Tag-URLs in Magento
-
Hello,
I have got a problem concerning Tag-URLs in Magento (the URLs mentioned are just fictitious
At the moment, they look something like this:
(1) http://store.com/tag/product/list/tagId/1/ ... so these URLs are not search engine friendly at all.
Using a Magento extension you could transform them in speaking URLs:
(2) http://store.com/tag/digital-cameras
What would you do if you sold, say, digital cameras and your online shop ranked high for the keyword "digital camera" with URL No. 1 (not search engine friendly). Would you transform (1) in (2) and 301 all non speaking URLs? But would you keep the high ranking for "digital camera" when 301 to URL No. (2).
But, what I'm most concerned of is : There is actually a landing page (category page) for the keyword "digital camera" : http://store.com/digital-cameras.
Shouldn't the last URL rank high for "digital camera"? (instead of the tag URLs). But given the situation above, does it make sense now to 301 the tag URL to the category page? I would perhaps lose my good ranking, wouldn't I?
Thanks a lot for your help!
Martin
-
If you're willing to do a little experimentation, all of these are good ideas. Best of luck.
-
Hi Cyrus,
I'm also a fan of the phrase you mentioned ("if it ain't broke, don't fix it"). But in this case, I'd rather have category pages rank.
The tag page doesn't offer any content. It's just a product listing page (all pages tagged with the label "digital camera" for instance). So when a potential client arrives on the page, I'm not sure he'll find what he's looking for whereas the category pages offers good content, faceted navigation and so on.
Your suggestion, in short, is to make the category page look more relevant to Google for the keyword "digital camera" than the tag-Page?? So I should leave the tag-Page as it is (no 301 to category page??) and link back to the category page in order to strengthen it (several internal links pointing to the category page).. What about altering the meta tags of the tag-Page so that they look less lrelevant for the targeted keyword?
Thanks for your help Cyrus, I really appreciated your answer!!
Bye Martin
-
Hi Martin,
Great question. There is always a risk when you move a URL. And if the URL in question is already ranking well for your keyword, you may consider the phrase "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."
There have been studies over the years that show that a 301 transfers about 80% of it's link equity to the new URL. Anecdotal evidence suggest this number may be slightly higher when using the canonical tag for the same purpose.
Sounds like you'd really rather have your category page rank instead of the tag page. If this is the case I'd make sure the category page contains truly unique content (and not just a listing of product excerpts). I'd also make sure all my top products linked back to the category page in a prominent fashion. So at the top of my high-ranking tag page, I might insert a keyword rich link pointing to the category landing page.
Of course, if you are already ranking well, you might also consider doing nothing. In this case ask yourself what's best for the customer? Especially the ones landing on the tag page. How can you help them find what they are looking for?
Hope this helps! Best of luck with your SEO.
-
I think rel=canonical is a better solution than a 301.
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=139394
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Long url links
Just wondering about creating links.
On-Page Optimization | | Robotnik
Is it ok to have very long links?
Like: http://www.robotnik.com/computer-hardware-ram/8gb-ddr3-1600-desktop Is the above too long, is it better for SEO to be more to the point? Also For better SEO, is it better to use hyphens in a domain name or not?0 -
IMG ALT tags - should they be the same or the product title?
I have about 300 products. Should I make all my IMG ALT tags with my keywords, such as sea glass jewelry, sea glass necklace, sea glass bracelets? Or, should I make them what their title is, some of which do not pertain to the keyword, such as By the Sea. Some of my products do have keywords in them, but not all. I am hesitant on changing all the titles, as almost all URLs are indexed.
On-Page Optimization | | tiffany11030 -
Head description tag, what now
Recently I heard Google virtually dropping the description tag for seo scoring? and it takes the data off the page, however one of my clients description is just pulling a url rather than any content from the page. is there some way thats ethical to suggest a description to google?
On-Page Optimization | | Shuffled0 -
Why are my tags causing duplicate error?
Hi, When I run an SEO moz crawl it is picking up duplicate errors from my tags. Currently I have these set as domain url/tag/name of the tag. Is this incorrect? Is there anything I can do to stop this being picked up as duplicate pages? Thanks, Eliz
On-Page Optimization | | econley0 -
Temp redirects of homepage URLs
Working on a site for a client and the CMS provider has all variants of their domain (.co.uk & .com and / and http:// etc) temp redirecting to the /default.aspx homepage. I know in theory that this means no Google Juice is being passed to the final location page, does this mean that all backlinks that point to their domain are not actually passing Juice onto the homepage? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Switch_Digital0 -
URL for location pages
Hello all We would like to create clean, easy URLs for our large list of Location pages. If there are a few URLs for each of the pages, am I right when I'm saying we would like this to be the canonical? Right now we would like the URL to be: For example
On-Page Optimization | | Ferguson
Domain.com/locations/Columbus I have found some instances where there might be 2,3 or more locations in the same city,zip. My conclusion for these would be: adding their Branch id's on to the URL
Domain.com/locations/Columbus/0304 Is this an okay approach? We are unsure if the URL should have city,State,zip for SEO purposes?
The pages will have all of this info in it's content
BUT what would be best for SEO and ranking for a given location? Thank you for any info!0 -
The URL Inside
Howdy SEO'ers, I have a quick question for the SEO gurus out there. When constructing "better" search friendly URLs would one of these be better than the other? Example 1: http://Domain.com/Category/Sub-Category/Product-name Example 2: http://Category.Domain.com/Sub-Category/Product-name In this example the category could be phones and the sub-category brands of phones. Is either one of these URLs "better" than the other in terms of ranking? Thanks! I'll hang-up and listen to your answer. 🙂 Jonathan
On-Page Optimization | | creativedepartment0 -
Absolute URLs
Hi, this is a very basic question but I want to confirm, as I remembered it was consider a good practice to use the absolute version of your links when linking to other pages of your site, not for any issue related to passing authority or PageRank, but because if someone scraps your content then they would take the links as well (as if they didn't remove them). Have the practices for internal linking with absolute or realtive URLs changed in any way? Which is the best way? absolute or relative? is there any harm for using the relative version? Relative: Absolute: [](<strong><em>http://www.cheapdomain.com/myfolder/mypage.html)[](<strong><em>http://www.cheapdomain.com/myfolder/mypage.html) [Thanks!](<strong><em>http://www.cheapdomain.com/myfolder/mypage.html)
On-Page Optimization | | andresgmontero0