How to handle Local SEO when two businesses merge
-
Hi, I have a landscaping client who is buying another company and merging the two companies together. I trying to figure what the best way to handle this type of situation is. Here are the specifics.
Company A
- I've been working with him for a number of years, he has a really robust site with good content and with really good rankings. I've done a ton of citations, he's in good shape.
- His company has decent name recognition.
Company B
- My client is buying Company B.
- Their site is really poor, no SEO done on site and no directory listing work.
- The company has great name recognition in the community and gets most clients through word of mouth.
- My client has decided to take Company B's name because its a more well known company. He is going to merge the companies, because he doesn't want to have 2 companies from a management standpoint. He plans to keep both physical locations open.
So here are my questions.
- Do I keep both sites live for a period of time and put a message notifying people that "Company A is now Company B Name"? OR
- Do I transfer all the good content from Company A's site to Company B's site and do a 301 redirect of the URL.
- How should I handle the data aggregators and directory listings?
I'm trying to keep all the great natural traffic that Company A gets to its site, start to build traffic around company B's location while following all of Google's policies. I could just start over and in the long-term they'd be fine, but I really love to find a strategy to avoid my client taking a big hit in organic traffic. Thanks in advance Mozzers!
-
Hi John,
Hmm, that does make it a bit tougher, having to put everything on the weaker domain, but I see what you mean in regards to having to go that way for branding purposes. I'm reaching out to one of our traditional SEO experts on staff for additional feedback on this. Please, check back.
-
Hi John,
To add to what Miriam was saying, you can still redirect the stronger domain to the weaker one. You will lose out on a bit of link value but it won't crush your ranking potential. You can conduct the 301 at any time (before or after building the strength of the weaker site). The main issue is to make sure you have the foundation in place for a smooth redirect whenever you decide to do so. That being said, I would suggest the 301 should be conducted before further SEO work continues.
To do this, all you really need to do is provide the same site architecture for Site A and Site B, then redirect page-to-page. After this is complete, SEO to your heart's content on Site B.
You can do it the other way, but it will take more time and you will have to maintain 2 domains while the merge is occurring which might get messy - just depends on the time frame your client has provided.
Hope this helps!
Rob
-
Thanks Miriam, your expertise is greatly appreciated! I agree that Option 2 makes the most sense. The only issue that I see is that the stronger website has the company name in the URL, and that company name is being eliminated. I am basically left with the weaker sites domain name because that will be the company name going forward. Any tips to make a smooth transition bringing the content over? Do I strengthen the site first then work on bringing the content over at the end?
-
Hi John,
So, if I'm understanding correctly, both companies will now be named Company B, but there will remain 2 distinct physical locations. You have 2 options here, that I can see:
Option 1
Make a legal business name change so that you have Company B Boston and Company B Philadelphia as the legal names of the 2 companies and run them separately. Keep the 2 websites, being sure that the NAP on Company B Boston is only on site #1 and that the NAP on Company B Philadelphia is only on site #2. Do not share phone numbers or any other part of the NAP. Edit all citations accordingly.
This option will allow you to maintain the 2 websites and, hopefully, build up the strength of the poorer site over time.
Option 2
This is likely the better option. Name both companies Company B. Bring any good content aboard from the poorer website and then redirect the poorer website to the stronger one. Create a unique landing page on the new, consolidated website for City A and City B, ensuring that the addresses and phone numbers are unique. Edit the citations so that all of them for location A point to the City A landing page and that all of them for location B point to the City B landing page.
This option allows you to go with a single website, single brand and means all of the future work you do is going toward building up the authority of a single, very strong company.
Hope this advice is helpful!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Accurate Rank Checking for Local SEO
Hi all, I am wondering if anyone out there has cracked the enigma of figuring out how to accurately find local rankings for multi-location businesses. I do understand that "accuracy" should be used loosely given the numerous factors that come into play for local such as distance from searcher and business location being located directly in the city of the search. So I definitely get that nothing will be entirely accurate but the programs I have used and the incognito browser approach just seems so far off. Moz tells me something different than the Google Adword Preview Tool which is different than SEMRush which is different than serps.com and so on. I have done the appending to search strings with near=city as well. I unfortunately do not trust any of them at this point. I would LOVE if my company flew me out to every single city we are in so I could do local searches but that is probably not going to happen 🙂 Any thoughts or recommendations for how I can get the most accurate local rank, even if it is an incredibly manual process? Is there an easy way for me to change my location anymore since Google stripped that option away awhile back? That was the ONLY time I felt I was getting somewhat accurate results. Thanks! -Ben
Local Listings | | Davey_Tree1 -
GMB listing not showing for local searches
Hi all, I've optimised an existing GMB listing that has been in place for over a year. The client is a yacht/boat broker and marine repair outfit based in Mallorca. When I search for terms that they 'should' be ranking for on Google and on a Maps search, they are nowhere to be found, yet their listing does show when you type in their company name. I've read lots of Local SEO guides and followed their advice but I'm not sure what I'm meant to do next?
Local Listings | | Bee1590 -
Google Business - Adding location into business name
Hello, I've a client that has many services in different locations and addresses with the same website and phone number. But the thing is they want me to involve location name to business name. Is there a way to add and verify as bulk ?
Local Listings | | omeryamac0 -
Unique Local Citation Descriptions?
Hello! As SEO’s we have always understood that it’s best practice to craft a number of unique descriptions when submitting to local directories, rather than using one generic description across all directories. However, if we look at this logically; An average business owner (even if Google didn't exist) wouldn't bother to vary descriptions. They would have a generic brand template and simply submit the same description to each directory. What do you think? Is having unique descriptions a MUST for Local Business Citations, or is it ok to use one generic one? I look forward to hearing your thoughts, Lee.
Local Listings | | Webpresence0 -
No Appearance in Local pack - group practice favored
Hi, One client has a website, Google My Business etc of his own. He ranks ok to good locally for search terms. However, his entry simply won't show up within the local n-pack (where it objectively should) and also does not appear in the map. It seems to me that instead a group practice with a colleague that has both their names in its name/title. (Moreover, it is in the same spot - they decided to go with different websites and entries of their own, though.) For some reason, this practice is also connected to the ranking website of our client. I suppose (NAP problems and previously used phone tracking numbers aside) that this group practice essentially blocks the real client-entry from appearing. Has anybody made such experiences? (My provisional ToDo would look like: Disconnect the group practice from the client's website; erase/merge it if possible; do proper LocalSEO otherwise.) Regards Nico
Local Listings | | netzkern_AG0 -
Google Local Business SEO
Under "http://moz.com/blog/everybody-needs-local-seo" Q) There is a paragraph saying "If your business has multiple locations, you should have a unique location landing page for each Google Plus Local listing." Does it mean that for each of my shop (location), i have to create an brand new google plus page for it? Q) There is a paragraph saying "you're dealing with a single location, then we're talking about your home page - but these elements should also be locally optimized on product and services pages. City and state in the title tag. City and state in H1 heading" For example, if my country is australia, i have to create a page within my website and the it is optimised to the keywords "Gold Coast | Australia" in my 'product and services page'?
Local Listings | | kevinbp0 -
New Local Search Results Appearance/Rankings?
Hi everybody! My team and I are all noticing a new layout for local search results. We just noticed it today. Mobile and desktop results appear to be affected. Specifically, we are looking at searches like "event spaces in Richmond" and "restaurants in Raleigh" as 2 examples. The listings appear differently in the SERPs, and the top results really are not relevant to the search queries. Is anybody noticing anything similar, or does anyone have any insight into whether this is something Google is testing or if it's here to stay? Also, any advice for overcoming rankings drops as a result of these changes? Thanks in advance!
Local Listings | | TriMarkDigital0 -
Bing Places for Business - Worth It?
Hey Fellow Mozzers, I am trying to determine if Bing Places for Business is worth the time and effort it takes to create listings. My business has 900 locations, and would take some time to create the bulk upload file to load into the Bing Places for Business dashboard. My question is, since Bing already does a good job of creating business listings using data from 3rd party sources such as Yelp and Citysearch, where I already have a strong presence for each of my locations, is there any value in overriding the automatically created business page for each of my location with information that I upload?
Local Listings | | dsinger2