Google EMD algo hurt my site pls give me suggestion to out come from this penalty
-
Guys i have site and its EMD , but google yesterday update the algo and my all keyword ranking goes out of 100....in some keyword its not showing and rest of the keyword are out of 100-200 position..i have quality copy scape content ...also i have very stable link building is going on...my purchase this domian before 3 month ..again guys i m not geting any msg in webmaster.
site:www.eacnecream.com
Keyword:Acne cream , Best acne cream , Acne treatment
Pls guys give me suggestion.i always trust this community..
Thanks
-
I'd remove all of the low-quality links like that.
-
So keri what should i do..should remove that edu link???
and there is no msg in gwt so pls guide me to out come from this quality.
Thanks
-
As good as you advice is... I'm a dreamer and would take on a challenge like that!
-
Agreed. The highest PA backlink for this site in Open Site Explorer is an EDU blog page with over 5000 comments on it, and the comment that leads to this site is:
"My friend recommended I mightiness equivalent this diary. He was totally honorable. This displace truly made my day. You can not ideate just how overmuch second I had spent for this message! Thanks!"
That is not quality link building. Period. Check out the beginner's guide to SEO at http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo and especially read the chapter on building links.
-
You're not gonna get any message in WMT.
My honest advice ? The content is poor, bare minimum if you will. You made a poor choice in selecting a prefixed exact match domain. Your backlinks don't help matters much either.
The domain is done. Cut your losses, use the money you made while it lasted to start a website that truly offers value. Hint: real value doesn't mean 'copyscape passed'.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google News results ...can it be SEOed?
Hello Everyone. I simply wanted to know if anyone had some useful insight on what it takes for a legitimate website to appear within the Google News results. I have rarely, or ever, had to dabble in this kind of SEO, but after coming across a situation with a perfectly legitimate website, I'm now scratching my head. The site in question is a very well established website, with 0 "seo" done to it. All links organic, all traffic legit and they have VERY strong social media presence. The site's current DA is 50. Its a 3 letter domain. Some of the points I believe are important quantity and quality of content (% of aggregated vs actually original content) overall % of "news" content vs rest of the site content authors/writers credentials (how would Google evaluate the authority of a writer, so his/her content is newsworthy?) overall site authority rich snippet and code needed to be indexed? I think rel publisher or rel author tags have something to do with it? making sure to have basic SEO in place: canonical tag, unique headers, etc. What am I missing? They have one particular competitor that seem to be ranking for almost everything news related, while being a similar site in content and authority, however they are nowhere. They have submitted to Google News before (not even sure what that means) but have failed to be included -- does this put a "stain" on them for any reason or impede the possibility of being indexed in the Google News results in the future? ANY input is appreciated.
SERP Trends | | 1stOTLJK0 -
Is this a panda penalty
Is this a panda penalty? A slow decline like this. http://imgur.com/a/YZz9h I've checked for penguin and nothing there. I've tried creating new content and we moved to HTTPS and added Rel Canonical to duplicate product pages. If you have time how you go about recovering this site? https://printpelican.com/ YZz9h
SERP Trends | | AaronRainsSEO0 -
Sitelink (meta) descriptions in Google SERP
Hi, I am probably not the only one having this question regarding the quality of sitelinks in organic results. When your search returns sitelinks, I know the only thing you can do to avoid certain sitelinks to appear is to demote it for that search result. But what can you do about the description. For the main result you are pretty much able to create an appealing description, but when the sitelinks appear, all sitelinks display these crappy 'composed' descriptions. I've read Google did some tests a couple of years ago with multiple descriptions and multiple titles, but this doesn't cover the issue I just described. Is there a way to create 'sitelink descriptions'? Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
SERP Trends | | ConclusionDigital0 -
Why Google shows site's in serp coming with wikipedia link as of its brand name?
Hi Mozzers & Moz Team, Let's know how actually this happens to come in Google SERPs with wikipedia link as of its brand name?
SERP Trends | | Futura
It is great to show, but i really want how this comes with brand associated link of wikipedia. Some sources also come wtih DMOZ if ones don't find in wikipedia. Please find the snapshot, where i borderd in red color , may show you clear in it. Waiting the responses. ujknjVr.jpg0 -
Google Adchoice - where to begin?
I know many of you may see this as cheating but I've been given a Adchoice budget so I'm going to make the most of it! One problem... where do I begin?
SERP Trends | | desktop_nev
Adwords doesn't seem to have any information about Adchoice and Adsense, as far as I can see, is placing adverts on my site which is not what I want.0 -
Should URL Follow Navigation Of A Site?
Following an SEOMoz webinar the other day, where the presenter made a case of eliminating folders in URLs, as these could confuse a bot when crawling a site. I love the idea. However, there are still a lot of Best Practices and guidelines out there that will suggest there should be a logic in the URL, just as there should be in your Navigation. My question in that regard is whether or not there is any value for a bot to crawl a website URL that follows the navigation by "stuffing" the URL with folders, identical to the navigation present on the site, and even a secondary navigation present on all pages? Example: the navigation of a site goes [Domain > Folder > Sub folder > Sub-sub folder > product]. What is the benefit of using a URL such as [www.domain.com/folder/sub-folder/sub-sub-folder/product] vs [www.domain.com/product] Thank you guys for your insights! PS this is a WP site we are talking about.
SERP Trends | | Discountvc0 -
Is this caused by EMD update or other reason?
Hi, I have question, which im not sure this problem caused by latest EMD or something other. Its more likely by EMD update, and i think the same, but to be sure that i`m right i want to ask. Example: We have Client which previous month(and as i remember always was) was #1 by brand keyword on Google.co.uk with URL that ends with .co.uk. What we see today that now it`s ranked on #2, on first place now our US site with the same URL but ending with .com. So they switched positions. And the question is, can this situation caused by EMD update? To clarify US site is more popular, has about 6 times more external links than UK, Domain, page authority and all other SEO things are higher. P.S Same situation i see only for 2 clients all other are as previous. Thanks, Sergey
SERP Trends | | 77Agency0 -
Google Merchant Center Feed Disapproved - Data Quality Good - No Warnings
I have noticed Google Merchant Center has been making many changes of over the last month. Feeds can now be optimized for certain product attributes. The dilemma currently is that I have a Google Merchant Center Data feed that shows zero warnings and that the data quality is good. Unfortunately, the entire feed has been disapproved. Across many other websites that I noticed the same issues, I have been able to fix all warnings and the feeds are taken perfectly. This one sites issues are eluding me. Anybody have any suggestions or experience dealing with this problem? Possible issues I have looked into but could be affecting feed. Merchant Center Guidelines have been reviewed multiple, multiple times and here is what I have found. 1. Website has limited duplicate content taken from distributors product listings (I have fought a unending battle with site owner to make all product content original) 2. Refurbished Products Issue: The sites feed has listed all products as "new". I found some of the product content in the site had "refurbished" listed. The guidelines state that products must be listed & marked as refurbished in the feed. To overcome this issue I disabled all refurbished products and resubmitted the feed. This did produce a good approved data feed.
SERP Trends | | SEMCLIX0