Why is this site not being punished!?
-
I guess this is the usual reaction to a seeing a domain rank above your own website is "They must be cheating"!
However... in this case I feel more than justified. The website is aircon247.com they rank top 3 in the UK for "air conditioning" and other quite generic terms in the industry. I'm interested to know your thoughts and what (if any) action should be taken. Here are many of the links that I think contravene the Google Guidelines :
Spammy Article Submissions with Inorganic Anchor Text:
http://www.furniturearcade.com/decorative-furniture/decorative-accessories-lamps/
http://www.sys-con.com/node/2308271
http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/imagine-a-world-without-air-conditioning-units-7-112555
http://www.retail-digital.com/press_releases/appliances/diy-air-conditioning-installation-options
http://www.livingwithwhite.com/three-fun-uses-for-antique-grates-and-floor-registers/
http://www.mcrjk2008.com/2009/04/best-air-conditioning-ever.html
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/comfort-your-business-needs-1682737.htm
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/diy-air-conditioning-installation-options-1677015.htm
http://www.housetohome.co.uk/topical-advice/531054/regulating-your-home-environment
http://homeklondike.com/2011/01/10/country-style-bedroom-design-ideas/
http://www.greenscenedebate.com/2009/04/take-good-luck-at-air-conditioning.html#.URzEmh17L5w
http://www.harlynn.com/2009/04/wanna-chill-out.html
http://www.loveshaven.com/2009/04/we-are-all-so-excited-for-my-sisters.html
http://asiwaspassing.com/2009/05/
Spammy Links in External Website Footers / Side Bars with Inorganic Anchor Text:
http://www.g-dir.com/home/gardening/
http://www.sefdir.org/popular-listings.html
http://rapidcoolsite.com/Home.html
http://www.singaporerealestate.info/blog/?s=%27the+solitaire+call%27
http://www.onlinepureherbs.com/acidity.htm
http://erostours.com/cheap-flights-Chicago.html
http://koolergazi.persianblog.ir/
Blog Spam Inorganic Anchor Text:
http://www.bluehatseo.com/quick-answers-1-link-building/
Spammy (Link exchange etc.) Directories:
http://ireland.accommodationforstudents.com/info/reciprocal_links_ad.asp
http://baliscript.net/barter-links.php
http://www.abacushosting.ca/linx.php
http://www.whelphelper.com/links.php
http://www.spectramedi.com/links_shopping.htm
https://www.midwayautosupply.com/linkexchange.aspx?
http://artsellart.com/links.html
http://www.linkalizer.com/directory/39-1/
http://dogdir.com/region/NA.php
http://www.easyezinearticles.com/ezineresources/Outsourcing.htm
http://www.patchhomeinspections.com/Links.html
-
We have someone with a shady link profile ranking above us too. Don't worry; as was already said, it's only a matter of time before they're gone. Just keep working on your long-term #RCS strategies, and they will pay off in the long run--probably sooner rather than later.
-
crappy links indeed, however the reason is probably because they are greatly varying the anchor texts.
for example: buy air conditioning units from Aircon247
if they were using "air conditioning units" over and over again they would get penalized for that but they are smart enough to know to create long tail variations that still contain the exact match "air conditioning units"
that being said, they still may get dinged. Google.co.uk competition is less than google.com competition too so it's much easier to rank in the UK. Hope this info helps.
-
Hey
Sometimes certain sites do manage to 'get away with it' for a bit longer but really, from a very quick look at their link profile, it looks super dodgy so I can't see them getting a free ride for much longer.
Really, I would forget about these guys, be happy that their is no longevity to their approach and that their days are numbered and focus on making the site you are working on as good as it can be in the meanwhile.
I know that is not an answer as such, but I doubt anyone outside of Google could give you a better one. You could get an fairly comprehensive seo audit done on their site and links etc but what would it achieve? You can't play the numbers game against this kind of profile so I would not even bother.
As it goes, it can be surprising how few real links you need to compete with this kind of profile and it may be that the competition in this sector are all just running the same weak strategies.
Hope that helps!
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What is the best strategy to SEO Discontinued Products on Ecommerce Sites?
RebelsMarket.com is a marketplace for alternative fashion. We have hundreds of sellers who have listed thousands of products. Over 90% of the items do not generate any sales; and about 40% of the products have been on the website for over 3+ years. We want to cleanup the catalog and remove all the old listings that older than 2years that do not generate any sales. What is the best practice for removing thousands of listings an Ecommerce site? do we 404 these products and show similar items? Your help and thoughts is much appreciated.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | JimJ3 -
Site Footer Links Used for Keyword Spam
I was on the phone with a proposed web relaunch firm for one of my clients listening to them talk about their deep SEO knowledge. I cannot believe that this wouldn’t be considered black-hat or at least very Spammy in which case a client could be in trouble. On this vendor’s site I notice that they stack the footer site map with about 50 links that are basically keywords they are trying to rank for. But here’s the kicker shown by way of example from one of the themes in the footer: 9 footer links:
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RosemaryB
Top PR Firms
Best PR Firms
Leading PR Firms
CyberSecurity PR Firms
Cyber Security PR Firms
Technology PR Firms
PR Firm
Government PR Firms
Public Sector PR Firms Each link goes to a unique URL that is basically a knock-off of the homepage with a few words or at the most one sentences swapped out to include this footer link keyword phrase, sometimes there is a different title attribute but generally they are a close match to each other. The canonical for each page links back to itself. I simply can’t believe Google doesn’t consider this Spammy. Interested in your view.
Rosemary0 -
Spam sites with low spam score?
Hello! I have a fair few links on some of the old SEO 'Directory' sites. I've got rid of all the obviously spammy ones - however there are a few that remain which have very low spam scores, and decent page authority, yet they are clearly just SEO directories - I can't believe they service any other purpose. Should we now just be getting rid of all links like this, or is it worth keeping if the domain authority is decent and spam score low? Thanks Sam
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | wearehappymedia0 -
Old Press Release sites - Which ones do you Disavow and leave alone
Hi Mozers! I need your help. I'm in the final stages of a huge link audit and press releases are a big concern. As you know, press release distribution sites up until 2012 had "follow" links, giving webmasters a delight of having their keyword anchor texts a big boost in rankings. These are the websites that are troubling me today so i would appreciate your input on my strategy below as most of these websites are asking for money to remove them: 1. Press Release sites that are on the same C-class - Disavow 2. Not so authoritative press release websites that just follow my www domain only (no anchor texts) - I leave it alone 3. Not so authoritative press release websites but have anchor texts that are followed - Disavow 4. Post 2012 press release websites that have "followed" anchor text keywords - Request to remove, then disavow 5. Post 2012 press release websites that just follow my www domain only (no anchor texts) - leave it alone #2 and #5 are my biggest concern. Now more than ever I would appreciate your follow ups. I will respond quickly and apply "good answers" to the one's that make the most sense as my appreciation to you. God bless you all.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Shawn1240 -
Best URL structure for SEO for Malaysian/Singapore site on .com.au domain
Hi there I know ideally i need a .my or .sg domain, however i dont have time to do this in the interim so what would be the best way to host Malaysian content on a www.domainname.com.au website? www.domainname.com.au/en-MY
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | IsaCleanse
www.domainname.com.au/MY
domainname.com.au/malaysia
malaysia.domainname.com.au
my.domainname.com.au Im assuming this cant make the .com.au site look spammy but thought I'd ask just to be safe? Thanks in advance! 🙂0 -
Multiple sites in the same niche (Should we redirect these to our Main Site)
I will keep this short and sweet. We have some websites in the same niche area but want to focus only on our newest site (basically all the information that was being posted on the other sites will now be part of our new site) This will save us a lot of time and increase our focus on 1 entity. Should we redirect these website with a 301 redirect to the specific categories that they focus on in the new site? or should we redirect to the main domain.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | CMcMullen0 -
Are 2 sites in same niche from same company white hat?
Hello, We want to open a second eCommerce store. Our first one is doing well. It would be different code, different graphics, a different category/menu system, but many of the products will be the same. Will that be safe and white hat now and into the future to have 2? Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobGW0 -
How to know if a link in a directory will be good for my site?
Hi! Some time ago, a friend of my added our site to a directory. I did not notice it until today, when in the search results for my domain name, the directory came in the first page, in the four position. My friend wrote a nice article, describing our bussiness, and the page has a doFollow link. Looking at the metrics of that directory, I found the following: Domain Authority: 70; main page authority: 76; linking domain roots: 1383; total links: 94663 (several anchor texts); facebook shares: 26; facebook likes: 14; tweets: 20; Google +1: 15. The directory accept a free article about a company, does not review it before it is published, but look for duplicated articles representing spam; so one company can only have one listing (in theory). Is there any formula to know if a directory is safe to publish a doFollow link? If they don't review the link I would say is not a good signal, but is there any other factors to take into account?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | te_c0