Sub-domain or sub-directory for mobile version
-
sub-domain or sub-directory for mobile version
advantages or dis-advangages?
-
Ok, in my opinion mobile website are not the actual part of the main website (mobile website do not have same status as blog) so it is intelligent to go with sub domain but always keep the visitor’s sensor on so if they are coming from smart phone or ipad it should open a mobile website for them but if they are coming from desktop or laptop in that case it should be the main website for web.
-
domain.mobi (Subdirectory)
Pros
- Carrier transcoding. Sprint PCS in the US and Vodaphone in the UK transcode (modify websites) that you load on your phone for the best experiences (although, it breaks some websites). These carriers assume .mobi is mobile-friendly and do not modify their content.
- .mobi means mobile-friendly and is best for search: Some search engines can be set to only search .mobi domains with the assumption that they're all mobile-friendly. Although, this area is very new and search engines can determine a mobile-friendly site via other methods, this is one area of speculation.
- Brandable. Some might say that .mobi is more brand-able than m.domain.com. For instance, it's easier to tell people to go to http://domain.mobi and build a campaign around it than http://m.domain.com.
- Separate control. This might be important for an agency who is building a mobile website for a client. If they wanted to purchase and host the domain names themselves, they can. This can speed up the process for getting a domain established for the mobile site.
Cons
- Opportunity for domain squatters. Several companies own their domain.com, but they don't always own the .net/.org variations. This could either be due to never having thought about it, lack of interest, or the .net/.org being owned by a domain squatter. The domain squatter also has the opportunity to purchase domain.mobi
- More effort to type. .mobi takes longer to type than .com thanks to the .com button on most smartphones. At the end of the day, a .mobi domain isn't needed much.
- New domain, no SEO juice. A .mobi domain would be treated as a new domain name and it wouldn't take any SEO from whatever current domain you have.
- Costs involved and inconvenience. The cost of a .mobi domain and added inconvenience for managing it may not make it worthwhile.
m.domain.com(Subdomain)
Pros
- Easier to access and maintain. The DNS is all stored under the same domain. No additional domain to purchase, set up, and manage.
- Easier to type on a phone. iPhone and Android on-screen keyboards include a .com button on the virtual keyboard.
- Keeps your brand in-tact. People already know domain.com is yours. Something like domain.mobimight confuse them.
- Free. Setting up a subdomain should be a simple process depending on the web host.
- Higher adoption in the US. Companies such as Yahoo, Twitter, Google, YouTube, and Facebook have adopted this method.
- Support for multinational domains. Some companies such as Amazon have Amazon.com for their US presence and Amazon.co.uk for their UK presence. A .mobi site just comes in .mobi. I suppose you could have co.uk.amazon.mobi, but that sounds messy (and backwards). m.amazon.co.uk makes more sense.
- It's what Matt Cutts said. Matt, who works at Google and shares webmaster tips for best practices, suggested that m.domain.com will do the trick.
- _Cookie support. _This may be one of the greatest benefits of the m.domain.com method. Cookies, or temporary files on your computer used to store information, can be set for a domain and a certain subdomain. With domain.mobi, however, cookies cannot work across multiple domains. So, if you logged into a mobile website but needed to view the desktop website and wanted to switch to that mode, using m.domain.com would be best so you can stay logged in between both sites.
Cons
- Too ambiguous. Some would argue "m.domain.com" makes no sense and isn't intuitive for people looking for the mobile site.
- No carrier transcoding. Few phone carriers are transcoding websites so when someone access a site on their phone the website gets reduced in size so it loads faster. This could break some desktop websites and mobile sites. Only Sprint PCS in the US and Vodaphone in the UK are doing this that we've heard of. The work around is to manually register your mobile website as a mobile website with each carrier.
One question I often hear is which makes more sense for someone to type in, m.domain.com, or domain.mobi? My answer: if you want the mobile version, go to the desktop site and it should take you to the mobile version.
If in doubt, use m.domain.com and redirect the domain.mobi to m.domain.com.
This was the more common method of delivering a mobile optimized website before responsive design came along. You have a mobile site on a different sub-domain, such as m.bbc.co.uk, keeping all of your mobile content on different URLs.
The two most important points if you’re using this method are:
Use the rel=”alternate” tag pointing to the mobile URL on the desktop version of the page, helping Google find your mobile content.
Use the rel=”canonical” tag pointing to the desktop URL on the mobile version of the page, helping Google understand which version of the content is duplicated.
**At the last my suggestion is go with subdomain for mobile website. **
Let me know if you need more help.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonicals from sub-domain to main domain: How much content relevancy matters? Any back-links impact?
Hi Moz community, I have this different scenario of using canonicals to solve the duplicate content issue in our site. Our subdomain and main domain have similar landing pages of same topics with content relevancy about 50% to 70%. Both pages will be in SERP and confusing users; possibly search engine too. We would like solve this by using canonicals on subdomain pointing to main domain pages. Even our intention is to only to show main domain pages in SERP. I wonder how Google handles it? Will the canonicals will be respected with this content relevancy? What happens if they don't respect? Just ignore or penalise for trying to do this? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Duplicate website pages indexed: Ranking dropped. Does Google checks the duplicate domain association?
Hi all, Our duplicate website which is used for testing new optimisations got indexed and we dropped in rankings. But I am not sure whether this is exact reason as it happened earlier too where I don't find much drop in rankings. Also I got replies in the past that it'll not really impact original website but duplicate website. I think this rule applies to the third party websites. But if our own domain has exact duplicate content; will Google knows that we own the website from any other way we are associated like IP addresses and servers, etc..to find the duplicate website is hosted by us? I wonder how Google treats duplicate content from third party domains and own domains. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Safari and IE killing our mobile ranking
My client's website does fairly well on mobile in a Google Search. So one day, my client is in a staff meeting and everyone does on search on their phones. The client’s website is nowhere on the 1st three pages. I get a call asking why. I tell the client that Google has maybe as high as 90% market share on mobile. Of course, their phones have the factory installed Safari and IE. Client says lots of people don’t change the factory settings on mobile . Question: How do we rate higher on lesser search engines?
Algorithm Updates | | jgodwin0 -
Exact Keywords Domain name
Hello everyone!, I would love to have your opinion on this matter. I am working on a company e-commerce site; these guys would like to change their domain name AND their company name, so the most logical thing that came to mind was to name the domain after the company name. However, they also bought in the past a domain that have the exact keyword they would like to rank for. I know that keywords in the URL are not as important as they used to be in the past, but nonetheless when I do a Google search for those keywords, 3 domains out of 10 on the first page are slight variations of those same keywords, meaning that they might have a really good domain name (also the other result are government, medical stuff and so on). And, no matter how many times I have read that keywords in the URL are not so important anymore, I still see a lot of sites ranking also because of their domain name (well at least outside the US) So, my question here is: would it be better for them to use the exact match keyword-domain name or should they use their company name for their new site? Or some sort combination of the two? (the keyword-domain that in some way points also to the brand domain). Thanks for your opinions on this; really appreciate it! Cheers
Algorithm Updates | | Eyah0 -
Duplicate content on a sub domain
I have two domains www.hairremoval.com and a sub domain www.us.hairromoval.com both sites have virtual the same content apart from around 8 pages and the sub domain is more focused to US customers so the spelling are different, it is also hosted in the states. Would this be classed as duplicate content ? (The url’s are made up for the question but the format is correct)
Algorithm Updates | | Nettitude0 -
Links from high Domain authority sites
I have a relatively uncompetitive niche ranking around number 6 for my keywords. Would getting a few links from some Moz DA 80-90 and DA 90-100 sites help my rankings a lot? Some of the pages linking to me from these sites might be deep in the site pretty far away from the home page with pagerank of "unranked" or a grayed out bar and these pages linking to me might not have many links at all other than from the internal links of the site itself and would have a Moz PA of 10 or 20. Would these pass much pagerank or authority to my site or would they not be worth going after? These links to my site would be in context on a blog. Thanks mozzers!
Algorithm Updates | | Ron100 -
Direct Domain Name Anchor Text Spammy Links
Hello! I have a website that has been hit with around 120-150 spammy bookmarking sites which I believe are just scraping content from one another or were added by someone that was hired earlier or maybe some other action, but that really doesn't matter. My question is whether I should be worried about that many domains linking to the site in question with anchor text that is "www.domainname.com" and linking to the domain itself? I have done quite a few researches on this issue and the general conclusion is these don't help, but they don't hurt your rankings either. I wanted to hear from the SEOMoz community about it though. My opinion is Google doesn't take them seriously and we shouldn't worry about them, try to take them off and we should simply work on our content, guest posts, produce our generally great deals on our services and move on. Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | Njave_MCP0 -
Parallel mobile website
After researching and comparing desktop keywords vs mobile keywords, I came to the conclusion that they are pretty much the same, with minor variations. The new keywords for mobile website do not have a great potential for bringing in much traffic. If I don't want to go after those new mobile, do I need to build separate links to our parallel mobile website (URL) to rank better or the link building for my desktop website would be enough to rank for my parallel mobile website as well?
Algorithm Updates | | echo10