Google rel hell
-
So apologies in advance for this question, but:
Can someone explain whether as a site we should be using the "rel author" tag or the "rel publisher" tag?
1. We don't really need to distinguish between the people who write our content.
2. We definitely do need to establish ownership of our content, as unfortunately it has been widely copied. We are spending quite a bit of time filing DMCA notices.
3. Do we need to apply either tag to every page? Or does "del publisher" just need to be applied to the homepage to cover the rest of the site?
4. What looks better in the search results? - a person's face or a company logo?
If prefer a face, but understand we need to promote our brand.
Thanks
P
-
Hi Guys
Thanks, very helpful.
We are an ecommerce site and an information site. So I guess we will go with publisher on the homepage and author for content pages.
Though we have tried author on product pages and G displays the author photo in the results. Not sure what effect that has, but I like to see a face related to the product. (We sell information products - legal documents). It also helps our product stand-out in the results.
Thanks again.
Patrick
-
There seems to be some confusion here.
First of all, rel="publisher" is a way to connect your site to your page on Google+. This can help your page be recognized as the "official" page for your brand and make it eligible for Google Direct Connect. The rel="publisher" tag goes ONLY on your homepage. rel="publisher" will NOT get your company logo shown in the search results (at least not yet).
rel="author" is a way to link the content on your site to specific authors on Google+. This has the benefit of building up the author rank for those authors, as well as displaying author snippets in the search results. This only works with photos of people, not cartoons or logos. The author tag should go on every page where you have unique content.
This link shows you the different ways you can verify ownership:
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1408986
Hope that helps!
-
1. What type of site are you promoting? An eCommerce site? A Brand? A consultant? An informational site.
For me, the ultimate decision would come down to what I want the "face of the company" or website to be.
For example, I may have two or three websites and am trying to build "Me" as a consultant or an expert in a particular subject matter. In that case I would definitely use "author." However, I own an eCommerce site where I want to build a brand...the people who write the content may come and go and I don't want to the article ownership (in Google's eyes) to leave with that person. I would use "publisher" in that case.
I have seen sites that successfully mix it up too. They would use "publisher" on the catalog pages and use "author" on blog type pages.
3. I would apply this to every page with unique content.
4. To me, same as question 1. If I were a consumer, I would want to see the website brand for products or catalog data but for opinions, industry expertise, consulting, etc., I would want to see a face with the content.
My 2 cents
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google is NOT showing up the right META DESCRIPTION
Hi, Recently I changed titles and meta descriptions of some pages. The problem is that google have updated the titles but not the meta descriptions.. Ive also checekd the source code of the google cached version of the pages crawled and the meta description reflect the changes i did...but the changes don't appear in google. Do you have some solution/advice for the issue? Tx so Much
On-Page Optimization | | tourtravel0 -
Google webmaster markup validation error
Type: Schema product Property: Image Error: Missing required field "name (fn)". Google Webmaster is showing this error when I try to validate markup on webmaster. This is my domain - www(dot)wishpicker(dot)com Would be great if someone could please help with this. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | bansheeviv
Prakul0 -
Rel="canonical" at the same page
Hello Everyone!! We have a Joomla Site and in the template we have a php function that create the **link rel="canonical" **and in the href inserts the same page url. For example, if the we do a search and the url have some cookies. That Url is gonna be the **rel="canonical" **for that page. Is it working correctly? We need an advice to to set it up correctly! Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | mycostaricalink0 -
Need I add rel="dofollow" or not?
Hello, My website is http://www.vietnamvisacorp.com is using the href links without meta tag rel="dofollow" such as I am using . Should I put ref="dofollow" in this: Thank you!
On-Page Optimization | | JohnHuynh0 -
Google cache tool help
This link is for the Ebay Google cache - http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.ebay.com&strip=1 I wanted to do the same for my homepage so I switched out the urls and it worked. When I try to get a different link in there such as mysite.com/category it wont work. I know my pages are indexed. Any ideas why it wont work for other pages?
On-Page Optimization | | EcommerceSite0 -
How does Google view frequent changes to the copy of an ecommerce product page?
Is there any reason to think that adding to or improving copy might harm seo?
On-Page Optimization | | Brocberry0 -
Different Rankings In Google Mobile
Does Google mobile have different signals? For some reason I seem to rank better with certain pages on the mobile site?
On-Page Optimization | | TP_Marketing0 -
Possible Reasons for 40% Drop in Google since January?
Hello: I know this is long - but I kept it as succinct as I could to explain the situation - but everyone of the brilliant people on here insight is so greatly appreciated in advance. There has been more than a 30% decline in traffic mostly from Google on a site with an 11 year presence on the web, 5 page rank (historically 6), fairly good quality backlinks (but they are old). I cannot pinpoint a smoking gun (such as a specific penalty) - if it's just not attrition in demand for the product itself which there is plenty of evidence for. But I practice only white hat, so I don't know what it is. I do not engage right now in link building because my time to work on SEO is very limited. We have a few common keywords that cannot be avoided (because there are no good synonyms) so there is a high density for one word especially all over the site. From some websites (like tidbits) we have in Google Webmaster account tens of thousands of backlinks. How serious is this (FYI - they're not new though) Because of some unflattering reviews from sites with strong authority, the number of click throughs vs. impression in Google Search has dropped dramatically - I think a big part of it is that because the reviews drove down CT ratio. Interestingly, the number of CTs from Adwords has also dropped off significantly, and I was told by Adwords specialist that declining organic traffic does affect the Adwords traffic to - in fact, they're not even using our daily budget for Adwords as they used to. The site also doesn't pick up quality organic backlinks as it used to, and the anchor link text is almost always the same - a product name. Plus, the site was banned in 2008 by Google (from a black hat keyword stuffing that I discovered happened in another dept.) and only after really working hard was it reinstated by reconsideration request. Site traffic from Google has never fully reached it's potential since then. Also, text prices were removed from Buy Now buttons even though the prices were textually part of the buttons for years (could this be some penalty?) **Is it possible that Google is taking the ban history, the poor reviews, the decline in CTs to impressions on the site, the huge decline (75% over four years) in "search volume" or "search interest" (according to Google Trends) for the site's main product name and just using all of this to keep downgrading the site? If true, wouldn't the page rank be diving down to anywhere from 0 to 2 (or is that not relevant at all?) ** There are no messages of a penalty or anything else in the official Webmaster account for this site. Any insight anyone is able to provide is much appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | holdtheonion1