What's been the best SERP rank tracker for you?
-
I do a lot of my SERP ranking tracking via Aaron Wall's Rank Checker, but I'm realizing it's taking up too much time. I was looking at Raven's tools and a few others. What's been your favorite thus far?
If you do reply, can you talk about:
- price
- capabilities
- time savings b/c of it
- graphical UI
- other thoughts
I like SEOMoz's UI, but I can only manage 5 domains and I don't have a huge budget yet.
Also, if there's a rank checker out there that incorporates google places results, that would be great too! Maybe too good, eh?
-
im not sure if you are still searching but I have spent the last 3 years experimenting with various options. I initially started with the usual suspects but then found RankWatch. This was great but there were some instances that were not 100% correct - bear in mind that I monitor 800 keywords daily. i then switched to ranktrackr which is really great. HOWEVER, there were some instances when the software was out of snyc and I woke up a few times to a screen showing hundreds of drops which, in fact had not happened. More recently I came across this which so far seems to work well http://serptoday.com/
-
LOL. Exactly.
-
^ And that is why us SEOs are all a little mad!
-
It's an interesting question about tracking many vs. a specific group of key terms.
The main reason for multiple terms, I would say is that we truly don't know what google's doing on the back end (or rather don't know every association they make), and so we may see how one term jumping up may also affect another term. There's so many permutations of each phrase:
dallas seo, seo in dallas, seo dallas, dallas seo firm (+ reverse), dallas seo company (+ reverse), etc.
While I'm not exactly keen on knowing all permutations of every single phrase, it's interesting how google gives us credit for one and not the other, but we won't know unless we're either tracking it or it pulls into our GA account.
With that said, you're probably right about the KPI's, but you might not find a phrase's potential without knowing that you're right on the cusp of bringing it up to page 1 for a client or yourself. If you do know that, you can make the efforts to pull it into the prized 3 positions where there is actually traffic and then see if it does pull traffic for a client.
I don't know if I'm answering or clarifying my stance really on the multiple phrases that well, but the ultimate point is that sometimes being able to see factors on phrases you don't keep close tabs on every day can be interesting in a) learning more about the algo's correlation between phrases and b) whether you're close to getting a phrase somewhere where it might mean something to you in terms of traffic, etc.
Then again, how many people can regularly process thousands of keywords and put the connections together in their head? Right?
-
Tool costs can add up, that's for sure! With even basic tools demanding $1000+ per year you do have to pick and choose carefully.
The only tool I can think of, off the top of my head, that provides unlimited tracking is http://authoritylabs.com . This is the firm who provide the data for raventools tracker. Unfortunately they list costs on their unlimited package as "starting from $450/month", so not a bargain offering!
Thinking on a tangent: How useful is tracking that number of terms anyway? If you don't have a big team how much value could you extract from thousands of terms tracking each month?
If it is for clients it could be worth checking how much attention they pay to it. We started doing that last year and it turns out that most of ours weren't watching the SERP tracking data. Rightly so as well, as it's a red herring most of the time. We simplified our reporting as a result and tried to tie it back to better KPIs than rank movement (this still isn't perfect, and we're trying to do this again at the moment).
Not the answer you were looking for, but worth a thought.
-
Thanks Mat. This last list definitely had a lot of possible rank checkers to look through.
I ended up buying the Rank Checker from Link-Assistant.com today, but a bit disappointed for what you get from $249.00 right now. I really need something to automate this rankings process for my clients, but all the reporting functions require you to upgrade or buy their most expensive package. Plus, they try to get you with other little extras to keep the software current after 6 months. I think I'm going to ask for my money back because they have a 30 day money back guarantee on keeping us happy.
I'm not having any luck with other tools either like cuterank.net and rankerizer.com which weren't on the list. I just need a tool that can do unlimited rank checks, keep track of the rankings over time so I save a good 3 days worth of work. Doing it manually with SEOBook's rank checker can't be an option moving forward.
I've been very attracted by Raven before and actually signed up for a while. However, the 1000 a month might be too little. They have a lot of other great benefits for the $99/mo, but I already have SEOMOz, Majestic SEO and bought SECockpit recently which I'm considering returning because I don't know if I have the time to take advantage of them all per month. Maybe when I build up a team that can start leveraging them, I may invest. Or maybe I'm just being too cheap? If I was rolling in it, it would be a different story. I would be buying tools right and left just to try them out.
Thanks again.
-
In addition to my previous comment, this popped in to my RSS reader this morning and I thought of your question:
http://www.evolvingseo.com/2012/01/24/the-ultimate-list-of-rank-checkers/
(by Dan Shure, who you might know from around these parts). Nice round up there to check back to.
Regarding Google places (and in fact other universal results), I cannot believe that no-one is (publicly) offering this. It's a huge need (Take note seomoz brigade!)
-
I like the tracker in seoMoz, but I monitor too many sites for it to be viable as my primary tool.
For me it is RavenTools. The cost of the tracker is effectively free for me, as I wouldn't live without Raven because of other features it offers anyway. However even if it was a standalone tracker I would probably go with Raven simply because:
- It works
- The packages work out very cost effective for me
Price
$99/month gives you unlimed websites and tracking on up to 1000 keyword rankings. As a tracker that isn't bad, but I suspect it isn't the best deal if you are not using their other toosl as well. If you factor in the social monitoring and link manager that becomes far easier to justify.
Capabilities
Check the site. It's a long list and seems to be growing.
In terms of the SERP tracker it'll check weekly, graph past performance, allow tracking of multiple engines (and geographic variants), allows tagging etc.
Time Savings
For me, immesurable. It would simply not be possible for us to do what we do without Raven or something similar.
UI
Raven does look dated compared to some and, despite daily use, I still struggle with their UI at times. There isn't a great deal wrong with it (and they are REALLY responsive if you do point out shortcomings), but it just doesn't sing.
Other Thoughts
Raven is an all rounder. If I only have access to one tool it would be Raven (sorry Moz!). Some of the tools they have seem to be "labs" style bolt ons, but the core tools are very good.
Hope that is some help.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What's the best way to eliminate "429 : Received HTTP status 429" errors?
My company website is built on WordPress. It receives very few crawl errors, but it do regularly receive a few (typically 1-2 per crawl) "429 : Received HTTP status 429" errors through Moz. Based on my research, my understand is that my server is essentially telling Moz to cool it with the requests. That means it could be doing the same for search engines' bots and even visitors, right? This creates two questions for me, which I would greatly appreciate your help with: Are "429 : Received HTTP status 429" errors harmful for my SEO? I imagine the answer is "yes" because Moz flags them as high priority issues in my crawl report. What can I do to eliminate "429 : Received HTTP status 429" errors? Any insight you can offer is greatly appreciated! Thanks,
Moz Pro | | ryanjcormier
Ryan0 -
Solving 'duplicate content' for page 2 of X for 1 blog post
Hi to all SEO wizards, For my Dutch blog google-plus-marketing.nl I'm using WordPress Genesis framework 2.0 with news theme pro 2.0 responsive theme. I love the out of the box SEO friendliness and features. One of those features is that it allows for a blog post or page to be divided into several pages. This results in MOZ signaling duplicate titles for all pages after the 1st page. Now I was thinking that a canonical url set to the first page should do the trick for me as I reason that the rank will go the the first page and the rest will not be seen as duplicates. Genesis does some good stuff on it's own and places the following meta tags in the header for the first page. All looks well and my question is about the same meta tags for the 2nd page and higher that I pasted below this one for the 1st page. Meta tags page 1 of X for blog post Meta tags page 2 of X for the same blog post Would it not be better to point the canonical url for page 2 till X to always point to the first page? In this case:
Moz Pro | | DanielMulderNL0 -
Why can't I see last week's stats?
Can see stats week ending May 1st but nothing after that- and it's May 9th!?
Moz Pro | | locumhunter0 -
Massive Drop in Rankings
Hello, My site (www.reynoldsdesignstudio.com) has recently dropped off the map (50+ places) for almost every phrase I was ranking between 3 and 6 on the first page. My main phrases on google were "web design rochester mn", "web development rochester mn" I have been setting up a new web server but have not pointed this domain at that server yet so it shouldn't be anything related there. I also have not updated the site in a couple years (I know that's bad), so it doesn't appear to be a hacking issue either. I was 'hacked' a few years back where I gained a TON of crappy links from China and what-not but it never appeared to affect anything. I'm not sure if that is what is causing the recent drop in rankings. If anyone has any ideas on what could have caused the issue that would be great. According to my GA traffic I had a spike earlier in the month and then it has steadily dropped off. This is consistent with my actual page rankings. Thanks OAsjcHw
Moz Pro | | reynoldsdesign0 -
What's up with Yahoo and Bing in my keyword rankings?
SEOmoz is good I've learned a lot from it. I'm on my 3rd month and now have 8 keywords in top 50 for one site and 1 keyword in top 50 for another. This is for Google US. For Bing and Yahoo! US however I am still not in the top 50 for anything. I have read elsewhere that meta-tag page words can be regarded by these engines as a spam signal. In my meta I have used competative keywords that are relevant to my content, some of which are in the body, but are not my actual targeted keywords as a red-herring to potential competitors. Also might be usefull for other smaller places that still use meta-tags. Could not appearing in BingHoo! have something to do with their alogrithms and the meta-tags? or is it an SEOmoz issue? I have another question also. The " / " after a domain name doesn't appear in my Firefox address bar (I think I did a 301 redirect), but when I copy and paste it into an entry box (e.g. for a link submission) it puts the " / " there at the end which I take off. Does this make any difference?
Moz Pro | | Zoolander0 -
Rankings in Google UK
Hi there, Can someone explain the difference between the results in Google UK - the default is 'The Web', whereas I can opt to choose 'Pages from the UK'. My question is: If I'm tracking rankings for Google United Kingdom in SEOMoz, is it tracking the results from 'Pages from the UK' or the default setting of 'The Web'? Are there any statistics on how many people choose to see 'Pages from the UK'? Thanks
Moz Pro | | columbus0 -
Woo rank features
Is there a way to find the same type of information that woo rank provides via the pro toolset? I am just learning SEO and exploring the PRO tool set and just received a woo rank report for a clients site and right off the bat I see that it is missing the robots.txt file, but I haven't found anything like that on SEO moz. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | ClayW0 -
Google SERP count 100
I'm not finding a clear solution to getting 100 results in the Google SERP. I'm currently using Firefox as I use Chrome for being logged into Google (Gmail, Docs, etc.) I tried the Grease Monkey script, no luck. I tried appending the url with &num=100 (looks like that may have been killed in 2010 which may explain why the GM script isn't working). And it doesn't look like any toolbar, SEOMoz included has that functionality, any ideas or places to look? In addition, does anyone have a good SERP numbering tool? If I do a search and the first page, including Local & Organic has 15 results, when I click over to the 2nd page it starts back at #11, kind of defeats the purpose of using a numbering tool 😉 Any help would be appreciated. Thanks much!
Moz Pro | | nsauser0