Anyone know how/where to get keyword yield ratio?
-
I'm trying to incorporate keyword yield ratio (the ratio of keywords to pages yielding search traffic) in my seo report.
I want to be able to compare on a monthly basis the percentage ratio of keywords to a landing page yielding search traffic.
So for example, in July we might have 5 keywords that earned a click to landing page A.
But in September, the number of keywords grew to 8 keywords that earned a click to landing A.
I would like to be able to report monthly on the % ratio growth of number of keywords to landing pages that yield search traffic. Aim is to grow # of keywords per page...
Is there a way I can get this data through seomoz tools or google analytics?
Thanks,
Gemma
-
Yeah... I'm trying to find a way to do it without me having to dump into excel... but thanks!
-
I looked up "amalgamation" - I can't even pronounce it right. So... I am in over my head here. But I am still trying!
I think you can import the data into Excel. Then using some formulas get the numbers you are looking for. A field that counts the number of keywords. You could also use a conditional formula. This is hard to explain but I think you could do it.
-
Sorry but that's all I got... not even sure what "amalgamation" means. Sounds painful!
-
Hi Stephan,
Thanks. But that particular report doesn't give you amalgamation of the % ratio growth of all non-paid keywords per landing page though..
-
I think I got it. Do you have a Google Analytics account?
If so... if you click on the ecommerce section, you should find a section called "keywords" where you can select "non-paid keywords" to get a list of all the keywords that sent traffic to your site. You can also get this list by going through the "traffic sources" section.
Once you have your list of referring keywords, you should see a drop down that says "none" in the column next to the keyword column. If you activate the drop down you can add another parameter...select "landing page" which will bring up the landing page associated with each keyword.
So you'll have visits per keyword per landing page... I think this gives you enough info for your report! Let me know if you need more info or if I am off base.
-
I want to be able to compare on a monthly basis the percentage ratio of keywords to a landing page yielding search traffic.
So for example, in July we might have 5 keywords that earned a click to landing page A.
But in September, the number of keywords grew to 8 keywords that earned a click to landing A.
I would like to be able to report monthly on the % ratio of number of keywords to landing pages that yield search traffic. Aim is to grow # of keywords per page...
Hope that's a bit clearer?
Thanks.
-
Hi.
Can you be more specific? Maybe give an example.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Comparing New vs. Old Keyword Difficulty Scores
We've had a few questions regarding the new Keyword Difficulty score used in Keyword Explorer, and how it compares to the old score in our stand-alone Keyword Difficulty tool. Specifically, people want to know why some scores are much lower using the new tool. There a general discussion of the math behind the tool in this post: Keyword Research in 2016: Going Beyond Guesswork One of the problems we had with the original Keyword Difficulty score is that, because it's based on our Page Authority (PA) score and PA tends toward the middle of the 0-100 range, Difficulty got a bit bunched up. A Difficulty score in the low-to-mid 20s (via the old tool) is actually very low. So, we set out to re-scale the new tool to broaden that score and use more of the 0-100 range. We hoped this would allow more granularity and better comparisons. While the logic is sound, we're concerned that we may have been too aggressive in this re-scaling, given recent feedback. So, we're going to be analyzing a large set of keywords (anonymously, of course) that people have run through the tool to see if too many Difficulty scores seem too low. If they do, we'll make some adjustments to the math. In the meantime, please be aware that low scores may appear lower in the new tool and very high scores may appear higher. We wanted to address some of the limitations in V1 and feedback over the years, and so the old and new scores really can't be compared directly in a meaningful way. We're sorry for any confusion that has caused, and we will re-evaluate if necessary.
Moz Pro | | Dr-Pete3 -
Update in Moz spider/tools?? Flagging duplicate content / ignoring canonical
Hi all, Has there been an update in the SEOmoz crawling software? We now have thousands of dupe content/page title warnings for paginated product page URLs that have correctly formatted canonicals. e.g. http://www.woolovers.com/british-wool/mens/tweed-green/wool-countryman-suede-patch-sweater.aspx ... has following pages with identical content that have been flagged: http://www.woolovers.com/british-wool/mens/olive-green/wool-countryman-suede-patch-sweater.aspx?p=true&rspage=4 http://www.woolovers.com/british-wool/mens/olive-green/wool-countryman-suede-patch-sweater.aspx?p=true&rspage=6 http://www.woolovers.com/british-wool/mens/olive-green/wool-countryman-suede-patch-sweater.aspx?p=true&rspage=4 ..plus 4 more URL's. But they all have canonical set. There's even a notice at the bottom of report that tells us there's a canonical set to http://www.woolovers.com/british-wool/mens/tweed-green/wool-countryman-suede-patch-sweater.aspx What gives, SEOmoz ?? Thanks Michael
Moz Pro | | LawrenceNeal0 -
Keyword analysis - error with difficulty %
Hello everyone! Edge of all, I like and I use very often the "Keyword analysis" tool . However, recently, I have some difficulty to rely on the difficulty % of the keywords I've added. As an example I entered as keywords for a french speaking client, words with a geographical reference. It gives me a percentage too high because I am almost convinced that it would probably not be difficult to work with. My question is: is there any known errors with keywords georeferenced French (google canada - english) and also what to trust when I want proof of the difficulty of a keyword in case of some errors may occur in the tool.
Moz Pro | | PTech-1885830 -
Google Algorithm Update July 30, 2012 - Anyone else notice a major drop in keyword rankings
From July 30th to the 31st many of my keyword rankings in Google plumited 30 spots or more. Has anyone else notice this on their site? Does anyone have any idea for the presumed penalty? I can PM my site information if needed for further assistance. As always thank you for the assistance, and any help in this matter is greatly appreciated!
Moz Pro | | BethA1 -
Why am I getting an access error when creating my first campaign?
The exact error message is: The change you wanted was rejected. Maybe you tried to change something you didn't have access to. I checked the Word Count and I am definitely <300 keywords. I have also made sure that the Branded Keywords are entered 1 per entry form. My cookies are clear and there should be no issue with my browser.
Moz Pro | | trufflelabs0 -
Keyword tool results - broad match or exact?
Do the SEOmoz keyword rankings display results for exact match or broad match?
Moz Pro | | ClaytonKendall0 -
Do keywords in drop-down menus count?
In running one of my campaigns in SEOMoz Pro, it was recommended that I reduce the amount of times a keyword is used to 15. On the actual page, there are fewer than 15, but when you include the number of times it is used in drop-downs from the nav bar, the number is 53. I know there is really no hard and fast rule about how many instances of a keyword make for keyword stuffing and the drop-downs only use the term where needed. Without it's use, it would be difficult to navigate the site. Is this a problem or should I focus on more important fixes?
Moz Pro | | rdreich490 -
LDA vs Farmer/Panda Update
Has anyone re-run the correlation data for webpages' LDA Score since Google's Farmer/Panda update? I still have my writers use the LDA Tool and I am curious to know if there was a significant change in correlation now that "quality content" is touted as a more important ranking factor by Google.
Moz Pro | | costume0