undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • SEO Q&A
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    What is your Brand Authority?
    Moz

    What is your Brand Authority?

    Check yours now
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • SEO Q&A

      Insights & discussions from an SEO community of 500,000+.

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • Case Studies

      Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. On-Page Optimization
  4. Duplicate content penalty

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Duplicate content penalty

On-Page Optimization
4
29
3.3k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • cheaptubes
    cheaptubes last edited by Apr 7, 2014, 5:53 PM

    when moz crawls my site they say I have 2x the pages that I really have & they say I am being penalized for duplicate content.  I know years ago I had my old domain resolve over to my new domain. Its the only thing that makes sense as to the duplicate content but would search engines really penalize me for that? It is technically only on 1 site.  My business took a significant sales hit starting early July 2013, I know google did and algorithm update that did have SEO aspects.  I need to resolve the problem so I can stay in business

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • cheaptubes
      cheaptubes @JaneCopland last edited by May 7, 2014, 12:06 PM May 7, 2014, 12:06 PM

      Thx Jane- No I wasn't aware of that.  I don't get it because I put canonical tags right under the Head and I used the code below to do it.  I will check again but am unsure how to fix it

      I don't even know how to fix coding on the Http://cheaptubes.com site.  It seems like when I add content to the canonical site it updates all of them.   Thx for pointing out errors, you are giving me something to fix and improve.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JaneCopland
        JaneCopland @cheaptubes last edited by May 7, 2014, 11:44 AM May 7, 2014, 11:44 AM

        Hi again,

        Are you aware that you have a canonical tag on http://cheaptubes.com that points to a non-existent URL? i.e. http://i.imgur.com/yEd2377.png

        http://www.cheaptubes.com/default.html

        If http://cheaptubes.com/ 301 redirected to http://www.cheaptubes.com/, this would resolve the issue.

        Are you aware that the www version of your site shows for a brand search (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=cheaptubes.com&oq=cheaptubes.com&aqs=chrome..69i58j69i60l2j69i57j69i60j0.3367j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=91&ie=UTF-8) but that the canonical tags on each page point to the non-www version, e.g. http://i.imgur.com/P7Tizsv.png and http://i.imgur.com/lhTA95w.png?

        The canonical tag on the www.cheaptubes.com/ page also points to http://www.cheaptubes.com/default.html. Sorry to show so many errors, but it doesn't look like canonicalisation has been implemented properly here.

        cheaptubes 1 Reply Last reply May 7, 2014, 12:06 PM Reply Quote 1
        • cheaptubes
          cheaptubes @JaneCopland last edited by May 7, 2014, 10:44 AM May 7, 2014, 10:44 AM

          Thx Jane - I may not have put a canonical tag on that page yet but its the same for every page.  I can't access the http://cheaptubes.com but I can access the canonical version to publish.  I did put canonical tags on most of my other pages such as the SWNTs page but it still shows a non canonical version when moz crawls it.  Perhaps a 301 from http://cheaptubes.com to the canonical page? I'm just not sure how to handle it.

          JaneCopland 1 Reply Last reply May 7, 2014, 11:44 AM Reply Quote 0
          • JaneCopland
            JaneCopland @cheaptubes last edited by May 7, 2014, 10:31 AM May 7, 2014, 10:31 AM

            Hi Mike,

            Are you saying that there is a canonical tag on http://cheaptubes.com/cntmaterialsafetydatasheet.htm, pointing to http://www.cheaptubes.com/cntmaterialsafetydatasheet.htm? This would solve the duplicate content problem, but I do not see a canonical tag on either of those pages...

            cheaptubes 1 Reply Last reply May 7, 2014, 10:44 AM Reply Quote 1
            • cheaptubes
              cheaptubes @cheaptubes last edited by May 2, 2014, 8:20 AM May 2, 2014, 8:20 AM

              Hi Everyone - I'm hoping you can help me out again.  I have a functional 301 on cheaptubesinc.com.  that cleared about 1/2 my dup content penalty on the moz crawl this week.  As you can see in the results below, I still have 57 pages with dup content according to Moz.

              57    Duplicate Page Content
              13    4XX (Client Error)
              57    Duplicate Page Title

              I checked and I think it is mostly a canonical problem.  I do have Rel Canonical tags on all my pages.  When I clicked on the 1st one it appears that is the case, see below

              cheaptubes.com carbon nanotubes msds

              http://www.cheaptubes.com/cntmaterialsafetydatasheet.htm29414872001 duplicate

              cheaptubes.com carbon nanotubes msds

              http://cheaptubes.com/cntmaterialsafetydatasheet.htm25My question is, do I need another 301 from http://cheaptubes.com to the canonical version? I'ld rather not since I had to fight with network solutions for a week for them to add the / after .com so my other pages would work.  Is this a penalty I should still be concernedabout given that I have the rel canonical tags?  Please let me know your thoughts on thisMike

              JaneCopland 1 Reply Last reply May 7, 2014, 10:31 AM Reply Quote 0
              • cheaptubes
                cheaptubes @cheaptubes last edited by Apr 26, 2014, 1:14 PM Apr 26, 2014, 1:14 PM

                Thanks Everyone.  I got the old url cheaptubesinc.com 301'd to cheaptubes.com this week.  Of course network solutions left off the / after .com and before the page name so that only the home page would 301 and they could try to sell me more 301s, it cost $60 for 1 and I have 48 pages on my site.  I called and emailed them all week and they kept saying they had done it right and and they couldn't force google to change the links.  I then realized if I typed www.cheaptubesinc/graphene.htm that it didn't work because it 301'd to www.cheaptubes.comgraphene.htm.  They were argumentative with me even though I was polite with them even though I didn't want to be.  I finally got a tech on the phone who said he would add the slash and ask his boss for forgiveness.  However given the history of having the domain parked and pointed before and that not working over time & now this, I think my best bet is to transfer my domains to someone else.  I heard bluehost is good.  My concern is if they were that unethical in our dealings and the boss was argumentative in emails than they could go in an remove the slash at any time.

                I also found a ton of code errors right at the top of my pages.  I now know it was from putting up temporary messages but not checking to make sure the code was clean.  The woman I bought my them from (6.5 years ago I paid her $60 and she still helps me for free, what  difference between her & NS) notice open H1's & P elements at the top of the pages.  I was still ranking well for acronyms but missing out on the long keywords since last july which caused my sales to drop off. I figure I lost at least 150K in sales because I neglected my website and didn't clean up the code on my pages a painful lesson I won't soon forget.  On tuesday, when I searched single walled carbon nanotubes I had to go 8 pages back in google to find my page.  By week's end I was #8 on page 1 and ahead of sigma aldrich a major materials supplier.

                Thank you so much for your help everyone, it is sincerely appreciated

                Mike

                cheaptubes 1 Reply Last reply May 2, 2014, 8:20 AM Reply Quote 1
                • topic:timeago_earlier,15 days
                • cheaptubes
                  cheaptubes @OlegKorneitchouk last edited by Apr 11, 2014, 7:04 PM Apr 11, 2014, 7:04 PM

                  Thank you Oleg - I did put the tag

                  into the head right below the robots & google bot code on every page.  I mistakenly deleted some very old non updated pages. Thx to moz, i have a list of the pages and will contact hosting co to 301 it. I think I ultimately have to 301 each page. I had moz recrawl my site last night but it said it dropped from 100 duplicate content penalties to 89, an improvement but not the one I hoped for.  I did have a client tell my the site was down today, contacted network solutions and they said it was up now but they had an outage last night.  Perhaps it affected the moz recrawl,but I can't know that.  I also want to change the names of the pages as an interim measure before I update the site to newer format. Should I create new optimized by name pages first and then get on the phone with tech support and 301 them all to the knew pages? seems logical but so did deleting old pages until moz couldn't find them, then i realized the bots will count it against me rather than the housekeeping that it was.

                  Mike

                  Mike

                  cheaptubes 1 Reply Last reply Apr 26, 2014, 1:14 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • OlegKorneitchouk
                    OlegKorneitchouk @cheaptubes last edited by Apr 11, 2014, 6:18 PM Apr 11, 2014, 6:18 PM

                    Read these two posts... they cover everything.

                    • http://moz.com/blog/canonical-url-tag-the-most-important-advancement-in-seo-practices-since-sitemaps
                    • http://moz.com/blog/rel-confused-answers-to-your-rel-canonical-questions
                    cheaptubes 1 Reply Last reply Apr 11, 2014, 7:04 PM Reply Quote 1
                    • cheaptubes
                      cheaptubes @JaneCopland last edited by Apr 9, 2014, 10:39 AM Apr 9, 2014, 10:39 AM

                      ok, got it, thank you so much Jane

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaneCopland
                        JaneCopland @cheaptubes last edited by Apr 9, 2014, 10:38 AM Apr 9, 2014, 10:38 AM

                        Hi,

                        You don't need to redirect at all (with a 301 or otherwise) if the canonical tag is in place. So don't worry about that at all - both URLs can load together if the canonical tag points Google from the "duplicate" to the "correct / canonical" one. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

                        I am not sure the frequency of Moz's crawling or if you can force a refresh, I'm sorry.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • cheaptubes
                          cheaptubes @JaneCopland last edited by Apr 9, 2014, 10:35 AM Apr 9, 2014, 10:35 AM

                          Thx Jane

                          The problem is I can't simply 301 it because I'm not on apache.   I can do the canonical tag.  Of course I've already gone in and changed it over to the tag + refresh but server is down so it won't publish right now.  I was trying to get it done ahead of moz crawling my site today.  Is there a way to get moz to recrawl it after the changes are updated or do I need to wait another week?

                          JaneCopland 1 Reply Last reply Apr 9, 2014, 10:38 AM Reply Quote 0
                          • JaneCopland
                            JaneCopland @cheaptubes last edited by Apr 9, 2014, 10:34 AM Apr 9, 2014, 10:34 AM

                            Hi,

                            Hard to say, but it definitely won't have helped. As Bryan says, you've split authority between over twice the number of pages the site should have, and Google can take action against sites that produce a large amount of duplicate content. I'd get the canonical tags in place (and thoroughly check they're set up right, as it can be a mess if they're implemented incorrectly) and check on progress over two or three weeks. If you see nothing happen, I'd say your reason for dropping could be something else.

                            cheaptubes 1 Reply Last reply Apr 9, 2014, 10:39 AM Reply Quote 0
                            • JaneCopland
                              JaneCopland @cheaptubes last edited by Apr 19, 2014, 6:08 PM Apr 9, 2014, 10:32 AM

                              Hi again,

                              The canonical tag sounds like the right way to go for you.

                              Regarding the meta refresh method of redirection - this works perfectly for users... it was always the case that search engines did not honour this as a redirect though. This may have changed in the recent past (and realistically, it should have - a lot of people used this tactic for redirection and Google should understand that it shows a moved page). However, it is generally thought that the meta refresh does not pass all authority (as noted here), and this thread shows a Googler advising against it (this is a post from 2010 though).

                              Honestly, with the canonical tag, you don't need to do the refresh / redirection - this will take care of the issue 🙂

                              Cheers,

                              Jane

                              cheaptubes 1 Reply Last reply Apr 9, 2014, 10:35 AM Reply Quote 1
                              • JaneCopland
                                JaneCopland @cheaptubes last edited by Apr 9, 2014, 10:26 AM Apr 9, 2014, 10:26 AM

                                Hi there,

                                I'll answer these one at a time as there are a few responses to go through.

                                default.htm is the home page as created by the CMS, but you want to either use that URL or www.cheaptubes.com as the home page, not both.

                                The solution is a 301 or the canonical tag so that home page content does not appear on both URLs.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • cheaptubes
                                  cheaptubes @JaneCopland last edited by Apr 9, 2014, 7:08 AM Apr 9, 2014, 7:08 AM

                                  Hi Jane, Oleg, & Bryan

                                  I checked with the woman who designed my theme (she is awesome).  She offered the following suggestions which seem like the way to go for me. Are there any negatives that I'm not aware of with the options below?

                                  Since you are still using FrontPage, just open your site, locate the appropriate pages, and type the following into the head area:

                                  If you are on a Windows server, your web host can do the 301 redirect for you. You will tell them the name of the old pages and the name of the new pages and they will do the rest.

                                  An easy alternate is for you to do the redirect yourself with an easy tag that goes into the head area of the old pages. This tag is called a redirect and redirects from the old page to the new one.

                                  URL="http://www.newsite.com/newurl.html">

                                  Google, Bing, and Yahoo all recognize the meta tag for the redirect and will adjust their indexing accordingly. I will usually leave an old page on the server for about 3 months to give the search engines time to catch up. Then I can delete the page.

                                  You can, of course, get more "bang for your buck" by using both the canonical link and the meta refresh at the same time.

                                  URL="http://www.newsite.com/newurl.html">

                                  I like the last one, am going to try that unless you think its a flawed strategy.

                                  Thanks for your help

                                  Mike

                                  JaneCopland 1 Reply Last reply Apr 9, 2014, 10:32 AM Reply Quote 0
                                  • cheaptubes
                                    cheaptubes @JaneCopland last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 1:32 PM Apr 8, 2014, 1:32 PM

                                    Hi Jane

                                    How do I change to canonical url's if I can't do a 301?

                                    Mike

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • cheaptubes
                                      cheaptubes last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 11:58 AM Apr 8, 2014, 11:58 AM

                                      so how do I use the canonical tag since i can't 301 it?

                                      OlegKorneitchouk 1 Reply Last reply Apr 11, 2014, 6:18 PM Reply Quote 0
                                      • hecklerponics
                                        hecklerponics @cheaptubes last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 11:55 AM Apr 8, 2014, 11:54 AM

                                        It certainly could. Google sees the www. version as a 2nd website, so essentially you're splitting your 'ranking authority' between 2 webpages.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • cheaptubes
                                          cheaptubes @OlegKorneitchouk last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 11:50 AM Apr 8, 2014, 11:50 AM

                                          Thanks Oleg

                                          I can't 301 because I'm not using apache, still on frontpage.  I know its old, getting out my abacus now : )

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • OlegKorneitchouk
                                            OlegKorneitchouk @JaneCopland last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 11:48 AM Apr 8, 2014, 11:42 AM

                                            To sum up...

                                            1. 301 redirect all non-www urls to www versions (since it has a higher page authority) and add canonicals to all pages with the www version of the url
                                            2. For all lower case / upper case page duplicates... pick one, set a canonical tag and 301 to the chosen case, make sure all your links point to the correct url case.
                                            3. 301 redirect default.htm to your root domain - http://www.cheaptubes.com
                                            cheaptubes 1 Reply Last reply Apr 8, 2014, 11:50 AM Reply Quote 1
                                            • cheaptubes
                                              cheaptubes last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 10:15 AM Apr 8, 2014, 10:15 AM

                                              does the 2 versions problem help to explain why my sales started dropping significantly after the google july 4th update? I know there were some SEO penalties in that update.  I also know a friendly competitor who saw a similar drop starting in early July.

                                              hecklerponics JaneCopland 2 Replies Last reply Apr 9, 2014, 10:34 AM Reply Quote 0
                                              • cheaptubes
                                                cheaptubes last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 10:12 AM Apr 8, 2014, 10:12 AM

                                                Hi Jane

                                                Thank you so much.  I am reviewing the link you provided.  I don't think I can 301 redirect because it is done in front page, not apache.  I have tried for years to find another platform but failed.  I spent years trying to figure out drupal, even ordered several books but no luck.  I tried concrete 5 and just using HTML 5 editor like coffee cup.  I keep struggling with getting them to work.  I've bought themes to use but can't get them operational.

                                                I thought default.htm was supposed to be the home page, is that incorrect?

                                                Mike

                                                JaneCopland 1 Reply Last reply Apr 9, 2014, 10:26 AM Reply Quote 0
                                                • JaneCopland
                                                  JaneCopland last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 11:48 AM Apr 8, 2014, 9:28 AM

                                                  Hi again,

                                                  Yep - your non-www and www pages are both resolving... e.g. http://cheaptubes.com/ and http://www.cheaptubes.com/ bring up the same content. Also, http://cheaptubes.com/default.htm and http://www.cheaptubes.com/default.htm is also a duplicate of the home page.

                                                  Internally, I am seeing the same thing, e.g. http://www.cheaptubes.com/carbon-nanotubes-prices.htm and http://cheaptubes.com/carbon-nanotubes-prices.htm - same page, one on the www subdomain ("www." is a subdomain like any other, just with an extremely common name) and one just sitting on the root.

                                                  The solution here is either to 301 redirect the non-www version of the site to the www version for every page, or to use the canonical tag to point from the non-preferred versions to the "canonical" versions. More information on this is available here.

                                                  You also have a situation where upper-case URLs will resolve as well as lower case ones, e.g. http://www.cheaptubes.com/SWNTs.htm and http://www.cheaptubes.com/swnts.htm (as well as http://cheaptubes.com/swnts.htm!).

                                                  URLs should only be allowed to resolve with one case, preferably lower. The upper / mixed case should 301 redirect to the proper version.

                                                  Essentially, the "two versions of the site" issue is the biggest problem, with all pages being available on at least two URLs - one with www and one without. There are other tidiness issues like /default.htm bringing up the home page as well.

                                                  Does this make sense? Let me know if this is not clear.

                                                  Best,

                                                  Jane

                                                  OlegKorneitchouk cheaptubes 3 Replies Last reply Apr 9, 2014, 7:08 AM Reply Quote 2
                                                  • cheaptubes
                                                    cheaptubes last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 8:49 AM Apr 8, 2014, 8:49 AM

                                                    also on a page that moz ranks as an "F", I still rank high in organic results, see the results from when I searched for MWNTs below, I was 1st organic result.  If long form, multi walled carbon nanotubes I fell to 6th or 7th but still on  the first page.

                                                    https://www.google.com/search?q=mwnts&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb#channel=sb&q=mwnts&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official

                                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                    • cheaptubes
                                                      cheaptubes last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 8:44 AM Apr 8, 2014, 8:44 AM

                                                      Thank you Oleg, Bryan, & Jane.  I am a rookie when it comes to web development but my pages always ranked well because enough Moz tips sunk in.   See the alert from last weeks crawl below.

                                                      Pages with High Priority Issues

                                                      98Duplicate Page Content24XX (Client Error)If we look at the home page, it has 3 URLs, see belowURLPage AuthorityLinking Root DomainsExternal Link CountInternal Link CountStatus CodeDuplicate URLsDownload Duplicates

                                                      cheaptubes.com the source for carbon nanotubes home page

                                                      http://www.cheaptubes.com3322611882003 duplicates

                                                      cheaptubes.com the source for carbon nanotubes home page

                                                      http://www.cheaptubes.com/default.htm2422622001 of 3 duplicates

                                                      cheaptubes.com the source for carbon nanotubes home page

                                                      http://cheaptubes.com2931502002 of 3 duplicates

                                                      cheaptubes.com the source for carbon nanotubes home page

                                                      http://cheaptubes.com/default.htm2410462003 of 3 duplicates    Does this help?-Mike

                                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                      • JaneCopland
                                                        JaneCopland last edited by Apr 8, 2014, 8:28 AM Apr 8, 2014, 8:28 AM

                                                        Hi there,

                                                        This could definitely be a case of both non-www and www URLs resolving, but I'd like to echo the guys above me and ask for more information - if you could share the actual examples, either on here or in a private message, it would be easier to find why Moz has found twice the number of URLs your site should have.

                                                        Thanks,

                                                        Jane

                                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                        • hecklerponics
                                                          hecklerponics @OlegKorneitchouk last edited by Apr 7, 2014, 7:06 PM Apr 7, 2014, 7:06 PM

                                                          +Really need more information

                                                          If you have URLs constructed dynamically depending on where the user navigates from this could also be an issue, but I would expect more than 2x the pages.

                                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                          • OlegKorneitchouk
                                                            OlegKorneitchouk last edited by Apr 7, 2014, 6:44 PM Apr 7, 2014, 6:44 PM

                                                            Could you share more details?

                                                            What do the duplicate content examples look like? http vs https? www. vs non-www?

                                                            If the content is replicated on 2 domains, yes that is duplicate content and you should consolidate to one site via 301 redirects.

                                                            hecklerponics 1 Reply Last reply Apr 7, 2014, 7:06 PM Reply Quote 0
                                                            • 1 / 1
                                                            1 out of 29
                                                            • First post
                                                              1/29
                                                              Last post

                                                            Got a burning SEO question?

                                                            Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                                                            Start my free trial


                                                            Browse Questions

                                                            Explore more categories

                                                            • Moz Tools

                                                              Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                                            • SEO Tactics

                                                              Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                                            • Community

                                                              Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                                            • Digital Marketing

                                                              Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                                            • Research & Trends

                                                              Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                                            • Support

                                                              Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                                            • See all categories

                                                            Related Questions

                                                            • neilhenderson

                                                              Does hover over content index well

                                                              i notice increasing cases of portfolio style boxes on site designs (especially wordpress templates) where you have an image and text appears after hover over (sorry for my basic terminology).  does this text which appears after hover over have much search engine value or as it doesnt immediately appear on pageload does it carry slightly less weight like tabbed content?   any advice appreciated thanks neil

                                                              On-Page Optimization | Dec 18, 2015, 8:43 PM | neilhenderson
                                                              0
                                                            • BeckyKey

                                                              Duplicate Content - Bulk analysis tool?

                                                              Hi I wondered if there's a tool to analyse duplicate content - within your own site or on external sites, but that you can upload the URL's you want to check in bulk? I used Copyscape a while ago, but don't remember this having a bulk feature? Thank you!

                                                              On-Page Optimization | Sep 28, 2015, 12:53 PM | BeckyKey
                                                              0
                                                            • jeeyer

                                                              Duplicate page titles and Content in Woocommerce

                                                              Hi Guys, I'm new to Moz and really liking it so far!
                                                              I run a eCommerce site on Wordpress + WooCommerce and ofcourse use Yoast for SEO optimalisation I've got a question about my first Crawl report which showed over 600 issues! 😐 I've read that this is something that happens more often (http://moz.com/blog/setup-wordpress-for-seo-success). Most of them are categorized under:
                                                              1. Duplicate Page Titles or;
                                                              2. Duplicate Page Content. Duplicate Page Titles:
                                                              These are almost only: product category pages and product tags. Is this problem beeing solved by giving them the right SEO SERP? I see that a lot of categories don't have a proper SEO SERP set up in yoast! Do I need to add this to clear this issue, or do I need to change the actual Title? And how about the Product tags? Another point (bit more off-topic) I've read here:  http://moz.com/community/q/yoast-seo-plugin-to-index-or-not-to-index-categories  that it's advised to noindex/follow Categories and Tags but isn't that a wierd idea to do for a eCommerce site?! Duplicate Page Content:
                                                              Same goes here almost only Product Categories and product tags that are displayed as duplicate Page content! When I check the results I can click on a blue button for example "+ 17 duplicates" and that shows me (in this case 17 URLS) but they are not related to the fist in any way so not sure where to start here? Thanks for taking the time to help out!
                                                              Joost

                                                              On-Page Optimization | Apr 13, 2015, 4:56 PM | jeeyer
                                                              0
                                                            • ShearingsGroup

                                                              Duplicate content on partner site

                                                              I have a trade partner who will be using some of our content on their site. What's the best way to prevent any duplicate content issues? Their plan is to attribute the content to us using rel=author tagging. Would this be sufficient or should I request that they do something else too? Thanks

                                                              On-Page Optimization | Dec 7, 2013, 1:57 AM | ShearingsGroup
                                                              0
                                                            • inlinear

                                                              Duplicate Content when Using "visibility classes" in responsive design layouts? - a SEO-Problem?

                                                              I have text in the right column of my responsive layout which will show up below the the principal content on small devices. To do this I use visibility classes for DIVs. So I have a DIV with with a unique style text that is visible only on large screen sizes. I copied the same text into another div which shows only up only on small devices while the other div will be hidden in this moment. Technically I have the same text twice on my page. So this might be duplicate content detected as SPAM? I'm concerned because hidden text on page via expand-collapsable textblocks will be read by bots and in my case they will detect it twice?Does anybody have experiences on this issue?bestHolger

                                                              On-Page Optimization | Jun 29, 2013, 12:06 AM | inlinear
                                                              0
                                                            • GOODSIR

                                                              Is content aggregation good SEO?

                                                              I didn't see this topic specifically addressed here: what's the current thinking on using content aggregation for SEO purposes? I'll use flavors.me as an example. Flavors.me lets you set up a domain that pulls in content from a variety of services (Twitter, YouTube, Flickr, RSS, etc.). There's also a limited ability to publish unique content as well. So let's say that we've got MyDomain.com set up, and most of the content is being drawn in from other services. So there's blog posts from WordPress.com, videos from YouTube, a photo gallery from Flickr, etc. How would Google look at this scenario? Is MyDomain.com simply scraped content from the other (more authoritative) sources? Is the aggregated content perceived to "belong" to MyDomain.com or not? And most importantly, if you're aggregating a lot of content related to Topic X, will this content aggregation help MyDomain.com rank for Topic X? Looking forward to the community's thoughts. Thanks!

                                                              On-Page Optimization | Aug 5, 2012, 6:40 PM | GOODSIR
                                                              0
                                                            • MeghanPrudencio

                                                              Would it be bad to change the canonical URL to the most recent page that has duplicate content, or should we just 301 redirect to the new page?

                                                              Is it bad to change the canonical URL in the tag, meaning does it lose it's stats? If we add a new page that may have duplicate content, but we want that page to be indexed over the older pages, should we just change the canonical page or redirect from the original canonical page? Thanks so much! -Amy

                                                              On-Page Optimization | Mar 8, 2011, 9:32 PM | MeghanPrudencio
                                                              0
                                                            • smaavie

                                                              Avoiding "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" - Best Practices?

                                                              We have a website with a searchable database of recipes. You can search the database using an online form with dropdown options for: Course (starter, main, salad, etc)
                                                              Cooking Method (fry, bake, boil, steam, etc)
                                                              Preparation Time (Under 30 min, 30min to 1 hour, Over 1 hour) Here are some examples of how URLs may look when searching for a recipe: find-a-recipe.php?course=starter
                                                              find-a-recipe.php?course=main&preperation-time=30min+to+1+hour
                                                              find-a-recipe.php?cooking-method=fry&preperation-time=over+1+hour There is also pagination of search results, so the URL could also have the variable "start", e.g. find-a-recipe.php?course=salad&start=30 There can be any combination of these variables, meaning there are hundreds of possible search results URL variations. This all works well on the site, however it gives multiple "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" errors when crawled by SEOmoz. I've seached online and found several possible solutions for this, such as: Setting canonical tag Adding these URL variables to Google Webmasters to tell Google to ignore them Change the Title tag in the head dynamically based on what URL variables are present However I am not sure which of these would be best. As far as I can tell the canonical tag should be used when you have the same page available at two seperate URLs, but this isn't the case here as the search results are always different. Adding these URL variables to Google webmasters won't fix the problem in other search engines, and will presumably continue to get these errors in our SEOmoz crawl reports. Changing the title tag each time can lead to very long title tags, and it doesn't address the problem of duplicate page content. I had hoped there would be a standard solution for problems like this, as I imagine others will have come across this before, but I cannot find the ideal solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Kind Regards

                                                              On-Page Optimization | Jun 2, 2013, 5:08 PM | smaavie
                                                              5

                                                            Get started with Moz Pro!

                                                            Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                                            Start my free trial
                                                            Products
                                                            • Moz Pro
                                                            • Moz Local
                                                            • Moz API
                                                            • Moz Data
                                                            • STAT
                                                            • Product Updates
                                                            Moz Solutions
                                                            • SMB Solutions
                                                            • Agency Solutions
                                                            • Enterprise Solutions
                                                            Free SEO Tools
                                                            • Domain Authority Checker
                                                            • Link Explorer
                                                            • Keyword Explorer
                                                            • Competitive Research
                                                            • Brand Authority Checker
                                                            • MozBar Extension
                                                            • MozCast
                                                            Resources
                                                            • Blog
                                                            • SEO Learning Center
                                                            • Help Hub
                                                            • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                                            • How-to Guides
                                                            • Moz Academy
                                                            • API Docs
                                                            About Moz
                                                            • About
                                                            • Team
                                                            • Careers
                                                            • Contact
                                                            Why Moz
                                                            • Case Studies
                                                            • Testimonials
                                                            Get Involved
                                                            • Become an Affiliate
                                                            • MozCon
                                                            • Webinars
                                                            • Practical Marketer Series
                                                            • MozPod
                                                            Connect with us

                                                            Contact the Help team

                                                            Join our newsletter

                                                            Access all your tools in one place. Whether you're tracking progress or analyzing data, everything you need is at your fingertips.

                                                            Moz logo
                                                            © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                                            • Accessibility
                                                            • Terms of Use
                                                            • Privacy

                                                            Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.