Hit by the penguin update
-
Hi,
My site @ www.mortgageadvicecenter.co.uk has been hit by the penguin update. I cannot be found at all in google for certain keywords such as mortgage advice where we ranked page 2. We still rank for certain keywords. I really don't know why we have been penalised and what to do. I have plenty of brand links and nothing out of the ordinary link distribution.
This obviously affects our bottem line so do you have any idea's or time scales?
Any help would be appreciated,
Thanks
Ryan
-
Thank you for your response.
Well this is the problem. I have no messages in webmaster tools or any issues flagging up.
Do you think it is down to the links as I am still ranking for certain keywords and for my brand.?
-
Unfortunately, I paid 'credible' seo professional's to do the work!!! I suppose once upon a time these techniques were to an extent white hat but things change and I can see that it is for the better.
Very frustrating from an seo perspective as I am sure in the past relevant content and popularity did not count as much for seo until the arrhythms change.
At the end of the day we provide a great service to our clients and are very relevant to what is being searched for. We provide mortgage advice from our own office and have done so for years and have an established domain that has also been verified for google places.It is very frustrating when you see companies that are ranked higher than us that are only lead aggregators that sell information on.. ie. money supermarket and the emergence of more and more lead generators.
At the end of the day not much has changed as it is still the companies that pump the most money into seo that will win.
This is not a rant just my opinion from a business that provides great service but cant afford to put thousands of £ into seo to get to the top of the rankings.
-
Google got it right. Remove all of these spammy links and humbly file for reconsideration and tell them you won't do it again. You're lucky it's only a few hundred, the domain can be salvaged
-
I agree with Ian's advice as well. Your site still have a very spammy link profile which Penguin was designed to penalize, but there may be other issues affecting your site's rankings.
-
** I really don't know why we have been penalised and what to do. I have plenty of brand links and nothing out of the ordinary link distribution.**
Actually, your link distribution is quite unnatural. Here is your links as seen in OpenSiteExplorer filtered for only external, followed links to your root domain: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?page=1&site=www.mortgageadvicecenter.co.uk&sort=page_authority&filter=follow&source=external&target=domain&group=1
If you wish to see what a natural link profile looks like, here is the same query for Google: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?page=1&site=www.google.com&sort=page_authority&filter=follow&source=external&target=domain&group=1
Your anchor text is not natural, indicating your company controls these links. The natural way most people link is simply by copying and pasting your URL. When anchor text is used, it varies substantially as seen in the Google query above.
Also, your link sources are unnatural as well. Your top links as shown in OSE are as follows:
1. http://www.hasenchat.de/chat-verzeichnis/index.html. You are a UK site with your #1 link being offered from a German web page. You do not offer any German content and I otherwise could not evaluate this page.
2. Dmoz. A great link to have and it has value.
3. http://contentking10.typepad.com/blog/2010/10/ballon-d-or.html. A pure link page. Very unnatural.
4. http://www.genuinemortgageadvice.com/. Link cannot be located on website.
5. http://www.directoryworld.net/index.php?c=65&s=41 Free directory, does not comply with Google's guidelines. Manipulative link.
Article submission site, very low quality article designed to manipulate PR.
In summary, your site's links are an ideal example of the links Penguin was designed to penalize. To resolve this issue you need to perform a 100% solid scrub of every link to your domain. If any inorganic link cannot be removed for any reason, a detailed explanation along with contact dates needs to be provided to Google.
-
Hi Ryan,
First question: Did you receive a warning notice about unnatural links? Google's been sending those out to most Penguin victims. I still see you at #1 for your brand name at:
Normally with a Penguin penalty I'd expect to see you buried for your own name.
It's more likely you got caught up in an onsite, content-related update. Although there are some fairly suspect links in your profile, like this page:
http://www.hasenchat.de/chat-verzeichnis/index.html
It also happens to be your highest-DA inlinking page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
404 Hurricane Update Page After?
Hi All, I am wondering if anyone could help me decide how I should go about handling a page i plan on removing and could possibly use later on. So, a perfect example is: Let's say a company in Florida posted a page about the stores hours and possibly closing due to the incoming hurricane. Once the hurricane passes and the store is reopened, should I 404 that page since another hurricane could come after? The url for the company is www.company.com/hurricane so this is a url that we would want to use again. I guess we could just 410 and name each url www.company.com/hurricane-irma & www.company.com/hurricane-jose for each new hurricane. I am just wonder what is the best practice for a situation like this. Thanks for the help!
Technical SEO | | aua0 -
Do the terms in a website url drive search hits
I've tried to do a search on a few key words that I knew was on my landing page and I couldn't get Google to find it. So I thought maybe I needed to change my url to reflect a few the terms.
Technical SEO | | Toal0 -
Help regarding updated content
Hi, Some time back we created tutorials on a test tool Quality Center (http://www.guru99.com/quality-center-tutorials.html) which now needs upgrading.
Technical SEO | | Riya8520
Currently the tool has been renamed to HP ALM.
Our dilemma is whether we should create new pages for the new tutorials or update the existing tutorials itself ? To add to our pain, most of the end users still refer the new ALM with its old name Quality Center. Also we here hit by penguin 2.1 and since then have been very precautions from SEO standpoint.
Please help
Regards
Krishna Rungta0 -
Updating/chaning title tags & meta descriptions
Hi there, Can altering title tags and meta descriptions too often have a negative impact on page ranking? Thank you!
Technical SEO | | ZAG0 -
Can Silos and Exact Anchor Text In Links Hurt a Site Post Penguin?
Just got a client whose site dropped from a PR of 3 to zero. This happened shortly after the Penguin release, June, 2012. Examining the site, I couldn't find any significant duplicate content, and where I did find duplicate content (9%), a closer look revealed that the duplication was totally coincidental (common expressions). Looking deeper, I found no sign of purchased links or linking patterns that would hint at link schemes, no changes to site structure, no change of hosting environment or IP address. I also looked at other factors, too many to mention here, and found no evidence of black hat tactics or techniques. The site is structured in silos, "services", "about" and "blog". All page titles that fall under services are categorized (silo) under "services", all blog entries are categorized under "blogs", and all pages with company related information are categorized under "about". When exploring the site's links in Site Explorer (SE), I noticed that SE is identifying the "silo" section of links (i.e. services, about, blog, etc.) and labeling it as an anchor text. For example, domain.com/(services)/page-title, where the page title prefix (silo), "/services/", is labeled as an anchor text. The same is true for "blog" and "about". BTW, each silo has its own navigational menu appearing specifically for the content type it represents. Overall, though there's plenty of room for improvement, the site is structured logically. My question is, if Site Explorer is picking up the silo (services) and identifying it as an anchor text, is Google doing the same? That would mean that out of the 15 types of service offerings, all 15 links would show as having the same exact anchor text (services). Can this type of site structure (silo) hurt a website post Penguin?
Technical SEO | | UplinkSpyder0 -
How could i create sitemap with 1000 page and should i update sitemap frequently?
My website have over 1000 pages but the sitemap creator tools i knew only create maximum 500 pages, how could i create sitemap with full of my webpage?
Technical SEO | | magician0 -
Google Reconsideration Request (Penguin) - Will Google give links to remove?
When Penguin v1 hit, our site took a hit for a single phrase (i.e. "widgets") due to the techniques our SEO company was using (network). We've since had those links cleaned up, and our rankings have not recovered. Our SEO company said they submitted a reconsideration request on our behalf, and that Google denied it and didn't provide which links we needed removed. Does Google list links that need removing if they are still not happy with your link profile?
Technical SEO | | crucialx0 -
Anyone else seeing increased duplication of domains since Penguin?
Hi Is it just me or are the Google SERPs showing more duplication of domains since the penguin update. As an example if I search for "business Christmas cards" on google.co.uk then results 2, 3 and 17 are from the same domain. Similarly results 4, 20, 21 and 22 are the same domain. All results are "reasonable" in that they are designed to catch traffic for variations on this term BUT I'm sure google used to filter this duplication per-penguin. Am I imagining this increased duplication of domains? Gary
Technical SEO | | gtrotter6660