Hidden text that's not really "hidden" - seo
-
Hi guys,
I have a question for you about a thing I saw on a website.
I've attached the prints.
They have like "hidden text". It must be good for indexation, they can
target a lot of important keywords in it, and still keep the website
"clean".
Is this penalized by google if discovered? Do they see this as black hat?Thanks,
Ricardo
?name=Captura+de+ecra%CC%83+2012-08-11%2C+a%CC%80s+06.00.36.png ?name=Captura+de+ecra%CC%83+2012-08-11%2C+a%CC%80s+06.00.36.png ?name=Captura+de+ecra%CC%83+2012-08-11%2C+a%CC%80s+05.59.56.png
-
I don't think this is black hat stuff. It looks like some type of rotating banner like lots of sites have. Now, if the so called "hidden" text is just a random list of keywords then this would look more manipulative.
In my mind, hidden text is more like when someone displays the text off of the screen with CSS or uses white text on a white background.
-
When deciding if a technique is black hat, we need to specifically state which one of Google's Guidelines the presentation violates. Google's Guidelines are broken in to three areas: Design and Content Guidelines, Technical Guidelines, and Quality Guidelines. A quick review of the first two areas shows the page does not violate those guidelines. The question is whether this method violations Google's Quality Guidelines.
The only specific Quality Guidelines one would suggest this site violates is "hidden text and links". Clearly, the method used here does not violate that guideline. From the Google site:
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66353
Hiding text or links in your content can cause your site to be perceived as untrustworthy since it presents information to search engines differently than to visitors. Text (such as excessive keywords) can be hidden in several ways, including:
- Using white text on a white background
- Including text behind an image
- Using CSS to hide text
- Setting the font size to 0
So none of the "specific guidelines" are violated. The next question is whether the site violates any of the "basic principles". There is only one which causes concern:
Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of thumb is whether you'd feel comfortable explaining what you've done to a website that competes with you. Another useful test is to ask, "Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?"
The question is whether a Google Spam Team member would manually penalize a site solely for this particular issue. The spam team members are highly calibrated and must follow strict guidelines. In my experience they would not presently penalize such a page, but I would love to receive a definitive response. Even if the question was asked directly, we would likely receive general info rather then "yes this violates our guidelines" or "no, it does not". It does not seem to go far enough to violate the guidelines.
Either way, I would state my belief the presentation on this site (scasino.com) is not helpful for users and should not be used in its present format. If it was a rotating banner that automatically cycled through the 5 pages, then clearly it would be fine. The only reason the question arises is the user needs to take an action, clicking one of the numbers, in order for the content to display.
Google has come a long way recently. With their "Above The Fold" update and other changes, I am confident Google understands what content is immediately visible on the page, what content the user is likely to engage with (i.e. scroll down on the page) and what content users are unlikely to engage with (such as pressing these numbers).
I don't believe much in "grey hat". Something either complies with Google Guidelines, or it does not. With that said, this particular issue is subject to the interpretation of Google as to how likely a user is to interact with this setup, and whether they believe this technique was done deliberately to manipulate search rankings.
In summary, my response is NO, it would not draw a manual penalty.
-
I agree with Host1.
Stay away from these practices.
-
Yes, this is seen as black hat by google and will be penalized.
See http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66353
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What's a good way to find recent blog posts about a given topic?
Let's say I want to find blog posts posted in the past week or so about "key west". These posts could be on a personal blog, travel blog, etc. Google News is mostly news sites (not blogs) and Google blog search doesn't work any more. What other good options are there? So far Open site Explorer Just Discovered is the best option I've found, but there is a lot of other stuff mixed in with a few blog posts.
Content Development | | AdamThompson1 -
Difference in Forum and Blog for SEO
I was pushing my employer to agree to switch to add a blog onto our site and he asked me, what is the difference between the blog and a forum for SEO purposes. Besides the general look and feel and a forum being more community oriented, is a blog better than a forum for seo, and if so, why? It can be vice-versa I just need to fully understand this myself so I can begin to work on one and explain it to my employer. If anyone can provide any insight, it will be much appreciated.
Content Development | | ithvac0 -
How "much" schema.org is "too much"?
In terms of adding schema.org information to web pages, how critical is it for SERP? Can anyone recommend a model of what to tag? For example, on a single blog post I could tag the "article" and the "author", but I could also tag the logo that's in the header on every page. How much is "enough"? What is the relationship between schema.org and rel="author" tags? Thank you!
Content Development | | Titan5520 -
Does Google really ignore Noindex pages?
Assume I may have some pages of my site that don't have a lot of text on them, and I have to keep them on the site. Let's say there are no more than 50 like this out of 400 great pages, and the ratio of great-to-short pages continues to increase. If I no index the short ones, will Google really ignore them in search? Will they ignore them enough to not downrank my site due to the short, noindexed pages? I know, theoretically, they are supposed to ignore them, but I don't always trust all the rules.
Content Development | | bizzer0 -
Does a Google Map on the contact page help with SEO?
In regards to ranking organically for local search results (not google places), I'm wondering if there is any benefit to having a Google Map on my Contact page with our location pinned? If so, how important do you think it is?
Content Development | | pharcydeabc0 -
Recos for SEO friendly blog for asp.net environment?
Can anyone recommend a blog platform for asp.net server environment that has SEO friendly components/plugins available? Client is migrating a Wordpress blog at wants recommendations as the internal requirement for the project is that the blog is hosted on asp.net. Thanks in advance for the help!
Content Development | | MRM-McCANN0 -
Is Creating a Lot of Content A Bad SEO Strategy?
In Danny Dover's book, Search Engine Optimization Secrets, he talks about how every page on your site should be at least a little linkworthy, or it is just sucking link juice from the rest of the site and not contributing any. Does this mean that creating a lot of content, (like a daily news article on your site that summarizes industry news or something similar) is not a good SEO strategy? Should you limit the amount of content pages on your site unless it can attract links or hits on one of your target keywords? Thanks!
Content Development | | SparkplugDigital0 -
What plugins & tactics are you using for Wordpress meta SEO?
Currently I use All-In-One SEO and I quite like how simple it is to setup and it's stable. Is that still one of the best ones? What are you using these days? Is it worth stripping out the superfluous meta tags that Wordpress now puts in? Is there any value to adding meta descriptions to all my Tag pages and if so, is there a good plugin that will auto magically create unique descriptions for these pages? Same goes for my paginated archives. Thanks!
Content Development | | flowsimple0