Link Building
-
I have to develop a strategy for link building.
The SEO guy I have been speaking with has started putting links on .edu sites etc .
To me - this "stinks" of manipulating the search engines - which I know we will get stung by at some point.
I hope this isn't standard practice - but I don't know what the best way to improve rankings in terms of links etc.
We sell health products and are starting to put out 3-4 high quality articles per week.
Ideas?
Kind Regards
Martin
-
Thanks @Chris, Sounds totally agreed, one has to know first all about their products/services, employees, audience, market, prices, and competition etc.
-
Marty,
The quest for better organic search marketing today a quest for knowing who and what you are as a company better than your competitors know who and what they are. The depth of your knowledge about your products/services, employees, audience, market, prices, and competition all distinguish you from your competition. A link building strategy takes some facet of those things and packages them into content of some sort--and it takes a networking effort so that others recognize your depth of knowledge.
I mention that because it kind of gives you an understanding of what it is, exactly, that you're tossing on your SEO vendor's plate. A link building strategy is an extension of a business plan and is not something to be taken lightly.
I know plenty of people out there can say "that's all hogwash, just give me some links on a PR 5 site and get on with it." So be it. Competitor like that come and go. If you're in it for the long-haul, start really studying what your audience needs that is not yet being satisfied, then study available channels you can use to tell them how you are the one to satisfy those needs. After you've been immersed in those two things, the content you can use to tell them your story will come to mind. Your "link building" strategy will be the combination of those three things.
-
Hi,
Link Building is now all about industry related : It's not having as many links as you can, but as having health related websites talking about your articles.
Use MOZ tools in order to find those links
Best,
Benoit.
-
Hi Martin,
That doesn't sound to good indeed. I'm still fairly new to Link building myself, but I'm pretty sure that it's not about getting as many (crappy) links as possible by getting your link up on .edu sites. Also I believe that link building is less and less about having your link on other people's website, and more about social media.
I checked out this mozinar recently and thought it had some good ideas about link building now being more about endorsements: http://moz.com/webinars/winning-the-future-of-search-and-seo Maybe it'll help you with your strategy.
Sophie
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Lower quality new domain link vs higher quality repeat domain link
First time poster here with a dilemma that head scratching and spreadsheets can't solve! I'm trying to work out whether to focus on getting links from new domains or to nurture relationships with the bigger sites in our business and get more links. Of the two links below which does the community here think would be more valuable a signal to Google? Both would be links from within relevant text/post copy. Link 1. Site DA 30. No links currently from this domain. Link 2. Site DA 60. Many links over last 12 months already from this domain. I suspect link 1 but given the enormous disparity in ranking power am I correct?! Thanks for any considered opinions out there! Matthew
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mat20150 -
Do you get links from new websites?
There's a new industry specific website that looks decent. It's clean and nothing spammy. However, it's so new it's DA is under 10. Is it worth pursuing a link from a site like this? On one hand, there's nothing spammy and it is industry specific. On the other...it's just DA is so terrible (worse than any of our other links), I don't want it to hurt us. Any thoughts? Ruben
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | KempRugeLawGroup1 -
If linking to contextual sites is beneficial for SE rankings, what impact does the re=“nofollow” attribute have when applied to these outbound contextual links?
Communities, opinion-formers, even Google representatives, seem to offer a consensus that linking to quality, relevant sites is good practice and therefore beneficial for SEO. Does this still apply when the outbound links are "nofollow"? Is there any good research on this out there?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danielpressley0 -
Building High PR Links
Would this technique work well for ranking? Get a relevant guestpost on a relevant site. Then send high PR links to that page to create pr3-5 relevant links to your main site.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | court120 -
Sitewide footer links - bad or not?
Hi, Sitewide footer links, is this bad for SEO? Basically I see all the time the main navigation repeated in the footer, sometimes as almost something to just fill the footer up. Is this bad for SEO (im guessing it is) and can you explain why you think it is? Cheers
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | activitysuper0 -
Are Links from Homepage safe?
I have the option of getting a link from 2 websites home pages. My site is a financial service website. I want to know if it is safe to do so. The first site is a hotel site, so their content has no relation to my site And the second is a Google News website about finances They have offered me a section in the sidebar to have a sentence or 2 about my site with a link. Can you tell me would these be safe to get? I don't want to be hit by any penalty
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JohnPeters0 -
Removing Canonical Links
We implemented rel=canonical as we decided to paginate our pages. We then ran some testing and on the whole pagination did not work out so we removed all on-page pagination. Now, internally when I click for example a link for Widgets I get the /widgets.php but searching through Google I get to /widgets.php?page=all . There are not redirects in place at the moment. The '?page=all' page has been rated 'A' by the SEOmoz tool under On Page Optimization reports and performs much better than the exact same page without the '?page=all' (the score dips to a 'D' grade) so need to tread carefully so we don't lose the link value. Can anyone advise us on the best way forward? Thanks in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jannkuzel0 -
Should I remove footer links?
I added footer links to my site some months ago as I figured that any authority my home page had would be distributed to several of my other most important pages on my site helping them to rank. Would I be better to remove them and would that improve the authority of my home page as less 'link juice' is being distributed. I did originally set up a page per keyword on my site and start building links to each one but as my home page has a good authority I am going to target several keywords on my home page instead as I have some way to go to improve the authority of my other important pages and think this would be a better solution. It would reduce the number of links I have per page however I did see Matt Cutts say that the no more than 100 links per page rule doesn't apply any more. Do footer links add any SEo value?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SamCUK0