Trying to Optimize my site for one keyword any advice please
-
Hi, we are trying to optimize our site www.in2town.co.uk for the keyword of lifestyle magazine.
We are having trouble with this. We were last year number one in google for the keyword and then the end of last year we went to position four and now we are on the bottom of the second page and we are not sure what is happening.
here is the text view of the site
I am just wondering if we need to do a better description of the lifestyle magazine at the top as i know it says you should have your keyword within the first 100 words
Any help on trying to solve this problem and get the page back where it belongs will be great.
I know we have a lot of text on the page so google maybe finding it hard to find out what keywords are what but the only keyword we are interested in this page is lifestyle magazine, in the near future we would be looking at including lifestyle news
many thanks
-
thank you for this. so you are saying that i should have in2town before each title, is this in the url or on the page. so for example if we look at the following page
the title in the url is
gastric-band-surgery-patient-from-cleethorpes-awarded-damages-after-surgery-went-wrong
on site page title is
NHS Gastric Band Bypass Patient Awarded £35,000 Over Complications.
are you saying i should have in2town before the title, so it would look like, In2town
In2town NHS Gastric Band Bypass Patient Awarded £35,000 Over Complications.
or in the url. never seen this before would love to see an example.
Last year before we had problems with our hosting company where a huge mistake was made, long story but we lost thousands of pages, we were pr4 but now we are pr3
what keywords would you aim for on the home page.
This is all great advice, thank you for this, this advice is allowing me to make things better, and we are in the process of making the site bigger and better and trying to make it one of the best magazines out there.
-
Hey Diane, my advice:
First of all, if you are just trying to optimize the homepage for "lifestyle magazine", I would take out all the extra keywords from your title:
"Lifestyle Magazine | In2town".
The reason I would include the brand name is because Google is increasingly looking at identifying brands as a ranking signal. I would also include your brand name in all the titles in your site, so "Article Name | In2town". You want Google to see you as the definitive brand for this category.
Secondly, I notice that your site is only PR3. When I search for "lifestyle magazine", all the top sites are PR4-6. This is a fairly competitive keyword. You need to get higher authority links if you want Google to see you as an authority.
Thirdly, do everything you can to make your site the best in its category. Is your site really the best lifestyle magazine out there? If not, why should Google rank you #1? Increasingly it is becoming more difficult to "game" Google because they look at things like social shares, user metrics, etc. The best way to attain these metrics is to have an awesome site that users will rave about and generate these signals.
Finally, while it can feel good to rank for head terms like "lifestyle magazine", you will probably find that people searching for the term may not be your highest converting traffic. The traffic is not even that high. It's probably a better strategy to rank for hundreds of terms related to having a great lifestyle than ranking for the broad "lifestyle magazine" term.
-
can you give me an example of the way you would change some of our titles
-
From my initial glance, it does look a little like you are overoptimising for lifestyle magazine.
If it were my site, I would be rethinking my approach on that keyword altogether.
I would concentrate heavily on optimising all the articles for the content that they represent. For example, the article, members of staff too scared to take time off work. I would be looking at changing you title tag and optimising the content to appeal to people searching for articles, news, tipes etc specifically around that subject matter. You'd need to get creative for each one and do the research into what the exact message of each article is and who your audience is. What might they be searching for etc.
The title tags of each article do not need to be the title of the article. I would start with optimising each article one by one. The backlinks will come as your readers find exactly what they are looking for on an article by article basis.
If you optimise the content on your site for what it actually is, you will become known as a lifestyle magazine just as a matter of course. I'm not saying don't optimise for that, but I think you are focussing on the wrong topic.
If you do find people nicking your articles, try sending them a polite message telling them you have no problems with them borrowing your content as long as they link back. If they don't, give them the heavier email!
-
the article you have listed, this article was done a long time ago which we put on article base, the link is in the author box, not sure what is wrong with it, would love to learn what the problem is so in the future if we put any more articles on there, we will know
-
we have not received a penalty we know that much. if you were going to optimize this page, what would you do what we have not done.
-
one of the things we have had is people are sharing our content but basically not giving us any links and instead stealing the content. we have to keep to checks all the time and stop people from doing this
i have tried to make sure that the home page is not over optimized and as far as i can see it is not. i have put it through the seomoz tools as well.
I think the problem maybe is that looking at the page, google is not sure what it is with all the different text and articles we have on there, the word lifestyle magazine is not shown that often
-
based off what you said I bet you over optimized your site for "lifestyle magazine". Like Richard said the best way of receiving links is having a magazine that beats your your competitors. Just to throw it out there people may be more willing to share your website content if the sharing icons weren't so discombobulated at the top. I would also think about using such a harsh black font color and font size. Makes it hard to read if someone is reading a longer article.
-
You have an quite a bit of unnatural Anchor Text with the key phrase "lifestyle magazine"
Just 2 examples (but there are many more)
http://www.young-baby-how-to-succeed.com/One_in_Ten_Parents_Do_not_Sterilise_Their_Babys_Bottle.html (unnatural text only used to fool Google)
http://katyroofers.net/resources.php?cid=8&page=4 (spammy looking page)
I have seen much worse than this but it might be worth submitting a reconsideration request to Google to see if you have been given a penalty.
If this is not the case you need to "produce a magazine that is much more popular than the competition and acquire higher quality links."
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We are migrating a site and are seeing alot of 301s and 302s already in the old site is it ok to leave those as is?
For the 3xx’s I’m not sure if it’s okay for us to redirect to these so please advise on that
Technical SEO | | lina_digital0 -
Unnatural links from your site
Hi, 24 February got this penalty message in Google webmaster tool. Google detected a pattern of unnatural, artificial, deceptive, or manipulative outbound links on pages on this site. This may be the result of selling links that pass PageRank or participating in link schemes. Already removed all the link on the blog and sent reconsideration request to Google spam team. But request is rejected. Please help me on this or share link with me on same case. Thanks,
Technical SEO | | KLLC0 -
Robots.txt | any SEO advantage to having one vs not having one?
Neither of my sites has a robots.txt file. I guess I have never been bothered by any particular bot enough to exclude it. Is there any SEO advantage to having one anyways?
Technical SEO | | GregB1230 -
Advice and Opinions Required Regarding creating new pages for similar keywords
We are currently in the process of creating new pages for keywords very similar to our main landing pages. Example: Page 1.) "Family Holiday in {Location}" Page 2.) "Family Vacation in {Location}" Page 3.) "Family get-away in {location}" All 3 keywords are currently optimised for the 1st page "Family Holidays in {Location}" but was wondering if there is any benefit or if its worth creating sub pages for these alternative keywords. I personally don't think we should do this as Google will know to rank our main page for secondary/synonym keywords via on page seo and links with anchor text, but can you foresee any negative aspects if we went ahead and created these children pages being linked to from the top level keyword's page? Or do we continue optimising our main landing page for related/synonym keywords? Thanks in Advance GREG
Technical SEO | | AndreVanKets0 -
Can we use our existing site content on new site?
We added 1000s of pages unique content on our site and soon after google release penguin and we loose our ranking for major keywords and after months of efforts we decided to start a new site. If we use all the existing site content on new domain does google going to penalized the site for duplicate content or it will be treated as unique? Thanks
Technical SEO | | mozfreak0 -
Young site trying hard, but banging head against the wall -- Site Review
Hi All New to PRO but we're seriously committed to getting this working. And firstly thank you to anyone who offers any useful thoughts and insights. We've launched a new site, unfortunately late to the market for the season and are really struggling to get search engine recognition. Site: http://www.ignitehats.co.uk/ We're continuously adding new content, slowly gathering more links and working hard to promote socially. But even on our clearest search terms like "Ignite hats" we're down on page 4. Both GWT and the Seomoz tools highlight no big problems (a few titles that are too long) but otherwise nothing. Maybe wrongly we requested that the Google spam team review our site incase it was being penalised, but got a template response saying the site was not in their spam system (phew, there wasn't a reason it should be we believe). We're wondering if this is just that our site is just too young? It's been live for 6 weeks. But worry maybe this is not the case. We've had success with another site we run much sooner than this. Any help or pointers would be really appreciated. Similar stories and what others have done, at least to give us some confidence to carry on would be great. Thanks for reading.
Technical SEO | | JHill0 -
"To keyword or not to keyword" in the URL string?
We are debating on whether to use primary keywords in the URL for every page for a new client for the sake of SEO. What is the feeling in the Community on which version is smarter? Version 1: www.abccompany.com/miami-moving-company/about-us www.abccompany.com/miami-moving-company/contact-us etc. etc. Version 2: www.abccompany.com/about-us Thank you for your thoughts!
Technical SEO | | theideapeople0 -
Moving Duplicate Sites
Apologies in advance for the complexity. My client, company A, has purchased company B in the same industry, with A and B having separate domains. Current hosting arrangement combines registrar and hosting functions in 1 account so as to allow both domains to point to a common folder, with the result that identical content is displayed for both A & B. The current site is kind of an amalgam of A and B. Company A has decided to rebrand and completely absorb company B. The problem is that link value overwhelmingly favours B over A. The current (only) hosting package is Windows, and I am creating a new site and moving them to Linux with another hosting company. I can use 301's for A , but not for B as it is a separate domain and currently shares a hosting package with A. How can I best preserve the link juice that domain B has? The only conclusion I can come up with is to set up separate Linux hosting for B which will allow for the use of 301's. Does anyone have a better idea?
Technical SEO | | waynekolenchuk0