Traffic down 60% - about to cry, please help
-
Hiya guys and girls,
I've just spent 6 months, a lot of blood sweat and tears, and money developing www.happier.co.uk.
In the last weeks the site started to make a trickle of money, still loss making but showing green shoots. But then on Friday the traffic dropped due to my rankings on google.co.uk dropping.
Visits:
Thur 25th april = 1950
Fri 26th april = 1284
Sat 27th april = 906
So it looks like Ive been hit with some sort of penalty. I did get a warning on the 20th april about an increase in the number of 404 errors, currently showing 77. I've now remove the links to those 404 pages, ive left the 404 pages as is, as was suggested here: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-fix-crawl-errors-in-google-webmaster-tools. Could that be the reason?
We have spent a lot of time on site design and content. We think the site is good, but I agree it has a long way to go but without income that is hard, so we have been struggling through. Any ideas on the reason/s for the penalty?
Big thanks,
Julian.
-
Yes that all makes total sense.
It's a real shame that google are so harsh on new sites. New sites need traffic from google like a baby needs oyxgen, and without it they might not be able to survive.
Happier is self funded and about 6 months old, and still losing money every week. I've thought about pluging the plug a fair few times. I'm not sure how much more money to invest, I might be just throwing good money after bad. Sorry whinge over.
-
There's an SEO debate going on right now about whether Panda is less likely to hit established brands. My position is that yes, it is more likely to impact small/new brands and sites. Perhaps once your brand is more established and you have a lot of comments on more of these pages you can try removing the noindex.
Without a full audit I may be missing something, but I hope this helps!
-
Firstly I would like to say a big thanks, your advice and thoughts are greatly appreciated. It has taken the pressure off me a bit, I was panicing but now I'm just a little worried.
I will talk to the tech guys today about noindexing the single deal pages and using a simliar layout to the code pages plus the comment layout from facebook. I don't really want to it as those pages are great for the long tail, checkout the traffic to hotukdeals.com who have a single page for every code and every deal, e.g. hotukdeals.com/deals/adidas-vintage-airline-bag-50-off-15-00-adidas-co-uk-1542011
But I can't afford to carry on with the current drop in traffic so have to make same changes fast.
Man do I hate google at the moment, they rank so much crap and obvious spam in their serps, but penalise a site like happier.co.uk on we have spent a lot of time carefully designing, adding quality content and playing by the rules.
-
The easy questions first: no, I don't think meta descriptions have anything to do with it. Google just crawls in spikes, especially if it detects a higher rate of change than usual. It's generally nothing to be concerned about.
As for thin pages, I think it's fine that you make the distinction between deals and codes. As a user, it just feels like "codes" are more valuable. It's a good idea. You have pages for each large brand, which is hugely important. Categories are also fine, as long as you don't multiply them endlessly.
I'm mostly concerned with pages like this:
http://www.happier.co.uk/deals/marks-and-spencer/3-pack-cotton-pyjamas-10-ms
I'd handle all of these as dropdowns like you seem to be doing on the home page, and make it like these pages never existed. I don't think this will hurt you much, either. I doubt anyone Googles, "deals on 3 packs of cotton pyjamas," and even if they do Google will pull up the text on brand pages.
As for the comments on these deals, see how Facebook does them. Load the first 3 most recent, then have an option for "show all comments."
I would personally put all NSFW content, or anything close to it, behind an authorization wall, then store the authorization in a cookie. This might hurt your rankings for these types of deals, but I feel like it would be well worth it to avoid being classified as someone dealing in adult content. It's unlikely to happen, but it's totally not worth the risk.
Again, I think your site will be fine if you keep at it, even in it's current shape. You know your industry better than I do, but from an SEO perspective I'd make these changes. Think about them and let me know if you see a flaw in them.
-
Hey Carson,
I really appreciated you taking the time to give such a well considered answer. It does make total sense. I feel the same that it's less likely to be a problem with links (which have built naturally and in an ethical way, therefore it would be really harsh to get a penalty for links).
I agree the problem could be thin pages, however to add a little more info into the mix.
-
We wanted to only display voucher codes, and not stuff the page with "deals" that add no extra value. We felt only showing codes in the codes category was a better user experience, than something like this: vouchercodes.co.uk/johnlewis.com - who just fill the page up with "deals" when there are no codes available - e.g. this is what we currently do http://www.happier.co.uk/codes/john-lewis - do you think it would be better to add a few "deals" even though the person visiting this page is looking for "discount codes"?
-
The deal page template is similar to the market leader's - e.g. hotukdeals.com/deals/rowntree-jelly-tots-randoms-160g-64p-pick-mix-150g-74p-fruittella-4pk-55p-mentos-1540682 - hotukdeals.com are in the top 100 sites in the UK according to alexa
In summary, I had considered the issue of thin pages before designing Happier.co.uk and knew it could be an issue, but there is only so much content user's want about a deal or code, and the market leaders seem to rank very well, so felt it would appear almost spammy to fill the pages up with more content, which I understand is opposite to normal advice for webpages.
Not sure about the nsfw content - I know we list sites like ann summers which is a high street brand in the uk which sells sex toys, etc, but as a high street brand I thought they were ok, plus everyone in this niche lists their codes and deals. But users can add content to happier.co.uk so I'm not 100% if more nsfw content is listed, I will check that out.
There are some crawl stats from GWT that spike on the same day our traffic drop, e.g.
Normal kilobyes downloaded per day about 15000, on 27th april it peaked at 45164. See attached image.
And finally, I was told that my IT guys fixed a problem with the meta descriptions the day before the drop in traffic, on most pages with the codes category, previously the meta desc what a templated one, but a handwritten one was in the db but not being used. So they changed that and now the handwritten one is being used. Personally, I can't believe that google would drop traffic to a site just because the meta desc was changed, especially as they are not suppose to use that in ranking a site.
So for the long reply but sometime a lot of info is needed, google is such a tricky beast these days. Here is a summary of my questions:
-
Do you think it would be better to add a few "deals" even though the person visiting this page is looking for "discount codes"?
-
Do the crawl stats, especially to spike in kilobytes per day, point at the problem?
-
Could changing the meta description be the cause?
Thank you for your time,
Julian.
-
-
Hi there,
I'm sorry that your site isn't doing as well as you'd like. Hopefully we can get to the bottom of this!
First, I've dealt with a LOT of link penalty questions, and I don't think that's what's happening. Consider, for example, that you have a ton of links for your Frugal 100 program. If you were slapped by Penguin, you would almost definitely not be ranking for "Frugal 100."
If your traffic is down - and SearchMetrics doesn't see it that way - please remember that it could just be fluctuation and SERP volatility that newer sites are prone to. Google tests, gives, takes away, and then gives back.
If you've been penalized (and I'm kinda doubting it), it's probably because of Panda. You have a LOT of really thin pages with little or no content on them and a heavy template. Can you add more content per page or scale back on the template space for individual deals? Do each of these deals need their very own page? I'm not sure, but a lot of deal sites don't do that.
I also noted that you have some adult deals on your site. Do keep in mind that Google might choose not to show the site for SFW deal-related terms if it thinks your content has a lot of NSFW stuff on it.
I hope this helps. Your site doesn't feel like most sites that get penalized - it seems useful to the people it serves. I think you'll be just fine in the end
-
I thought it was now normal for google to send out a "unnatural links" email, e.g. http://searchengineland.com/googles-cutts-on-how-to-locate-unnatural-links-pointing-to-your-web-site-148190
in the article is says "As you know, Google has been sendingunnatural link warnings to Webmasters for about a year now." dated 13th feb 2013.
So can it be a link penalty without a link warning email? By the way the links are natural and certainly not from thousands of sites, GWT is showing links from 292 domains.
-
No, Google won't tell you the specifics, but I agree this is from the quick building of links in a short amount of time.
-
if it was to do with links would I have got an email from saying that they found unnatural links? Then give me a chance to sort the problem out. Because I didnt I assume that links are not the problem.
-
Google is probably not happy with your link building, I would try to contact some of the links that are not relevant and ask to be removed. I don't know if that will be the best way to spend your time considering the 28,000 new links in 3 months. Maybe some positive social signals would take some of the suspicion down, I think to make 28,000 links seem natural your would have to be trending and going viral on the social networks but even some small work may help.
-
Vouchercodes and hotukdeals have been around for many years and therefore got a considerable amount of authority. What is your traffic like on weekends? I used to run a deals website similar to your own and traffic was always down on the weekend because people would use it more during the build up to the weekend.
-
Hi Rich,
28000 sounds a lot but if a site adds us to their blogroll and they have 28000 pages that would account for all the links.
We done the following types of links building:
- Top quality content, e.g:
- http://www.happier.co.uk/blog/apple-ripping-off-everyone-apart-from-americans-average-iphone-5-international-mark-up-32-samsung-s3-11-3153 (got a link from guadian.co.uk)
- http://www.happier.co.uk/blog/the-frugal-100-awards-2013-edition-2741 (this is where a lot of links can from, all from related niche blogs, they either mentioned us in a post or added a badge to their right nav)
- http://www.happier.co.uk/blog/the-uk-economy-a-billion-here-a-billion-there-1530 (this got a few quality links)
- http://www.happier.co.uk/blog/20-of-the-best-positive-psychology-blogs-of-2012-113 (a few quality links)
Also we have done, some guest posting on related and quality niche blogs, listed the site on some directories (not many), and some general out reach.
-
You appear to have aquired an aweful lot of links in a very short time. A look on Majestic SEO is telling me you have gained 28000 in the last 90 days, how have you been going about link building?
-
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the answer.
Yes it an affiliate site, but these types of sites can do amazing well in terms of rankings and traffic, check these two:
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/vouchercodes.co.uk#
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/hotukdeals.com
and of course http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/retailmenot.com
They are all similar sites. Maybe linking out from the homepage was not a great idea, but I thought it was user friendly, e.g. user see a code, so they click and go directly to merchant and get the code instead of going to deeper page, then get the code. In fact, I just checked and that is just how retailmenot.com works, which to my knowledge is most popular coupon site in the world.
I'm still dazed and confused.
-
i doubt that is the reason for your drop in all honesty, i'd suggest if you can redirecting to a category to avoid any issues though.
Id suggest adding more value content to the front page, at the moment its just a link-out affiliate site, these don't usually do amazingly well in search - you are adding a blog and forum that is great but maybe look at surfacing them on the front page if you can to add some depth to the site other than via the top nav.
other than that without delving into your stats and GWT i can't say too much.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Creating two websites from one and building up traffic to the new domain quickly
A client has an existing successful website that sells niche products - they are well known in their marketplace. They have two sets of key customers, let's call them (a) and (b), that need addressing in different ways to maximise sales. (a) is the more specialist end of the market, where people have complex needs - there are fewer of them but repeat business is likely, and we can talk to them in more technical language. (b) is the layman's end of the market - there is a vast pool of potential customers but they'll be more casual buyers and need to be addressed more in layman's terms. So what they want to do is to take their existing website, and essentially split it into two different websites, one for each market. The one that will use the existing domain, with all the links that have built up over the years pointing to it, will be the site for the more specialist end of the market (a). The domain name suits it better, which is why he wants to use the existing domain with that site and not the other. (b) will be a brand new domain. The client will write new product descriptions across the board so that the two sets of product information are not duplicate. I'd rather he didn't do this at all, because of the risk involved, and the difficulty of building up the traffic to the new site, which is after all the one with the best chance of mass market sales. But given that the client has decided that this is definitely what he wants, does anyone have any thoughts on what the action plan should be?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | helga730 -
Still Seeing GSC Traffic in HTTP Property Post-Migration
We migrated to HTTPS in June 2017, so why would I still be seeing a bit of traffic in our HTTP property in Google Search Console? QyqQ2
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | catbur0 -
Help With Href Lang Implementation
Hi, We've received the following Href Lang errors in Google Search Console. After much research and playing around with the tags we're still no closer to fixing the issues. ERRORS; http://prntscr.com/du8ei8 AND http://prntscr.com/du8evi As you'll see, Google is telling us that some URLs do not have return tags, but they do seem to! Does anyone know of a pro that can provide a service to fix this for us? Many thanks in advance, Lee.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Webpresence0 -
Over 30,000 pages but only 100 get traffic... can I kill the others?
I have a website with over 30,000 pages. But only around 100 are getting traffic from Google/being used by the company. How safe is it for me to kill the other pages? Usually I'd do rel canonical or 301's to scrap as much link juice as I can from them, but at 30,000 we just don't have any place to 301 the pages that makes sense and rel canonical to irrelevant pages seems... wrong? So my hope was to just kill the pages, reuse their content when needed, but pretty much start fresh. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jacob.young.cricut0 -
Strange internal links and trying to improve PR ? - Please advise
Hi All, I've been looking at the internal links on my eCommerce site to try and improve PR and get it as efficient as possible so link juice isnt getting wasted etc and I've come across some odd ones I would like some advice on My website currently has between 125-146 links on every page (Sitemap approx 3500 pages). From what I read ,the ideal number of links is under 100 but can someone confirm is this is still the case ?..Is it a case of less is more , in terms of improving a page PR etc ? in terms of link juice strength etc so it's not getting diluted to unnecessary pages. One of my links is a bad url ( my domain + phone number for reason) which currently goes to a 404 page ?. - Is this okay or do we need to track down the link and remove it. I don't want link juice getting wasted as it's on every page. Another one of my links is my domain.name/# and another one with some characters after the # which both to the home page. Example www.domain.co.uk/# and www.domain.co.uk#abcde both go to homepage. Is this okay or am I potentially getting duplicate content as If I put these urls in , they go to my home page. I have a link on every page which opens up outlook (email) on the contact us. Should this really be changed to a button with a contact us form opening up instead ? I currently have 9 links on the bottom on every page i.e About it , delivery , hire terms,.contact us , trade accounts , privacy, sitemap. When I check , these pages seem to be my strongest pages in terms of PR. Is that because they are on every page?.. Should I look to reduce these links as they are accessible from the navigation menu apart from privacy and sitemap. Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated ? thanks Pete
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PeteC120 -
Will redirecting poor traffic web pages increase web presence
A number of pages on my site have low traffic metrics. I intend to redirect poor performing pages to the most appropriate page with high traffic. Example
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mark_Ch
www.sampledomomain.co.uk/low-traffic-greyshoes
www.sampledomomain.co.uk/low-traffic-greenshoes
www.sampledomomain.co.uk/low-traffic-redshoes all of the above will be redirected to the following page:
www.sampledomomain.co.uk/high-traffic-blackshoes Question
Will carrying out htaccess redirects from the above example influence to web positioning of both www.sampledomomain.co.uk/high-traffic-blackshoes and www.sampledomomain.co.uk Regards Mark0 -
90% Traffic Drop...
Hey Moz Community Our team has been racking our collective brains about a 90% drop in traffic a niche client of ours has seen. The traffic drop occurred September 20th. The site averages 300-400 unique visits a month (very targeted & niche) & dropped to 30-40 uvm. The domain is on an exact match but other then that I can't see anything that would be deserving of such a significant drop in traffic. Our campaign had been performing very well & we were seeing steady gains in traffic & ranking over the long term until September 20th. I'm curious if the exact match update would have such a big impact months after it was released (July/July if I remember correctly). I also didn't think it could be such a big issue because that domain has been used by us for a couple years. Is the Exact Domain Match such a big deal? eJGe3Vw
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | hendersondavidp0 -
Lost 86% of traffic after moving old static site to WordPress
I hired a company to convert an old static website www.rawfoodexplained.com with about 1200 pages of content to WordPress. Four days after launch it lost almost 90% of traffic. It was getting over 60,000 uniques while nobody touched the site for several years. It’s been 21 days since the WordPress launch. I read a lot of stuff prior to moving it (including Moz's case study) and I was expecting to lose in short term 30% of traffic max… I don’t understand what is wrong. The internal link structure is the same, every url is 301 to the same url only without[dot]html (ie www.rawfoodexplained.com/science.html is 301′s to http://www.rawfoodexplained.com/science/ ), it’s added to Google Webmaster tool and Google indexed the new pages… Any ideas what could be possible wrong? I do understand the website is not optimized (meta descriptions etc, but it wasn't before either) .... Do you think putting back the old site would recover the traffic? I would appreciate any thoughts Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JakubH0