Using a 302 instead of a 301
-
I am trying to figure out the best way to garner the most amount of link value.
We have an app that lives on a sub-domain ... For the purposes of this question, let's call it app.mydomain.com. We provide a service with this app that requires clients (with very high ranking websites) to link into app located on the sub-domain.
Would I garner more authority if had the high ranking client website link into a url that wasn't a sub-domain and redirect it using a 302?
For example: What if I created a 302 that was www.mydomain.com/app and have it redirected to the sub-domain version of app.mydomain.com?
Additionally am I correct to assume that a 301 would merely pass that value to the sub domain and NOT provide much value to the root?
-
Just to clarify, I want to direct the link juice to: www.mydomain.com from app.mydomain.com. As these high profile websites will be linking to the app.
My idea was to have them link to a page on the www.mydomain.com/app that I would effectively redirect back to app.mydomain.com.
But if I use a 301, the 301 will direct link juice back toward the sub domain (app.mydomain.com).
So my question is ... will the 302 keep the juice at the www version (not pass the juice)
Hopefully this makes sense. The other option is to simply let them link to the app. and add a canonical tag that points the juice back to the www version.
-
It seems your on the righ track as a 302 Redirect is a temporary redirect
and passes 0% of link juice according to SEOMOZ: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/redirectionAlso The "root domain" redirected page will still retain its PageRank, MozRank,
Page Authority and Traffic Value – and the detour page will not accumulate any.You are also correct about the 301:
A 301 Redirect is a permanent redirect which passes between 90-99% of link juice
according to SEOMOZ: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/redirectionKeep in mind that on this same page SEOMOZ goes on to say "and in most cases (302 redirect) should not be used.
Also if kept to long a 302 will eventually slide in rankingsI think yes you will garner more link value using a subfolder then a subdomain
As you will see posted also on SEOMOZ:"5. Subdomains or Sub-folders
Since search engines keep different metrics for domains than they do subdomains,
it is recommended that webmasters place link worthy content like blogs in subfolders
rather than subdomains. (i.e. www.example.com/blog/ rather than blog.example.com)
The notable exception to this is language specific websites. (i.e. en.example.com for english)"http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/domain
But the main point here is will you gain anything to your root domain while it
has a 302 and redrecting to another pagePersonally, I would avoid the 302 and move the page "app.mydomain.com" to the subfolder "www.mydomain.com/app"
Having the old page url "app.mydomain.com" 301 redirect to the subfolder "www.mydomain.com/app"
passing 90-99% of the juice -
What subdomain are you trying to get link juice for? app.mydomain.com or www.mydomain.com?
Never use a 302. You lose 100% of link juice.
With a 301, you will still lose a little, maybe 10% or so, but you will pass the link juice on to the app.mydomain.com
But if you are trying to get the most Link Juice to the root domain mydomain.com, then I would just suggest linking directly to the app.mydomain.com
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
301 redirect recovery
Hello Please understand that English is poor. I used to run a site called A This time, I am running a site called B. I need to set up a temporary 302 redirect from A to B
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jinseok
I accidentally set a 301 redirect Site A has many spam links
For now I have removed the 301 redirect source to B. Will A's spam links affect site B?
For your reference, Site B is putting a lot of effort into SEO. Help me.0 -
Do you recommend using tabs on desktop in 2017
Hi, I know google is moving toward mobile first world but I am wondering if tabs on desktop are still ignored by google those days and what you recommend ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Should I run 302 first before implementing 301?
I just want to ask if it is necessary to run 302 redirections first before redirecting old to new URLs permanently. I heard that we should run temporary redirects first so we can check after and to avoid passing the link juice but I want to hear thoughts from experts. Do i need to test 302s for old pages that are still live or should we redirect old URLs once these pages already removed from the site?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | esiow20130 -
Redirect 301
Hi, I `m redirecting some pages in htaccess The first 15 pages that i redirected it worked. But the last 3 dont work, and i cant figure it out why it is not working. Redirect 301 /analyseverktoy/ /webanalyse
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SGacic
Redirect 301 /index.php/ledige-stillinger/ /
Redirect 301 /?page_id=352/ / Anu suggestions?0 -
Canonicalization interact with 301 redirects?
This is a interesting one I think. I have recently taken down some product list pages from our website www.towelsrus.co.uk. These have canonicalisation in place to deal with pages where a query string is generated depending on the search criteria. When I put a 301 redirect in place the target page redirects fine, however webmaster tools then errors with 404 on all canonicalised pages. Is this correct behaviour and how do we get over this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Towelsrus0 -
Warning about a 302 redirect
Hello everyone, I'm testing the pro software and recently I installed an SSL Certificate on one of the websites I'm monitoring, I put in place an .htaccess directive to force all traffic to the secure version of the site (https) and I noticed how this raised a warning because my directive is forcing the traffic with a 302 redirect. These are the lines: _RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80 _ RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://example.com/$1 [R,L] I understand that this is not good so I figured since I'm already redirecting all www to -www I can force traffic that arrives trying to use www to the secure version like so: RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^example.com$ RewriteRule (.*) https://example.com/$1 [R=301,L] But this is not 100% effective because if someone visits the site directly on the -www version this person wont get redirected hence it wont be forced to see the https. So my question is: does anybody know of an alternate way to force traffic to the secure socket using a 301 instead of a 302? Oh boy, just by writing the question I think I may have figured it out, I'll post it anyways because (1) I could be wrong and (2) It could help someone else. It just hit me but the directive that is forcing www to -www specifies what type of redirect to do here [R=301,L]. So to try to answer my own question before even posting it this could probably do the trick: _RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80 _ _RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://example.com/$1 [_R=301,R,L] I'll be testing it out ASAP and again I'll post the question anyways just in case it doesn't work, in case someone has a good suggestion or to help someone that could be in the same situation. If this is turns out right I will need someone to slap me in the face 😐
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | stevenpicado0 -
My site penalized after 301 Redirect or redesign?
Hi, I have a question regarding my site (http://www.pokeronlineitalia.com) that has, all of a sudden, lost rankings on several keywords; plus, Google Analytics and the plug-in Clicky installed on my site (the site is built on WordPress) claim that my site has no visitors/visits anymore. I would like to provide a little background of what has happened. Three weeks ago I asked my web hosting company to do a 301 redirect from http://pokeronlineitalia.com to http://www.pokeronlineitalia.com. At the same time I asked a web hosting company to to a redesign of the site. Strangely, the day after the new redesigned site went online Google Analytics and the Clicky plug-in showed that my site, from one day to the other, had no visitors/visits anymore (I had installed Google Analytics and Clicky before the 301 redirect). In addition, I noticed that I had lost positions on many keywords for which I used to rank on the second page. However, the PR of the site has remained intact and Google is indexing it without problems. Plus, I still rank high for a keyword. I tend to believe that because of this, my site was not penalized by mighty Google...but I'd like an SEO expert to tell me what he thinks about it. In particular, please answer this: has my site lost rankings because of the 301 redirect? Has my site been penalized because of the redesign? Is this only a temporary situation? Thank you very much for your help. Sal
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | salvyy0 -
Should I be using rel canonical here?
I am reorganizing the data on my informational site in a drilldown menu. So, here's an example. One the home page are several different items. Let's say you clicked on "Back Problems". Then, you would get a menu that says: Disc problems, Pain relief, paralysis issues, see all back articles. Each of those pages will have a list of articles that suit. Some articles will appear on more than one page. Should I be worried about these pages being partially duplicates of each other? Should I use rel-canonical to make the root page for each section the one that is indexed. I'm thinking no, because I think it would be good to have all of these pages indexed. But then, that's why I'm asking!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MarieHaynes0