Unreachable Pages
-
Hi All
Is there a tool to check a website if it has stand alone unreachable pages?
Thanks for helping
-
The only possible way I can think of is if the other person's site has an xml sitemap that is accurate, complete, and was generated by the website's system itself. (As is often created by plugins on WordPress sites, for example)
You could then pull the URLs from the xml into the spreadsheet as indicated above, add the URLs from the "follow link" crawl and continue from there. If a site has an xml sitemap it's usually located at www.website.com/sitemap.xml. Alternately, it's location may be specified in the site's robots.txt file.
The only way this can be done accurately is if you can get a list of all URLs natively created by the website itself. Any third-party tool/search engine is only going to be able to find pages by following links. And the very definition of the pages you're looking for is that they've never been linked. Hence the challenge.
Paul
-
Thanks Paul! Is there any way to do that for another persons site, any tool?
-
The only way I can see accomplishing this is if you have a fully complete sitemap generated by your own website's system (ie not created by a third-party tool which simply follow links to map your site)
Once you have the full sitemap, you'll also need to do a crawl using something like Screaming Frog to capture all the pages it can find using the "follow link" method.
Now you should have a list of ALL the pages on the site (the first sitemap) and a second list of all the pages that can be found through internal linking. Load both into a spreadsheet and eliminate all the duplicate URLs. What you'll be left with "should" be the pages that aren't connected by any links - ie the orphaned pages.
You'll definitely have to do some manual cleanup in this process to deal with things like page URLs that include dynamic variables etc, but it should give a strong starting point. I'm not aware of any tool capable of doing this for you automatically.
Does this approach make sense?
Paul
-
pages without any internal links to them
-
Do you mean orphaned pages without any internal links to them? Or pages that are giving a bad server header code?
-
But I want to find the stand alone pages only. I don't want to see the reachable pages. Can any one help?
-
If the page is indexed you can just place the site url in quotes "www.site.com" in google and it will give you all the pages that has this url on it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
ECommerce Category Page H2
Hello, I have a dental eCommerce and I think to make products names in the category page as H2 is that good practice for SEO? and how is the situation as they are clickable elements drive to the product page? here an example: https://souq.dental/bonding-agents
Technical SEO | | Anass110 -
Old pages not mobile friendly - new pages in process but don't want to upset current traffic.
Working with a new client. They have what I would describe as two virtual websites. Same domain but different coding, navigation and structure. Old virtual website pages fail mobile friendly, they were not designed to be responsive ( there really is no way to fix them) but they are ranking and getting traffic. New virtual website pages pass mobile friendly but are not SEO optimized yet and are not ranking and not getting organic traffic. My understanding is NOT mobile friendly is a "site" designation and although the offending pages are listed it is not a "page" designation. Is this correct? If my understanding is true what would be the best way to hold onto the rankings and traffic generated by old virtual website pages and resolve the "NOT mobile friendly" problem until the new virtual website pages have surpassed the old pages in ranking and traffic? A proposal was made to redirect any mobile traffic on the old virtual website pages to mobile friendly pages. What will happen to SEO if this is done? The pages would pass mobile friendly because they would go to mobile friendly pages, I assume, but what about link equity? Would they see a drop in traffic ? Any thoughts? Thanks, Toni
Technical SEO | | Toni70 -
HTTPS for form pages?
I am creating a small business website for a friend in Recruitment. It’s very small and mainly just a shop window for the business. There’s no login area for the website, but there are two areas were users can enter information: General contact us form (giving email and phone number) Applying for a job (attaching a resume) The forms are using Ninja Forms – which I believe are secure in passing information. But am I missing anything? Do I need to make these pages https at all? I’m quite new to building sites from scratch. Thanks for your help
Technical SEO | | joberts0 -
Pages with Title Missing or Empty
When I crawl my site MOZ gave me 275 Pages with Title Missing or Empty within the High Priority Issues. So I went I reviewed it and the pages are Tag's that I use in my Blog posts. For example: https://www.cuencacigars.com/blog/tag/+cuenca+cigars https://www.cuencacigars.com/blog/tag/+florida https://www.cuencacigars.com/blog/tag/+Mobile How do I fix this? Is that a real error or is just MOZ been MOZZY? The pages have Authority 11, may I put some content on those pages since they had a decent rank? Maybe I can use this to my advantage? Or maybe I should choose my tags better? Is there anything to learn to tag?
Technical SEO | | mcuenca24100 -
Why are crawlers not picking up these pages?
Hi there, I've been asked to audit a new subdomain for a travel company. It's all a bit messy, so it's going to take some time to remedy. However, one thing I couldn't understand was the low number of pages appearing in certain crawlers. The subdomain has many pages. A homepage, category pages then product pages. Unfortunately, tools like Screaming Frog and xml-sitemaps.com are only picking up 19 pages and I can't figure out why. Google has so far indexed around 90 pages - this is by no means all of them, but that's probably because of the new domain and lack of sitemap etc. After looking at the crawl results, only the homepage and category (continent pages) are showing. So all the product pages are not. for example, tours.statravel.co.uk/trip/Amsterdam_Kings_Day_(Start_London_end_London)-COCCKDM11 is not appearing in the crawl results. After reviewing the source code, I can't see anything that would prevent this page being crawled. Am I missing something? At the moment, the crawl should be picking up around 400+ product pages, but it's not picking up any. Thanks
Technical SEO | | PeaSoupDigital0 -
Different links to to the same page
Hi, Based on the user's actions we post activity into users Facebook timeline. And each activity has link back to our particular page on our website. For example if original page was: www.Domain.com from Facebook timeline it would be like this: www.Domain.com?Ffb_action_ids=101508953168 Do you think this will have a negative effect on our page rankings as we will eded up having a lot of different URL's to the same page? www.Domain.com?Ffb_action_ids=101508953168 www.Domain.com?Ffb_action_ids=456788765609 etc.. Thank you, Karen Bdoyan
Technical SEO | | showme0 -
Page Over-optimized?
I read over this post on the blog tonight: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/lessons-learned-by-an-over-optimizer-14730 & it's got me concerned that I might be having a similar issue on our site? Back in March & April of last year, we ranked fairly well for a number of long tail keywords, here is one in particular 'Mio Drink' for this page: http://www.discountqueens.com/free-mio-drink-from-kraft-facebook-offer The page is still indexed, but appears back on page #3 for the search term. During this time we had made a number of different updates to our site & I can't seem to put an exact finger on what might have caused the problem? Can anyone see any issues that might have caused this to drop? Thanks, BJ
Technical SEO | | seointern0