business plan based around it which I am pretty sure you do if you are planning on doing this.
Then I would move forward with changing the tech section of your current site to become the beginning of technews.com ( I have made this a live link to where the www. version of it links so people can be of better help by under understanding the scale of this change.)
Unfortunately, any traffic, links, social media approvals, page rank and everything that is currently helping you rank with your news technology section will disappear. as soon as Google crawls the site and notices the 301 redirects.
Because you are not changing domains like when SEOmoz.org became Moz.com it is very unique that this type of thing occurs. Though I can understand now why you would want to do it.
I would recommend taking a tool like http://deepcrawl.co.uk/ and having it run a universal index on your current news site the reason I recommend Deep Crawl is I have used it with great success on extremely large sites over 1 million URI's it has the ability to scale Because it is not based on how much your local workstation or desktop has for RAM I believe it is hosted on AWS regardless because it is hosted it allows it to process the data on huge sites I usedit on the one Fortune 500 that I cannot name however it did a fantastic job.
if you read the information on this site you will see just how capable and indispensable tool like this is when making changes to a site a as large as your news site
http://deepcrawl.co.uk/features/advanced-processing
Another tool you should not be without my opinion is Screaming Frog SEO Spider though for the amount of pages that you will need to crawl you will need a workstation with a lot of RAM as it does many of the same things deep crawl does however requires you to install it on your local workstation or desktop it can be installed on Mac, PC and Linux though I have placed it on a Verizon Terremark server running Ubuntu with 24 gigs of RAM with a lot of success there are other things you will want it around for checking. I would purchase the Pro version Of
http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
I would then use a combination of Moz http://moz.com/researchtools/ose , https://ahrefs.com/ , http://www.majesticseo.com/ & Google Webmaster tools or www.google.com/webmasters/ to look at the back links pointing to technology.
http://moz.com/blog/achieving-an-seo-friendly-domain-migration-the-infographic
http://moz.com/blog/domain-migration-lessons
http://moz.com/blog/web-site-migration-guide-tips-for-seos
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/83105?
http://moz.com/blog/achieving-an-seo-friendly-domain-migration-the-infographic
http://builtvisible.com/domain-migration/
http://builtvisible.com/surviving-seo-site-migration/
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2067216/The-10-Step-Site-Migration-Process
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/04/best-practices-when-moving-your-site.html
a larger version of the photo below is right here
http://www.aleydasolis.com/images/seo-website-domain-migration.gif
I would follow the directions that are laid out in the URLs below because making a mistake when doing this will be costly to your new satellite business.
Hosting your new site on a server that you trust to have the capability to host it protect it is paramount to it surviving
Peek Hosting http://www.peakhosting.com/
Terremark http://www.terremark.com/
FireHost http://www.firehost.com/
To gain speed and reliability I would recommend not using the current DNS setup
ns-1027.awsdns-00.org
pdns6.ultradns.co.uksimply because AWS route 53 or ns-1027.awsdns-00.org depends on both DynECT Dyn.com & UltraDNS http://www.neustar.biz/services/dns-services is to keep itself alive and meaning if in the extremely unlikely instance of both of them going down you are out of luck.
However, your current setup depends on a secondary DNS that depends on your primary DNS being up I hope that makes sense.
I would simply do what many other companies that do not want down time and need very fast name servers do use DynECT along with UltraDNS or combine DynECT with EdgeCast Route DNS
Amazon.com is not backed up by AWS Route 53 as you can see below it is a combination of DynECT & UltraDNS two keep your site from having issues so it is not a good
use
ns1.p1.dynect.net & ns1.edgecastdns.net
or
ns1.p1.dynect.net & pdns1.ultradns.net
or just ns1.p1.dynect.net
UltraDNS had a bout of downtime less than a month ago on salesforce
Dyn has never been down ever look At the Way, Amazon configures their server DNS.
http://who.is/whois/amazon.com
Name Server: ns4.p31.dynect.net
Name Server: pdns6.ultradns.co.uk
Name Server: pdns1.ultradns.net
Name Server: ns3.p31.dynect.net
Name Server: ns2.p31.dynect.net
Name Server: ns1.p31.dynect.net
http://who.is/whois/technews.com
Name Server: pdns3.ultradns.org
Name Server: pdns1.ultradns.net
Name Server: pdns5.ultradns.info
Name Server: pdns2.ultradns.net
Name Server: pdns6.ultradns.co.uk
Name Server: pdns4.ultradns.org
Sincerely,
Thomas
PS large version of the photograph below his right here http://imgur.com/X3AiQNi.gif
-
Very Detailed answer y Thomas!!
If I have the similar kind of situation the first thing I would do is to audit the current website and will make sure the area that I am going to redirect have what kind of links and what impact they are producing to the website whole website.
If the section, I want to redirect have a major impact on rankings, now I have to make a decision. Can I afford a dip in ranking? And how users will react and respond to the new separate website.
I will recommend you to do your analysis and as there not much in your hand make sure what you want to achieve and what you can put at risk, make a back -up plan and start doing it.
Hope this helps!!
-
Some of the negative things that will happen to your current site include losing whatever page rank your current links that will be redirected contained.
When you 301 redirect a link to another site that is off of a subfolder it will impact your entire site's ability to rank if those 301s were helping you at all.
Are you going to continue to operate the first site as it was?
I would have to see the page rank of the site how many links you have that you are talking about redirecting and much more to actually tell you whether or not it is worth
harming their old site
it may not be worth it and it might be best to simply move the /news content and not redirect the pages themselves. To technews.com
There is not much that you can really do to in the impact of losing links of value to your current site except for build new exceptional content that gains the same quality and amount of links that you will be redirecting to the other site.
Also remember you will be losing any social media likes thumbs up's whatever when you 301 redirect.
I assume the first domain has nothing to do with tech news that is why you are splicing it off?
I would choose between creating a new site with the old site's content and of course deleting that content has to not have duplicate content because remember whichever domain has the highest page rank wins meaning your existing domain if it has a page rank will take away the technews.com site's ability to rank for that content. I would place information telling somebody that this page is now able to be found at technews.com/what-ever-the-pages
I hope you know not to just 301 redirect /news to the new domains homepage and think that will be the best way of doing things because it will not. Redirects are done page by page meaning if you had a news/opinions/ you could place it in technews.com/opinions/
That would more or less help the new site more than it would the old site.
If I could see the domain of the first site if you want to send it to me via private message I am more than happy to look at it that way if you are uncomfortable showing it in the form.
I hope this is of help,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will 301 Redirects Slow Page Speed?
We have a lot of subdomains that we are switching to subfolders and need to 301 redirect all the pages from those subdomains to the new URL. We have over 1000 that need to be implemented. So, will 301 redirects slow the page speed regardless of which URL the user comes through? Or, as the old urls are dropped from Google's index and bypassed as the new URLs take over in the SERPs, will those redirects then have no effect on page speed? Trying to find a clear answer to this and have yet to find a good answer
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MJTrevens0 -
Website Redesign, 301 Redirects, and Link Juice
I want to change my client’s ecommerce site to Shopify. The only problem is that Shopify doesn’t let you customize domains. I plan to: keep each page’s content exactly the same keep the same domain name 301 redirect all of the pages to their new url The ONLY thing that will change is each page’s url. Again, each page will have the exact same content. The only source of traffic to this site is via Google organic search and sales depend on the traffic. There are about 10 pages that have excellent link juice, 20 pages that have medium link juice, and the rest is small link juice. Many of our links that have significant link juice are on message boards written by people that like our product. I plan to change these urls and 301 redirect them to their new urls. I’ve read tons of pages online about this topic. Some people that say it won’t effect link juice at all, some say it will might effect link juice temporarily, and others are uncertain. Most answers tend to be “You should be good. You might lose some traffic temporarily. You might want to switch some of your urls to the new structure to see how it affects it first.” Here’s my question: 1) Has anyone ever done changed a url structure for an existing website with link juice? What were your results and do you have a definitive answer on the topic? 2) How much link juice (if any) will be lost if I keep all of the exact content the same but only change each page’s url? 3) If link juice is temporarily lost and then regained, how long will it be temporarily lost? 1 week? 1 month? 6 months? Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kirbyf0 -
New Site (redesign) Launched Without 301 Redirects to New Pages - Too Late to Add Redirects?
We recently launched a redesign/redevelopment of a site but failed to put 301 redirects in place for the old URL's. It's been about 2 months. Is it too late to even bother worrying about it at this point? The site has seen a notable decrease in site traffic/visits, perhaps due to this issue. I assume that once the search engines get an error on a URL, it will remove it from displaying in search results after a period of time. I'm just not sure if they will try to re-crawl those old URLs at some point and if so, it may be worth it to have those 301 redirects in place. Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BrandBuilder0 -
301 redirection pointing to noindexed pages
I have rather an unusual situation where a recently launched affiliate site does not have any unique content as its all syndicated content. For that reason we are currently using the noindex,nofollow meta tags to keep the pages out of the search engines index until we create unique content for the pages. The problem is that due to a very tight timeframe with rebranding, we are looking at 301 redirecting (on a page to page basis) another high authority legacy domain to this new site before we have had a chance to add unique content to it and remove the noindex,nofollow tags. I would assume that any link authority normally passed through the 301 would be lost in this scenario but Im uncertain of what the broader impact might be. Has anyone dealt with a similar scenario? I know this scenario is not ideal and I would rather wait until the unique content is up and noindex tags are removed before launching the 301 redirect of the legacy domain but there are a number of competing priorities at play outside of SEO.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | LosNomads0 -
Too many 301 redirects?
Hey, My company currently has one chief website with about 500-600 other domains that all feature the same material as the chief website. These domains have been around for about 5 years and have actually picked up some link traffic. I have all of these identical web-pages utilizing rel=canonical but I was wondering if I would be better served, from SEO purposes, to 301 redirect all of these sites to their respective pages on our chief website? If I add 500 301 redirects, will the major search engines consider this to be black-hat link-building even though the sites are related and technically already feature the same content? For an example, the chief website is www.1099pro.com and I would 301 redirect the below sites to the chief site: 1099softwarepro.com 1099softwarepro.info 1099softwarepro.net 1099softwarepro.biz 1099softwareprofessionals.com 1099softwareprofessionals.info ...you get the point
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Stew2220 -
Redirect ruined domain to new domain without passing link juice
A new client has a domain which has been hammered by bad links, updates etc and it's basically on its arse because of previous SEO guys. They have various domains for their business (brand.com, brand.co.uk) and want to use a fresh domain and take it from there. Their current domain is brand.com (the ruined one). They're not bothered about the rankings for brand.com but they want to redirect brand.com to brand.co.uk so that previous clients can find them easily. Would a 302 redirect work for this? I don't want to set up a 301 redirect as I don't want any of the crappy links pointing across. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jasonwdexter0 -
Language Detection redirect: 301 or 302?
We have a site offering a voip app in 4 languages. Users are currently 302 redirected from the root page to /language subpages, depending on their browser language. Discussions about the sense of this aside: Is it correct to use a 302 redirect here or should users be 301 redirected to their respective languages? I don't find any guideline on this whatsoever...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | zeepartner1 -
Changing a parent category and 301 redirecting
I have a set of three pages that are subpages of a parent. The structure is as follows: mysite.com/directory/personal-widgets mysite.com/directory/commercial-widgets mysite.com/directory/widgets-services The partent page name "directory" really isn't working for where I want these pages to evolve. So I want to change it to "guides" In a world without worrying about google, I would simply change the parent page to guides, so they look like this, and be done with it: mysite.com/guides/personal-widgets But, the obvious problem is that I have external links to the page now. And the pages have a nice PR. And they also have Facebook page Likes and I don't know if I'll lose those. I know that if I should do this I should redirect the pages to the new pages of course. My question is: Will redirecting the old URL to the new URL with a 301 cause anything negative to happen that I might not be expecting? Does Google dislike Redirects for any reason, or understand they are sometimes necessary?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bizzer0