How to improve internal linking for automotive reseller website?
-
Hi everyone,
we set up a website for an automobile reseller. The site is online for about 10 days now and is doing ok. The competition is at a medium level.
The URL is http://fahrzeugankauf-wehrle.de/
Now I wonder how I can improve the internal linking a little more. I already read this one https://moz.com/learn/seo/internal-link but still wonder whether I should link from the sub-pages with the main keywords like "auto kaufen freiburg" oder "autoankauf freiburg" to the mainpage.
Instead I am linking right now from the mainpage to the subpage "Auto verkaufen".Isn't this a bit contradictory?
-
Hi,
How significant did the ranking increase?
Would you be able to go into more detail on how you approached the websites. Since each one would be in different location. Would you take a different approach from a destination location then a high traffic area location.
Thank You!
Scott
-
Hi Rob,
thanks again for this second very detailed answer.
I now do understand that using the silo or thematic architecture is really a good thing to establish and I'm willing to implement it in my client's website.
Now I do have one or two last questions that I am wondering about.
- Let's say I use your proposal Home --> Freiburg --> Auto Purchasing --> Auto Purchasing Freiburg which I find very good.
What do I do about the Freiburg page ? Do I just use an empty page, or do I have to fill it with content about the city of Freiburg? Does it have to show it in the menu or does it have to exist without a menu entry just to be there as a hook for the next page?
What I mean is: People and also Google will maybe wonder a little to read content dealing with Freiburg when coming to a cardealer page.
- Let's say I would use Home Page --> Cars For Sale --> BMWs For Sale --> BMW [Model]
Doesn't this produce a lot of duplicate content? I cannot imaginge having very differing content for pages like BMWs for sale, Audis for sale and Fords for sale...
Thanks again Rob for taking the time!
It really opened my eyes for a big SEO topic and takes me to the next level!
Highly appreciated!
Cheers
Marc
-
Hi Marc,
I had to go digging for this one as it is about 5 years old now, but it is Matt Cutts effectively stating the same thing I did in my answer above:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H49pOqkQPF4
For a better idea of what a silo looks like, you might check out this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNVPkonEW6E
Again, an oldie but a goodie. This stuff has been around for a while and a lot of people have argued about its effectiveness. I'm just saying that in my experience it has worked wonders.
When I say "Website Silo", other names can be "Website Theme" or "Thematic Architecture" or 100 other names. Basically what you are trying to do is categorize every item or service you are selling so as to target long tail keywords as well as categorize your terms for LMI keywords. So in your case, you might try:
Home Page --> Cars For Sale --> BMWs For Sale --> BMW [Model]
since someone looking to buy a BMW is likely to use keywords like "buy a bmw" or "cost of a bmw" or "how much is a bmw" and then you can even break it down to specific models for further long tail targeting.
I used to conduct work like this for the largest auto dealer in North America - I managed about 450 websites for them for over a year with each website correlating to a location. We utilized this strategy for every dealership and the rankings/traffic boost we saw was pretty significant.
It's a lot of work from a web dev perspective, but once it's set up it's tough to beat. It's particularly useful if you only have to target a couple of locations as opposed to an entire continent like we did.
Let me know if you want to discuss how to make it happen - I'm always around to send some info your way.
Cheers,
Rob
-
Hi Robert,
thanks very much for your answer. I saw this kind of several times when looking at competitor sites. I wonder whether this is a procedure that is really appreciated by google. I cannot find any whiteboard Friday about it? Do you know any video from Matt Cutts, Wil Reynolds or Rand talking about this topic?
Best regards
Marc
-
Hi there.
The idea of internal linking is quite simple - link with relevant keyphrase to a page, you want to have some boost amongst internal rankings. It's far not necessary to have an internal link going back to main page from each of sub-pages. Just make sure that every page is accessible and navigation makes sense.
If you have sub pages which are about "Auto verkaufen" (i assume it's quite broad keyword), maybe you should have more narrow topic sub-pages and then link to them with more specific keywords?
-
Hello,
So the main point I would make here is that you are attempting to create relevancy with your internal linking to terms users may be searching for. Where I work, we call this a website silo - creating tiered relevancy based on location, keywords, intent, etc.
For example, a website which features the following architecture:
Home --> Region --> Service --> Keyword Term
Will do better than a website which features:
Home --> Keyword Term
Because such a structure is self-limiting (how many links can you really have coming off your Home Page?) and it poses technical ranking problems (a Home Page with hundreds of links coming off of it will look spammy).
This is going to be a huge factor moving forward, especially with Local SEO becoming more and more prevalent in algorithmic updates.
So you might try:
Home --> Freiburg --> Auto Sales --> Auto Sales Freiburg
Home --> Freiburg --> Auto Purchasing --> Auto Purchasing Freiburg
(Or whatever keywords you have lined up)
This means you can expand your site at a later date along geographical or service-oriented lines, and you will have created the relevancy that Google wants when showcasing organic listings.
Hope this helps and feel free to touch base with any further questions.
All the best,
Rob
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are These Links Junk?
I hired an SEO to create incoming links to me website insisting that only white hat techniques be used. The SEO was highly recommended by a family friend. In 3 months about 14 links to my site were obtained. The URLs for the domains where the links originate are below. I paid $8,000 for the services of the SEO provider to create the links over 4 months. When I looked at the links more carefully I noticed that the sites did not seem to have owners. That there was no phone number, physical address and scant information about ownership. I also noticed that most pages had outgoing links of a promotional nature. Also, that content created for me had grammatical and occasional spelling errors. The links did not look bad in terms of MOZ domain authority and MOZ page authority, but when I went subscribed to AHREFS a few days ago and evaluated the links, I noticed that the URL rating (somewhat equivalent to MOZ page authority) was really low. Furthermore, noticed that one of the domains solicits paid links from gambling sites. The SEO who sourced the links on my behalf says he will explain why I "have nothing to worry about". Dividing his monthly fee by the number of links and I paid $571 per link. Is it possible the the below domains could have pages that I would want links from? Would these links be potentially worth more than a few hundred dollars? O are these sites more like a cheap PBN or maybe "the hoth". If the links are in fact good I would be delighted. But if they are of poor quality could I legitimately ask for a refund? Also, are these domains so bad that it is imperative for me to get the links removed? <colgroup><col width="198"></colgroup>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
| https://www.equities.com |
| http://www.realestaterama.com |
| https://moneyinc.com |
| https://homebusinessmag.com |
| http://digitalconnectmag.com |
| https://suburbanfinance.com/ |
| http://www.homebunch.com |
| http://inman.com |
| https://www.propertytalk.com/ |
| http://activerain.com |
| https://www.conservativedailynews.com/ |
| http://moneyforlunch.com/ |
| http://baltimorepostexaminer.com/ |
| https://www.tgdaily.com/ |
| |0 -
Base href + relative link href for canonical link
I have a site that in the head section we specify a base href being the domain with a trailing slash and a canonical link href being the relative link to the domain. <base <="" span="">href="http://www.domain.com/" /> href="link-to-page.html" rel="canonical" /> I know that Google recommends using an absolute path as a canonical link but is specifying a base href with a relative canonical link the same thing or is it still seen as duplicate content?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Nobody16116990439410 -
HTTPS website migration and internal links
Hey Moz! I read Moz's guide on migrating websites from http to https, and it seems changing all relative internal links to absolute https is recommended (we currently use relative internal links). But is doing this absolutely necessary if we will already have a redirect in our .htaccess file forcing all http pages to https? Changing all of our internal links to absolute https will be very time consuming, and I'd like to hear your thoughts as to whether it's absolutely recommended/necessary; and if so, why? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TheDude0 -
SEO Impact of High Volume Vertical and Horizontal Internal Linking
Hello Everyone - I maintain a site with over a million distinct pages of content. Each piece of content can be thought of like a node in graph database or an entity. While there is a bit of natural hierarchy, every single entity can be related to one or more other entities. The conceptual structure of the entities like so: Agency - A top level business unit ( ~100 pages/urls) Office - A lower level business unit, part of an Agency ( ~5,000 pages/urls) Person - Someone who works in one or more Offices ( ~80,000 pages/urls) Project - A thing one or more People is managing ( ~750,000 pages/urls) Vendor - A company that is working on one or more Projects ( ~250,000 pages/urls) Category - A descriptive entity, defining one or more Projects ( ~1,000 pages/urls) Each of these six entities has a unique (url) and content. For each page/url, there are internal links to each of the related entity pages. For example, if a user is looking at a Project page/url, there will be an internal link to one or more Agencies, Offices, People, Vendors, and Categories. Also, a Project will have links to similar Projects. This same theory holds true for all other entities as well. People pages link to their related Agencies, Offices, Projects, Vendors, etc, etc. If you start to do the math, there are tons of internal links leading to pages with tons of internal links leading to pages with tons of internal links. While our users enjoy the ability to navigate this world according to these relationships, I am curious if we should force a more strict hierarchy for SEO purposes. Essentially, does it make sense to "nofollow" all of the horizontal internal links for a given entity page/url? For search engine indexing purposes, we have legit sitemaps that give a simple vertical hierarchy...but I am curious if all of this internal linking should be hidden via nofollow...? Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jhariani2 -
Need assistance in improving SEO of website
Dear SEO Expert, We run a website www.guitarmonk.com. Moz has told us of some errors at our website viz.: Especially duplicate content etc and whatever in addition you suggest should be good for the website for certain relative important keywords. Regards
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Guitarmonk0 -
Website URL Structure - keyword targeting on homepage vs internal pages
I have developed a few websites before where the homepage contains the content for the keywords I was targeting. This has been reasonably successful as I have found it easy enough to get links to the homepage. I am considering a new site in a totally different industry that I am thinking about structuring like this: mybrand.com (not necessarily targeting any keywords) mybrand.com/important-keyword-1/ (definitely want to target) mybrand.com/important-keyword-2 (equally important as 1st keyword) There will be several (30-ish) other pages targeting keywords but they are not as significant as the two mentioned above, more so they are about publishing informative information. The two important keywords are quite different but industry related. My questions are: should I be careful targeting keywords away from the homepage when the homepage gets the most links? Would I be better off building 2 different websites where the keyword content is captured in the homepage? Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BGu0 -
To recover from Penguin update, shall i remove the links or disavow links?
Hi, One of our websites hit by Penguin update and I now know where the links are coming from. I have chance to remove the links from those incoming links but I am a little confused whether i should just remove the links from incoming links or disavow the links? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Rubix0 -
Links from Directories
We are currently listed in a number of Association Buyer's Guides. We signed up for these last year in an effort to increase our external links. With recent Panda changes, do these links carry any value for us? Here are some examples: http://buyersguideforeducators.com/ http://wasteindustrymarketplace.com/ http://wefbuyersguide.com/ We're in about 40-50 of these different directories. Thanks, Ben
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Colbys0