Did you see Search Engine Watch remove links to sources on an article about websites scared of outbound links?
-
I saw this over on reddit and was curious if anyone else saw this article and noticed the same thing?
http://www.reddit.com/r/bigseo/comments/38jgro/sew_quotes_me_and_others_on_a_topic_about_sites/
http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/opinion/2411268/the-collateral-damage-of-google-s-link-policy
The irony here is pretty great. Thoughts on this?
-
SEW is under new ownership. I submitted a post a couple of weeks ago for my monthly column and the majority of the links in my post were nofollowed by SEW. I wrote to the new editor to ask why and they reviewed the links and decided the the one that I had included that linked to my own site did contribute to the conversation well, so they removed the nofollow. I had also mentioned Alan Bleiweiss in my article and out of courtesy, linked to his site. (It bugs me when people mention someone and then link to their Twitter profile...if they're good enough to mention, why not give them a link?) They would not remove the nofollow on that link.
I think that publications like Search Engine Watch, Moz and other high quality sites that accept user generated content have to be really careful about how they link out. Personally, if SEW told me that all of my links would now be nofollowed, I'd likely keep publishing there as I do get business as a result of my articles. But, I am guessing that there are quite a few authors that would stop submitting articles to them.
I think this is a case where a few bad apples spoil the lot. I bet you the new editors reviewed some article submissions and saw that people were using SEW as a platform to link out. If SEW got an outbound link penalty that would not be good...so they might have gone a little over to the side of caution in making nofollow decisions. With that said, it looks like they have now edited the article you quoted to go ahead and allow followed links. I also checked a few other articles and didn't see any excessive nofollowing so maybe they've loosened up a little.
-
Yeah, I saw this - it's a bit ... sad and ironic that SEW would say Google's link policy was "doing damage" and then say "we can't link to you because of our company policy about links."
SE Watch was most definitely irony-impaired on this one.
-
I asked John Mueller at Google a while ago about a news article my company wrote, should my links be dofollow or nofollow, he replied if they have been requested or in exchange for something then it should be nofollow. WHAT! Its a news article that was 100% researched by our team and nobody we link to would even know about it until the article came out and EVEN if they did how the hell would they even know unless there was some sort of visual exchange in someway! I didn't UNDERSTAND the response then and I still DON'T now. If this is a their response and I know 100% that we did our own research how can I trust that anyone looking at the news article from Google will see it the same way and if not then say its seems like someone would have paid for that so we are going to punish you for it. SO despite the article not having any influence or paid links or anything of that sort I still decided to nofollow the links. Google screwed me before on false pretenses and I am sure they will do it again. Mathematically it all leads back to Adwords in some way or another.
Google's flaw has always been the same, don't reveal anything and wait for the spammers who are actively looking for ranking factors to find them way before legit businesses understand them, by this time its exploited by everyone and the cycle starts again!
If ranking factors are a sign of what Google thinks a Good company should demonstrate then why the hell don't they tell people. This way legit business owners will rank up top for their services and be competing with others in their industry instead of competing with spammers and affiliate sites that only exists because of the reasons mentioned in the paragraph above.
Sick of this crap from Google. Same cycle for 15+ years. When will they learn.
They WILL NOT be able to build an algo/system that simply responds to genuine sites. So they might as well train business how to market themselves better. The better the real companies do the harder it will be for blackhat SEO's to enter the market.
They also need to respond immediately to spam issues not wait 6 months to factor them into a new algo. Nip the churn and burns in the bud and they will die a quick death forever!
How can so many bright minds at Google produce such poor decisions. They never think of the consequences of their actions.
Their thoughtless actions and poor response times have led to an astonishing amount of damage.
Forums have been trashed because of link profile building, Google should have discounted that immediately. It would have saved hundreds of thousands of site owners agony and in some cases irreversible damage. The success of this led to people in Asia being hired to decipher captcha codes every few seconds leading people to KILL themselves because of their jobs.
Google has a strong part to play in their DEATHS! This is just the tip of the iceberg.
YES you can't blame a gun maker for a gun owners actions but you can blame them for irresponsible distribution of those guns or poor reactions to issues with those guns. Same thing applies to links and the also to content for Google. The amount of spun garbage out there because Google desires content amounts to unfathomable amounts of garbage content flooding the web. Think of the webservers holding all this garbage and everything surrounding it. The global impact alone of all the energy needed for every aspect of that content, from being crawled and indexed, space required, loading of the content X billions of pages its shocking and probably has a notable impact on climate change.
A company this size needs to take better care before they make ANY decisions.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
A simple link juice question!
lets say i have backlink from a site with dr 80 and ur 10 and no.of external links on that page are 5 on the other hand my competitor has same backlink with same dr and ur but on that page there are other 10 external links already and link is 11th who is getting the most juice
SEO Learn Center | | Sam09schulz0 -
What are some of your favorite website examples for any reason - design, SEO, uniqueness, etc? Thanks Catherine Corn
What are some of your favorite website examples for any reason - design, SEO, uniqueness, etc? Thanks Catherine Corn
SEO Learn Center | | CatherineCorn10 -
Is the Search Love Conference worth the money?
Hi, Thinking about going but just gathering a few opinions first. Well, is it any good? Worth £1,000? Anything to share? Info here: https://www.distilled.net/events/searchlove-london/ Thanks
SEO Learn Center | | YNWA0 -
My Wordpress Organic Blog traffic disappeared and Google is indexing Viagra and Online Med titles for some articles. How to fix that?
Hello, I'm worried that all my organic traffic has disappeared according to Analytics from past friday and now Google is showing results from my title tags in the last days as you can see here: http://goo.gl/QFSgy Is there any additional resources I can read apart from Google Clean Your site Guidelines here https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/163634 or the Wordpress FAQ for hacked sites here? http://codex.wordpress.org/FAQ_My_site_was_hacked Very much appreciated all of your help! Regards.
SEO Learn Center | | viventuraSEO0 -
Many competitors are doing spam report as well as spam link building for my website. Could you suggest me that how can I resolve this issue?
Many competitors are doing spam report as well as spam link building for my website. Due to spam links my website's ranking has been going down. Could you suggest me that how can I resolve this issue? Regards,
SEO Learn Center | | GSM
Mak0 -
Best Website satisfaction Survey Tool/Company to use
I need to do a voice of customer survey on one of our key webpages. It's basic questionnaire of why did you come here today, did you complete your task, etc. The company we were using last time Ipercetion has gone up tremendously in price and I was looking for another vendor with same attributes of easy to build survey and simple code that can be put on page easily. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks.
SEO Learn Center | | inhouseninja0 -
Flow of Authority/PR Distribution of Internal Links
OK, there are tons of Q&A on this subject but after about 20 mins of sifting through I found nothing on this. On the surface it is a simple idea but I'd like to hear a wide range of thought s on this. So if a page has 150 internal links and only about 3-5 external links, would it still be considered a good page to get a link from assuming it is relevant and authoritative? My thoughts have always been that too many links on a page, regardless of whether or not they are internal links or external links, will dilute that page's authority either way and that in turn makes it a poor link prospect. If PR/authority flows internally through links then my thoughts should be substantiated. And I think that we all agree that external links flow authority out from the domain AND the page. But internal links flow authority away from the page which should make a page with lots of internal links on it a poor target for a link.
SEO Learn Center | | GearyLSF370 -
Websites copying my content and spamming it on 15+ different domains- WHY?? More pop up as I try to take each one down- what do they gain from this?
I own http://TheCareerProject.org and in the last 3 months over 15 sites have popped up copying my content and Google is scanning it as my own. Why would a site do this? Is it a hacker campaign to take away rankings? What benefits do they get from this. EXAMPLE1 : http://germanbollati.com/heat-victor-hugo-juarez-puebla/, EXAMPLE 2: http://rsa-dev1.com/unbalanced-underwriting-outsourcing-india/ There are 15 more I have submitted to Google Webmaster to evaluate and I contact the site owners and majority do not respond. Why are they doing this and what can I do? Thank you - Alicia- info@thecareerproject.org
SEO Learn Center | | miller4280