Buying expired domains with PR and redirecting question :)
-
Hi,
Might be a silly question but wanted to ask it anyway.
Lets say I run a gifts website and this year I decide I want to try for a more competitive keyword 'Christmas Gifts'.
Now each year I see a lot of search on for example 'Christmas Gifts 2011' and because of the search volume the EMD for this is gone (an affiliate has brought it or something).
So the affiliate works hard on ranking it builds up say PR2-PR3 but when it comes around to renewing the domain they don't bother because 2011 search volume has passed and they move onto 'Christmas Gifts 2012'.
My question is this: If I was to buy the 'Christmas Gifts 2011' when it expires and redirect it to my Xmas page would it pass the PR and give my new page a boost?
-
Thanks for the great replies Shane.
Well I doubt I would use this tactic, I was just doing something and the idea popped into my head so wanted to get a second opinion.
Christmas keywords are very competitive like you said, so was just thinking of ideas on how to get a new page ranking in such a competitive area.
-
You are correct if there is no dup content currently then it will not be seen as duplicate.
Yes, you and mhelp3 are correct some of the "juice" may be passed, and since any penalty items on the site have been leveraged pre 301, the penalty content will probably not transfer as they have already "dropped off" the index.
The longterm issue with this strategy is it does not help user experience. It is merely an "SEO Trick" that more and more every day are being devalued by Algorithm updates.
Where i agree that this tactic probably a years ago and before was VERY VERY effective, now and going forward it will become LESS AND LESS effective.
Also private registration already looses some of its "Trust" with Google and usually sets off a red flag, which probably will devalue the entire endeavor.
Will this ultimately harm your main domain... Probably Not So if you are up for a risk of it maybe working and maybe not, but i would not base a strategy around this concept going forward as these types of old school white hat tactics are dying....
w00t!
-
When you say there is a chance of getting a duplicate penalty how do you mean?
If my site has unique content and the domain I want to redirect had unique content then all your telling Google to do is pass on the PR to the new site.
I know a lot of affiliates will use the content the merchants supply them, which yes can flag that domain as dup and gain a penalty from it, but if the affiliate has built up some good PR then there is a good chance they know dup content is wrong and would have not used it.
Thanks for all the feedback, much appreciated
-
It might work. You buy the expired high PR domain and 301 to your main site (make sure there is no duplicate content) and see what happens. In doing this, my testing has shown that about 50% of the time the PR will fall off and the other 50% you will keep it and some of that link juice will pass to your site.
If you do this, make sure you do a private registration on the expired domain.
-
In My opinion this could work, but will ultimately be devalued as Duplicate content. Also (not to pigeon hole all affiliate marketers) but most use tactics that get quick boosts, not longterm sustained traffic.
So not only are you possibly gonna cause yourself a duplicate content penalty, you assume the risk of all the links that Affiliate marketer acquired good and bad.
All in all this strategy could yield positive results, and is not necessarily a "Black Hat" tactic so its not gonna get you banned, but probably is not the best risk free strategy.
You would be better off creating a page with lots of content keyword optimized for "Christmas Gifts" and do a link building campaign around this page ex: www.example.com/Christmas-Gifts use quality articles and content from linked from this page around the topic of Christmas and Christmas Gifts plus LOTS of other items cause i did not look into it, but I am assuming they Keyword "Christmas Gifts" around this time is a VERY high competition keyword, and you will be fighting against established brands so "SEO tricks" probably will not help.
w00t!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Vanish from google after choosing preferred domain and fixing 40 duplicate meta descriptions?
I recently followed 2 Google webmaster suggestions to clean up the on page SEO for our site. I chose a preferred domain 2 weeks ago(to www.website.com) and fixed the duplicate meta descriptions that our CMS was setting to unique and more natural descriptions for each page. I did that 3 days ago. Webmaster tools still says they are duplicates because it hasn't crawled the whole site yet. We have been fortunate enough to have some of our blog posts be covered by yahoo.com, cnet.com, huffingtonpost.com, gizmodo.com, etc. That is some major backlink juice and, as recently as 2 weeks ago, our website would be the #1 result when searching Google for "ourwebsite.com exact title of very popular blog post". Now it is on the 3rd page, and the top results are the websites that linked to our blog post. So....what gives? Is there a specific area I should look at? Our should I wait for Google to fully index our whole site now that changes have been made? It should be noted that our rankings have stayed the same in yahoo and bing. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
Search Behavior | | garyislearning0 -
Local SERPs Question - Phone Call or Click?
I have a client who recently experienced a boost in local organic rankings. They were appearing towards the bottom of the local (maps) results (with their phone number & address listed) for their main target keywords. After this ranking boost, they are now positioned higher in the SERPs, in the traditional organic section. It seems as though this boost in rankings has actually caused a slight DECREASE in organic search traffic to their website. My theory is that when they were listed in the Google+ Local section of Google, some people must have been calling directly from the SERPs instead of actually clicking through to their website. Due to the issues involved with organic call tracking, it's obviously difficult to measure the actual impact of strong Google+ Local rankings. So, I'm on a mission to find some reliable data on this. For my own peace of mind and that of my client. Does anybody know of any research conducted that analyses the % of local searches that result in a phone call directly from the local SERPs without actually clicking through to a business' website or Google+ page? In know this is a tricky one (and probably harder to ascertain on desktop than mobile) but any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks!
Search Behavior | | Dave_Eddy0 -
What's the best way to redirect mobile site?
Hi, We have a mobile website using a sub-directory domain.com/m/whatever-page/. Our mobile is completely separate site from desktop version. What's the best way to handle the redirection from mobile visitors and those that are searching from mobile and see desktop version in the search result? Appreciate anyone's expert advise. Thanks,
Search Behavior | | DirectAsia.com
Willy0 -
Is there such a thing as to many 301 redirects?
Our shopping cart automatically generates the URL for each product using keywords from the product titles, because of this EVERY TIME we change titles etc. the URL changes and a 301 is automatically generated. On a site with only about 550 pages in our sitemap and for indexing we have about 550 301 redirects. Does anyone know how google handles this? This seems like a terrible ratio of 301's to indexed pages. But I don't know if Google cares about this or not.
Search Behavior | | absoauto0 -
Disvow Tool Question
Please forgive me if this is a silly question but I am an online retailer not an SEO man, If I was to upload a file with all the links I thought were spam links on and some weeks later I thought some of them were good links, if I uploaded another file with all of what I thought were good links removed would Google start taking these into account?
Search Behavior | | Palmbourne0 -
Google slow to index new domains and subs?
Anyone finding Google slow to index new websites at the moment? Made a new site on Thursday and posted a number off high quality, relevant, backlinks to it the same day and now on Monday it is still not indexed. Have see the same with a couple of sub domains I have created off a website with a moz score of 40. Normally can get new sites indexed within hours but this seems super slow.
Search Behavior | | Grumpy_Carl0 -
Would you say it is more bennificial to seperate keywords in the title tag tag of a page using a common ( keyword , keyword | Domain.com) or using a hyphen as SEOmoz best practices reccommends (keyword - keyword | domain.com)?
Title tag best practices according to seomoz is the following keyowrd - keyword | brand.com but I have seen some interesting results from using a comma as to a hyphen to seperate keywords as reccomended and wanted to know which method is more crawler friendly.
Search Behavior | | JHSpecialty0 -
Homepage redirect dilemma, need some advice!
Our site is built to show users things to do around their current location. For this reason we redirect users to a city specific home page based on their location. To do this we detect users IP address and 302 redirect them to the closest city with events. Our site is below and you should be able to see the 302 redirect. fyifly.com My concern is that I always here not to use 302 redirects as they don't pass link juice through. I don't think 301 redirect would be good either as it is not a permanent redirect. Any advice on how you think the best way to treat this would be great or if you think the 302 direct is the best solution.
Search Behavior | | lsujoe0