Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
How Does Google's "index" find the location of pages in the "page directory" to return?
-
This is my understanding of how Google's search works, and I am unsure about one thing in specific:
- Google continuously crawls websites and stores each page it finds (let's call it "page directory")
- Google's "page directory" is a cache so it isn't the "live" version of the page
- Google has separate storage called "the index" which contains all the keywords searched. These keywords in "the index" point to the pages in the "page directory" that contain the same keywords.
- When someone searches a keyword, that keyword is accessed in the "index" and returns all relevant pages in the "page directory"
- These returned pages are given ranks based on the algorithm
The one part I'm unsure of is how Google's "index" knows the location of relevant pages in the "page directory". The keyword entries in the "index" point to the "page directory" somehow. I'm thinking each page has a url in the "page directory", and the entries in the "index" contain these urls. Since Google's "page directory" is a cache, would the urls be the same as the live website (and would the keywords in the "index" point to these urls)?
For example if webpage is found at wwww.website.com/page1, would the "page directory" store this page under that url in Google's cache?
The reason I want to discuss this is to know the effects of changing a pages url by understanding how the search process works better.
-
Yeah that makes sense. I also have a lot of experience with databases and the back ends of websites so I know your language.
I'm wondering how Google correlates the url with the page entries then. Maybe each page entry would have a url field so Google knows the location of the live version to constantly update that entry in the "page directory" database?
-
That is a question that no one here can answer. We cant speak for how Google does things internally.
but.... as a web / database programmer for 14+ years let me tell you how its "generally" done
Usually when you have to link to separate sets of data together (ie. database or tables) there is usually a unique_id created to link them which usually is never changed. So when a new record is created that record will live with that ID for its life, also known as a (unique identifier which tends to be an auto-incremented number that is dynamically generated and can not be repeated).
Since records tend to be linked this way, any other fields that exist in the record (firstName, lastName, Url, blah blah) then can be changed without the original ID being disturbed.
So to answer your question from my experience I would assume Google links from a unique identifier of some sort and not the URL directly.
Hope I didn't lose you, its my favorite subject...but no one here speaks that language to much
-
That makes sense, thanks for getting back to me so fast!
Perhaps you can help answer my next question. I have a client who used to host his domain at "www.oldurl.com", and has migrated his website to "www.newurl.com". He wants to use his old domain "www.oldurl.com", so he setup forwarding/masking so that when someone tries to access "www.oldurl.com" they are forwarded to "www.newurl.com" but the url shown to the user is "www.oldurl.com".
My client want his old url "www.oldurl.com" to be ranked in Google, but from what I understand his new url will be ranked. I know masking is really bad for SEO, and I want to educate my client as to why on the technical side. I have read Google see's all the content as duplicate with masking. Do you know the details as to why?
-
Hey Cesar,
Thanks for the links! Really useful info there.
Unfortunately they I couldn't find the answer I was looking for so I'll be more specific in what I'm asking.
From what I understand Google uses two database systems. One contains keywords and the other contains cached pages. How does a keyword entry point to a page entry? Does it use a unique id number, or does it use the url that page is using in the "live" vesion on the web?
-
Just because you create a new page and delete the old one, Google won't know immediately about it. So if Google crawls the new page before it's had a chance to crawl the old one, then it will indeed consider the new page to be duplicate content. Then when it tries to crawl the old page, it will discover that it no longer exists. However, as long as links to the old page exist, it will continue to try to crawl that page. Eventually it may de-index the old page if it keeps returning an error.
Bottom line, if you are moving content to a new URL, be sure to include a 301 redirect on the old page so that Google (and other search engines) know that the piece of content has moved. You can also do this with canonical tags, but 301s are more effective.
-
Thanks for the response and links Takeshi. Maybe I can rephrase the question to be more clear. Let's say a piece of content (or page) is at the url "www.oldurl.com/page". During a migration this same piece of content now at the url "www.newurl.com/page". The "www.oldurl.com" doesn't exist anymore so there isn't duplicate content in the live web.
Would Google create a new entry in it's "page directory" (what is the industry standard name for this directory?) and give it the url "www.newurl.com/page"?
If it does create a new entry, would Google keep the old entry "www.oldurl.com/page" although the old url doesn't exist in the "live" web anymore?
-
Wow you just asked questions that would require about 10,000,000,000 answers
Lets start here
- Video from the man himself Mr. Matt Cutts - Matt Cutts (Works for Google)
- Great Web 2.0 Page create from Google themself - (Google Them self)
- Older but still relevant description about how "backlinks" affect PR - (Google Them self)
-
This a pretty confusing question, and the terminology you use is different from industry standard. Check out these links for a quick overview of how Google works:
- http://www.google.com/insidesearch/howsearchworks/thestory/
- http://www.googleguide.com/google_works.html
If you are just worried about changing a page's url, just be sure to put in a 301 redirect from the old page to the new page. That way, even if Google has an older version of the page indexed, it will automatically redirect the user to the new page as well as help Google discover the new location of the page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Not Indexing Pages (Wordpress)
Hello, recently I started noticing that google is not indexing our new pages or our new blog posts. We are simply getting a "Discovered - Currently Not Indexed" message on all new pages. When I click "Request Indexing" is takes a few days, but eventually it does get indexed and is on Google. This is very strange, as our website has been around since the late 90's and the quality of the new content is neither duplicate nor "low quality". We started noticing this happening around February. We also do not have many pages - maybe 500 maximum? I have looked at all the obvious answers (allowing for indexing, etc.), but just can't seem to pinpoint a reason why. Has anyone had this happen recently? It is getting very annoying having to manually go in and request indexing for every page and makes me think there may be some underlying issues with the website that should be fixed.
Technical SEO | | Hasanovic1 -
Does Google index internal anchors as separate pages?
Hi, Back in September, I added a function that sets an anchor on each subheading (h[2-6]) and creates a Table of content that links to each of those anchors. These anchors did show up in the SERPs as JumpTo Links. Fine. Back then I also changed the canonicals to a slightly different structur and meanwhile there was some massive increase in the number of indexed pages - WAY over the top - which has since been fixed by removing (410) a complete section of the site. However ... there are still ~34.000 pages indexed to what really are more like 4.000 plus (all properly canonicalised). Naturally I am wondering, what google thinks it is indexing. The number is just way of and quite inexplainable. So I was wondering: Does Google save JumpTo links as unique pages? Also, does anybody know any method of actually getting all the pages in the google index? (Not actually existing sites via Screaming Frog etc, but actual pages in the index - all methods I found sadly do not work.) Finally: Does somebody have any other explanation for the incongruency in indexed vs. actual pages? Thanks for your replies! Nico
Technical SEO | | netzkern_AG0 -
Are image pages considered 'thin' content pages?
I am currently doing a site audit. The total number of pages on the website are around 400... 187 of them are image pages and coming up as 'zero' word count in Screaming Frog report. I needed to know if they will be considered 'thin' content by search engines? Should I include them as an issue? An answer would be most appreciated.
Technical SEO | | MTalhaImtiaz0 -
Why is Google's cache preview showing different version of webpage (i.e. not displaying content)
My URL is: http://www.fslocal.comRecently, we discovered Google's cached snapshots of our business listings look different from what's displayed to users. The main issue? Our content isn't displayed in cached results (although while the content isn't visible on the front-end of cached pages, the text can be found when you view the page source of that cached result).These listings are structured so everything is coded and contained within 1 page (e.g. http://www.fslocal.com/toronto/auto-vault-canada/). But even though the URL stays the same, we've created separate "pages" of content (e.g. "About," "Additional Info," "Contact," etc.) for each listing, and only 1 "page" of content will ever be displayed to the user at a time. This is controlled by JavaScript and using display:none in CSS. Why do our cached results look different? Why would our content not show up in Google's cache preview, even though the text can be found in the page source? Does it have to do with the way we're using display:none? Are there negative SEO effects with regards to how we're using it (i.e. we're employing it strictly for aesthetics, but is it possible Google thinks we're trying to hide text)? Google's Technical Guidelines recommends against using "fancy features such as JavaScript, cookies, session IDs, frames, DHTML, or Flash." If we were to separate those business listing "pages" into actual separate URLs (e.g. http://www.fslocal.com/toronto/auto-vault-canada/contact/ would be the "Contact" page), and employ static HTML code instead of complicated JavaScript, would that solve the problem? Any insight would be greatly appreciated.Thanks!
Technical SEO | | fslocal0 -
Can you noindex a page, but still index an image on that page?
If a blog is centered around visual images, and we have specific pages with high quality content that we plan to index and drive our traffic, but we have many pages with our images...what is the best way to go about getting these images indexed? We want to noindex all the pages with just images because they are thin content... Can you noindex,follow a page, but still index the images on that page? Please explain how to go about this concept.....
Technical SEO | | WebServiceConsulting.com0 -
Correct linking to the /index of a site and subfolders: what's the best practice? link to: domain.com/ or domain.com/index.html ?
Dear all, starting with my .htaccess file: RewriteEngine On
Technical SEO | | inlinear
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.inlinear.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://inlinear.com/$1 [R=301,L] RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^./index.html
RewriteRule ^(.)index.html$ http://inlinear.com/ [R=301,L] 1. I redirect all URL-requests with www. to the non www-version...
2. all requests with "index.html" will be redirected to "domain.com/" My questions are: A) When linking from a page to my frontpage (home) the best practice is?: "http://domain.com/" the best and NOT: "http://domain.com/index.php" B) When linking to the index of a subfolder "http://domain.com/products/index.php" I should link also to: "http://domain.com/products/" and not put also the index.php..., right? C) When I define the canonical ULR, should I also define it just: "http://domain.com/products/" or in this case I should link to the definite file: "http://domain.com/products**/index.php**" Is A) B) the best practice? and C) ? Thanks for all replies! 🙂
Holger0 -
How do I add "noindex" or "nofollow" to a link in Wordpress
It's been a while since I've SEOed a Wordpress site. How do I add "nofollow" or "noindex" to specific links? I highlight the anchor text in the text editor, I click the "link" button. I could have sworn that there used to be an option in the dialogue box that pops up.
Technical SEO | | CsmBill0 -
Can I format my H1 to be smaller than H2's and H3's on the same page?
I would like to create a web design with 12px H1 and for sub headings on the page to be more like 24px. Will search engines see this and dislike it? The reason for doing it is that I want to put a generic page title in the banner, and more poetic headings above the main body. Example: Small H1: Wholesale coffee, online coffee shop and London roastery Large h2: Respect the bean... Thanks
Technical SEO | | Crumpled_Dog
Scott0