What is the best image format to put on your site
-
Hi at the moment i am working with images to try and speed up my site and i am wondering what is the best format to save images and then put on my site.
I have been playing around with photoshop where they have the following formats
png-24
gif (but not sure which one i should choose
or jpeg
I would be grateful for your advice and also to know what size i should try and keep the image down to
many thanks
-
thanks for that, i will try that now. i am getting different results for my site speed www.in2town.co.uk and would be grateful if people could put the site speed here so i can see real results
-
Hi Diane. This is timely, we just finished up rendering a bunch of our images to improve page speed.
I'll also throw this in there. Sometimes you won't be able to reduce a file size sufficiently by "save for web devices." When this happens, you can open Bridge in Photoshop and use Photoshop's image processor to render it to a smaller size and then save it for the web.
From Bridge, select the file (or files - you can do it in bulk). Go to tools>photoshop>image processor. From there you can select three ways to save it (jpeg, psd or tiff). If jpeg is acceptable for your situation, select jpeg and choose to render it to low, medium or high.
We were able to render them to 1 or 2 (low) without the image becoming too lossy. Then you can open up the image and "save as web devices" and reduce the file size to a more acceptable size.
Keep an eye on the quality of the image as you go through the steps. I'll trade off some speed for quality appearance.
Be careful when processing files in bulk. You may have ten images and 3 of them won't be able to be rendered down as low as the others and you'll spend time re-doing things.
Good luck!
-
thanks for this as at the moment image quality is a big problem on my site as well as load speed
-
I go with whatever format provides the cleanest appearance in the smallest file size.
If you shoot the image - shoot the image in the best quality at the lowest file size. I shoot with a professional grade Canon camera in a medium file size which produces a 2mb file. I can render it down from there.
If you have no control over the original file, create a new file in Photoshop at 72 to 100dpi. You won't need to go over 100 dpi on the file as you prepare it. If the image you are working with is poor keep the file at 100dpi while you work with it. If it is a clean and crisp image you can work with it in 72dpi.
Once you have your image ready to save for the web, click "save for web devices". Then, you can choose how you want to save it. For instance, JPEG will allow you to save it at maximum to very high to low. You can watch the file size change as you move from jpeg to gif to png in the lower left corner of the page. We try to keep all of our images at about 10k to 15k. Watch the quality of your image as you render it to different sizes. If your website allows users to enlarge an image for details, you will not want to render the file so small that it compromises the crispness and clarity of the image.
Keep in mind that naming your file is important for SEO purposes. Don't just give your image a generic combination of letters and numbers, but work your keyword into the name of the file. For example, don't load the file to your site as ABC Blue, but rather Carhartt S209 Blue.
-
The formats do different things.
If you have straight lines in your image like you would in a chart, don’t use jpg use png instead. Jpg can not handle straight lines, it burs them.
don’t use gif unless you need it to be animated
Use png-8 or 24 are fine for most things but jpg is often smaller.
png 8 and 24 both do transparency, but png 8 transparency does not work in ie6png24 is good for all occasions but is not always the smallest
-
PNG images are generally large files, take up a lot of disk space on your server, and slow down the load time of your site because they have more data to deliver. I generally stick to JPEG image files and sometimes save in lower quality to lower the file size. GIF would also be fine. The only problem you may run into is with JPEG image files that have transparency. In that case, I generally just use PNG or a GIF, but I typically only use transparent images in headers so it is not often an issue.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can hotlinking images from multiple sites be bad for SEO?
Hi, There's a very similar question already being discussed here, but it deals with hotlinking from a single site that is owned by the same person. I'm interested whether hotlinking images from multiple sites can be bad for SEO. The issue is that one of our bloggers has been hotlinking all the images he uses, sometimes there are 3 or 4 images per blog from different domains. We know that hotlinking is frowned upon, but can it affect us in the SERPs? Thanks, James
Technical SEO | | OptiBacUK0 -
What is the best way to find missing alt tags on my site (site wide - not page by page)?
I am looking to find all the missing alt tags on my site at once. I have a FF extension that use to do it page by page, but my site is huge and that will take forever. Thanks!!
Technical SEO | | franchisesolutions1 -
How to remove a thin site penalty
Wondering if anyone could help out. A while back I made an affiliate store using wordpress and merchants products feeds. I didn't get found to adding any unique content to the site and, as was to be expected, I gained a penalty and my search traffic died. A few months back I redesigned the store, still using merchant csv but now with 98% unique content on each page. However, try as I may I still cannot get anywhere in the engines. The domain doesn't even rank for it's own name!! I have submitted reconsideration request but they have replied saying no penalty on the site. The domain is www.digitalcatwalk.co.uk. While the domain isn't massively strong I would prefer not to have to start again as I feel it is a very good domain name. Any advise would be most gratefully received. Thanks Carl
Technical SEO | | GrumpyCarl0 -
Should this site start again on a new domain
Hi We have not done SEO on this site they have used another company who looks like they outsourced and the links have been built by a third party all blog networks and this company have said they cannot get the links removed. Google flagged artificial links on this web site in February and in April it lost over 10000 visitors in a month and its just free falled ever since. The categories have been recreated and no redirects created due to the amount of backlinks from the blog sites to the original category pages but the site is not recovering its down to 1500 visitors a month and used to get 14000 a month. So should my customer ditch the domain and move this site to fresh domain? http://www.kids-beds-online.com Any answers would really be appreciated. thanks Tracy
Technical SEO | | dashesndots0 -
How do you diagnose if on your site is only 50% crawled?
Good Morning from 7 degrees C, goodbye arctic conditions wetherby UK, If a site had 100 pages for example & that site was plugged into Webmaster Tools how could you diagnose if all the pages had been crawled? The thing is I want to learn how to diagnose crawl issues with sites, is their a known methodology for this? Thanks in advance, David
Technical SEO | | Nightwing0 -
Why are old versions of images still showing for my site in Google Image Search?
I have a number of images on my website with a watermark. We changed the watermark (on all of our images) in May, but when I search for my site getmecooking in Google Image Search, it still shows the old watermark (the old one is grey, the new one is orange). Is Google not updating the images its search results because they are cached in Google? Or because it is ignoring my images, having downloaded them once? Should we be giving our images a version number (at the end of the file name)? Our website cache is set to 7 days, so that's not the issue. Thanks.
Technical SEO | | Techboy0 -
Image filenames
A developer asked me if it's ok to add a string of characters (output by Sharepoint) to the image filename. Not a good idea for SEO I said....I've already suggested using keywords for filename and including keyword descriptions in the alt and title attributes. It's a SharePoint shopping cart. Does anyone have any suggestions, experience or workarounds for this?
Technical SEO | | CoL-PR0