How Does Google's "index" find the location of pages in the "page directory" to return?
-
This is my understanding of how Google's search works, and I am unsure about one thing in specific:
- Google continuously crawls websites and stores each page it finds (let's call it "page directory")
- Google's "page directory" is a cache so it isn't the "live" version of the page
- Google has separate storage called "the index" which contains all the keywords searched. These keywords in "the index" point to the pages in the "page directory" that contain the same keywords.
- When someone searches a keyword, that keyword is accessed in the "index" and returns all relevant pages in the "page directory"
- These returned pages are given ranks based on the algorithm
The one part I'm unsure of is how Google's "index" knows the location of relevant pages in the "page directory". The keyword entries in the "index" point to the "page directory" somehow. I'm thinking each page has a url in the "page directory", and the entries in the "index" contain these urls. Since Google's "page directory" is a cache, would the urls be the same as the live website (and would the keywords in the "index" point to these urls)?
For example if webpage is found at wwww.website.com/page1, would the "page directory" store this page under that url in Google's cache?
The reason I want to discuss this is to know the effects of changing a pages url by understanding how the search process works better.
-
Yeah that makes sense. I also have a lot of experience with databases and the back ends of websites so I know your language.
I'm wondering how Google correlates the url with the page entries then. Maybe each page entry would have a url field so Google knows the location of the live version to constantly update that entry in the "page directory" database?
-
That is a question that no one here can answer. We cant speak for how Google does things internally.
but.... as a web / database programmer for 14+ years let me tell you how its "generally" done
Usually when you have to link to separate sets of data together (ie. database or tables) there is usually a unique_id created to link them which usually is never changed. So when a new record is created that record will live with that ID for its life, also known as a (unique identifier which tends to be an auto-incremented number that is dynamically generated and can not be repeated).
Since records tend to be linked this way, any other fields that exist in the record (firstName, lastName, Url, blah blah) then can be changed without the original ID being disturbed.
So to answer your question from my experience I would assume Google links from a unique identifier of some sort and not the URL directly.
Hope I didn't lose you, its my favorite subject...but no one here speaks that language to much
-
That makes sense, thanks for getting back to me so fast!
Perhaps you can help answer my next question. I have a client who used to host his domain at "www.oldurl.com", and has migrated his website to "www.newurl.com". He wants to use his old domain "www.oldurl.com", so he setup forwarding/masking so that when someone tries to access "www.oldurl.com" they are forwarded to "www.newurl.com" but the url shown to the user is "www.oldurl.com".
My client want his old url "www.oldurl.com" to be ranked in Google, but from what I understand his new url will be ranked. I know masking is really bad for SEO, and I want to educate my client as to why on the technical side. I have read Google see's all the content as duplicate with masking. Do you know the details as to why?
-
Hey Cesar,
Thanks for the links! Really useful info there.
Unfortunately they I couldn't find the answer I was looking for so I'll be more specific in what I'm asking.
From what I understand Google uses two database systems. One contains keywords and the other contains cached pages. How does a keyword entry point to a page entry? Does it use a unique id number, or does it use the url that page is using in the "live" vesion on the web?
-
Just because you create a new page and delete the old one, Google won't know immediately about it. So if Google crawls the new page before it's had a chance to crawl the old one, then it will indeed consider the new page to be duplicate content. Then when it tries to crawl the old page, it will discover that it no longer exists. However, as long as links to the old page exist, it will continue to try to crawl that page. Eventually it may de-index the old page if it keeps returning an error.
Bottom line, if you are moving content to a new URL, be sure to include a 301 redirect on the old page so that Google (and other search engines) know that the piece of content has moved. You can also do this with canonical tags, but 301s are more effective.
-
Thanks for the response and links Takeshi. Maybe I can rephrase the question to be more clear. Let's say a piece of content (or page) is at the url "www.oldurl.com/page". During a migration this same piece of content now at the url "www.newurl.com/page". The "www.oldurl.com" doesn't exist anymore so there isn't duplicate content in the live web.
Would Google create a new entry in it's "page directory" (what is the industry standard name for this directory?) and give it the url "www.newurl.com/page"?
If it does create a new entry, would Google keep the old entry "www.oldurl.com/page" although the old url doesn't exist in the "live" web anymore?
-
Wow you just asked questions that would require about 10,000,000,000 answers
Lets start here
- Video from the man himself Mr. Matt Cutts - Matt Cutts (Works for Google)
- Great Web 2.0 Page create from Google themself - (Google Them self)
- Older but still relevant description about how "backlinks" affect PR - (Google Them self)
-
This a pretty confusing question, and the terminology you use is different from industry standard. Check out these links for a quick overview of how Google works:
- http://www.google.com/insidesearch/howsearchworks/thestory/
- http://www.googleguide.com/google_works.html
If you are just worried about changing a page's url, just be sure to put in a 301 redirect from the old page to the new page. That way, even if Google has an older version of the page indexed, it will automatically redirect the user to the new page as well as help Google discover the new location of the page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I'm struggling to understand (and fix) why I'm getting a 404 error. The URL includes this "%5Bnull%20id=43484%5D" but I cannot find that anywhere in the referring URL. Does anyone know why please? Thanks
Can you help with how to fix this 404 error please? It appears that I have a redirect from one page to the other, although the referring page URL works, but it appears to be linking to another URL with this code at the end of the the URL - %5Bnull%20id=43484%5D that I'm struggling to find and fix. Thanks
Technical SEO | | Nichole.wynter20200 -
What's best practice for cart pages?
i don't mean e-commerce site in general, but the actual cart page itself. What's best practice for the links that customers click to add products to the cart, and the cart page itself? Also, I use vanity URLs for my cart links which redirect to the actual cart page with the parameters applied. Should I use use 301 or 302 redirects for the links? Do I make the cart page's canonical tag point back to the store home page so that I'm not accruing link juice to a page that customers don't actually want to land on from search? I'm kinda surprised at the dearth of information out there on this, or maybe I'm not looking in the right places?
Technical SEO | | VM-Oz0 -
Joomla creating duplicate pages, then the duplicate page's canonical points to itself - help!
Using Joomla, every time I create an article a subsequent duplicate page is create, such as: /latest-news/218-image-stabilization-task-used-to-develop-robot-brain-interface and /component/content/article?id=218:image-stabilization-task-used-to-develop-robot-brain-interface The latter being the duplicate. This wouldn't be too much of a problem, but the canonical tag on the duplicate is pointing to itself.. creating mayhem in Moz and Webmaster tools. We have hundreds of duplicates across our website and I'm very concerned with the impact this is having on our SEO! I've tried plugins such as sh404SEF and Styleware extensions, however to no avail. Can anyone help or know of any plugins to fix the canonicals?
Technical SEO | | JamesPearce0 -
Google's "cache:" operator is returning a 404 error.
I'm doing the "cache:" operator on one of my sites and Google is returning a 404 error. I've swapped out the domain with another and it works fine. Has anyone seen this before? I'm wondering if G is crawling the site now? Thx!
Technical SEO | | AZWebWorks0 -
On-Page Report Says 'F', and I'm Confoozled As to Why
I'm primarily interested in how we failed in our "Broad Keyword Usage in Title" category. The Keyword Pair we're gunnin' for is: "Mac Windows" Our current page title is: "CrossOver: Windows on Mac and Linux with the easiest and most affordable emulator - CodeWeavers" This is, I grant, ugly. However, bear with me. SEOMoz Report Card says "Easy Fix!" and suggests: "Employ the keyword in the page title, preferrably as the first words in the element." I humbly submit that "Mac" and "Windows" IS in the page title. So what am I missing? Is it the placement of the words relative to each other, or relative to the start of the sentence? Or is the phrase "CrossOver:" somehow blocking the rest of the sentence from being read? Are colons evil? I'm genuinely mystified as to why (from a structural standpoint) our existing title tag is failing this test, and I'd be delighted for answers and/or feedback. Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | CodeWeavers0 -
Should we use "and" or "&"?
Our client has an ampersand in their brand name. The logo has "&", their url is spelled out. I'm trying to get them to standardize the use of the name for directories/listings. Should we use "and" or "&"?
Technical SEO | | vernonmack0 -
For Google + purposes, should the author's name appear in the Meta description or title tag of my web site just as you would your key search phrase?
Relative to Cyrus Shepard's article on January 4th regarding Google's Superior SEO strategy, if I'm the primary author of all blog articles and web site content, and I have a link showing authorship going back to Google Plus, is a site wide link from the home page enough or should that show up on all blog posts etc and editorial comment pages etc? Conversely, should the author's name appear in the Meta description or title tag of my web site just as you would your key search phrase since Google appears to be trying to make a solid connection with my name, and all content?
Technical SEO | | lwnickens0 -
Can JavaScrip affect Google's index/ranking?
We have changed our website template about a month ago and since then we experienced a huge drop in rankings, especially with our home page. We kept the same url structure on entire website, pretty much the same content and the same on-page seo. We kind of knew we will have a rank drop but not that huge. We used to rank with the homepage on the top of the second page, and now we lost about 20-25 positions. What we changed is that we made a new homepage structure, more user-friendly and with much more organized information, we also have a slider presenting our main services. 80% of our content on the homepage is included inside the slideshow and 3 tabs, but all these elements are JavaScript. The content is unique and is seo optimized but when I am disabling the JavaScript, it becomes completely unavailable. Could this be the reason for the huge rank drop? I used the Webmaster Tolls' Fetch as Googlebot tool and it looks like Google reads perfectly what's inside the JavaScrip slideshow so I did not worried until now when I found this on SEOMoz: "Try to avoid ... using javascript ... since the search engines will ... not indexed them ... " One more weird thing is that although we have no duplicate content and the entire website has been cached, for a few pages (including the homepage), the picture snipet is from the old website. All main urls are the same, we removed some old ones that we don't need anymore, so we kept all the inbound links. The 301 redirects are properly set. But still, we have a huge rank drop. Also, (not sure if this important or not), the robots.txt file is disallowing some folders like: images, modules, templates... (Joomla components). We still have some html errors and warnings but way less than we had with the old website. Any advice would be much appreciated, thank you!
Technical SEO | | echo10