Competitor doing very well through reciprocal linking. Should I adopt it?
-
I've always heard that reciprocal linking is dead but my main competitor who is at number one for both my primary keywords has a link profile built up of mainly reciprocal links. Should I adopt this practice? I've only valued one way links up to now.
-
Samuel,
We have found other avenues to build links that are time better spent. We do not do reciprocal linking at all and get great results for our clients. Spend your time on other things like link baiting. The quality of your links will be better and you will eventually overtake your competitor.
-
Samuel,
Everyday (OK, at least some days, but it feels like everyday) in SEO I look at some competitor (typically of a client of ours) and one how in the h3ll they got ahead of our guy/gal. I peruse, I read content, I compare PA/DA, I look at links (quantity, quality, matching c blocks, etc.). I can see that obviously we have the better of them in 75% of the important areas. I scratch my head, curse (mildly), wonder, and complain. But, then it hits me. What's the point?
First, I cannot draw a conclusion from one set of data. You are trying to do that. If you are willing to give up a keyword and the two urls, you might be surprised at what a few mozzers can teach one another. For you, speaking solely of links, have you looked at internal vs. external, anchor text and anchor text distribution, C blocks, over use of internal links, too many unnatural links, absence of nofollows, etc, etc, etc. (That was purely off the top of my head after being up an hour and a half (0530 now). So, there is more than just the reciprocity factor in the links.
For me, one thing I have learned from mozzers I have come to respect on this Q & A is what I will call SEOP. Search Engine Optimization Perspective: You cannot point to my PR, PA, DA, Link profile is better, I should outrank. You cannot even do a thorough analysis and believe that you couldn't be missing some one small thing. On a forum like this for SEO the majority of those visiting regularly are in the top 30% of SEO conservatively (Yes, IMO). When we look out at those who claim to be gurus and originators and friends of Sergey and Larry, we are all struck by the wonderment of how they can pull it off. I literally am in an argument with someone around local search at a much larger firm than ours (national), that they cannot use same address of a business, same phone, different URL, and have it in Places, et. al. - they are a Local search firm..... So, it gives me a sense of being a bit too bright some times. I think if they are so stupid then I must be.... WOW!
So, what I do today is this: When I am truly perplexed at how we are being outranked by an inferior :0 and I have researched it as best I can I realize that maybe, today I am not the brightest guy in the room and I come over here to realize how smart others are and learn. I also realize that there are factors I cannot see: for that term, on that page, is there something they have done that is getting them an amazing CTR? Remember, what we do is much prettier, catchier, nuanced, etc. than the other guy....to us. Maybe show the page to two or three others and let them tell you what they see.
No, this is not likely the answer you wanted. So, for me, I will do an occasional reciprocal link if it makes sense with my content and my audience. No, I will not go to the wall with relationships like that as there is no end point that works, again, IMO.
So, I hope you work it out. I would look at content. I would really look at CTR (compare meta descriptions and ask yourself this question: Does yours answer the query better than any other meta description out there?) Then ask this, when they get to your page, will the page reflect the meta description and make them want to hang out? If all things are equal in SEO from one page to another, look there.
Best
-
Hi Samuel,
I will tell you the same thing as for a lot of clients when we have similar discussions.
First thing: don't try to "play the game" of a competitor. Instead try to come up with something new and better.
Second: Reciprocal links are less important nowadays. I look at websites as they would be real-life persons. And links they are votes they point out to each other on the anchor text niche :-). (Wow, Reading this sentanse even confused me
But I still hope you get the idea)
So when two websites start to point to each other on a very similar anchor you get confused. (Think about Schwarzenegger and Stallone sitting at the same table telling people that the other one is the better action movie "star" of the '90s... )
So finally the idea is: try to deliver something new for your audience, try out new things in link building for your website and focus more on diversity, and you will win!
Gr.,
Istvan
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
A website with a spam score of 5 is back linking to me. How important is to get that link removed?
There is a website that OSE has identified with a spam score of 5, it back links to me with a very specific key word. How important is it to have them remove those links?
Link Building | | absoauto0 -
The No of Sites linking to www.apollopowersystems.com is 50 as per Alexa, but Moz shows that the no of sites linking is 23\. The no has increased in Alexa but in Moz the no is 23 since 3 months. Why is this Difference?
Hi There, As I am new to SEO, so the problem that I am listing below may seem very naive. Please help me out. Please explain me the difference between the no of backlinks of the website, www.apollopowersystems.com as per the websites below. The nos are completely different as per the websites below: As per www.moz.com the no is 23 As per www.ahrefs.com the no currently is 586 As per www.alexa.com the no is 50 Please tell me why these nos are different. Looking forward to hear from you at the earliest. Thanks in advance.
Link Building | | KDKini0 -
Any benefits to having Wikipedia links now they are 'no-followed' (apart from traffic and natural link prof.)
I see that Wikipedia outbound links are all no-followed, is there any benefit (aside from the traffic) for having links here now ? For example is their co-citation and co-occurance benefits. I know there is without the links since from seeing previous Moz content about this saying Google getting good at connecting brand/s and topic mentions on a page (without any links) so appreciate Wikipedia is still good for that sort of thing. And a no-followed link is obviously good for the potential traffic. But is there any additional SEO benefit to having a no followed link on a wikipedia entry/stub too ? (aside from its contribution to your no-followed links which in turn contribute to a natural looking link profile) Cheers Dan
Link Building | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Reciprocal links
Are they worth anything, if they are from relevant sites? I'm I better off avoiding linking back wherever possible?
Link Building | | littlesthobo0 -
Is link exchange a reliable source to get back links?
I read a latest post on seomoz that _“Do not buy or exchange link with anyone who contacts you. This is completely against Google's policies and if they were to find out, you could be penalized." So I went through Google's ''Link Schemes'' and found that ''Excessive link exchanging ("Link to me and I'll link to you")'' can negatively impact a site's ranking . _ So is it the ''excessive'' link exchanging that can cause a negative impact? Exchanging links with good quality, cached sites (without excessive doing) can do good or bad? Can anyone please explain to me in detail?
Link Building | | semvibe0 -
Can competitors pay to have spammy sites link to your website?
Is there anything stopping competitors from doing a negative text-linking campaign against your site to purposefully harm your business?
Link Building | | mbelsito0 -
Do No follow links from social media platforms transfer authority or value when they link to third party websites?
With social media playing a bigger role in SEO (since the Panda, Penguin updates etc) and how search engines rank sites now, does anybody know why Twitter for instance has 'no follow' when I check my client's websites under 'inbound links' on Open Site Explorer?
Link Building | | caroline19770