Duplicate products - is this fix acceptable?
-
Hey Mozzers,
Questions around this have been asked time and time again. But i have a specific example I would like some advice on.
I have 2 products,
Product 1: https://goo.gl/Gzo1WC
Product 2: https://goo.gl/VbrHQJAs you can see, the products are almost identical bar some technical specifications. The owner of the business wants them listing as 2 products, combining them into a single listing with configurable options is not an option.
As such I have simply made one a canonical of the other. Whilst not ideal this seems to be the best "SEO" fix.
Option 2: My second option is to rewrite the descriptions to they are different - not too hard on this product and a future options when i have more time, however....
I am presented with a similar problem for another product where there are 23 versions of the same product, i cannot rewrite the same info this many times. They are different sizes, ranges, capacities, resolutions and accuracies and must be listed separately but contain all the same features and basic product information. The basic info is too important not to talk about, and talking about all the technical specs would be too much and teaching the customers likely to buy them to suck eggs.
As such I have taken the 23 products and broken them down into 5 similar groups of 2 to 6 products. I have then picked 1 product from each group and written a unique description and changed all similar products in its group to match choosing 1product in each group as the canonical for all the others.
So 23 same products become 5 unique products with 18 duplicated products pointing to them as canonicals.
Any product pointing to another only differs in technical info, 95% of the page is the same.
Whilst obviously not ideal, Is this an acceptable use of canonicals?
-
I should have also mentioned the linking structure within the site.
All 23 versions of the product are linked from within 1 category that contains roughly 70 products. This is why the products must be kept separate. So users can browse the different specs alongside other products with similar comparable specs in the same category.
An example can be found here: https://goo.gl/5L4cpK (its a little unordered at the moment but will be more organised soon)
Take the 572 series, on the page above, it has 11 variations, the link currently filters the results on the page all 11 models are currently canonical'd to one version of the page. The filter also produces a category page that isn't linked on the website (https://goo.gl/c53sBY) This page is currently no-indexed.
How is the following for a solution?
Turn the 572 series filter link into a link to the 572 category page (https://goo.gl/c53sBY)
Change this page to be indexed and make its description a detailed guide to the full 572 series listing all models, options etc as you suggest
Make all the 572 products canonical of this super descriptive all singing and dancing page -
The lack of options is the biggest problem, hopefully some people have some more ideas or i guess ill stick with is
-
Hi Patrick, thanks for taking a look.
I agree with your first comment regarding my example product. At the moment im just trying to clear out the duplicate content flags as there are 400 products all guilty of similar crimes. A lot of work needs to be done before i can address individual product descriptions and look to insert the schema. So whilst all the traffic is going to one version of the product at the moment, because of the duplicated content neither were ranking before, so this isn't a problem. In time i will indeed look to make them different, remove the canonical and give it unique content.
I like the idea of the "main product page containing all versions", however, wouldn't this just add another version of the product with more duplicate content? Would all the other products become canonicals of this main version that links back out to them all?
Because it listed the different models + contained all the tech specs etc woulnd't it be too different to utilise a canonical in this manner?
-
Hi there
Really quick, Inflow has a great resource regarding thin and duplicate content for eCommerce, I suggest taking a look.
Okay, so, my thoughts here - one thing you could do here is option 2. Since these are two different versions of 1 product (while technical aspects may be the same), they are worthy of separate descriptions if you want to have a page for each. You can also take advantage of product Schema to help distinguish these a bit more as well to search engines.
Another potential option you have is one page for a product with a drop down to show the different versions of that product. That way, you have one page that can rank for that product with a great description, a bullet point list of the different versions, and a dropdown for the user to choose their version.
I am a bit weary of your canonical tag usage here because it's going to give all of your credit to the 15kg counter. A couple things come to mind here - if the 15kg sells more than the 30kg and you get more traffic / rankings there to begin with, this shouldn't be an issue. But if your 30kg gets traffic / rankings, then I'd be super cautious as to not lose your SERP positions and sales.
Just a thought! Let me know if this helps, good luck!
-
Hi,
You are correct in your use of canonical tags in this situation. I've run into similar instances and there really aren't any other options.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Regarding internal duplicate content
Suppose two of my webpages from the same site are having 30% to 35% common content. The reason behind this common content is that I put same data and images (in the main content area) since both pages are partially related. But, title tag, meta description, h1 tag, urls are different.
On-Page Optimization | | b.me
My questions are Can Google consider it as duplicate content?
Can it hamper the ranking of my pages ?
How can I deal with it?0 -
Keyword Stuffing and Product Reviews
Hello Fellow Mozzers! I am pretty new the SEO world and have been tasked with improving our companies SEO with no prior knowledge of anything to do with SEO as of about 5 months ago. So far, I have been fairly successful (May be luck). There is a product page on our website that has moved from Rank 8-9 all the way up to Rank 3, on a high volume keyword, which increased our traffic to that URL by 500%! I was very proud of this accomplishment until tragedy struck... We suddenly dropped to Rank 6. It doesn't look like we've lost any Backlinks to this URL. My suspicion is that we got penalized for Keyword Stuffing since we recently changed from have multiple pages for a specific product's reviews to having them all on one page (To decrease the number of URLs our Site has). Many of these product reviews have the Keyword in them making us have over 30 of this specific keyword on our page. Could this be a valid suspicion? Should we go back to having different URLs for reviews and Disallow them for Robots?
On-Page Optimization | | LaceyVapeWild0 -
Duplicate H3, H4 or H5 Tags
I know that duplicate H1 and H2 tags are a red flag for Google, but does the same apply for H3, H4 and H5 tags? A lot of my products have the same H5 tags and I'm wondering whether or not that is pulling down my keyword rank.
On-Page Optimization | | moon-boots0 -
Duplicate Content, Same Company?
Hello Moz Community, I am doing work for a company and they have multiple locations. For example, examplenewyork.com, examplesanfrancisco.com, etc. They also have the same content on certain pages within each website. For example, examplenewyork.com/page-a has the same content as examplesanfrancisco.com/page-a Does this duplicate content negatively impact us? Or could we rank for each page within each location parameter (for example, people in new york search page-a would see our web page and people in san fran search page-a would see our web page)? I hope this is clear. Thanks, Cole
On-Page Optimization | | ColeLusby0 -
Title Tag duplication.
Hi Guys/Gals, We do a lot of work in a very competitive space (personal injury) and are having an internal debate on the best way to implement title tags for new sites. We understand that keywords, title tags, etc., don't possess the power they once did, but we have yet to see conclusive proof of this in our space. The vast majority of competitors still rank very well for keyword focused content, title tags, etc., while having average link profiles and little content. We write a lot of content for our clients and want to know if someone can offer their opinion on the question that follows this example: "Top 5 Injuries Caused by T-Bone Collisions | Indiana Accident Lawyer" Would it seem repetitive or manipulative to construct title tags as shown, always placing "Indiana Accident Attorney" or "Indianapolis Accident Lawyer," or similar of at the end of each title tag? Thanks, gang!
On-Page Optimization | | Wayne760 -
Google Authorship v Product Rich Snippets
Hi Folks, So ,we have a website that we have fully configured with Product Rich Snippets (its an e-Commerce Store), including product image and the usual. We are considering verifying the Authorship of the website for the client as they will have an extensive blog. My question is, if we verify the Authorship of the website, which will Google use in terms of the rich snippet photograph in the SERP, will it use the product image as detailed in the Product Rich Snippet or us the company logo we have on the Google Plus page (Verified Author) Or is it a case we only add the rel:author tag to pages without products. Would just like to verify before we continue on as Thanks in advance John
On-Page Optimization | | Johnny4B0 -
Is ranking hurt by slow moving product
I sell B2B industrial products. I have 300 products on the site. Some products are seldom purchased and the brand name is not significant for these products If the title page is the right wording and length, and there is a valid product widget -1-1-1 but nobody has bought one in 5 years due to it being a niche product, but they could and it's a profitable sale. Question: Is** overall site rankin**g **being hurt **by valid content ( Description, Part # and Price and it can be checked out in the cart), but is is never/seldom searched for.?
On-Page Optimization | | Wales0 -
Duplicate Content
We offer Wellness programs for dogs and cats. A lot of the information is the same except for specifics that relate to young vs. senior pets. I have these different pages: Senior Wellness Kitten Wellness Puppy Wellness Adult Wellness Can each page have approx. 75% of the same text? Or should I rewrite each page so the information (though the same) appears unique.
On-Page Optimization | | PMC-3120870