Do user metrics really mean anything?
-
This is a serious question, I'd also like some advice on my experience so far with the Panda. One of my websites, http://goo.gl/tFBA4 was hit on January 19th, it wasn't a massive hit, but took us from 25,000 to 21,000 uniques per day. It survived Panda completely prior. The only thing that had changed, was an upgrade in the CMS, which caused a lot of duplicate content, i.e 56 copies of the homepage, under various URLs. These were all indexed in Google.
I've heard varying views, as to whether this could trigger Panda, I believe so, but i'd appreciate your thoughts on it.
There was also the above the fold update on the 19th, but we have 1 ad MAX on each page, most pages have none. I hate even having to have 1 ad. I think we can safely assume it was Panda that did the damage.
Jan 18th was the first Panda refresh, since we upgraded our CMS in mid-late December.
As it was nothing more than a refresh, I feel it's safe to assume, that the website was hit, due to something that had changed on the website, between the Jan 18th refresh and the one previous.
So, aside from fixing the bugs in the CMS, I felt now was a good time to put a massive focus on user metrics, I worked hard and continuing to spend a lot of time, improving them.
- Reduced bounce rate from 50% to 30% (extremely low in the niche)
- Average page views from 7 to 12
- Average time on site from 5 to almost 8 minutes
- Plus created a mobile optimised version of the site
- Page loading speeds slashed.
Not only did the above improvements have no positive effect, traffic continued to slide and we're now close to a massive 40% loss. Btw I realise neither mobile site nor page loading speeds are user metrics.
I fully appreciate that my website is image heavy and thin on text, but that is an industry wide 'issue'. It's not an issue to my users, so it shouldn't be an issue to Google.
Unlike our competitors, we actively encourage our users to add descriptions to their content and provide guidelines, to assit them in doing so.
We have a strong relationship with our artists, as we listen to their needs and develop the website accordingly. Most of the results in the SERPs, contain content taken from my website, without my permission or permission of the artist. Rarely do they give any credit.
If user metrics are so important, why on earth has my traffic continued to slide?
Do you have any advice for me, on how I can further improve my chances of recovering from this?
Fortunately, despite my artists download numbers being slashed in half, they've stuck by me and the website, which speaks volumes.
-
The duplicates that were created by the CMS are now all gone. Though didn't get 100% sorted until several days before the recent Panda refresh. There was a line in the code, that said any index.html, display the contents of the homepage. So Google had 56+ pages showing my homepage. Crazy.
It maybe that I've solved the issues, but waiting around for month is awful.
-
From a "pure" SEO standpoint, here's what I'd say we know about user metrics:
(1) Bing has confirmed using click-through rate (CTR) and "dwell time" as ranking factors. Dwell time is the time it take a visitor to return to search results from a site, so it's related to both bounce rate and time-on-site.
(2) Google has officially said that they do not use bounce rate as a ranking factor. Google historically defines things narrowly, so we don't know if they factor in dwell time. Reading between the lines, they seem to find it unreliable.
(3) I'm not sure if Google has confirmed this, but they very likely factor in CTR.
(4) We don't know for sure how user factors fit into Panda, although people have certainly suggested a connection. My gut reaction is that, if it's part of Panda, it's not a large part.
Of course, looking beyond SEO, reducing your bounce rate and increasing your page-views and time-on-site is great. You've improved your engagement and it will help you. This is in no way wasted effort, and even if it doesn't have a direct, immediate impact on SEO, it will have indirect effects.
You mentioned the CMS spun out a lot of duplicates. If you have text-thin pages AND a ton of duplicates, that certainly could cause some problems. Have you taken steps to control and de-index those duplicates? That would probably be the first place I'd look, from your description of the problem.
-
Hi Highland, I truly wish I was in a niche, where it was viable to use Adwords. So much more reliable and consistent.
As we give away content and don't sell anything, adwords is a no-go.
I only wish I were hit by Penguin, I feel that's a much easier mess to clean up. Panda to me, is the bigger evil.
I do feel ATM, I am looking for a needle in a haystack.
But that said, I must remain hopeful!
-
This is going to sound screwy (especially in an SEO forum) but I stopped worrying about the organics after we tanked in April (I think Panda 3.5 possibly but no one update fits the drop). We started Adwords immediately and got some of the lost traffic back but there's really nothing major we can do to fix it. It's not that I've given up, its that the drop is really hard to quantify as to the cause, so fixing it is nigh impossible. I cleaned up some links that looked bad and I have my fingers crossed that it will fix the problem as the index catches up but, beyond that, most of our efforts in general are in making our website better. We've pretty much defined our niche and I suspect we will bounce back eventually but, until Google stops disliking us, we're just going to keep on plugging away. We've made our site far better and nobody else even comes close to offering what we offer (although some people have stock items that are cheaper)
Incidentally our bounce rate has gone way down, conversion rates have crept up and I still have no earthly idea how to get us back to #1 (there's 15 cruise liners of people like us out there, tho). But Adwords have shown us some terms we've not pursued before. Small blessings in a hurricane, I suppose.
My advice to you: be the best at what you do. Make your website awesome and then call it crap and make it even more awesome (that's how artists do it I think). Be sure you're running social campaigns as well. Social has been a small bright spot as well. Sooner or later Google will sort it out but I have a hunch they're playing chicken with the spammers.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
My site Metrics are not as per they should
Hi, I am regularly making links on my site to improve its metrics but i am confused how other people fastly improve their DA/PA and my DA/PA is not improving with that site. The same happened with spam score. It has been a month i disavow my links having spam score but instead of decrease in it, my spam score increased. Please advice. Is there any special way to use that help moz crawler to check site and update accordingly? Please help
Technical SEO | | AzadSeo37310 -
Google Search Console and User-declared canonical is actually Hreflang tag
Hey, We recently launched a US version of UK based ecommerce website on the us.example.com subdomain. Both websites are on Shopify so canonical tags are handled automatically and we have implemented Hreflang tags across both websites. Suddenly our rankings in the UK have dropped and after looking in search console for the UK site ive found that a lot of pages are now no longer indexed in Google because the User-declared canonical is the Hreflang tag for the US URL. Below is an example https://www.example.com/products/pac-man-arcade-cabinet - is the product page is the canonical tag rel="alternate" href="https://www.example.com/products/pac-man-arcade-cabinet" hreflang="en-gb" /> - UK hreflang tag rel="alternate" href="https://us.example.com/products/pac-man-arcade-cabinet" hreflang="en-us" /> - US Hreflang tag then in Google search console the user-defined canonical is https://us.example.com/products/pac-man-arcade-cabinet but it should be https://www.example.com/products/pac-man-arcade-cabinet The UK website has been assigned to target the United Kingdom in Search Console and the US website has been assigned to target the United States. We also do not have access to robots.txt file unfortunately. Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | PeterRubber0 -
Ranking penalty for "accordion" content -- hidden prior to user interaction
Will content inside an "accordion" module be ranked as non-hidden content? Is there an official guide by google and other search engines addressing this? Example of accordion element: https://v4-alpha.getbootstrap.com/components/collapse/#accordion-example Will all elements in the example above be seen + treated equally by search engines?
Technical SEO | | houlihanlokey1 -
Google displays multiple titles for same article. What does this mean?
I've linked to some screenshots so that it what I'm talking about makes more sense. Sometimes, when I perform a search, I see an article with the correct article title listed as the page title in the SERPs. Other times, I see the wrong page title – it's a generic somethin' or other done by my client's web design company with a bunch of keywords thrown in. The latter (not the correct article title) also appears at the top of the browser tab for every article on my client's site. I know this is bad, but what can be done about it? This would never happen if my client used Wordpress or some easily modifiable CMS, but they're using a proprietary one maintained by the group that designed the website. open?id=0BxB_dYL1ylGgVVF1dHlwdXp2dFU open?id=0BxB_dYL1ylGgdWJjdlJoRlRIR00
Technical SEO | | Greenery0 -
Homepage "personalisation" - different content for different users
Hi Mozians, My firm is looking to present different content to different users depending on whether they are new, return visitors, return customers etc... I am concerned how this would work in practice as far as Google is concrened- how would react to the fact that the bot would see different content to some users. It has the slight whiff of cloacking about it to me, but I also get that in this case it would be a UX thing that would genuinely be of benefit to users, and clearly wouldn't be intended to manipulate search rankings at all. Is there a way of acheiving this "personalisation" in such a way that Google understands thay you are doint it? I am thinking about some kind of markup that "declares" the different versions of the page. Basically I want to be as transparent about it as possible so as to avoid un-intended consequences. Many thanks indeed!
Technical SEO | | unirmk0 -
Log in, sign up, user registration and robots
Hi all, We have an accommodation site that asks users only to register when they want to book a room, in the last step. Though this is the ideal situation when you have tons of users, nowadays we are having around 1500 - 2000 per day and making tests we found out that if we ask for a registration (simple, 1 click FB) we mail them all and through a good customer service we are increasing our sales. That is why, we would like to ask users to register right after the home page ie Home/accommodation or and all the rest. I am not sure how can I make to make that content still visible to robots.
Technical SEO | | Eurasmus.com
Will the authentication process block google crawling it? Maybe something we can do? We are not completely sure how to proceed so any tip would be appreciated. Thank you all for answering.3 -
Will really old links have any benefit being 301'd
I have a client who when they built their site never had any of their old links 301'd - I've now managed to locate a few of these links and am going to redirect them. The site was rebuilt 2006/07 - and it ranked page one and #1 for lots of relevant keywords, if I redirect these to the current pages will the rankings still carry??
Technical SEO | | lauratagdigital0 -
Verisign Trust Seal and Domain Metrics (Has noting to do with SSL)
Hi, Does anyone have any evidence or case studies that Verisign Trust seal actually raises trust metrics? I know there are the obvious benefits such as better CTR and Conversion (which could in turn raise trust metrics). But i am looking for actual sighted examples of Verisign increasing trust signals to search engines discrediting the correlation between search metrics improving. I modified this as i think people are getting confused between SSL products and the specific Versign product i am talking about Verisign Trust Seal seen here. https://www.verisign.com/trust-seal/index.html?tid=gnps This has nothing to do with security for transactions it is more geared towards all around safer user experience including Malware scans and enhanced "stand out" in SERPS. It is not just a Domain validation but an organizational or Branding authentication check" With that being said, the question still stands Does anyone have any case studies or direct examples of trust being elevated in metrics for the specific product mentioned above. Thanks.
Technical SEO | | Jinx146780