Is CloudFlare bad for SEO?
-
I have been hit by DDoS attacks lately...not on a huge scale, but probably done by some "script kiddies" or competitors of mine.
Still, I need to take some action in order to protect my server and my site against all of this spam traffic that is being sent to it. In the process of researching the tools available for defending a website from a DDoS attack, I came across the service offered by CloudFlare.com.
According to the CloudFlare website, they protect your site against a DDoS attack by showing users/visitors they find suspicious an interstitial that asks them if they are a real user or a bot...this interstitial contains a Captcha that suspicious users are asked to enter in order to visit the site.
I'm just wondering what kind of an effect such an interstitial could have on my Google rankings...I can imagine that such a thing could add to increased click-backs to the SERPs and, if Google detects this, to lower rankings.
Has anyone had experience with the DDoS protection services offered by CloudFlare, who can say a word or two regarding any effects this may have on SEO?
Thanks
-
i know this is a old thread and i see where people says cloudflare dont have a bad effect but i need someone to tell me more about it because am scare loosing all my hardwork on my Music niche
-
Wanna know if cloudflare depends on some country and unavailable in some countries? thinking of using this as well on my subscene page
-
it should not negatively impact your ranking in any way shape or form. If you are seeing the speed increase from it it will most likely be a positive effect on your rankings. Google no longer uses IP's so it's fine. to have a reverse proxy in front like CloudFlare. you like it and you think it's fine to help move site, by all means, try it out.
It will only have a negative impact on your rankings if you do something that's almost impossible in block Google Bot with your firewall which is not going to happen unless you really start getting technical with the WAF, in other words, don't worry about it
sincerely,
Tom
-
Seriously I wanted to go for cloudflare too on my music blog because they make site super fast but I'm scared to loose my ranking
Should I or not
-
I agree that they are much better than they where I’m still using Incapsula & Fastly.
I use CloudFlare Enterprise for China.
Glad to hear you’re doing well!
Tom
-
We have hundreds of sites managed through Cloudflare. So far the good far outweighs the bad, although I am beginning to suspect bad neighbors could certainly negatively influence ranking. We have a few comparisons ongoing. We will know for sure in the coming months. I only wish Cloudflare would take a higher stance about which sites it is willing to get in bed with.
Here https://sarkariresultsite.com/ is the our new website which is managed by Cloudflare.
-
With CloudFlare the challenge page you refer to is dependent on your security questions. My knowledge of DDos mitigation is not great, but what I do is have the CloudFlare security settings on Low. If I was to come under attack, I would react and put the security settings on high for the duration.
If the DDos is bad, than you may need the expensive plan that has specialist DDos protection.
today i transfer my site https://sarkariresultsite.in on cloud flare with cloudflare flexible SSL
-
Generally speaking, CAPTCHA based DDoS protection is not advised as it will drive away clients and DDoS bots alike.
Same goes for delay pages.Also, DDoS attacks are swift and can bring site/server down in minutes so the manual approach is risky and probably less effective than it sounds on paper. Even if you are always near your PC, like many of us here are, you`ll still be exposed on weekends, nighttime, launch breaks, etc... Hackers know that and will exploit it. (favorite attack time - VERY EARLY Sunday mornings... )
You should also consider that DDoS can serve as a means to an end. It's often used to "soften" the protective layer to hack the database, inject the site with backdoors, deface or delete it and so on and so forth.
What you really need is a combination of auto-triggering and transparent mitigation, which shies away from intrusive mitigation methods in favor of more subtle progressive challenges (i.e. JS challenge combined with reputation and behavior monitoring).
This may sound fancy but it really this is the emerging industry standard and growing competition between vendors actually drives costs down. -
With CloudFlare the challenge page you refer to is dependent on your security questions. My knowledge of DDos mitigation is not great, but what I do is have the CloudFlare security settings on Low. If I was to come under attack, I would react and put the security settings on high for the duration.
If the DDos is bad, then you may need the expensive plan that has specialist DDos protection.
-
Hi
SEO wise, there are many things to consider before on-boarding a CDN service and bot filtering is one of them.
I've covered the topic in 2 blogs posts about a year ago:1. CDN's SEO related advantages 2. CDN's SEO related myths (and possible issues to consider)
PS: I work for CDN-based security and acceleration service provider - Incapsula.
-
Hi
http://www.neustar.biz/enterprise/ddos-protection
https://www.verisigninc.com/en_US/forms/ddosattackservice.xhtml
http://www.incapsula.com/ddos/anti-ddos-protection
What can happen
If you want a true built for enterprise host that actually has a perfect record and will care more than any other that I know of about security, up time and would you benefit yes you would fire host is the best they offer built-in DoS/DDoS mitigation
2 answer your question about cloud flair I do not feel adding them will give you the same advantages as a enterprise level hosting company.
For instance I believe fire host to be the best let's say you think liquid Web managed dedicated with layer 7 DDoS protection is better.
Well that's up to you and me to make our decisions. Based on past history and our own opinions of the companies.
If you where to add CloudFlare
you would receive CloudFlare layer 7 DDoS protection only once you started paying $200 a month of free cloud for a service is not a system that will protect you against an attack
http://www.cloudflare.com/features-security
There content delivery network as they call it is simply a reverse proxy it's not what other people would call a true CDN once again the issues would be a large with the base plan http://www.cloudflare.com/features-cdn
Your so-called anti-cast DNS CloudFlare says is standard changes your IP address by definition any cast and DNS does not change your IP. There are some methods two get around this but it's not simple.
A $200 a month "CloudFlare Railgun origin network optimizer"
http://www.cloudflare.com/railgun
Will do the same thing as any high end content delivery network as far as fixing the front end code edge cast will do that as will NetDNA, Akamai, numerous others so may I can't list them all.
Information on Akamai stopping attacks
The unique thing is edge cast is very fast so is Akamai you can purchase a Akamai CDN from liquid Web for $120 a month with a terabyte of bandwidth that's a lot.
It will do more than the CloudFlare Railgun including help stop DDoS attacks it will do it faster and if were to spend the money on a liquid Web VPS with DDoS you would be at about $175 a month or you could start off on the base package with fire host and that would cost you $200 a month however for a month $250 you can you can add edge casts outstanding content delivery network
I have accounts with liquid Web and fire host I use fire host primarily and really do not do much with liquid Web however both of them are better than CloudFlare in terms of protection and in terms of speed.
http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/cn-domain-service-restored-following-massive-ddos-attack
I of course have tried to use CloudFlare and found it worthless to me.
My main point is for $200 a month you can get a much faster and safer setup.
The other thing to remember when CloudFlare said it blocked a 300 GB attack that is considered fictitious and debatable by many in the
industry myself included. I don't think switches that At 10 Gb can do that when there's only two pointing at it
Here is a link from cloud flair talking about how good of a job they did saving the Internet and stopping the biggest attack ever. They did not succeed in keeping Spamhaus online so they did not stop the attack in my opinion.
http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
"On Monday, March 18, 2013 Spamhaus contacted CloudFlare regarding an attack they were seeing against their website spamhaus.org. They signed up for CloudFlare and we quickly mitigated the attack." & said there was "more then than 300Gbps of attack traffic"
The other big difference between CF and everyone else is they utilize there any cast network to accept the attack this slows down any one on that network instantly as it did when "the attack that almost broke the Internet happened"
Instead of moving the traffic to a private cloud and dealing with it so it would not affect others using their service they basically did not have any regard for their users at that time.
"The attackers were quiet for a day. Then, on March 22 at 18:00 UTC, the attack resumed, peaking at 120Gbps of traffic hitting our network. As we discussed in the previous blog post, CloudFlare uses Anycast technology which spreads the load of a distributed attack across all our data centers. This allowed us to mitigate the attack without it affecting Spamhaus or any of our other customers. The attackers ceased their attack against the Spamhaus website four hours after it started."
CloudFlare actually spread the attack on to their own customers this is something that harmed everyone using their service that day for I believe five days total.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/Print/2013/03/28/spamhaus_mega_ddos_little_collateral_damage/
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1065748
Nearly half of DDoS attacks in the first half of 2013 are now larger than 1Gbps, up from 13.5 percent in 2012,
http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/prolexic-stops-massive-dns-reflection-attack
largest DNS reflection attack ever recorded,” which peaked at 167Gbps.
If this is now the largest what was the 300gbps?
It is not bad for SEO in itself however using a CAPTCHA page if it thinks your visitors is a attack or bot is very bad & happens allot I know changing your IP address can cause some issues. What I'm getting at is if you want the type of protection you were talking about there are much better methods of going about getting it.
Try them out see what you think you can really only learn more about it.
I hope this helps you,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO rank down 35%
So I recently switched from an Opencart website to a Magento 2 website and my rank has dropped by 35% two weeks later, this is bad news. My old Magento website was 5 years old and was in desperate need of an upgrade, hence the Magento 2 site. I realised today that the canonical URLs on my stores were set to the individual stores as opposed to one store, thus I expect resulting in duplicate content issues (even though Google Webmaster Tools didn't show it). I'm just wondering if anyone else can see something I may be missing? My sites are: thespacecollective.com (primary) thespacecollective.com/us/ (canonical to primary) Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | moon-boots0 -
Unique content for international SEO?
Hi Guys, We have a e-commerce store on generic top-level domain which has 1000s of products in US. We are looking to expand to aus, uk and canda using subfolders. We are going to implement hreflang tags. I was told by our SEO agency we need to make all the content between each page unique. This should be fine for cateogry/product listing pages. But they said we need to make content unique on product pages. If we have 1000 products, thats 4000 pages, which is a big job in terms of creating content. Is this necessary? What is the correct way to approach this, won't the hreflang tag be sufficent to prevent any duplicate content issues with product pages? Cheers.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | geekyseotools0 -
Business Listing sites SEO
How websites like justdial, askme, indiamart, tradeindia do their search engine optimization? Is it different from normal seo? please help
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Obbserv0 -
Negative seo problem
Hello, Someone attacked our website with negative SEO and our website fell drastically. If i use bing webmaster tools link explorer i see dozens and dozens spam links but if open a link i don't find this link in that website. Is it possible that someone added the links and then remove thouse links when we got hit? Or is it possible to hide the links that they don't show up on webpage but they are still there? How can i use Google disavow links tool if there is no links in thouse websites but Bing link explorer shows spam domains pointing to our website. BR, T
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | otsinguturundus0 -
Is a dynamic online user list bad for SEO?
Hello everyone, I have a question that is currently puzzling me, and I hope you can help me with. On musicianspage.com (one of our websites), we show a list of online users embedded within the page which, as you may expect, changes all the time according to who's online at that moment. That list appears on every page of the site, so at any time any page on the site has a different content and different link profile (sometimes we have just a few users connected, other times we may have over 50 users connected at the same time). My question is: is such a "dynamical-embedded" list bad, good or neutral from a SEO stand point? If it is bad, what do you suggest to do? Put it inside a frame? Using AJAX? Any thoughts and suggestions are very welcome! Thanks in advance to anyone reading this. All the best, Fabrizio
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau0 -
Indirect SEO boost from links
I have 2 ecommerce sites, each with a blog. I am increasing my linkbuilding efforts, but I don't want to build too many links directly to my 2 sites over a short period of time. I have decided that I will add a certain number of links to sites/pages that are already linking to my main sites (for example, a blog post on my blog, guest post on another blog, article submission, etc.). How much of a benefit can I expect in terms of rankings? Has anyone tested this out or experimented with something like this? What are the pros and cons? I appreciate thoughtful comments.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | inhouseseo0 -
Seo Hosting
Can anyone suggest me some seo hosting providers?But in better price like hostgator?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nyanainc0 -
Dynamic SEO resources
Hi everyone, Could any of you recommend a good resource to learn about dynamic SEO? Thanks very much, Diana
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Diana.varbanescu0