SEO impact of an iframed blog is very low ? Right or wrong ?
-
We're thinking about adding a blog to our site, but our CMS blogging features are not good.
Someone suggested using a wordpress blog and putting it in an iframe on our site.
I replied that all the SEO impact of our blogging efforts will be lost because of the iframe. I am right or wrong ?
If I am right, could you suggest better alternatives ?
Thanks in advance !
Jean-François Monfette
-
You're welcome,
From what I can tell, 2013 features massive improvements in terms of SEO for publishing pages. I'm not sure about the blog, but I'd be surprised if it wasn't a whole lot better.
-
Thanks a lot for this reply, I really appreciate it !
I will share this information right now with our development team. This will help a lot. Also, we are moving to Sharepoint 2013 in the summer. I hope they have improved their blogging features.
-
Hello,
Your question about iframes has already been answered, but I thought I'd share my experiences with Sharepoint as a blog platform...
I've just spent the past few months building a site in Sharepoint with a blog. We ended up coming up with a couple of different solutions from an SEO perspective...
The biggest issues the out-of-the-box blog in Sharepoint (I'm assumine 2010 or 2007 here) faces are:
- Lack of SEO friendly URLs
- No meta description
- The apparent inability to display an excerpt on the homepage of the blog.
- Horrible horrible commenting system
Unfortunately the blog uses a query to pull the posts from a list, and it's a lot harder to modify than a standard page layout.
We've been testing out two solutions:
- Using an article page for the blog post, a content query web part to roll up these articles on a "blog" page, and then used the Byline field on the article as a way to power both the meta description (I can locate the code for you for that if you want) and the excerpt.
We then created "category" pages which contained another content query web part, which attempted to display all posts that had a certain keyword in them.
Finally, we ditched the Sharepoint comments system altogether, and used Disqus (which was surprisingly easy to add to the blog)
It was pretty clunky, but from a purely SEO perspective, it's working out fine.
- That said, we're unhappy with how clunky it is for internal users, so we're now working with an open source solution that enhances Sharepoint's native blog. http://cks.codeplex.com/releases/view/28520
Just this morning we got it to work with Sharepoint 2010. It covers most of the issues I outlined above (though we're still going to implement disqus) aside from the meta description, which is what I'm set to tackle next.
Hopefully this provides some guidance on where you might be able to go while remaining with Sharepoint.
-
Thank you both for your comments. I marked it as answered since you seem to agree on the point and clarified my thinking that we would not receive the sought after SEO value of blogging by using iframes.
I will share your answers with our team and try to look for a proper way of doing it.
-
Our site use Microsoft Sharepoint as a CMS and the blogging features are not good, as I have heard.
We probably could do bdc.ca/blog, but we would probably have infrastructure issue to mix php pages and apsx pages.
-
To add to my comment, one of the problems with my solution starts when your navigation changes, which it almost always does.
A solution to this is to for example to use a php include statement for the navigation/header from your old CMS in Wordpress and only link to your Wordpress main page from the navigation. Come to think of it, if you have a good programmer he/she can probably also make sure that new Wordpress pages and the navigation thereof can automatically be inserted into the navigation of your old CMS.
In short, you just need a designer/coder to port your current theme to Wordpress and a programmer to make sure the navigation stays the same in both CMS's.
-
right exactly this is what I was trying to say; so essentially the Wordpress page would be indexed and the keyword placement and optimization done by the contents of the blog in the iFrame would not lend credit to the domain but instead to the wordpress site making it less than ideal.
You are correct, sir.
-
In my research iframes do get indexed, only just by their URL and not by the page the iframe was incorporated in.
-
Wordpress itself is indeed an option, but I don't really see why you should an iframe.
It is better to install Wordpress yourself, on your own website in a different directory and put a link in the navigation of the old CMS to the Wordpress directory and have your current theme ported to a Wordpress theme. This way your website will look the same in both your old CMS and Wordpress, as I think this was part of your initial hesitation of not immediately using Wordpress on your own site.
As for SEO impact, that depends on how you look at it. By using an iframe your website does not benefit from the additional content association, but when you link back to your main site from the iframe, that will carry a bit of weight.
But an iframe is definitely not an ideal solution, no.
-
You are correct. The text of the iFrames will not be crawled. However, if you are using the blog simply to gain backlinks then it MIGHT work... keyword "might." depends what people share, the wordpress link or your website link.
Why can't you put the blog on your site? I don't understand this part, my apologies. IMO there's no better place for a blog than yoursite.com/blog
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Blogs Not Getting Indexed Intermittently - Why?
Over the past 5 months many of our clients are having indexing issues for their blog posts.
Technical SEO | | JohnBracamontes
A blog from 5 months ago could be indexed, and a blog from 1 month ago could be indexed but blogs from 4, 3 and 2 months ago aren't indexed. It isn't consistent and there is not commonality across all of these clients that would point to why this is happening. We've checked sitemap, robots, canonical issues, internal linking, combed through Search Console, run Moz reports, run SEM Rush reports (sorry Moz), but can't find anything. We are now manually submitting URLs to be indexed to try and ensure they get into the index. Search console reports for many of the URLs will show that the blog has been fetched and crawled, but not indexed (with no errors). In some cases we find that the blog paginated pages (i.e. blog/page/2 , blog/page/3 , etc.) are getting indexed but not the blogs themselves. There aren't any nofollow tags on the links going to the blogs either. Any ideas? *I've added a screenshot of one of the URL inspection reports from Search Console alt text0 -
Wordpress pagination and SEO
Hello Mozzers, We have incorporated Wordpress blog in our website. The blog has a fair share of what we believe is a valuable content both for the users and SEO. We have reached the point where our content is getting pushed out to pages 2, 3 and etc. 99% of the older content is still relevant and useful. However it does get less traffic from the users because it is not on the front page. I am dealing with it by showing "related posts" and get some traffic through that. I feel that the content that got pushed from the front page of the blog gets less love from search engines as well.The my permalink structure is /%postname%/ only, however when Wordpress adds page/1/ the SEO ranking appears to drop. Is it because Wordpress adds page/1/ to the address? What is a good way to optimize is? I have 15 posts showing on the front page should I increase it?
Technical SEO | | SirMax0 -
Website not ranking but the blog is!
I am hoping someone might be able to help me, I am doing some work on a website. A new version of the site was recently launched and since then rankings have plummeted and the new blog pages are ranking better! When the new version of the site went live, the domain changed to the non-www version, plus an incorrect robots.txt file and we have never really been able to fully recover (both of these things were beyond my control!). The robots.txt file was corrected and some of the external links links changed to the non-www but there is a 301 redirect in place so changing to the non-www shouldn't have been the reason to drop the site out completely. Before the launch of the new website, the site was ranking on the front page of Google for a lot of relevant keywords such as outdoor blinds, outdoor blinds Perth, cafe blinds, patio blinds, etc. The quality of the links is pretty bad and I am attempting to remove them before doing a disavow of all the really bad quality links but unless we were really unlucky I don't think it's the links right now that are causing the problem. I have ran the site through numerous crawl tests, checked the robots.txt, there are no messages in GWMT, the pages are indexed but I have a feeling there is something wrong with the site that is stopping this site from ranking well. If anyone could give me any insights I would be really grateful. I know the site could be better structured from a keyword/ structure perspective but the site was ranking fine!
Technical SEO | | Karen_Dauncey0 -
Will blocking the Wayback Machine (archive.org) have any impact on Google crawl and indexing/SEO?
Will blocking the Wayback Machine (archive.org) by adding the code they give have any impact on Google crawl and indexing/SEO? Anyone know? Thanks! ~Brett
Technical SEO | | BBuck0 -
Adding content into an iframe
I want to buy an app/program that will help me create unique content but the content will be inserted to the page via an iframe. I have heard that iframes are problematic. I know that there will not be a lot of indexable content from this but I think that it will make people want to link to me. I would like to hear from someone's experience if I should go ahead or not.
Technical SEO | | JillB20130 -
Guest Blog Posts and PR
Let's say I do a guest blog post on a PR5 site. Let's also say the post is deep within the site, and the page rank that flows to it is only maybe PR1 or 2. Let's also say it doesn't get many links to it so it forever stays that way. Will Google realize even though the PR of that page is low, it's on a PR5 site, thus giving it more link power than it the overall site were a PR2 site? Did that make any sense?
Technical SEO | | UnderRugSwept0 -
Advertising and negative impact on SEO
On one of my sites, I've been trying to get the word out by contacting blogs and asking them to share my site with their readers. This has resulted in some free publicity for my site, as well as quite a few paid reviews/sponsored posts. Note, however, that I've never paid for links, just reviews of my site... When I started this about 2 months ago, my site was a PR3 and getting fairly lowsy organic search traffic (i.e. 30-40 visits a day from Google). Then a few days ago, my PR dropped to 1. I didn't worry too much though, because my organic traffic was still around 30-40 visits a day. Now today, I checked and I only had 1 visitor the entire day from Google. Obviously I've been penalized. My most important question is, what can I do? Do I have an recourse, or do I need to just shut the domain down and move elsewhere? Second, wtf is Google penalizing this? I understand the argument against paid links, but should I not be allowed to advertise my site? Apparently I can buy links all day long through Google and they'll happily take my money, but the minute I pay some poor blogger to write an article about my site to their audience, I get penalized? Please help, I can't believe I just destroyed one of my sites like this!
Technical SEO | | dustin9990 -
Mobile SEO or Block Crawlers?
We're in the process of launching mobile versions of many of our brand sites and our ecommerce site and one of our partners suggested that we should block crawlers on the mobile view so it doesn't compete for the same keywords as the standard site (We will be automatically redirecting mobile handsets to the mobile site). Does this advice make sense? It seems counterintuitive to me.
Technical SEO | | BruceMillard0