SEOMoz directory list - some clarity needed FROM SEOMOZ STAFF
-
There are 455 directories (212 web, 188 social & 55 local) on the SEOMoz list.
Presumably they are there because SEOMoz recommends them.Yet common wisdom seems to be that web directories have negligible SEO benefit - see this recent SEOMoz Q&A discussion.
Matt Cutts advises against paid directories in this video (which >99% of them are)
In a private Q&A last month a member of the SEOMoz staff told me a link to my site from this directory, which appears on the list, was a "poor link".I think some better clarity in SEOMoz's guidelines on directories would be appreciated -- and I'd appreciate SEOMoz staff weighing in as promised when Private Q&As were ended -- especially as many SEOMozzers take most of what we learn here as near-gospel.
-
We've decided to hand off the directory list to a few interested industry friends, who are planning something new for it. There should be a placeholder for the new site soon, but it will no longer be part of Moz.
-
I am not seeing the list anymore on the new Moz. Shall we consider the list dead or is it going to come back?
-
Actually, you have asked that our staff respond, and we have. So I see this being answered.
-
I would add that one criterion we look at for the directories list is whether or not real people are actually using them. I don't think directories are a good tactic (and certainly shouldn't be your only tactic) for getting links, but can be a way to build brand recognition and drive some additional referral traffic, which is part of the reason why we don't just abandon the directories page completely.
I will say that we have plans to go a different direction with the directories page/list in the near future, although all of the specifics haven't been nailed down yet. It's definitely a resource whose usefulness we've questioned and we're working to make it more useful.
-
I'm not really even disagreeing, but the original goal was a balancing act. My recollection is that we wanted to find decent directories but also enough breadth that it covered a lot of industries. This naturally means that, for some industries, the end result isn't always as high-quality as we'd like. It also means that finding editorial directories was nearly impossible (there just aren't many of them).
I would not list yourself in 75-100 directories, regardless of industry. It could absolutely look low-quality, especially with exact-match anchor text.
I know there's been discussion about whether this is a resource we want to continue to support, and I can't give a definitive answer, because there isn't one at this point. The goal was to try to create something actionable and weed out the truly bad directories, but as Google's attitude towards directories change (and, unfortunately, as some directories become lower quality over time), we'll probably have to revisit this.
-
Dear SEOMoz
I don't know why/how this thread has been marked as "Question Answered" when it hasn't.
-
Toss up a lot of keyword links into those directories. I bet you get hit with Penguin.
A big list of directories on SEOmoz will mean "go here" to lots of people.
-
Thanks for your response, Peter. But I'm still as confused.
Surely, if SEOMoz cherry picks a shortlist -- having applied criteria for inclusion, otherwise you'd have www.spamlinkdirectory.net and all sorts -- then puts them on a page headed "SEO Web Directory List" it must been seen as an SEOMoz endorsement (implicit or otherwise) of their SEO benefits. I could probably find 75-100 on that list (Web+social+local) that could be construed as relevant to my site. Would listing in them be a "terrible idea", given that I'm also using other link-building techniques?
-
That's always been a tough line to tread - we want to list potentially useful resources, but that list is certainly not an endorsement. Personally, I think directories can have limited value, but:
(1) It's true that Google doesn't put much value on non-editorial directories.
(2) It's an easy thing to abuse. Picking a couple of relevant directories to list yourself in can be a way to pick up a few links and get a small amount of traffic, but someone is going to try to list themselves in all 455, which would be a terrible idea.
I think the original goal was to help people understand the diversity of what's out there and give them enough information that they could find 2-3 relevant directories that fit their niche. Unfortunately, in SEO, any good thing can be taken too far and often is.
-
Regardless of the value (or lack of) of a specific link from a specific directory I would agree with you that the seomoz directory list is a bit problematic. Since they are listed it does give the impression (rightly or wrongly) that these directories are 'approved' by seomoz and this might be sending the wrong message to many people. Would be interested in hearing the thoughts of a staff member on this, personally I would be tempted to get rid of the list!
-
Yes, Google have turned down the link value of links coming from most of the directories but saying that the link value of directories is finished is untrue! There are many directories which contain a link value and paying for them is a worth investment (in terms of link juice and business conversions.)
Yahoo directory and others are few of finest example of it as people still find them reputable and pass businesses to the businesses listed here!
-
I believe Google is against paid directories that accept everyone. Directories such as Yahoo, BOTW etc charge a fee, but those fees can be considered an editorial fee. Believe it or not high quality directories actually do reject applicants.
In google's guidelines it tells you to submit to directories, but people ended up taking that and submitting their site to thousands of directory sites not matter the quality. Submit to the big high quality directories and you will be fine. Make sure that the directory page you are submitting to has a higher page authority that way you can pass some link juice. These are my personal practices and beliefs and may vary with other people on this site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Need Directories list
I need free high page rank directories list. I know about this list http://www.seomoz.org/directories/+ need more sources. Thanks
Link Building | | GM0070 -
I'm hiring a link building company - need help choosing
I asked this question before and got mixed feedback. Companies vs. Freelancers. Well I have a couple questions here. At a certain point it is definitely worth going in house, but what about the knowledge that we could gain from working with a big agency? Does that really add any value? Can I hire a freelancer and trust him as much as a big agency? or vice versa? Can I hire an agency and trust them as much as a freelancer? I have also been advised to make sure they offer competitive / site analysis as a first step, AND inform you of exactly how many links they plan to build per month, how much time they will dedicate to you and your account, expect turn around times, and light strategy details that they would likely use. Thanks for any help! TA
Link Building | | TylerAbernethy0 -
SeoMoz says I have no link, when I know I have. What's going wrong
I know I have backlinks to the site, they are not showing up on SeoMoz. I've only recently started the account. Can anyone help?
Link Building | | jeffshrimpton0 -
Back to Basics: Lets talk link directories :)
Hi, Ok, bit of a muddy subject for me because lots say it's a good method, great for getting things started and some say it's a complete waste of time and it's spammy. But I guess the difference between the two opinions is quality! I have stopped using directories but think it's time to add some diversity to my link profile. In the past I have used this - http://www.directorycritic.com/free-directory-list.html What are your thoughts on that list? Does it actually fall into the spammy category and I should be looking for a much higher quality list. Cheers
Link Building | | activitysuper0 -
Need help with link building
How do I get good links to my site. Is it best to hire a link builder, or do it myself. I am new at seo
Link Building | | mikespy0 -
How can influence a directory backling page on your website ?
Hi, Some good directories asked a backlink for having ours listed in their categories. But of course, I am not fan of putting their link on the home page, but creating a page exclusively for these backlinks is a bad thing to mister google ? thanks in advance !
Link Building | | thuraminho750 -
Link Bait - Directory Style Resources Page
Hello Mozzers! Basically I want to add a beefed up "resources" page (directory style) to my site to attract in bound links. Below is an example of a site that has a similar directory style resources area. http://www.petfinder.com/shelters.html I was thinking that it might be good to add a resource box in my site footer with links to these resource pages such as: 1) Dog breeder resources
Link Building | | k9byron
2) Dog training resource
3) Dog shelters/kennels
4) Pet health resources
5) Pet care resources And funnel links to my category pages from there .. I was looking for some feedback or any tips or the best way to go about doing this and if anyone knew of a SE friendly script or something that that I might be able to integrate with my site (x-cart / PHP) platform that would make it easy to populate / update, ect Below is a paste of how one person I talked to envisions it: I'd suggest building some pages of value, such as dog resources pages (rescue groups & resources, etc.), adoption resources, etc. I'd guarantee if the resources were very comprehensive and built correctly, you'd get more bang for the buck versus throwing hundreds (or even thousands) away on sub-par links. Case:
http://www.tnj.com/black-history-makers/major-inventions-african-americans (a simple test content page to show this client we could build lifetime links with a few hours of work for a decent-sized resource page) Although very ugly, this is more of a gold mine for links taking the example above:
http://www.enchantedlearning.com/inventors/black.shtml This is just one simple example but I hope you get the concept versus ongoing payments for junk links.The more links you get to internal pages - even the resource guide pages - the more opportunity to link back to core product pages contextually or within the content portion of the page of side columns. The goal is to create funneled links from these resource pages back to your other pages, but doing it in a manner that's not outlandish or spammy in nature.0 -
Which Directory Sites to Choose?
Hi All I am a newbie to SEO and have a quick Q. Assuming that appropriate steps would be to; a) Ensure all onsite matters are are correct, title tags, meta descriptions, redirects, canonical issues. b) Submit to Directories c) Build Links I am approaching step b) Which Directories are worth submitting to? For those which require payment, how can I decide which are value for money or should I just use SEOMOZ list of links and assume that theyre worth the $50 - $100 if my higher ranking competitors have links from these directories. Also, can this be looked opon as grey/black hat 'buying of links'? Thank you Sean www.pretavoir.co.uk
Link Building | | seanmccauley0