URL structure
-
Hi,
I am in the process of having a site created which will focus on the Xbox 360, PS3, Wii and PS3 Vita.
I would appreciate some advice when it comes to the URL structure. Each category mentioned above will have the following subsections
News
Reviews
Screenshots
TrailersWould the best url structure be?
www.domain.com/xbox-360/news/news-story-headline
www.domain.com/ps3/reviews/ps3-game-nameThanks in advance for your help and suggestions.
-
The timestamp is totally up to you if you think your URL:s will look better without them.
However Google tends to give pages with clear indications of when the information was published a little boosts. And they do mention that freshness is key for content.
So the timestamp is important but I'm guessing that you'll have a timestamp in the article with the standard WP config anyhow so it's really not that essential in the URL. But If you have many articles it can be good to have a time indicator in them, if only for your own use.
To give yo a better example of how the permalink settings could look in WP:
/%category%/%postname%/
If you do it this way you won't have a timestamp in the URL.
* Remember that WP will use only one category in the permalinks so I reccomend you to only have one category for the URL.
Both way works, just choose one and remember that you need to stick to the one you choose so that the inbound links don't loose effect.
best, G
-
Thanks Gustav. Do I really need the timestamp? (However I am looking to get listed on Google News in the future)
I was thinking of the following structure:-
ps3/ps3-reviews/game-name-review
xbox-360/xbox-360-reviews/game-name-review -
That's correct
- otherwise it would be seen as duplicated content.
But that doesn't create any problems for you.
Just set the structure to:
Maincategory/subcategory/nichecategory/timestamp/article
EG:
For Xbox:
Reviews/xbox-360/timestamp/game-review-name
FOr PS3:
Reviews/Ps3/timestamp/game-review-name
This should work fine
Best, G
-
Thanks for the kind words, both.
It appears that with Wordpress each category (even sub categories) cannot have the same name so for example, "reviews" can only be used once and cannot be used within /xbox-360/reviews/game-review-name and ps3/reviews/game-review-name
Is that correct?
-
Great thoughts, but I would just like to add another: you may want to keep all subfolders in lowercase. This could prevent headaches later on if URL characters have a mixture of cases.
-
Nice thread!
As Marcus mentioned, it's good to have cross platform category, there is however another way
You could:
Instead of using cross platform as a category, simply use rel canonical.
In WP this is simple you just choose the categories eg: Xbox360, PS3 and Wii and then choose which one that you want as a main indexed article with a rel canonical tag.
Best
Nice work on the site!
-
Yep, I guess, but to play devils advocate here, what if it is a cross platform review?
You could review on one platform, make that the main one and then have the same content on other URLS that have a canonical pointing to the main review.
Alternatively, you could have another category
/cp/ - cross platform
Then you could have:
www.totallygn.com/cp/reviews/fifa12-review
And the review could be listed under all categories from a browsing perspective and just have a caveat that the version reviewed was for PS3.
Either way, this is not going to skyrocket your SEO, but your current URLs are a bit on the long side (standard wordpress set up?).
Just try to choose something that makes for a good, readable, descriptive URL that is not too long and you will be okay.
Oh, and make sure you 301 all the old page addresses else you will run into bigger problems. In fact, take a look at this plugin: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/redirection/
It gives you loads of 301 options from within wordpress but more importantly, it creates automatic 301 redirects when a posts address changes so it will do most of the heavy lifting for you. It also logs all 404's so you can see any changes you didnt make and add the relevant rules.
You are doing a lot right though: Wordpress is a great base and your site has tons of great content so so keep at it!
Marcus
-
Thanks Marcus. The site currently exists at www.totallygn.com but is not very SEO friendly as you can see.
With regards to what you said above. If we were to review FIFA 12 for the PS3 would your url be
www.totallygn.com/ps3/reviews/fifa12-review ?
Thanks again,
Neil
-
Hey, sounds interesting, I am a UK gamer so you will have to let me have a link!
Really, this should be a common sense, usability driven decision so the way you have listed it above seems to work for me.
The main categories are the consoles themselves so
/xbox/
/ps3/
/wii/
/vita/These then all break down into your four categories so
/xbox/News
/xbox/Reviews
/xbox/Screenshots
/xbox/Trailers/ps3/News
/ps3/Reviews
/ps3/Screenshots
/ps3/TrailersThis gives you plenty of flexibility to add new root categories, children categories etc and it gets your keywords in your URL if that is your SEO goal here. Ultimately, it makes for a nice, descriptive URL as well.
Good luck with the site!
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Structured Data - How frequent does Google update?
Hi all, I recently updated some markup on my site about a week ago. However, when using the structured data testing tool and inserting the URL of the page that was updated with the schema, I see that the schema being recognized does not reflect the updated markup. However, when I use the structured data testing tool again and insert the code I used for the schema, I see no errors and all info was implemented properly. Any idea why my updates (which seem to be correct based on my code) are not reflecting when testing the URL of my site via structured data testing tool? Is there some delay for this data to update? Any insight would be much appreciated. Thanks all in advance! Best,
Technical SEO | | hdeg
Sung0 -
Is there any problem with my information structure?
Hey guyz I have a client who got a very interesting structure that I've ever seen. He has got a navigation down link, and with that he links every page on his site , with his every each page.
Technical SEO | | atakala
I mean each page link each page with dropdown navigational menu. ( Menu can be crawled .)
And the other interesting thing is in the image . http://prntscr.com/3q7zp6 He has a level 1 page that has a huge content in it.
But he links every topic of the content with another link which is anchor text link I mean this (http://site.com/level2page.html#part1).
How Google treats this ?
Is there anything wrong with it ? I mean amount of it .
Thank you! 3q7zp60 -
Odd URL errors upon crawl
Hi, I see this in Google Webmasters, and am now also seeing it here...when a crawl is performed on my site, I get many 500 server error codes for URLs that I don't believe exist. It's as if it sees a normal URL but adds this to it: %3Cdiv%20id= It's like this for hundreds of URLs. Good URL that actually exists http://www.ffr-dsi.com/food-retailing/supplies/ URL that causes error and I have no idea why http://www.ffr-dsi.com/food-retailing/supplies/%3Cdiv%20id= Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Matt10 -
When to use canonical urls
I will be the first to admit I am never really 100% sure when to use canonical urls. I have a quick question and I am not really sure if this is a situation for a canonical or not. I am looking at a my friends building website and there are issues with what pages are ranking. Basically there homepage is focusing on the building refurbishment location but for some reason in internal page is ranking for that keyword and it is not mentioned at all on that page. Would this be a time to add the homepage url and a canonical on the ranking page (using yoast plugin) to tell Google that the homepage is the preferred page? Thanks Paul
Technical SEO | | propertyhunter0 -
Removing a URL from Search Results
I recently renamed a small photography company, and so I transferred the content to the new website, put a 301-redirect on the old website URL, and turned off hosting for that website. But when I search for certain terms that the old URL used to rank highly for (branded terms) the old URL still shows up. The old URL is "www.willmarlowphotography.com" and when you type in "Will Marlow" it often appears in 8th and 9th place on a SERP. So, I have two questions: First, since the URL no longer has a hosting account associated with it, shouldn't it just disappear from SERPs? Second, is there anything else I should have done to make the transition smoother to the new URL? Thanks for any insights you can share.
Technical SEO | | williammarlow0 -
Products with discrete URLs for each color
here is the issue. i have an ecommerce site that on a category page, shows each individual color for each product sold. and there is a distinct URL for each color. each product page shares the same content, with the only potentially differentiating factor being customer reviews (not nearly enough of these to differentiate anything). so we have URLs like: www.domain.com/product-green www.domain.com/product-yellow www.domain.com/product-red and so on. i am looking for a way to consolidate these URL while still showing all colors on the category page. the first solution i am considering is using the hash tag. so we would create www.domain.com/product#green, www.domain.com/product#yellow, www.domain.com/product#red. if possible, i would set the canonical tag as www.domain.com/product. the second solution would be to use the canonical tag and keep the URLs as is. the issue i see here is that we would need to create www.domain.com/product and show that page somewhere. www.domain.com/product would the URL that the above color URLs would canonicalize to. what would be the preferred solution? or is there something else?
Technical SEO | | rakesh_patel0 -
Suggested url structure for hierarchical data
For an existing web site we are developing a local info web site section where each area would get a review and information about local bars and restaurants. The site manages areas in the following hierarchy: Country > Broader region > Perfecture > Municipality > Neighborhood e.g. Italy > Northern Italy > Lombardia > Milano > Center Local Info pages would exist for all the above levels so you could have a page for Italy as a whole, a page for Lombardia, and a separate page for the Center of Milano. On certain countries there are many synonyms especially in the Neighborhood level but also a few in the Municipality level. We would like to build a generic SEF url structure/pattern that would be able to represent the above and be as short as possible for the purpose of SEO. 1. the obvious solution would be to incorporate the unique identifier of e.g. www.example.com/local-info/Italy-10
Technical SEO | | seo-cat
www.example.com/local-info/Milano-12363
www.example.com/local-info/Center-789172 but this does not represent the hierarchy and does not include the interesting keyword of e.g. Milano when looking at the neighborhood level 2. Another option would be to include all levels e.g. www.example.com/local-info/Italy/Northern-Italy/Lombardia
www.example.com/local-info/Italy/Northern-Italy/Lombardia/Milano
www.example.com/local-info/Italy/Northern-Italy/Lombardia/Milano/Center But this would end up with large URLs 3. I am thinking of another solution which would include the current level and its parent at any page. Not capturing the hierarchy very well but at least it includes the parent name for richer keywords in the url itself. www.example.com/local-info/Northern-Italy/Lombardia
www.example.com/local-info/Lombardia/Milano
www.example.com/local-info/Milano/Center 4. Or a hybrid where the first levels are always there and the rest are concatenated on a single segment www.example.com/local-info/Italy/Northern-Italy/Lombardia
www.example.com/local-info/Italy/Northern-Italy/Lombardia-Milano
www.example.com/local-info/Italy/Northern-Italy/Lombardia-Milano-Center any thoughts? thanks in advance0