Diagnosing a Penguin Demotion
-
Whilst ive noyt hit the panic button just yet ive learnt that a specific target term I was optimising a site flor has dropped off the Google radar from forth to zero
The site is www.davidclick.com the target term was "York wedding photographer" and the demotion happened at the end of March this year, below illustrates the carnage..
http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/target-term-demotioncopy.jpg
When i first learnt about this I began to wonder if I was a victim of the Penguin update. I suspected i might so I ran a test to see how many inbound links used the target term York wedding photographer and here is what i found... Only one site http://www.singingwaitersx2.com/links/ and at a push this site also http://york-wedding-photographer.blogspot.co.uk/
So my question is have i fallen foul to the penguin update? If yes then is the only remedy to block the aforementioned site links via this technique:
http://www.htaccess-guide.com/deny-visitors-by-referrer/
Thanks in advance,
David
-
Thanks riplash, respect the detail you've gone into here , ive got work to do
-
EDIT 2: You never know, the site might bounce back once that blogspot domain change (from .com to .co.uk) completes properly in the SERPs.
In the meantime, I would still fix the other problems I mentioned in my first post (the on page stuff, the 302s, etc), and perhaps change some of the backlinks you are getting from the blogspot blog to non-exact match anchor text. You could also consider getting rid of some of the links in those blog posts completely to make the blog less spammy overall, as the content therein doesn't actually seem that bad.
Meanwhile, try approaching wedding blogs/sites (local sites and general UK authority sites too), to see if you can write a guest post or two on for them. You could offer to write about anything, from the obvious (How to choose a Wedding Photographer), to the more interesting/unique (Top 5 things you should never say to a Wedding Photographer). It's sometimes good to break the ice by helping the webmaster or blog owner out, e.g. if you can find a broken link on their site, or a spelling error, email them about that first to get the conversation going. As well as finding wedding sites, you could post for some general local blogs/sites - perhaps an article about wedding venues in York could work on a general local interest website.
When it comes to the davidclick.com site, I'd add a blog to that, and start trying to create some great content that will really attract links from other sites within the wedding sphere. Whilst you want to be giving your guest blogs some good content, you definitely need to save the best for your own blog. There are loads of great articles, videos and webinars to spark ideas for content here at SEOmoz!
-
Not for me.
EDIT: Ah, I see.. the .com blogspot URL is indexed.. but the blog has moved to a .co.uk - Do you happen to know when this occurred?
-
Thanks Riplash
But curious about the following "The blog that you mentioned, http://york-wedding-photographer.blogspot.co.uk/ is not indexed by Google"
Ermm... when i google "Dark side of wedding photography" or put the url directly in the serach box it does appear in the SERPS. Does this not mena it is indexed?
-
Based on the date your site dropped down the rankings, it was not a Penguin related change. Penguin did not roll out until 24th April 2012. I've had a very brief look at the SEO for this site, I can see a few issues - this is not by any means an exhaustive or definitve list, but is probably a good place to start
-
You have canonicalisation issues - i.e. I can visit the site by going to www.davidclick.com and davidclick.com. Make sure you fix this with a 301 redirect.
-
You have 302 (temporary) redirects from wedding-york-photographer.co.uk (a URL linked to from the blog mentioned below, incidentally), and also www.davidclick.com - you prob want to make those 301 (permenant) redirects
-
The blog that you mentioned, http://york-wedding-photographer.blogspot.co.uk/ is not indexed by Google, having most likely been deindexed due to Panda.This will be because it's clearly there to affect ranking and not much else - evidenced by the fact that every post links back to the same website. I'd bin it completely if I were you as it's not doing you any favours SERP wise, and could be evidence of over optimisation leading you to fall foul of Penguin further down the line.
-
As a result of the blog above being de-indexed, the site basically has very few backlinks, and none with the anchor text matching the keywords you are targetting. Therefore there is no real reason that it should be ranking for those keywords.
-
A quick glance at the on-page for the site shows multiple repetitions of the keyword (title tag, h1, h2, body text) which isn't necessarily the cause of the ranking drop (as I said, Penguin came later) - but potentially looks like over optimisation. I would clean up the site - target the text at human visitors, not SEO.
Hope this helps a bit. I'd certainly start with the basics, and get those right, then build some relationships and get some good quality links in.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Sitelink demotion not working after submitting in Google webmaster tool
Hello Friends, I have a question regarding demotion of sitelinks in Google webmaster tool. Scenario: I have demoted one of the sitelink for my website two months back; still the demoted sitelink has not been removed from the Google search results.May I know any reason, why this page is not getting removed even after demoting from GWT? If we resubmit the same link in demotion tool one more time, will it work? Can anybody help me out with this? Note: Since the validly of demotion exists only for 3 months (90 days), I am concerned about the same.
Technical SEO | | zco_seo0 -
Penguin 2.1 update, ranking dropped.
Hi, My website was hit by Google's new update like never before, first my ranking dropped back in May when Google rolled out with their second Penguin update, back then i was outsourcing my SEO since most of the time i was working on optimizing my local maps. As soon as noticed my traffic dropped i start doing SEO my self, I removed over optimized keywords on website ( title, meta description) then i analyzed my link profile and found that i had a lot of commercial anchor text linking from spammy websites, mostly blog comments. Its been over 4 months since I used Google's disavow tools in hoping that will help me get my raking back, but i still see these spammy links in my profile, 90% of them are nofollow anyways , so i'm not sure if disavow tool helped me at all. With this Penguin 2.1 update my website ended up on page 4-10 for 90% of my keywords http://screencast.com/t/3bcw8LUxpj Im not sure what would be the best way out this, should i buy a new domain and start fresh?Please let me know if you want to take a look on my link profile and give your opinion. Looking forward to your help!
Technical SEO | | mezozcorp0 -
Is Panda as aggressive as Penguin in terms of being able to escape its clutches ?
Hi, Is being hit by Panda as hard to get out of as being hit by Penguin ? Or if you clean up all your content should you get out of it relatively quickly ? I have a very old (11 years) and established site (but also very neglected site that i'm looking to relaunch) but its on an ancient shopping cart platform which never allowed for Google analytics & GWT integration etc so i cant see any messages in GWT or look at traffic figures to correlate a drop with any Panda updates. The reason i ask is i want to relaunch the site after bringing up to date with a modern e-commerce platform. I originally launched the site in early 2002 and was perceived well by Google achieving first field of view SERPS for all targeted keywords however competitive, including 'ipod accessories', 'data storage' etc etc. These top positions (& resulting sales) lasted until about 2007 when it was overtaken by bigger brand competitors with more advanced & Google friendlier ecommerce platforms (& big SEO budgets) I originally used the manufacturers descriptions editing slightly but probably not enough to avoid being considered duplicate content although still managed to obtain good rankings for these pages for a very long time even ranking ahead of Amazon in most cases. The site is still ranking well for some of the keywords relating to products for which there is still manufacturer copied descriptions so i actually don't think i have been hit by Panda. So my questions Is, is there any way of finding out for sure if the site has indeed even been hit by Panda at all without looking at analytics & gwt ? And once i find out if it has or not: Is it best if i relaunch on same domain to take advantage of the 11 year old domain history/authority etc ? So long as i make sure all product descriptions etc are unique, if i have been hit by Panda the site should escape its clutches quite quickly ? **OR ** Is Panda as aggressive as Penguin in which case is it best to start again on a new domain ? Many Thanks Dan
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Google Reconsideration Request (Penguin) - Will Google give links to remove?
When Penguin v1 hit, our site took a hit for a single phrase (i.e. "widgets") due to the techniques our SEO company was using (network). We've since had those links cleaned up, and our rankings have not recovered. Our SEO company said they submitted a reconsideration request on our behalf, and that Google denied it and didn't provide which links we needed removed. Does Google list links that need removing if they are still not happy with your link profile?
Technical SEO | | crucialx0 -
Strategy for recovering from Penguin
I have a web site that has been hit hard by the penguin update. I believe that main cause our problem has been links from low quality blogs and article sites with overly optimized keyword anchor text. Some questions I have are: I have noticed that we still have good ranking on long tail search terms on pages that did not have unnatural links. This leads me to believe that the penalty is URL specific, i.e. only URL with unnatural linking patterns have been penalized. Is that correct? Are URLs that have been penalized permanently tainted to the point that it is not worth adding content to them and continuing to get quality links to them? Should new contact go on new pages that have no history thus no penalty, or is the age of a previously highly ranked page still of great benefit in ranking? Is it likely that the penalty will go away over time if there are no more unnatural links coming in?
Technical SEO | | mhkatz0 -
General Penguin Discussion
I think that all the threads regarding the Penguin update (including this) need to be merged into 1 thread as it seems the majority of new conversations are all about the same thing whenever I log on in the morning.
Technical SEO | | SEOclient120 -
Whats the quickest way of diagnosing a canonical problem
Salut from from positivley tropical 10 degrees C wetherby UK 🙂 Ok here goes... on this site http://www.cedarcourthotels.co.uk/ there is a canonical problem but I'm interested to know if my method of spotting a canonical problem is the most efficient. In the case of Cedar Court I started with http://www.cedarcourthotels.co.uk/ then i entered this https://www.cedarcourthotels.co.uk/ and noted they were pointing to the same home page. My question is there a quicker way of diagnosing a canonical problem or is it a case of knowcking out w's and adding s etc. Thanks in advance, David
Technical SEO | | Nightwing0 -
How can you manually diagnose the canonical problem
Good Monrning from snow dusted minus 3 degrees C Wetherby UK... Is there a quick way to diagnose wether or not a website has a canonical problem or not? So far Ive been doing this for example: Typing a full web address then one without the w's and seeing if a 301 redirect has been set up. But I'm not confident this is the best way to diagnose if there is a canonical problem with a site. I would like to ad that I want to see if a canonical problem exists with any site and webmanster tools is not available. Any insights welcome 🙂
Technical SEO | | Nightwing1