What is a Good Keyword Volume Score?
-
Hi All!
Continuing my series of discussions about the various keyword scores we use here at Moz (previously: Keyword Difficulty & Keyword Opportunity)... Let's move on to Volume.
Volume in Moz's tools is expressed in a range, e.g. Bartending Certification has volume of 201-500. These ranges correspond to data we have suggesting that in an average month, that keyword is searched for a minimum of X to a maximum of Y (where X-Y is the volume range). We use clickstream data as well as data from Google AdWords and then some PPC AdWords campaigns we run and have access to when we build the models for our volume data. As such, we've got very high confidence in these numbers -- 95%+ of the time, a given keyword's monthly search volume on Google will fall inside that range.
If you want to see all the nitty gritty details, check out Russ Jones post on Moz's Keyword Volume and how we calculate it.
As far as a "good" volume score -- higher is usually better, as it means more demand, but lots of keywords with low volume scores can also add up to strong traffic when combined, and they may be more relevant. Capturing exactly the audience you want that also wants you is what SEO is all about.
p.s. When Keyword Explorer or Moz Pro gives you a "no data" or "unknown" volume number, it may just mean we haven't collected information from our clickstream providers or AdWords crawls, not that the keyword has no volume (though it sometimes means that, too, we just don't know yet). One way to verify - see if Google Suggest autofills it in when you type in the search box. If it does, that's usually a sign there's at least some volume (even if it's only a few searches a month).
-
-
Hi Everyone, I have a gaming blog when I tried Moz pro first time for my blog and keyword research I was impressed so much. Moz gives the exact volume of all keywords.
-
Moz is the best tool for providing the keywords difficulty. It is the best ever tool which I recommend to everyone, I personally believe that it shows the KD of any keyword almost correctly than others. You can check each keyword difficulty even if you are checking the KD for carpet installer in Dubai.
Cheers!
-
please tell me 201-500 mean...?
-
Same problem is with me can’t solve the issue
-
Thanks a lot.
I don't know if it's possible to share my link to get more explanation, I share it .
could you please give me your idea?
-
Hi there! It is very simple, you only have to go to the Keyword Research tab on the left and select the option "Explore by Site" or "Site OVerview."
After doing so, you will be finding keywords from a given domain, in this case, yours. Remember changing the language!!! Otherwise, nothing will come up.
-
Hi Anualam, I can relate to your question because we work with clients located in different places, and in some cases, this data has not yet been collected. That said, I will give you a few ideas hoping you can combine them or test them, but you will need to be willing to learn about SEO.
1.- When it comes to research, the volume is important but more important is understanding how those volumes reflect the behavior of a certain group. Understanding how people search is crucial because it helps us reframe our content and get to those people easier. Think of research as an opportunity to make educated guesses. Nothing has to be precise, you will see how well you are doing later on by monitoring your campaigns.
2.- I think that being precise is important, but one metric is not enough to put things in perspective. Your subscription comes with more tools, the idea is that you combine them and make the most out of this iterative process.
This is a list of things that you can do to make your research process pay off:
a) When doing keyword research, you can also use links instead of keywords. That way, by entering the URL of competitors within your niche located in Colombia, you will see what keywords they are using in their pages to drive traffic. This is useful because beyond testing how good their performance is, you can find other opportunities if you look at their backlink profile, etc. It can also be the case (it happens often) that the websites of your competitors are not optimized, therefore, it is not a worthy reference for you, on the other hand, it means that you have many more opportunities in the keyword landscape.
b) Try looking for competitors that belong to your niche but are serving other areas, for example, Mexico, Argentina, or as we do it, United States. If you pay close attention to the data and you use a representative group of companies, you will advise opportunities for your keyword research since they are using similar words that are working in their area. After finding what keywords they use, and reviewing their best pieces of content, evaluating their backlink profile and determining how good of a fit these companies are to your research purposes, you will have to localize those keywords. I am not suggesting you translate them to Spanish, you have to localize it. that means that you understand how you can rephrase it in your area so that it makes sense.
c) Test and combine these ideas by creating blogs, updating the content of your webpage, creating or adapting your advertising strategy, and try to interpret the results to improve your performance. That is what research in this context means to me.
If you need anything else, let me know and I will be glad to help you. I am just getting started but I will be glad to share what I know if that can improve your chances for success.
-
i Have been using moz for key world on zee world niche.
moz is the perfect tool for link building and analysis.
-
Recently we bought the Moz tool but when using the Keyword Explorer tool it shows NO DATA for the monthly volume data for our keywords based in Colombia. How can I find an alternative way for this huge inconvenient? Tech Helper
-
How do I find keywords for my site? This is my site https://cscvlesupport.com
-
Moz is good but I wan more data many time low competitive keyword I search no data monthly volume .when I work on my site myspiritualguru its Hindi site your work is grate just need little more info sir.
-
HI I see that this is rather old post, but ill ask anyway. I run an lgbt business, and when I search at Moz almost none of the gay words i search as f.eks "Gay wedding cards" there are only data on a few of the words. Am I doing something wrong or is it that none of these words have been collected by Moz?
- Nille
-
Thanks
I don't know if it's possible to share my link to get more explanation, I share it .
could you please give me your idea?
-
Try and use Express VPN and link yourself to that localized server. One you are connected, try using Predictive Query to determine what keywords are being searched for, and if indeed nothing comes up within PQ at all.
-
Hello,
Recently we bought the Moz tool but when using the Keyword Explorer tool it shows NO DATA for the monthly volume data for our keywords based in Colombia. How can I find an alternative way for this huge inconvenient?
Thanks,
Daniel C.
-
Hi Russ,
When you say:** "Google Keyword Planner combines similar words together for volume"**
Is it not perhaps because Google treats similar keywords as one keyword?
Or is it because Google uses LSI to find synonyms of words you want to rank for.
"LSI looks for synonyms related to the title of your page. For example, if the title of your page was “Classic Cars”, the search engine would expect to find words relating to that subject in the content of the page as well, i.e. “collectors”, “automobile”, “Bentley”, “Austin” and “car auctions”."
Taken from: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/what-is-latent-semantic-indexing-seo-defined/21642/
So as you can see, all the words Google groups in keyword planner would be relevant since if I want to rank for "collector's cars" then I would want to know what are all the monthly search volume for the all possible variations of that keyword which I want to rank for.
Am I missing something here?
Would like to know your thoughts.
Thank you in advance. -
Hi LAJ,
I am Russ Jones, Principal Search Scientist at Moz, and I am primarily responsible for our keyword volume model. This is a common question we get at Moz and there are typically 3 parts to the issue:
1. Google Keyword Planner combines similar words together for volume. For example, take the term "stepping stone molds". Google actually combines the volume of at least 4 keywords "stepping stone molds", "stepping stone mold", "step stone molds", "step stone mold". So, when you see Google's numbers for the term, you are actually seeing the combined volume. There are certainly even more variants (misspellings for example) that Google combines into that phrase. Google doesn't tell us, which is why we use clickstream data to build our models against Google volume. We call this the "disambiguation" problem.
2. Our model is intentionally conservative. Our models are intended to give users a conservative estimate so they don't over-estimate potential traffic and then waste resources (dollars, time, etc) on terms that just don't deliver the traffic. We would rather you be pleasantly surprised with the results of your campaign than underwhelmed and, even worse, under-water, so to speak. This is accomplished a number of ways, one of which is removing outliers more aggressively if they are greater than the the predicted volume. This also helps with severe disambiguation issues like Google Keyword Planner telling you a keyword like "facbook" is searched tens of millions of times because it considers it the same as "facebook".
3. Our model isn't exactly average search volume. The technical definition of our search volume range would be "the highest range of volume which you could expect 6 or more months out of the year to receive that amount or more impressions". This means that things like seasonality (which definitely impact landscaping related terms) will cause a lower volume average.
All this being said, we are constantly revisiting and improving the model. I am looking forward to an early 2018 revamp of the model which better integrates seasonality. However, in general, our numbers would and should always be lower than Google's because we disambiguate terms rather than join them together.
-
Thanks LAJ! I'll ask the team to look into these straightaway.
-
Hi LAJ - could you give some examples of the keywords where Google is showing search volume but Moz isn't? We may be able to figure out what's going on from that.
-
My keywords for my site are low count, but Moz has zero or super low count for my keywords but google has numbers for all.
I guess this what you mean when you say Moz just has not collected data on the group of words I am searching for?
Is there any way to get Moz to pull this data for my keywords.I am not an SEO person, just a woodcarver trying to figure out some traffic.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Search volume discrepancies between keyword tools
I'm feeling like I'm basing all my research time on tools that I cannot necessarily trust. Between Google keyword planner, Keywords everywhere chrome extension, and Moz keyword explorer, I'm getting wildly different results on 2 simple keywords related to colleges with baking & pastry arts degrees. "baking college", "baking colleges" So Keyword planner won't give me any search volume for those 2 words, I don't even see them in the results. Instead, it decides I really meant "baker college" which has 33,100 global searches. I tried telling it use only closely related terms, but it keeps giving me "baker college" and refuses to show me the terms I asked for. Stubbornly useless. Keywords everywhere says both of these keywords bring in 33,100 searches. It does not tell me those searches were for "baker college." Totally misleading. Moz keyword explorer says baking college as 0-10 volume, baking colleges has 101-200 volume. So at least it's not trying to give me "baker college" numbers. Perhaps I can trust this, but it's not convenient to upload hundreds of various keywords at a time to pull the volume numbers like I do with the other tools. With Keyword planner making assumptions and grouping unrelated terms together, and Keywords everywhere using those numbers without pointing out the assumptions, I feel like I can't trust anything without taking time to dig into the discrepancies, which is impossible with hundreds of keywords. Do you know of any good search volume tools that don't force or hide assumptions? Thanks.
Moz Bar | | JannetteP1 -
Tracked Ranking Keywords in Campaign and Ranking Keywords in Keyword Explorer are coming up with very different results - does anybody know why?
We have a campaign set up that is tracking keywords with varying monthly volumes and the website is ranking for them. I have gone into the new Keyword Explorer Feature (looks great!) and I have tested it by putting in the root domain address mentioned above. My problem is that none of the keywords that I am tracking and ranking for are appearing in the "ranking keywords" report in Keyword Explorer. Does anybody know why this might be happening?
Moz Bar | | RedAntSolutions0 -
What is a Good Keyword Organic CTR Score?
Hi Folks! You might have seen my discussion on What Is a Good Keyword Difficulty Score, and this is a continuation of the same vein. Keyword Organic CTR is probably my favorite score we developed in Keyword Explorer and Moz Pro. It looks at the SERP features that appear in a set of results (e.g. an image block, AdWords ads, a featured snippet, or knowledge graph) and then calculates, using CTRs we built off our partnership with Jumpshot's clickstream data, what percent of searchers are likely to click on the organic, web results. For example, in a search query like Nuoc Cham Ingredients, you've got a featured snippet and then a "People Also Ask" feature above the web results, and thus, Keyword Explorer is giving me an Organic CTR Score of 64. This translates directly to an estimated 64% click-through rate to the web results. Compare that to a search query like Fabric Printed Off Grain, where there's a single SERP feature - just the "People Also Ask" box, and it's between the 6th and 7th result. In this case, Keyword Explorer shows an Organic CTR Score of 94, because we estimate that those PAAs are only taking 6% of the available clicks. There are two smart ways you should be using Organic CTR Score: As a way to modify the estimated volume and estimated value of ranking in the web results for a given keyword term/phrase (KW Explorer does this for you if you use the "Lists" and sort based on Potential, which factors in all the other scores, including volume, difficulty, and organic CTR) As a way to identify SEO opportunities outside the normal, organic web results in other SERP features (e.g. in the Nuoc Cham Ingredients SERPs, there's serious opportunity to take over that featured snippet and get some great traffic) OK, so all that said, what's actually a "good" Organic CTR score? Well... If you're doing classic, 10-blue-links style SEO only, 100 is what you want. But, if you're optimizing for SERP features, and you appear in a featured snippet or the image block or top stories or any of those others, you'd probably be very happy to find that CTR was going to those non-web-results sections, and scores in the 40s or 50s would be great (so long as you appear in the right features).
Moz Bar | | randfish12 -
KW Explorer is Working to Disambiguate Keywords Google Merges Together
Hey gang, Russ Jones from Moz has been doing a ton of heavy lifting work to try to get around the new problem posed by Google AdWords recent change to merged-keyword volume data. But, we're fighting back against this obfuscation in Keyword Explorer. I'm sharing two emails (slightly edited) from Russ about what we're doing here: Introduction to the Problem: Google Adwords Keyword Planner is the primary source for keyword search volume (how often a keyword is searched monthly on Google) for much of the search marketing industry. While Google has grouped together highly-similar terms for a while (especially misspellings), in June of 2016 they dramatically increased this keyword-grouping. This means similar phrases like "keyword rank", "keyword ranking" and "keyword rankings" would all be reported as having the same, combined search volume, rather than their individual search volumes. If you were to take Google's numbers at face value, you might think there are 3,000 searches per month for these 3 terms, when in reality there is only 1,000, divided amongst the 3 terms. How we are addressing it: Moz's Keyword Explorer uses a blend of data sources, not just Keyword Planner, to build our volume metrics. This gives us a distinct advantage in that we can adjust the volume of words that deviate dramatically in one data set verses another. Take for example the phrases "keyword rank", "keyword ranking", and "keyword rankings". While Google Keyword Planner might report all of these as having 1,000 searches per month, Moz Keyword Explorer can detect that these numbers are significantly higher than what our models would predict given our other data sets. We can then adjust the volume accordingly. Moreover, given our huge keyword data set, we can also identify grouped phrases (like these 3) and divide the volume proportionally to what we see in our other data sets. Thus, we address the grouping problem from multiple directions. Here's email #2 from Russ, detailing more of how we're attacking this: I have been working pretty much non-stop on this keyword volume disambiguation problem (finding the real search volume of individual keywords when Google clumps several together). I think I have settled on a pretty good solution and am working on getting it all in. For example... Google Keyword Volume for the phrases "briefcase for women" and "briefcases for women" are both at 3600 because they have been lumped together. My disambiguation script says the singular (briefcase for women) should be 2731 and the plural should be 869. Google Trends roughly agrees with this, showing that the singular is searched more than 2x the plural: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=briefcase%20for%20women%2C%20briefcases%20for%20women&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B4 Basically, Keyword Explorer should already be providing some more accurate/segmented numbers than AdWords, and in the future, we'll get even better thanks to our clickstream data and our evolving models. Any questions, let us know!
Moz Bar | | randfish15 -
How is Moz's DA score so high?
Obviously they make the tool that measures this, but is their own score inflated because of this? I know DA isn't strictly a measure of popularity, but Moz's own score seems a little _too _high compared to some other sites... 92 - Moz.com 90 - Salesforce.com 87 - Airbnb.com 84 - Priceline.com 83 - Squarespace.com Can someone shed some light on how DA is actually measured?
Moz Bar | | WickVideo0 -
How does the grader tool treat keyword "stuffing" in ecommerce
We recently started using Moz on our ecommmerce site because I'm concerned that our SEO company doesn't really know what they are doing and I want to see what I can do on my own with the little bit of knowledge I have. It's helping in a number of ways but here's a big question mark: The Grader Tool keeps telling us that our product category pages have too many keywords on them. We are only using them in the content once or twice, but the sub-category buttons on the page show the category + sub repeated. Could this be what's causing it? Does Google distinguish this for ecommerce? We've taken a huge hit in rankings for key phrases and keywords over the past six months and I'm wondering if this is part of it?
Moz Bar | | Creative-Web-Stores0 -
Keyword Difficulty Not Working (using it for AU)
The Keyword Difficulty is not working for AU. Can you get AU KWs to work? Any tips on us getting it to work? We've: deleted KWs and started over. logged out & logged back in. tried from multiple computers. waited hours. Thanks!
Moz Bar | | WME0 -
Is there a good local competitive analysis tool for the UK
Hello Mozers I have learnt from the forum about the competitive analysis tool http://www.51blocks.com/online-marketing-tools/free-local-analysis/ and followed the link - only to find that it is for the US. I'm in the UK and need to access this for google.uk - does anyone know of a UK equivalent? Could I also check with the forum to ask the question that got me into this in the first place. It's probably a daft question. For the Ranking report in Moz, do I just need to put the local city name in front of the keyword to get the local rank. I have been doing this and assuming it's ok, and my local ranking does show up. Thanks Catherine
Moz Bar | | catherine-2793880