Prevent indexing of dynamic content
-
Hi folks!
I discovered bit of an issue with a client's site. Primarily, the site consists of static html pages, however, within one page (a car photo gallery), a line of php coding:
dynamically generates a 100 or so pages comprising the photo gallery - all with the same page title and meta description. The photo gallery script resides in the /gallery folder, which I attempted to block via robots.txt - to no avail. My next step will be to include a:
within the head section of the html page, but I am wondering if this will stop the bots dead in their tracks or will they still be able to pick-up on the pages generated by the call to the php script residing a bit further down on the page?
Dino
-
Hello Steven,
Thank you for providing another perspective. However, all factors considered, I agree with Shane's approach on this one. The pages add very little merit to the site and exist primarily to provide the site users with eye-candy (e.g. photos of classic cars).
-
Just personally, I would still deindex or canonical them - they are just pages with a few images - so not of much value and unless all titles and descriptions are targeting varying keywords and content is added, they will canabalize eachother, and possibly even drag down the site due to 100's of pages of thin content....
So actually from an SEO perspective it probably IS better to deindex or canonical 3 - 5 or so years ago, maybe the advice would have been keep them and keyword target - but not in the age of content
(unless the images were optimized for image searches for sale able products (but I do not think it is)
-
Hi Dino,
I know this won't solve the immediate problem you asked for, but wouldn't it be better for your client's site (and for SEO) to alter the PHP so that the title and meta data description are replaced with variables that can also be dynamic, depending on whichever of the 100 or so pages gets created?
That way, rather than worrying about a robot seeing 100 pages as duplicate content, it could see 100 pages as 100 pages.
-
It depends on how the pages are being created (I would assume it is off of a template page)
So within the template of this dynamically created page you would place
But if this is the global template - you cannot do this as it will noindex every page which of course is bad.
If you want to PM me the URL of the page I can take a look at your code, and see what is going on and how to recitify, as right now i think we are talking about the same principles, but different words are being used.
It really is pretty straightforward. (what I am saying) The pages that you want to be not indexed DO NOT need a nofollow they need a meta noindex
But there are many variables, as if you have already robot.txt disallowed the directory, then no bot will go there to get the updated noindex directive....
If there is no way to add a meta noindex then you need to nofollow and put in for a manual removal
-
I completely understand and agree with all points you have conveyed. However, I am not certain as to the best approach to "noindex" the urls which are being created dynamically from within the static html page? Maybe I am making this more complex than it needs to be...
-
So it is the pages themselves that are dynamically created you want out of index, not the page the contains the links?
If this is so ---
noindex the pages that are created dynamically
Therein lies the problem. I did have the nofollow directive in place specifying the /gallery/ folder, but apparently, the bots still crawled it.
Nofollow does not remove from index, it only tells the bot not to pass authority, as it is still feasible that the bot will crawl the link, so without the noindex, nofollow is not the correct directive due to the page (even though nofollowed) is still being reached and indexed.
PS. also if you have the nofollow on the links, you may want to remove it, so the bots will go straight through to the page and grab the noindex directive, but if you wanted to try to not let any authority "evaporate" you can continue to nofollow, but you may need to request the dynamically generated pages (URLS) be removed using webmaster tools.
-
The goal is to have the page remain in the index, but not follow any dynamically generated links on the page. The nofollow directive (in place for months) has not done the job.
-
?
If a link is coming into the page, and you have Noindex, Nofollow - this would remove from index and prevent the following of any links -
This is NOT instant, and can take months to occur depending on depth of page, crawl schedule ect... (you can try to speed it up by using webmaster tools to remove the URL)
What is the goal You are attempting to achieve?
To get the page out of index, but still followed?
Or remain in index, but just not follow links on page?
?
-
Therein lies the problem. I did have the nofollow directive in place specifying the /gallery/ folder, but apparently, the bots still crawled it. I agree that the noindex removes the page, but I wasn't certain if it prevented crawling of the page, as I have read mixed opinions on this.
I just thought of something else... perhaps an external url is linking to this page - allowing it to be crawled. I am off to examine this perspective.
Thanks for your response!
-
noindex will only remove from Index and dissallow the act of indexing the specific page (or pages created off template) you place the tag in upon the next page crawl.
Bots will still follow the page, and follow any links that are readable as long as there is not a nofollow directive.
I am not sure I fully understand the situation, so I would not say this is my "reccomendation" but an answer to the specific question.....
but I am wondering if this will stop the bots dead in their tracks or will they still be able to pick-up on the pages generated
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate and thin content - advanced..
Hi Guys Two issues to sort out.. So we have a website that lists products and has many pages for: a) The list pages - that lists all the products for that area.
On-Page Optimization | | nick-name123
b) The detailed pages - that when click into from the list page, will list the specific product in full. On the list page, we perhaps have half the description written down, when clicked into you see the full description.
If you search in google for a phrase on the detailed page, you will see results for that specific page including 'multiple' list pages where it is on. For example, lets say we are promoting 'trees' which are situated in Manhatten. And we are also promoting trees in Brooklyn, there is a crossover. So a tree listed in Manhatten will also be listen in brooklyn as its close by (not from America so don't laugh if I have areas muddled)
We then have quite a few pages with the same content as a result. I read a post a while back from the mighty Cutts who said not to worry about the duplicate unless its spammy, but what is good for one person, is spammy to another.. Does anyone have any ideas as to if this is a genuine problem and how you would solve? Also, we know we have alot of thin content on the site, but we dont know how to identify it. It's a large site so needs something automated (I think).. Thanks in advance Nick0 -
Mass Duplicate Content
Hi guys Now that the full crawl is complete I've found the following: http://www.trespass.co.uk/mens-onslow-02022 http://www.trespass.co.uk/mens-moora-01816 http://www.trespass.co.uk/site/writeReview?ProductID=1816 http://www.trespass.co.uk/site/writeReview?ProductID=2022 The first 2 duplicate content is easily fixed by writing better product descriptions for each product (a lot of hours needed) but still an easy fix. The last 2 are review pages for each product which are all the same except for the main h1 text. My thinking is to add no index and no follow to all of these review pages? The site will be changing to magento very soon and theres still a lot of work to do. If anyone has any other suggestions or can spot any other issues, its appreciated. Kind regards Robert
On-Page Optimization | | yournetbiz1 -
Landing page content and link distribution
Hey there fellow mozers, Need some advice, one of my clients asked us about the best way to distribute their content: number of restaurants per page, links and footer in their Landing pages. Here are 2 examples of what I mean: http://www.just-eat.es/adomicilio/madrid http://www.just-eat.es/adomicilio/pizza Thanks a lot!
On-Page Optimization | | Comunicare0 -
Duplicate content and the Moz bot
Hi Does our little friend at SEOmoz follow the same rules as the search engine bots when he crawls my site? He has sent thousands of errors back to me with duplicate content issues, but I thought I had removed these with nofollow etc. Can you advise please.
On-Page Optimization | | JamieHibbert0 -
User experience regarding dulpicate content and managing this content with google.
Hi long title i know! We are moving on to magento and have chosen to allocate a specific colour to each category using corresponding tabbed navigation for user experience.All products within each of the coloured tabs then inherit the repective colour, giving the products a category identiy within the store. This layout has had a positive feedback from our "testers" As a lot of our products are seasonal and can be represented in different categories there is a significant amount of duplicate content. ATM i see our options as being: Alter the site structure so that the category is not shown in the url, therefore eliminating our duplicate products. The downside of this is that the colour co-ordination of the categories would not work at product level as its the category path that assigns the colour. create canonical links for every duplicate, can this be damaging? keep the duplicates and do nothing let google decide the most important version of a product. any guidance would be appreciated!
On-Page Optimization | | LadyApollo0 -
Strategies for revising my duplicate content?
New to SEO and SEOmoz. I tried searching for this first and I'm sure it's on here but I could not find it. I have a site that markets fishing charters in a few dozen cities. Up to now I was relying on PPC and using each city page as a landing page of sorts. Each citiy page is very similar (there are only so many ways to write about a type of fish or fishing). What would be the recommended way for optimizing this, keeping in mind the duplicate information we provide on each page seems to be important to people. Site is www.vipfishingcharters.com Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | NoahC0 -
Sitemap generator and /index.htm
I use DMX Zone sitemap generator in Dreamweaver. When generating the sitemap, it includes both http://www.domain.com and http://www.domain.com/index.htm. Should the /index.htm be deleted from the sitemap, or will the 301 redirect take care of that? Best,
On-Page Optimization | | ChristopherGlaeser
Christopher0 -
How to "rich-content" optimized!
Hi mozzers! How to optimize really a rich index.php of a page,with a keyword example: " mobile " what kind of things to include,video,comments,images,how many words,manually meta-descriptons or to leave it empty to take automatically the googlebot a snippet! Tell us more on this, because we forget sometimes the rich-content-optimized and only concentrated on the link-building. Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | leadsprofi0