Canonical tags
-
In previous we had issues with capital letters in page urls. So we made a 301 redirection to lower case page url. But I read there that it's not good idea to use 301 redirection, better solution for that canonical tag. So we placed canonical url tak to lower case page url... So after week, in google webmaster tools I see around 60k os dublicate pages. Why google don't see canonical tag?
Thank you
-
**google bot crawled our new pages yesterday, canonical tag was placed maybe week ago. **
The canonical tag which is providing the adjustment is the one on the old page, not the new one. In order to fully update Google needs to crawl both the old and new pages.
So it should see this tag, but looks like they ignore this tag.
That is not true. Your understanding of how the process works is not complete. You are not using the best solution and you are expecting results way too fast.
301 redirection is not good idea as we loose ~10% of link juice, that's why it's recommended to use canonical.
You lose a small amount of link juice when performing a redirect. That amount is estimated as between 1 and 10%.
You lose the same amount when using a canonical tag.
All of the above information is correct, but I sense you are convinced otherwise so perhaps this video from Matt Cutts will change your mind: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW5UL3lzBOA
-
google bot crawled our new pages yesterday, canonical tag was placed maybe week ago. So it should see this tag, but looks like they ignore this tag. We do not block urls in robots.txt. 301 redirection is not good idea as we loose ~10% of link juice, that's why it's recommended to use canonical.
-
Personally, I'd try to eradicate the problem at the root. Make sure your CMS does not generate any URLs in upper case letters at all, and you'll have the best solution for this problem!
-
I am not sure where you got the idea the canonical tag would be a better solution. Faced with the situation you shared, I would use the 301 redirect.
A canonical tag is best when you need to maintain more then one version of a URL. For example, if you sell radio controlled cars on your site it may be a good idea to list it under /toys/radio-controlled-car and also under gifts/radio-controlled-car. One of those pages would be the primary page which the other would be duplicate content. You can use a canonical tag to let search engines know which is the primary page.
In your case, there is no reason to maintain the old page with the upper-case URL. Therefore I would use a 301 redirect and only offer the new page on your site.
So after week, in google webmaster tools I see around 60k os dublicate pages. Why google don't see canonical tag?
For starters, expect it to take a month for Google to see all the pages of a large site. Google will crawl a small percentage of your site each day.
There could be various issues with your site which can affect Google's ability to see the change. For example, if you block the pages with robots.txt, Google would not see the canonical tag.
My recommendation would be to implement the 301 redirect then submit an updated sitemap to Google. The next step is to wait 30 days.
-
Google does seem to take a while with canonical tags. However, it sounds like a 301 might be the better choice in these circumstances.
When choosing between 301 & canonical, the issue for me is the user experience. If the 2 URLs show different content and the user would expect to be able to find either set then I'd go with canonical. Otherwise it is 301. If you are just trying to stop issues with capitalisation in URLs then really it should be a 301.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
No-return tag error
Am receiving a no-return tag error on Search Console for pages in our site that are unrelated. Originating Page: https://www.eginnovations.com/in-the-news/performance-assurance-a-key-to-virtual-desktop-success Alternate URL: https://www.eginnovations.com/fr/ There is a link to the /fr/ page in the language version at the top of the page but I can't figure out why this would be throwing an error from the originating page. Any help would be appreciated!
On-Page Optimization | | eGInnovations0 -
Hi - How do you get rid of duplicate content that was accidentally created on a tag url? For example, when I published a new article, the content was duplicated on: /posts/tag/lead-generation/
the original article was created with: /posts/shippers-looking-for-freight-brokers/ How can I fix this so a new URL is not created every time I add a tag to a new posting?
On-Page Optimization | | treetopgrowthstrategy0 -
Benefits of having a Title-Tag that fits on the SERP
Has anyone seen any case studies that show that title-tags that fit on the page (http://moz.com/blog/new-title-tag-guidelines-preview-tool) have a higher ctr than title-tags that don't fit? I know it's been said that keywords past the pixel limit still matter but if there's a major benefit to ctr for title-tags that fit....Any thoughts?
On-Page Optimization | | GSO0 -
Title Tag duplication.
Hi Guys/Gals, We do a lot of work in a very competitive space (personal injury) and are having an internal debate on the best way to implement title tags for new sites. We understand that keywords, title tags, etc., don't possess the power they once did, but we have yet to see conclusive proof of this in our space. The vast majority of competitors still rank very well for keyword focused content, title tags, etc., while having average link profiles and little content. We write a lot of content for our clients and want to know if someone can offer their opinion on the question that follows this example: "Top 5 Injuries Caused by T-Bone Collisions | Indiana Accident Lawyer" Would it seem repetitive or manipulative to construct title tags as shown, always placing "Indiana Accident Attorney" or "Indianapolis Accident Lawyer," or similar of at the end of each title tag? Thanks, gang!
On-Page Optimization | | Wayne760 -
How to handle long dynamic meta tags?
Hi All, I have a site that has upwards of 40 000 pages and I'm redeveloping it so really want to get some SEO elements spot on for the new development. Hoe do I go about handling the following: The user creates a title for their advert which I use as the meta title. The problem is titles are quite often longer that the accepted lengths. How should I handle this? String manipulation down to the desired size, leave it as is or is there another solution? The meta descriptionn is pulled from a summary they created as part of their profile. Is this the right way to do it? Any advice would be appreciated. Ross
On-Page Optimization | | Mulith0 -
Should a title tag and the URL be a 100 percent match?
My understanding is that a URL should be as short as possible and also match the title tag, but in order to keep the URL shorter, can you abbreviate it? For example: Title Tag: Eat Your Way to Beauty with Superfoods URL: websitename.com/sbeauty-with-superfoods
On-Page Optimization | | KimCalvert0 -
Internal Links & Title Tags, Which Page Benifits?
The best way I can explain why question is with an example. Lets say I have a parent parent page that is focusing on a broad keyword.
On-Page Optimization | | donford
I also have a sub-page which is focused more on long-tail keyword variations. When I make an internal link and give it a title tag, should I give it the long-tail keyword for the juice, or should I use the broad keyword for the parent page's relevancy? Thanks for any help, advise or pointers.0 -
How many meta tags are appropriate?
How many meta tags are appropriate? There is a page that ranks above me that has many more than I do. It has (I have removed the content of each to give a description of the type of content): I only use meta tags for keywords and description, robots. Should I have more? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | scanlin0