How best to approach archiving badly optimised content
-
I signed up SEO Moz about a month ago as i'm currently rebuilding my site from scratch and wanted to learn from current mistakes.
At present I use the forum software Invision Power Board to manage my site and one thing i've learnt is that it is terrible for SEO, there are so many thousands of errors listed by the crawler that it's not even worth trying to fix it.
However because it has 5 or 6 years worth of content alot of which is on Google I don't want to totally remove it, rather I would prefer to archive it of with a big banner at the top letting anybody that visits it know that it's no longer in use and pointing them to the frontpage.
I should note that it is in a subfolder already so the location of any of the links won't be changed.
So the few questions I have are:
- The forum index has alot of link juice and I would like to redirect that to the new forum index, however for archive purposes the old index still needs to be accessible.
- Some topics are very popular and appear high in Google and have alot of backlinks. The important information in these forum topics will be available elsewhere on the new rebuilt site. Again I would like to redirect both link juice and users to the new page, however being a forum topic there are tens or hundreds of pages of old comments that need to still be accessible for reference.
- There are bound to be duplicate meta title and description issues with new similarly named categories appearing both on the new site and the old forum, is this going to be that much of a problem?
So really what i'm asking is, how should I go about archiving this of without destroying content and rankings, but still making sure that the new stuff is getting the right exposure both to users and search engines alike?
-
hmm that's very interesting, i've had another look at the stats to give more insight.
150,000 visitors hit the forums from search engines every month, of these only 10 landing pages get over 1000 visitors and 168 get over 100. This amounts to 76,000 visits or roughly half.
The other half comes from visits to a whopping 16,222 different landing pages.
So whilst manually redirecting those 168 may be a manageable task it would mean the loss of half of the visitors the forums pull in.
It also doesn't deal with the problem with letting users still browse the old content whilst transferring the link juice to newer areas, since Search Engines would not take kindly to being treated differently to an actual user.
-
We have a blog that gets about 2000 to 3000 short posts per year. Most of those posts have a temporary value and have very little archive value.
The posts are filed in folders by year such as /blog/2010/ .
Once a year we run analytics to identify old posts that pull in significant traffic or old posts that have valuable links. Where possible we create a new page of evergreen content on the same subject and 301 redirect those posts.
All posts that receive very little traffic are considered to be "dead weight" on our site. We delete those posts and redirect the entire folder to the homepage of the blog with an .htaccess file at /blog/2010/.htaccess. This also reduces the size of our database.
With a forum, you might be able to delete some of the worthless material and feature some of the archival gold.
-
Thanks for the response you're right it is not a simple problem, but i'm hoping people on this forum may be able to provide some very useful tips or advice from past experience, i'm sure many will have had to tackle this sort of dilemma before.
Just looked at some stats which demonstrate it's importance, 51.76% of visits come from Google and land on the forum currently.
Given that stat it may seem ludicrous to want to change the site so drastically but as you can imagine having everything managed on a forum can become very messy compared to a custom coded site where every page and content type is tailored to its specific needs and of course keeping the urls is not going to be an option when it's all tied into "topic ids".
-
I don't think that this is a simple problem.
A good diagnosis should be considering historic traffic information, past and potential linkage structure, keywords, external links, premium content vs worthless content, usability and more.
If this forum is low value it maybe be best just redirecting everything.
However, if there is a lot of value there I would want to put some careful consideration and planning into the solution. Certainly more than the five-minute-look that most visitors to a Q&A forum are able to provide.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does hover over content index well
i notice increasing cases of portfolio style boxes on site designs (especially wordpress templates) where you have an image and text appears after hover over (sorry for my basic terminology). does this text which appears after hover over have much search engine value or as it doesnt immediately appear on pageload does it carry slightly less weight like tabbed content? any advice appreciated thanks neil
On-Page Optimization | | neilhenderson0 -
What to do about resellers duplicating content?
Just went through a big redevelopment for a client and now have fresh images and updated content but now all the resellers have just grabbed the new images/content and pasted them on their own site. My client is a manufacture that sells directly online and over the phone for large orders. I'm just not sure how to handle the resellers duplicate content. Any thoughts on this? Am I being silly for worrying about this?
On-Page Optimization | | ericnkatz0 -
Help With Duplicated Content
Hi Moz Community, I am having some issue's with duplicated content, i recently removed the .html from all of our links and moz has reported it as being duplicated. I have been reading up about Canonicalization and would to verify some details, when using the canonical tag would it be placed in the /mywebpage.html or /mywebpage file? I am having a hard time to sort this out so any help from you SEO experts would be great 🙂 I have also updated my htaccess file with the following Thanks in advance
On-Page Optimization | | finelinewebsolutions0 -
PDF's - Dupe Content
Hi I have some pdfs linked to from a page with little content. Hence thinking best to extract the copy from the pdf and have on-page as body text, and the pdf will still be linked too. Will this count as dupe content ? Or is it best to use a pdf plugin so page opens pdf automatically and hence gives page content that way ? Cheers Dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Footer Content
We currently have footer content contained in a single php include file and is included in every page and contains the following: Most recent 3 tweets from our twitter feed Snippets of our 3 most recent blogs posts navigation links to our main pages (essentially the same as our main navigation in the header) Is this good/bad?
On-Page Optimization | | NeilD0 -
Is there a way to measure a competitors content growth?
Bonjour from 23 Degrees C hot & sultry Wetherby UK, I find again and again clients find jumping into an active volcano easier than addid fresh content. I want to try another tactic to prompt / scare them into adding content and here is my idea. I want to track a competitor site for a target term and monitor if they are adding content over time specific to that term. So my question is please: "Is there a reliable method to do this?" Ideas i had was doing a good old Google Title operator at the beginning of the month and then at monthly intervals to see if anything changes. Any insights welcome 🙂
On-Page Optimization | | Nightwing0 -
Original content and the Google Panda Update
We are an online furniture store with about 1300 products on the site, and we mostly use the catalogue descriptions for the product. Recently I have been reading about One Way Furniture: http://ecommerceprnews.com/e-commerce_articles/2011/03/one-way-furniture-shifts-toward-quality-content-after-google-panda-update-201928.htm They are a big american online furniture which seemed to have lost about a 3rd of there traffic due to being punished in the panda update. Now it seems they are blaming the fact they use they use catalogue descriptions for the product (like us), and now they are going to rewrite all their product descriptions. We are a small company and rewriting 1300 products (meaningfully) is no small task. Looking at our own traffic we have taken a small slump since feb after about 18 months of general increased month on month traffic ( bar seasonal dips and boost), but we didn't have a "fall of the cliff" like One Way Furniture. But have been expanding into other areas (and there for new keywords), so we had expected to be increasing our traffic. So the question is, how important is unique content for all our products? is it worth all the time and money to fix all the pages? Our plan is to make sure our category pages (and there for landing pages) have unique content, would that be enough on its own, or are the product pages damaging the site over all?
On-Page Optimization | | eunaneunan0 -
On-page optimisation for CMS based sites
With so many sites being based on a CMS, and with so many hundreds of different CMS out there, as SEO consultants how do you recommend dealing with on-page optimisation for a client where you discover their site is built with a CMS you have not previously used (or even heard of!)
On-Page Optimization | | bjalc20110