Local SEO Issue or Penguin? Or both?
-
Hey folks
I have a fairly complicated SEO issue we have been looking at for a few years now. There are two parts to this problem so would be interested to get the input of the community here and any experienced in Penguin and Local SEO issues.
I am going to have to change the names to protect the innocent a bit here as some of the issue relates to a competitor and a shared address.
History
My client originally worked for company A which we will call Events R us.
He then set up on his own at a new address and lets call his company Fantastic Events.
EventsRus never had a good website or SEO
Fantastic Events set up a great website and really focused on adding tons of relevant content for all the myriad event options available and subsequently did really well.
This is a few years back and they were also doing some article marketing on sites like ezinearticles.com to build links (1). As time went on they did get a bit carried away with these low quality links and were buying $5 spun content articles and other low quality links. They ranked really well for a few key terms.
There was a suspected local SEO issue as fantastic events used the same office as their fathers business called fantastic finance and the citations / phone number issues etc all had to be cleared up (2).
Fantastic Events and Events R Us remained friends and over time Fantastic Events moved to the same farm address as Events R Us so they could offer a wider range of services based on the farm (and ran by fantastic events) and to some extent run away from the address confusion with the same office and very similar name to the other fantastic finance business.
Events R Us wanted some of the Fantastic Events success and built a new website and largely copied the website of Fantastic Events - at times even lifting entire pages of content but certainly mirroring the structure of the site. Fantastic Events tussled with them for a few years over this and over time they updated the content but the structure and services and address all pretty much mirrored what was offered on the Fantastic Events site. (3)
Two companies - same address (it's a farm so whilst there are different barns I believe Google can only get as far as the farm gate so same address to all intents and purposes. Same services give or take. Events R Us was the older company overall by several years and was at the farm address many years longer than Fantastic Events (4).
Fantastic Events starts running a blog and adding regular, useful event orientated content. The first true team building blog out there as far as we could tell and traffic tripled over a six month period.
Penguin hits and Fantastic Events loses a lot of traction - this gets worse with Penguin 2.0. Both the homepage and the evening events page lose visibility and traction. The owner gives up on the blog to a large degree.
Subsequent clean up happens and is rigorous - all bad links are pretty much removed and the remaining elements are disavowed. (90% of it is actually gone by now). Penguin 3.0 comes and no recovery at all. Nothing. If anything it gets worse and the once strong blog is now losing traction.
Events R Us starts to do really well in search for exactly the same terms that Fantastic Events used to do well for. In particular one page ranks for exactly the same keywords and in exactly the same position (#1) as what was believed to be the primary traffic driver on the Fantastic Events site. It is almost like they exchanged positions and Events R Us went from nowhere to a strong footing with some national and local keywords and Fantastic Events fell from grace.
A new website is built. All content is refreshed and bought up to date. Some light investment back in the blog. Some light link building is done around digital PR and infographics. Some initial movement in the right direction but overall this did not move the dial.
Certain pages on the site that used to rank are nowhere - looks very much like a page level / keyword level penguin penalty. These same pages rank great, often first on the competitor site (an exchange of positions to some extent).
Advice from myself and other esteemed consultants was to clean up, build some good links and wait for Penguin 4.0 to remove that eventuality. Also that the address issue could be causing some local SEO issue where Google believes the two businesses are one and has somehow merged the two with some local SEO filter or some such (same business with multiple websites at same address).
Penguin 4.0 comes along and no improvements. Events R us sit pretty.
Feeling is that the local issue must play a part here now that Penguin should be eliminated due to the extensive link clean up etc and there must now be some action to resolve this address / local issue.
Issues
- low quality links - but cleaned up 100% now.
- same business name and address as fathers business initially
- older business copied the structure and content of newer business
- moved to same address as older more established business with very similar content
- older business now seems to have taken all the exact keywords and positions the newer business used to occupy
- Penguin 4.0 and no resolution.
- Local SEO issue seemingly remains
Summary
So we are left in a difficult position. The business does not want to move. But if there is some filtering or merging going on here then how can we get around this? The client is likely collateral damage to an algorithmic component designed to stop single businesses having multiple websites. I know there are reports of this happening but I have never seen such a thing for an innocent business like this but the nature of the address (two separate barns on a gated farm) and the history and similarities between the businesses makes this difficult.
Things are somewhat desperate though - a move has to be made now. Even if that is a physical one. The client has considered a virtual address to take that variable out the picture but I have advised caution. I am even cautious about a change in physical address. Google has a long memory. If such a move was made at considerable expense would it help or would the other business retain
Is the best option a new start? New brand, address, website, services etc - cut all ties with the historic Fantastic Events brand and by association the Events R Us brand. This is not a recommendation I can quickly or easily make so would be really interested to hear the feedback on anyone who has come across such a multi faceted and complex issue before.
This is a tough one. We know what we are doing on the local front. We know what we are doing on the Penguin front. We know how to build links and authority. We are doing this work of the clock to help a long term friend / client get back to where they really deserve to be. The history is not spotty clean but the good work and effort far outway a short spell building dodgy links several years ago now. As an SEO consultant I don't want to advise for the company to rebrand and move offices at considerable expense but whilst I have a theoretical understanding of the issue how can we prove it and be sure this is the best possible advice?
Thanks folks - hope this at least makes for interesting reading. This is something of an edge case. A good business likely caught up in a filter designed to stop abuse.
Cheers
Marcus -
Hey, I agree. But this client has poured a lot of money down the SEO consulting plughole (not with us) and is just not keen to throw more money at this site that is seemingly just burned. I suggested second opinion a while back and he did try that and the other consultants (good guys that know their stuff) just hit a brick wall as well.
It's a super odd one although we are trying to help and doing some experiments (pro bono) as I am sure there is something to learn and a good case study here somewhere.
-
Hi Marcus,
I haven't see a case like you described regarding getting caught in a duplication filter. Like I said, I'm really not an expert on penalties. In your shoes, with a client with this complex of a history, I would hire an expert. It could save the client months of trouble. I'm sure you really know your stuff, but even the best SEOs can overlook things. I'd want a second opinion from someone who looks at penalties and filters all day long to tell me if I'm missing something.
-
Hey Miriam - thanks for the input.
We have tons of experience with penalties - fact is the client has no bad links remaining. Zilch. They also have very little in the way of good links and unfortunately ranked predominantly on dodgy links. They do have a good deal more than the other company though that has seemingly been rewarded with their rankings. I agree it would not hurt to get a second opinion.
It's a tough one - it's all but impossible to diagnose with 100% confidence and it seems the client simply can't rank for the terms they want to. We waited for Penguin 4.0 as the final factor here and still no improvement.
Few quick questions
- have you ever seen anyone caught up in a local duplication filter who should not have been?
- if so have you ever seen anyone recover?
The client has moved address but my gut tells me Google has a long memory so I am unsure again if this will help (and certainly it does not seem to as of yet).
Tough one!
Cheers
Marcus -
Hi Marcus!
Thanks for pinging me on Twitter. I'm not a penalty expert, so I'm going to start my advice with this recommendation: I highly, highly recommend that you hire a penalty expert to consult with you on this prior to advising your client to make a move in any direction. The sheer length of your client's story = a very tangled scenario that is going to need to be investigated from the ground up for resolution. Advice given while not looking at your actual client's properties could actually make the problem worse rather than better (arggghh!) and that is the last thing your client needs right now. So, I highly recommend investing in consulting with an expert. I would recommend you consider seeing if Joy Hawkins has availability. Her coverage of both Penguin and Possum is excellent. She knows her stuff and may be one of the few Local SEOs out there with the patience and skill to get to the root of your client's issues and map out a plan for cleaning them up.
So, with that being said, this is what I see:
-
It's extremely unfortunate that in your client's effort to avoid NAP confusion with their father's business, they ended up sharing a property with a same-industry competitor. That really raises a red flag for me, and when coupled with the fact that the competitor then copied their structure/strategy/content ... yes, it makes perfect sense that Google would be suspicious that this is really one business trying to brand itself as two. It has all the earmarks. Worrisome.
-
This thread at Linda Buquet's Local Search forum might interest you, http://www.localsearchforum.com/local-search/43121-have-you-seen-any-local-rankings-you-feel-were-affected-penguin-4-0-a.html Marie Haynes might also be another good person for you to contact.
Hope this helps!
-
-
Hey - thanks for taking the time to respond. I am pretty much of the opinion that a new address is the only option here but I am concerned that Google has a long memory about these things. Countless hours have been spent talking to the largely hopeless Google support staff by the customer but as this is an algorithmic thing the issue is going to go away.
-
Hi Marcus,
Really a very complex case.
Possum is tough! Also you are right, Penguin is playing also.
I think that Google see Event R us as the main website and Fantastic Events as the attempt to deceive, mostly due to age gives authority.From SEO strictly speaking, nothing else to do. Even more, the owner of the Fantastic Events should not be the owner of the new domain, if he decides to move.
Said that.
Brainstorming, before advice to move and start over. I would try some out of the box thinking/options.1.- The fist step should be: address might be changed a little, by going to the city council and/or the post office and asking for a differentiation like Beaumont Farm - B.
Sending the new NAP, with the B to all aggregators asap. After that, setting up 2 GPS tracking devices as far as possible, with the B for Fantastic Events and using an online service, known due to Google follows it as related company or business partner.
2.- Sending to Google the official registration of the business and the tax payments, as well (one of my clients was required to do so for register a second address in another country).
It could be used to prove that both business, though they are family related, do not belong to the same person. As far as I know, many automatic algorithms can be lifted manually by Google.3.- By a very intensive social media campaign from Fantastic Events which includes the name of the proprietor of the company.
As we all know, though Social Media will not help the website itself, Google reads and understands Social Media signals completely. In that case, using companies no related to Google, like Facebook - as far as I know - Twitter and LinkedIn. Perhaps some paid ads also. Google does not like when clients pay somewhere else. It seems they have algorithms to call back and offers help and support...
4.- Also, a very intensive campaign using Google tools, ie. Google+ and reviews which includes strong signals to differentiate Fantastic Events from Event R us.
5.- If data from Uber, Netflix and Tinder Insights might sink a person, what about getting a different cable provider for the Fantastic Events. Using Uber with the new B & the GPS in place.
Due to it seems that all the algorithms are rolling continuously, if some of the measures have results, it will be within a month, after the B in place. As far as I understand, none of the above moves are expensive.
In the event that everything fails, your client will have to move, and sue Google - yes, it can be done, perhaps with the help of an Org or a reputed Law School - so keeping all the records is very advisable. As well as an aggressive campaign by twitter and exposing the issue to the Media, if your client is willing to fight back, of course.
Wish you success.
P.S. On the contrary, if your client changed his address, tell him do not log in Google, Uber, Netflix, etc., in or in the vicinity of his father business.
Those would be very contradictory signals.
Modified November 1st.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Practitioner Vs Practice Listings: Local Pack Issues
Hi, and THANK YOU! in advance for any input you give, its much appreciated. We've been doing research on this and also wanted to see if the community could provide any more input. We work with a plastic surgery clinic. The namesake of the surgery clinic is that of the first doctor: Practice Name: Gardner Plastic Surgery Plastic Surgeon 1: Dr. Gardner (we've worked with him since at least 2015) Plastic Surgeon 2: Dr. Baccaro (joined practice June 2018) Plastic Surgeon 3: Dr. Crespo (joining their practice starting Sept. 1 2020!) To summarize our issues to date: As we brought on our new surgeon Dr. Baccaro in 2018 we decided to ultimately claim his practitioner GMB listing, and to claim Dr. Gardner's (which had been unclaimed and we had to eliminate duplicates.) Before deciding to utilize the supplementary practitioner listings, we were managing/optimizing their main practice listing: Gardner Plastic Surgery. We continued to primarily/heavily optimize “Gardner Plastic Surgery” and mimicked the details for “Dr. Gardner” and “Dr. Baccaro” From Dec. 2018 - Jan. 2020 we would from time to time notice that "Dr. Paul Gardner's" individual listing was showing up in Local Pack instead of "Gardner Plastic Surgery" but it was not really a big issue, happened very occasionally. Around Dec. 2020 - Jan. 2020 we experienced some Google errors when trying to create Google Posts with videos--it resulted in a few very random and unexpected suspensions. We were posting appropriate content, it seemed that Google was struggling to process our video files from API and it would get stuck in a loop etc. All in all the suspensions happened, and we worked with Google many times to try to understand and stop that from happening. Fortunately that hasn't happened since (and we now don't post videos to Google posts because that was a bit too stressful. We still upload to main photo/video area) Since February 2020 to present we have consistently noticed "Dr. Paul Gardner" appearing in place of the well-optimized full of photos/videos/posts "Gardner Plastic Surgery." We thought algorithm updates etc./COVID were all factors as to why doctors may be more prescient than a clinic. There were times where we thought it was fixed for sure, only for it to continue to crop up. Specifically we were trying to rank for the search term "naples plastic surgeon" What We've Done So Far: I've done a LOT of research and understand a number of errors we were overlooking from Q&As like this (duplicate categories/phone numbers): https://moz.com/community/q/gmb-page-for-law-not-ranking-but-individual-attorneys-names-are And: https://moz.com/community/q/partner-outranking-main-site-in-local So I understand we have some decisions to make on the best path forward. We’re guilty of just about all of the issues Miriam elaborates on. ** As we move forward there are a few elements at play:** They are adding a new surgeon to the practice in September, we’re excited! Making a clear decision before he arrives is important With the addition of the 3<sup>rd</sup> surgeon “Gardner Plastic Surgery” is actually changing the name of its business to “Naples Plastic Surgery” as its much more suiting to the growing scope of practice. ** To end:** Wow. I wrote a lot and really appreciate it if you stuck with me! Some thoughts I had that I wonder if anyone has insight on: Is the fact that “Gardner Plastic Surgery” is “Dr. Gardner’s” namesake a huge factor into why the individual doctor is popping up more often? He’s well known and his name and his business name have been around the internet for years longer than Dr. Baccaro etc. Do you think changing the name to “Naples Plastic Surgery” along with other needed updates could help address the issue? Could our string of unfortunate, though ultimately well-intentioned suspensions be part of what’s enabled “Dr. Paul Gardner” to prop up as well? Should we choose to heavily optimize all listings and see how diversifying categories etc. helps? Should we try to de-optimize and focus on practice profile for now as that’s our main listing? If you have any other recommendations, I’d love to hear them. I think working on optimizing and diversifying our listings would be useful. Thank you again.
Local Listings | | MoxxiMarketing0 -
How to rank local keywords?
Hi guys, I have been enjoying here to be a part of the community. A simple question: I have some local low volume keywords and want to rank on 1 with all. I have set up pages according to the keywords such as "california plumbers" and page is /california-plumbers.html To rank these types of keywords I am doing local listing and adding these particular page instead of "home page". Am I doing right? Would classifieds and local listings are suffice to get these keywords on 1 spot of Google? What else can I do? Can you suggest me some queries to find "deep local directories or classified or other stuff whereby I can target my pages? Thank you in advance for ideas.
Local Listings | | ksmith882 -
Website showing #1 in Local search, disappeared from Organic search - previously #1?
We manage a website santamaryflorist.com - a local Ohio florist. She is #1 ranked on Google Local results (and also on Yahoo and Bing). The site's homepage was previously #1 ranked for Organic but has disappeared from Organic ranking over the past few days. It shows occasionally as #1 in organic, like every few hours, but typically does not show. - Sub-pages are still showing on organic but not front page- Last week we had some issues with crawl errors but those seem to be resolved for several days (pages not available)_Why would the site be showing #1 in Local but only occasionally as the #1 result in organic but most of the time not showing in Organic results at all? _
Local Listings | | william20390 -
Consistant citations for Local SEO
Hi Guys - Ive got a tricky question. I want to create correct and consistent citations for this business http://www.singlewellcarsales.co.uk/ However theres a twist, the website is called ‘Singlewell Car Sales Ltd’ but they also have a service centre called ‘Singlewell Service Centre Ltd’ so in theory two business names under one website. We want to treat them as two separate businesses when adding to local directories. We also want to create two local Google pages. Both divisions share the same website, and address but include a different telephone number and business name. I want to use Schema mark up on the website to reference both business names so that Google can make a link between the name and various local citations NAP. My main questions is, can you use Schema two mark up two business names under one website? or will Google get confused and regard it as duplicate or inconsistent citations? Many Thanks Jon Rayner
Local Listings | | NaughtyChilli0 -
Organic and Local ranking changes UK
Hi, Has anyone seen any major fluctuations in local and organic rankings over the last week? I'm recording some significant changes, cannot fathom why at the moment other than Pigeon is still maybe rolling out... Dan
Local Listings | | SEOBirmingham810 -
How do we setup renting space without hurting our local seo?
Currently, one of our offices has two businesses in it that our owned by the same person. The law firm and the title company. They both use the same address, but they both rank locally for this area. I'm worried that having another company rent space here that is not affiliated with the owner AND is using the same address will hurt us. What are our options here? The best thing I can think to do is have them add a suite number or something to their listing, but I'm not sure exactly how to do that. Do I need to get the post office is to verify that? Will google and the rest just overturn it, if it's not in their records? Anyone know how best to proceed with this? Thanks, Ruben
Local Listings | | KempRugeLawGroup1 -
Can I use a fake email address for Moz Local submission? This is for a medical practice, that has been advised not to publish an email address due to HIPAA concerns.
I work with medical practices, who due to HIPAA do not want to publish an email address in listings. Would it cause a problem if I just submitted a non-working address (like noreply@client.com) that is not set up at all, so any email sent there would just bounce? Obviously, one option is to use a HIPAA compliant email account, but there are other considerations (timeliness of responses related to clinical issues, for example) that make it less than ideal for a many medical practices to publish a public email address of any sort. I'm interested in any options or solutions that could allow me to use Moz Local (which requires an email address) for businesses with HIPAA concerns. Ira
Local Listings | | irapasternack0 -
Confusion and Issues With Google Places + Google Plus for Business
Hi all, I'm currently dealing with the frustration between our Google Places page and Google Plus for Business. I know, it's not an uncommon issue, so I'm hoping there's an easy fix to mine! I am currently dealing with 2 Google accounts and 2 businesses. Each business has 2 locations. Each account has 1 location of each business. Obviously this isn't ideal. 😕 A few questions: 1. Each account has already been setup with a personal Google Plus page. Will this interfere or cause any issue when I claim the existing Google Places businesses for a Google Plus for Business? 2. Once I have verified the Google Plus for Business page, I can then merge it with our standard Google Places page, correct? 3. Is the merging only for control/login and dashboard settings? Will there still be 2 separate pages/URLs? 4. If someone +1's our Google Places page, does this reflect on our Plus page, or vice/versa? 5. Is there a way to assign these listings to different accounts/logins without deleting the listing and creating them fresh again? I'm assuming no, but would love to hear of a solution! Thanks a lot!
Local Listings | | kirmeliux0