Multi Store SEO Drop
-
I have two stores (thespacecollective.com and thespacecollective.com/us) and over the past month the keyword rank for the US store had dropped by half, while the UK store is relatively the same. The content is mostly the same, except the US site uses US spelling. I assumed that this would not be flagged as duplicate content because it is the same site, just serving two locations.
I'd be interested to hear some thoughts on the reason for this drop and how I might fix it.
-
The redirect service is the gray area here for me. I don't know them or their services. With that parameter in play, you need the self-referring canonical. The hreflang is set up right now, but I don't know how all of this is interacting together.
I'd suggest starting by addressing the hreflang with the parameters in them. Make sure those parameters are not in the hreflang tags. Also, do you have sitemaps for both languages submitted to Google?
For what it is worth, I don't see things wrong in the SERPs. You are still on the first page for 'NASA gifts' and 'meterorite gifts' in the US. What other drops are you seeing? Some adjustment is expected when making changes like this.
-
All UK and USA website traffic has both dropped by 70% since I made the initial change you suggested.
The georedirect section of the URL is from an external redirect service called geotargetly.com
-
Can you tell me specifically what is plummeting? Just this page? All US, All UK pages? If you can share specifics, I can try to ID what is up. My theory is that the canonical is messing with things, but since you had the issue with parameters in some indexed URLs, it seemed relevant to keep in.
In face, I am digging a little, and when I google your name from my location in the US, this is the first page:
view-source:https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/archive?utm_source=georedirect
The hreflang there has that utm source in it. There is something that might be messing things up. Any idea where that thing is coming from yet? It seems very prevalent.
Also, how is the traffic to your site? With your rankings down, I'd assume a major drop in traffic. But if the URLs with that parameter are taking over, you might still be getting traffic, just to the wrong URL.
-
I believe it has now been done correctly as of a week ago, and yet, my rank continues to plummet - literally plummet.
-
It is possible that fluctuations will happen once the canonical is removed. That tag was equating the two pages and google was in the middle of trying to figure out that they were similar but not the same. So removing that canonical is going to reset the pages for a bit. If you are seeing a drop, I expect it to come back up shortly as long as the hreflang is there.
I looked at: view-source:https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery
And am seeing:
<link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">alternate</a>" hreflang="<a class="attribute-value">en-US</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">alternate</a>" hreflang="<a class="attribute-value">x-default</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> So with the above, you are confusing Google. That is says that it is it's own canonical (good) and is a language variation but you provide no others (including the strong page that is the UK). Rather than the above, it should be this:
<link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">alternate</a>" hreflang="<a class="attribute-value">en-US</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">alternate</a>" hreflang="<a class="attribute-value">en-GB</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/meteorite-jewellery</a>" />
The X-default is meant for pages that allow the user to select a country and/or language for a big company like IKEA or fedex. ```
-
Is it a coincidence that my rank for both sites just dropped by nearly 40% each after making this change?
-
That is news to me! Thank you so much for this. I will remove all of the canonical tags and leave only the hreflang, and see how this effects the site rank.
-
No canonical at all for either side, rather they should have hreflang tags that act as canonicals but not as strong (they are specific for language differences).
-
Thank you so much Kate. Just to double check, are you saying that there should be no canonical tag at all on the US site? Or just one (leading to the UK or US site)?
-
Ah, apologies on the logs thing! You can read more about it here: https://moz.com/blog/server-log-essentials-for-seo
It's not something you can see from search console. You'll need to get to your logs from your website host. Do you have a developers you can talk to or a website host team that can help you out?
The canonical!!!! Yeah, that is a problem! You should not use a canonical when dealing with international signals. You need to use HREFLANG. https://moz.com/learn/seo/hreflang-tag
On the linking, if Moz isn't showing anything, consider looking at search console. There is a links area, and if you can find the URL in the list of top pages, Google will give you an idea of where they found that URL.
-
I'm sure not what you mean by "check your crawl logs", can you please elaborate on that? Check them where exactly? I looked in the Google Search Console but there was no reference to IP addresses in any logs.
I tried looking up the linking domains in the Moz Link Explorer for "thespacecollective.com/ us/meteorite-jewellery?utm_source=georedirect" but it just says that it isn't a valid domain... so I'm not sure how to check how the URL is being linked to either.
I also noticed on the US site there are two canonical (attached), one for the UK and one for the US. This could be causing problems - I need to find out what is causing this and stop it. On that note, even the US site should still canonical to the UK site, right? Otherwise we would have two sites canonicalising to themselves respectively.
Thank you for your help thus far!
-
It can have SEO impact as Google primarily crawls from the US. They will from other locations but this has flip flopped over the years. This might be something that is causing this problem, if they are getting redirected to the US side but see many people mentioning the main domain (what you call the UK side). You can check by looking at your logs for when Google crawls and check the IP address in their list mentioned here. https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6144055?hl=en That will narrow down if it is a problem.
However, I do want to stress that using IP based redirects is frowned upon from a usability perspective. Giving people more choices is almost always better. A situation to consider outside of the issue that Google itself crawls from the US: When not in COVID times, people travel. I once tried to design my IKEA kitchen when traveling for work. I went back to continue my design I did one night in my hotel room, and it was gone! Little did I know, the design I did was on the UK side. People travel and you don't want to stop that from happening.
I get your point though, which is why it is preferred to do something like, funny enough they figured it out, IKEA does. If you go to ikea.com fresh, they welcome you with a message that they think you are in the US. It doesn't have to be a whole page, many sites use popups. But I would strongly urge you to consider this. And with that, I promise to drop the subject
Now, back to ranking. I see you at #6, and I am fresh eyes in the US space. I looked for NASA gifts and got this at exactly #6.
Where are you looking at ranking? Moz or Google Search Console or ?
I do see the issue with the meteorite jewelry. I see the URL https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery?utm_source=georedirect -- It's canonicalized properly, so Google is being ... annoying. I would, if you have time, take a look at how that is exact URL is linked to. Somehow, that one is seen as particularly powerful, so if you can narrow down where it is and get that parameter removed, that should change over time.
-
Hi Kate,
Thanks for answering. The redirect is deliberate, we do not want our customers to have a choice - if they're in the US or ROW, they go to the US site, if they're in the EU, they go to the UK site - anything else would be detrimental. So long as this doesn't negatively affect SEO, it is the perfect solution for us.
"NASA gifts" is a good example. We were 6th and now relegated to 51+, or "Meteorite Gifts", we were 2nd and not 51+.
"Meteorite Jewelry" took a nosedive too (thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery?utm_source=georedirect) and I noticed the URL is picking up the redirect, that can't be good (attached).
-
First major thing, you are auto redirecting based on the user's location. I would not do that, rather ask the user where they want to go. But that is more of a usability thing.
Second, I don't see an issue with one search for "nasa mercury memorbilia" - the US page showed up for me. Can you be more specific about the terms and pages that are seeing problems? Below was my earch result and it is for the US page (I checked to be sure, not just going to the page).
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Image upload SEO tips?
Is there anything I can do to my images other than naming them correctly to have with SEO? Size? File type? Maybe adding text on top of them to pick up OCR? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jamesmcd030 -
Pagination & SEO
Hi We have automatically created brand pages based on which brand they have in their attributes. At the moment, developers have restricted the ability to properly optimise these for SEO, but I also wanted to look at how we should handle pagination. Example: http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/brand/manutan?page=1 http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/brand/manutan?page=2 http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/brand/manutan?page=3 Should we do any of the following - which I've found in an article: Put no follow on all links located on pagination pages Should we no index these pages as they are wasting crawl budget? - Don’t show links to page 2, 3, 4, 5… 10, 11, 12… at the end of your content but only a link to the next and previous pages so that you won’t dilute your page authority. Or does anyone else have any tips on how to handle these pages? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Pagination, Javascript & SEO
Hi I need some help identifying whether we need to rethink the way we paginated product pages, On this page http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches when clicking page 1,2, etc - we have javascript to sort the results, the URL displayed and the URL linked to are different. e.g. The URL for these paginated pages is for example: page2 http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches#productBeginIndex:30&orderBy:5&pageView:list& Then the arrows either side of pagination, link to the paginated landing page e.g. http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches?page=3 - this is where the rel/prev details are - done for Google However - when clicking on this arrow, the URL loaded is different again - http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches#productBeginIndex:60&orderBy:5&pageView:list& & doesn't take you http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches?page=3 I did not set this up, but I am concerned that the URL http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches?page=3 never actually loads, but it's linked to Google can crawl it. Is this a problem? I am looking to implement a view all option. Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Website Migration and SEO
Recently I migrated three websites from www.product.com to www.brandname.com/product. Two of these site are performing as normal when it comes to SEO but one of them lost half of its traffic and dropped in rankings significantly. All pages have been properly redirected, onsite SEO is intact and optimized, and all pages are indexed by Search engines. Has anyone had experience with this type of migration that could give some input on what a possible solution could be? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AlexVelazquez0 -
Should we always avoid drop-down menus?
In Google's SEO Guide, they say avoid the use of drop-down menus, page 12: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf But, is this always true? What if you create the drop down purely using HTML & CSS? Is it fine to use a bit of javascript to create the drop-down menu, or should it only be HTML & CSS?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
Advertising links hurt SEO?
I'm working with a publisher who said that having DFA links on his site will hurt his SEO. He is taking my link and pointing it back to his site and then to mine. Does that sound right to you?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GFTMarketer0 -
Expiring URL seo
a buddy of mine is running a niche job board and is having issues with expiring URLs. we ruled it out cuz a 301 is meant to be used when the content has moved to another page, or the page was replaced. We were thinking that we'd be just stacking duplicate content on old urls that would never be 'replaced'. Rather they have been removed and will never come back. So 410 is appropriate but maybe we overlooked something. any ideas?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | malachiii0