Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
KWs w/ no bids on Google AdWords
-
When using the Google Keyword Planner to research KWs, is it a correct assumption that if the KW doesn't have a suggested bid, there's probably not going to be a real impact in optimizing for it? Hypothetically, if I saw a high-volume, low-competition KW w/out a suggested bid I'd feel differently, but I'm just seeing it happen with low volume and competition.
Thanks,
Sarah -
lol... Yes, but you can do BOTH.
-
** If everybody is asking then it might not be addressed well on the web. **
I've never heard before, but it makes total sense. Thank you for that.
That kid blew it for the goat operation.
-
I remember that goat project. The kid was the pitch man and the old man had all of the expertise.
So what you are saying is less emphasis on KWs and more emphasis on ideas?
Not quite. What I am saying, is that if you have ideas don't allow volume or bidding or pricing data to frighten you away or discourage you. There could be a lot of money out there. It might be widely distributed but it still can be profitable. I have made nice money by casting a wide net.
Now, changing to a different philosophy.... one that has been more successful for me.... I use the Adwords keyword planner, but in a different way.
I first ask myself... What are the keywords for which I have the expertise, enthusiasm and content creation ability to be highly competitive? Then I go to those SERPs and look at the content that is out there right now. If I can beat it then I am ready to attack. That is the time to look at the keyword planner and determine the exact point of attack and what the keyword data tells me should be explained on my page(s). That is the information that everybody everywhere is asking about. If everybody is asking then it might not be addressed well on the web. The keyword planner data informs content development around the topics that people are asking about. Address them. All of them.
Again I don't allow the keyword planner data to sway my thinking. If it says... "Highly competitive" and "high volume" then I am not frightened off. Why? Because where there is high levels of competition and high levels of traffic there is usually a lot of search diversity and a lot of money changing hands. Even if you get in there for long tail queries you can make a lot of money. But since I attack where I am confident that I can compete head-on with their content that is exactly where I do NOT want the presence of competition to discourage me.
So, I attack and it often works well. Do not fear competition. That is where money is made as long as you have what it takes to compete.
-
Reminds me of the time contestants brought goats on Shark Tank.
http://abc.go.com/shows/shark-tank/video/Casting-Pitches/_m_VDKA0_dphdodu2
So what you are saying is less emphasis on KWs and more emphasis on ideas?
-
Is it a correct assumption that if the KW doesn't have a suggested bid, there's probably not going to be a real impact in optimizing for it?
Some people know how to make big money in niches where nobody else has ever guessed (the people who can sell manure or dirt are examples). It is who knows how to do something valuable with that traffic - even if the money per keyword is small. A little money here and a little money there... ads up to big money.
Looking where others have ignored can make you highly successful. Some of the biggest oil discoveries have been made where no one else ever thought to drill, and where many believed that there was none to be found.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Inconsistent Keyword Search Volume & Difficulty Across Tools (e.g., Moz, Google Keyword Planner, Ahrefs, Semrush)
Hi there, Moz Community! I'm reaching out for some guidance on keyword research discrepancies. I'm currently targeting the keyword "sui gas bill" for my blog, sngplbill, which focuses on information related to Sui gas bills. I've used several keyword research tools, including Moz, Google Keyword Planner, Ahrefs, and Semrush, and each platform provides different search volume and keyword difficulty scores: Moz: No search volume data, Keyword Difficulty (KD) 24
Keyword Research | May 19, 2024, 9:03 PM | Faizali.786
Google Keyword Planner: Search volume 100k-1M, Difficulty (Low)
Semrush: Search volume 90k, KD 31
Ahrefs: KD 1 (Very Easy)
These varying results are causing some confusion. Ideally, I'd like to understand which platform offers the most reliable data for search volume and keyword difficulty. Here are some additional details that might be helpful: My target location: Pakistan My Questions: What factors might contribute to these discrepancies in keyword data across different tools?
Considering my niche (Sui gas bill information in Pakistan), which platform would you recommend for the most accurate search volume and keyword difficulty estimates?
Are there any additional factors to consider beyond search volume and keyword difficulty when selecting keywords for content strategy?
Any insights you can provide would be greatly appreciated!
Capture sui gas bill semrush.PNG Capture moz sui gas bill.PNG Capture gkp sui gas bill.PNG Capture ahref sui gas bill.PNG
Thanks,0 -
Which keyword to use (plural / singular)
Hi guys. So I'm racking my brain with a question whether I should use plural or singular keyword as a focus keyphrase of my page. The page that I'm optimizing is basically a review page of different websites offering proofreading services. Considering the fact that this is a review and I mention a lot of websites on my page, I decided to rank for a plural keyword that ends with "services". However, this keyword is very unpopular (ahrefs doesn't show any volume for it), while singular "service" has about 100 searches per month. As far as I understand, Google sees both keywords as synonyms, because search results for both keywords are almost identical. Should I change my keyphrase to singular "service" (even though the page mentions a lot of services), or stick with "services" instead? Do I have a chance of ranking for "service" if I stick with "services" in this case? Thank you.
Keyword Research | Dec 26, 2019, 8:25 PM | AslanBarselinov0 -
Can you rank for copyrighted/trademarked words that became generic terms?
Hi, As everyone knows, lots of generic terms we use everyday (depends from one country to another obviously) are trademark terms and technically protected.
Keyword Research | Jan 24, 2019, 7:53 AM | GhillC
Some examples here and there. So my question is ... are we free to rank (or try to at least!) for some of these keywords?
Some of these keywords vastly outranked their original generic terms and there is little to no value trying to get traffic from the latter. More specifically what about the keywords such as spin, spinning etc.? Thanks!
G0 -
Google: Is There a Way to Find Your "Unknown Search Terms"
I believe Google stopped reporting search terms for privacy reasons. All my searches show as "unknown". I found a video that showed how to get around this but it's not current. Is there any way to get your Google terms search information? Thanks, Jo-Ann
Keyword Research | Sep 5, 2016, 7:51 PM | VinJGirl0 -
On Google Analytics under search queries, the most popular query is "(not set)", how do I find out what this is?
I am trying to discover what users are searching for and what keywords drive traffic to our site.
Keyword Research | Jan 28, 2016, 8:06 AM | Sable_Group0 -
Cheap/ Discount/ Value/ Sale Keywords
Hi, Does anyone have any experience in targeting cheap/discount/value etc keywords in an SEO campaign? I'm interested to find out: How Google perceives these keywords, as the search results are only very slightly different if you search with or without a 'cheap' keyword. Whether Google differentiates between 'cheap synonyms ie 'cheap' and 'affordable'. There are far higher searches for 'cheap' but affordable is much more user- and conversion-friendly. Thanks, Karen
Keyword Research | Mar 13, 2014, 2:33 PM | Digirank0 -
Why does this keyword have much greater volume in Bing Keyword Research Tool than Google AdWords Keyword Planner?
I'm using the Google AdWords keyword planner and Bing Webmaster Keyword Research tool. For both, I'm trying to get accurate search volume for the exact term "advertising sales". Over the last thirty days, Bing reports a volume of 5,988. Google's average monthly search volume is 880. Given the market share Google has, I would expect a much higher volume, especially when compared to Bing. Can you offer some ideas of why this might be happening?
Keyword Research | Nov 12, 2013, 10:37 AM | Kevin_P0 -
Google Keyword Tool: What is considered a unique keyword?
I'm trying to research keywords using Google's Keyword Tool. After looking at results, I have the following questions: 1. Does singular/plurals of a word count as two different keywords to Google (ie: photobooth and photobooths)? Would I need to have a unique page targeting each word or will one page on my site be sufficient for targeting both? 2. I've noticed that different variations of keywords have the same global monthly search results. This leads me to believe that Google see's all of them as one keyword. ie: "photo booth props" and "props for a photo booth" and "props with photo booth", all have 22,200 search global monthly search resluts. On the other hand "moustache prop" and "prop moustache" have different global monthly search results (480 and 590). Can anyone explain this?
Keyword Research | Jan 28, 2013, 6:47 PM | Alchemist230