Duplicate page error from SEOmoz
-
SEOmoz's Crawl Diagnostics is complaining about a duplicate page error. I'm trying to use a rel=canonical but maybe I'm not doing it right.
This page is the original, definitive version of the content:
https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/sent-2011-10-01
This page is an alias that points to it (each month the alias is changed to point to the then current issue):
https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/latest-issue
The alias page above contains this tag (which is also updated each month when a new issue comes out) in the section:
Is that not correct? Is the https (vs http) messing something up?
Thanks!
-
Thanks, Ryan.
My entire site is https. I 301 any http request to the https version. That works fine.
I also 301 any non-www to the www version. That works.
I'm not currently doing anything special with the trailing slash (or lack of). I guess I should 301 anything with a trailing slash to the non-slash version, rather than serve up slash and non-slash each as status 200.
Appreciate the guidance...
-
What would you expect to happen?
Well, when look at the current Q&A URL:
http://www.seomoz.org/q/duplicate-page-error-from-seomoz
now try adding a trailing slash to it
http://www.seomoz.org/q/duplicate-page-error-from-seomoz/
in this case the URL with the trailing slash is rejected, which is expected. What I don't expect is for the page to be redirected to the root Q&A page. Not sure why that was implemented here and it seems unusual to me.
An example of a site with the (close to) expected behavior is the Distilled site:
http://www.distilled.net/blog/seo/7-technical-seo-wins-for-web-developers/
If you try to remove the trailing slash, you will notice the URL is changed back to a URL with the trailing slash.
What I am a bit surprised about in the Distilled example is the redirected page shows a 200 header code. I believe it should display a 301 redirect from the page without the trailing slash to the page with it.
Overall I would say this is very nit-picky SEO but since the topic came up, it is relevant. Actually I am curious enough about this I will use my staff question this month on this topic
Should I 301 redirect the url with the slash to the url without the slash, or something else?
Yes. This issue is very similar to www vs non-www. Each page should have one version of a URL available and not more. It is not so important which you choose in as much as you make a decision and remain consistent.
The Distilled site chooses to end all URLs with a slash. That is a fine choice. SEOmoz chooses (as do I) to end category pages with a slash and actual web pages without a slash. Using this system if you look at a URL and it ends with a slash, you know you can go deeper. If the URL does not have a slash, you have reached the bottom.
Wow. This is the most time I have spent thinking about this little detail of SEO
-
Thanks for the response. A followup question.... when you say:
"when I enter the same URL with a trailing slash, the same page appears"
What would you expect to happen?
Should I 301 redirect the url with the slash to the url without the slash, or something else?
Thanks.
-
Your example of how the canonical tag is presented is perfect. You can verify your canonical tag is recognized using the MozBar Analyze Page > Page Attributes.
The https should not cause any issue.
Is it possible something else is causing the duplicate content warning? For example, I noticed when I enter the same URL with a trailing slash, the same page appears:
https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/latest-issue
https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/latest-issue/
Of course, both pages are canonicalized properly but it does show there is an issue on your site which should be addressed. Technically adding a slash to the end of a URL is a different page in much the same way that adding or removing the "www" subdomain offers a different page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Lots of 404s listed in Top Pages by Page Authority
Hi guys, I'm slowly getting to grips with all the aspects of using Moz.
Moz Pro | | giddygrafix
Looking at my link analysis, under the tab labelled Top Pages by Page Authority, there's an awful lot of 404 pages listed. Are these pages which are being linked to (either internally or externally), and should I put a 301 redirect on all the pages listed? I've attached a picture... moz-screen-shot.jpg0 -
Duplicate titles reported with canonical
Hi Mozzers, In the reports it is saying that I have some duplicate content and titles even though there is a canonical tag on them, is anyone else getting this?
Moz Pro | | KarlBantleman0 -
Find 404 errors
Seomoz is currently reporting 404-errors, without saying where these errors are found. What good is this report when it does'nt say a word about where I can find the page linking to the 404? Screen: http://filer.crenia.no/NJPZ I really think it's time for Seomoz to prioritize upgrading the pro tools. Feels like they haven't been updated in ages..
Moz Pro | | Inevo1 -
How to increase page authority
I wonder how to increase the page authority or the domain authority to begin with. It seems you are putting a lot of weight on this in your analysis.
Moz Pro | | wcsinc0 -
Duplicate content error?
I am getting a duplicate content error for the following pages: http://www.bluelinkerp.com/products/accounting/index.asp http://www.bluelinkerp.com/products/accounting/ But, of course, the 2nd link is just an automatic redirect to the index file, is it not? Why is it thinking it is a different URL? See image. NJfxA.png
Moz Pro | | BlueLinkERP0 -
Why aren't canonical tags reducing duplicate page title/content?
We have canonical tags set up for a feature page on one of our sites. This site has an image gallery controlled by javascript. To aid the user experience the image can also be specified by a URL parameter (the javascript also uses this URL to fetch the images). The SEOMoz report complains that the links to these images have duplicate page titles and content. To try and combat this we set canonical tags to point only to the original page, without the slideshow parameter. e.g. http://www.example.com/feature-page/ http://www.example.com/feature-page/?slideshow=1 -> canonical tag set to http://www.example.com/feature-page/ http://www.example.com/feature-page/?slideshow=2 -> canonical tag set to http://www.example.com/feature-page/ The latest SEOMoz report has come back and the errors still exist. What can we do to remove these error messages? Thanks
Moz Pro | | TJSSEO1 -
SEOMoz Campaign Tool
I've noticed that when looking at the SEOmoz tool, specifically the On Page analysis tool, it is still looking at an old url. About two months ago I made updates to all of our category page URLs. Previously the old urls were stuffed with keywords, strange characters and were really long. When looking at the on-page tool though it is referencing the old urls for keywords and I'm wondering why? I figure its been long enough to recognize the new urls. Is the paring of a keyword and a url saved and just graded on a weekly basis to produce the report? I had expected to see the new url's by now which are also represented in the sitemap. Around that same time I also added our TellAFriend Page and Review pages to our Robots.txt file as not to be crawled but I still see these pages come up in the errors report. Should this update as well?
Moz Pro | | dgmiles0 -
In page analysis
Hello, Seomoz did a crawl of my whole page, but under in page analysis grade rankings there have been no crawls? how can I initiate one?
Moz Pro | | AdamGymyGym0