Robots.txt usage
-
Hey Guys,
I am about make an important improvement to our site's robots.txt
we have large number of properties on our site and we have different views for them. List, gallery and map view. By default list view shows up and user can navigate through gallery view.
We donot want gallery pages to get indexed and want to save our crawl budget for more important pages.
this is one example of our site:
http://www.holiday-rentals.co.uk/France/r31.htm
When you click on "gallery view" URL of this site will remain same in your address bar: but when you mouse over the "gallery view" tab it will show you URL with parameter "view=g". there are number of parameters: "view=g, view=l and view=m".
http://www.holiday-rentals.co.uk/France/r31.htm?view=l
http://www.holiday-rentals.co.uk/France/r31.htm?view=g
http://www.holiday-rentals.co.uk/France/r31.htm?view=m
Now my question is:
I If restrict bots by adding "Disallow: ?view=" in our robots.txt will it effect the list view too?
Will be very thankful if yo look into this for us.
Many thanks
Hassan
I will test this on some other site within our network too before putting it to important one's. to measure the impact but will be waiting for your recommendations. Thanks
-
Others are right by the way canonical may be better, but if you insist on robots restriction you should add two schemas to each parameter:
disallow:?view=m disallow:?view=m*
so that you block the urls that contain the parameter at the end and block the ones that have it in the middle as well.
-
I had a similar issue with my website: there were many ways of sorting a likst of items (date, title, etc) which ended up causing duplicate content, we solved the issue a couple of days ago by restricting the "sorted" pages using the robots.txt file. HOWEVER, this morning i found this text in the Google Webmaster Tools support section:
Google no longer recommends blocking crawler access to duplicate content on your website, whether with a robots.txt file or other methods. If search engines can't crawl pages with duplicate content, they can't automatically detect that these URLs point to the same content and will therefore effectively have to treat them as separate, unique pages. A better solution is to allow search engines to crawl these URLs, but mark them as duplicates by using the
rel="canonical"
link element, the URL parameter handling tool, or 301 redirects. In cases where duplicate content leads to us crawling too much of your website, you can also adjust the crawl rate setting in Webmaster Tools.source:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359I havent seen any negative effect on my site (yet), but I would agree with SuperlativB in the sense that YOU might be better off using "canonical" tags on these links
http://www.holiday-rentals.co.uk/...?view=l
-
For these paratmeters are not at the very end os the url you should add * after the letter of the parameter as well in the restriction
you got my point, thanks for looking into this. Since our search page load with list view by default and it is not in URL but still v=l represents the list view.
I want to disallow both parameters "view=g, view=m" in any URL from bots.
If these parameters are sometimes in between and some time at the end of URL what will be the work around for for both cases, you suggest?
Thanks for looking into this...
-
You can do the restriction you want but if i get it right m stands for map view g stands for gallery view and l stands for list view. So if you want list view to be indexed and map and gallery view not to be indexed you should add two lines of distriction:
disallow:?view=m disallow:?view=g
if these paratmeters are not at the very end os the url you should add * after the letter of the parameter as well in the restriction
-
Sounds like this is something canonical could solve for you. If you disallow ?view=* you would disallow all "?view" on your homepage, if you are unsure you should go for exact match rather that all.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I have two robots.txt pages for www and non-www version. Will that be a problem?
There are two robots.txt pages. One for www version and another for non-www version though I have moved to the non-www version.
Technical SEO | | ramb0 -
GWT returning 200 for robots.txt, but it's actually returning a 404?
Hi, Just wondering if anyone has had this problem before. I'm just checking a client's GWT and I'm looking at their robots.txt file. In GWT, it's saying that it's all fine and returns a 200 code, but when I manually visit (or click the link in GWT) the page, it gives me a 404 error. As far as I can tell, the client has made no changes to the robots.txt recently, and we definitely haven't either. Has anyone had this problem before? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | White.net0 -
Robots.txt | any SEO advantage to having one vs not having one?
Neither of my sites has a robots.txt file. I guess I have never been bothered by any particular bot enough to exclude it. Is there any SEO advantage to having one anyways?
Technical SEO | | GregB1230 -
Are robots.txt wildcards still valid? If so, what is the proper syntax for setting this up?
I've got several URL's that I need to disallow in my robots.txt file. For example, I've got several documents that I don't want indexed and filters that are getting flagged as duplicate content. Rather than typing in thousands of URL's I was hoping that wildcards were still valid.
Technical SEO | | mkhGT0 -
Disallow: /search/ in robots but soft 404s are still showing in GWT and Google search?
Hi guys, I've already added the following syntax in robots.txt to prevent search engines in crawling dynamic pages produce by my website's search feature: Disallow: /search/. But soft 404s are still showing in Google Webmaster Tools. Do I need to wait(it's been almost a week since I've added the following syntax in my robots.txt)? Thanks, JC
Technical SEO | | esiow20130 -
Blocked by meta-robots but there is no robots file
OK, I'm a little frustred here. I've waited a week for the next weekly index to take place after changing the privacy setting in a wordpress website so Google can index, but I still got the same problem. Blocked by meta-robots, no index, no follow. But I do not see a robot file anywhere and the privacy setting in this Wordpress site is set to allow search engines to index this site. Website is www.marketalert.ca What am I missing here? Why can't I index the rest of the website and is there a faster way to test this rather than wait another week just to find out it didn't work again?
Technical SEO | | Twinbytes0 -
Robots.txt Sitemap with Relative Path
Hi Everyone, In robots.txt, can the sitemap be indicated with a relative path? I'm trying to roll out a robots file to ~200 websites, and they all have the same relative path for a sitemap but each is hosted on its own domain. Basically I'm trying to avoid needing to create 200 different robots.txt files just to change the domain. If I do need to do that, though, is there an easier way than just trudging through it?
Technical SEO | | MRCSearch0 -
Robots.txt blocking site or not?
Here is the robots.txt from a client site. Am I reading this right --
Technical SEO | | 540SEO
that the robots.txt is saying to ignore the entire site, but the
#'s are saying to ignore the robots.txt command? See http://www.robotstxt.org/wc/norobots.html for documentation on how to use the robots.txt file To ban all spiders from the entire site uncomment the next two lines: User-Agent: * Disallow: /0