Google disavow DMOZ/ODP spam sites?
-
Hello
Looking into links to my one of my sites (over 10 years old) I've found that along with some bad spammy links, around 80% of my inbound links are from directories that are exact copies of ODP. Should I be concerned about / asking for removal / disavowing these links? Normally I would be trying to get rid of low quality links like this, but since they are ODP clones I'm not sure it's worth the effort. The sites openly state that their data is from ODP (Open Directory Project), but does this mean Google ignores them? I could spend my whole life swatting these links.
Thoughts?
Edit: I'm hoping for suggestions that specifically reference the ODP clone site situation. I did not create these links, I guess I should have made that more clear.
-
Contact the site owner and request removal.
More specifically, make every possible attempt to locate the site owner. Use the following:
WHOIS e-mail address, e-mail address from website, contact form on website, social media pages, and phone number, physical mailing address. Make a sincere effort to reach each site owner.
-
What is best way to get rid of bad inbound links in your opinion?
-
Hi Nelson,
I am glad your question was addressed.
I apologize if my perspective has become hardened over time. I actually work with many aspects of SEO but manipulative link issues have consumed the majority of my time this year. When my phone rings it is often a client who has an issue related to manipulative links.
To be clear, I am not passing any judgment here or taking sides. I do understand Google did not enforce their guidelines in the past with respect to manipulative links. Many topics arise during this conversation about what Google should do, can't do, perceived abuses, etc. In order to best service clients I focus on a single question - - - what steps need to be taken to restore site rankings so they are not artificially suppressed.
Once we clear the air and reach that point, we can move forward productively. I want to help you and other site owners impacted by this issue which is why I share my time here. I hope you are able to receive complete and accurate information, then put it to use.
Best of luck.
-
"In your case, it is different based on your manipulative activities. "
You seem to really want the scenario to be one in which I'm manipulating links either directly or indirectly. I read some of your other posts and I see that's your niche, fixing manipulative links, so it's understandable but it's not necessarily useful for this bias to colour every answer. You may or may not remember that 10 years ago it was considered desirable and normal to get listed on ODP. Google was barely more than a search provider to Yahoo then.
For the record, the site I'm referring to is not commercial, nobody has ever worked on it for me so nobody was building links on my behalf. I have not received communication from Google about a penalty (never on any site as a matter of fact), and this particular site's traffic has never been high enough to notice a drop in traffic in April. I was just wondering if it was possible the scraped sites and their links to me were diluting my site's rankings and if I should but a bunch of effort into having them removed and/or disavow.
Anyway, thank you very much Ryan, I managed to filter out an answer to my question
-
For you, yes. For most site owners, no.
Based on your interpretation, I am going to assume your site is manually penalized by Google or you have your rankings are being suppressed by Penguin. If that is the case, either you or an agent (employee, "SEO", developer, etc) acting on your behalf has built manipulative links to your website. If that is the case, you intentionally tried to cheat the system.
To be clear, no laws were broken. It does not mean you are a bad person or anything on that level. Rather it means there is a process which everyone who desires to rank well in search engines should follow, and that process was intentionally broken for your site. So yes, there are negative consequences to cheating and getting caught.
The overwhelming majority of site owners are not negatively impacted by the links you mentioned. Google simply devalues those links and that is it. In your case, it is different based on your manipulative activities.
I know that may be hard to hear so I will try another analogy. In California, if anyone drives with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08% or above they are violating the law and can be arrested. Most of the public does not have a DUI on their record so they can drive with a 0.07% BAC and not worry about a DUI; however, if you are convicted of a DUI then you are likely on probation for several years. During that probationary period, you may not drive with even a 0.01% BAC you can be arrested. The point being the rules are not the same for those who have been caught breaking the rules and those who have complied with them.
The links from 99% of general directories are indeed manipulative. Whether those links were built by the site owner or, in the case of a DMOZ clone site, a directory owner, the links were built with the purpose of manipulating search engines. Sometimes a new directory is attempting to fill up with some data to give visitors the illusion it has numerous in the hopes they will pay for service. Others attempt to earn money with AdWords. Either way, they are manipulative links.
-
So, what I'm getting from this is even though I didn't create these links (and therefore I was not participating in manipulative link schemes, unless getting myself listed in ODP/DMOZ in the first place was "manipulative"), I should try by any means necessary to get the clone links removed because they look manipulative to Google.
-
**Is your site under a manual penalty or impacted by Penguin? Have you participated in manipulative link building? **
If the answer to these questions is no, then Google has clearly stated you should not be using the Disavow tool at all.
**Have you contacted these sites via multiple methods (WHOIS email, email address on site, contact form from site, phone, mail, social media, etc) requesting the links to be removed? **
If not, you may be wasting your time. Google has clearly stated they expect site owners to use the Disavow tool as a last resort when all other methods fail.
I've found that along with some bad spammy links, around 80% of my inbound links are from directories that are exact copies of ODP.
If your rankings are being suppressed by Google due to manipulative links, then any manipulative directory links should be removed. Google likely devalues all those links, but they must be addressed in order to remove a penalty.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Disavow Google Links
Hi Guys, one question from my side: When I disavow domains in the Google link disavow tool, do I have to disavow every subdomain of a main domain.....for example; I want to disavow the following (sub)domains safsad.mydomain.com hapdasd.mydomain.com skdkada.mydomain.com Do I have to disavow every subdomain solely or does it suffice if I disavow "mydomain.com" and when done also every subdomain of this main domain is disavowed too? Thank you in advance. BG
Link Building | | MihaSI0 -
Spam Score not decreasing
Hey Experts I extract all high spam score links from Moz of my website codingcurious, and submit then in webmaster for disavowe but we didn't get any results after 3-4 months any solutions
Link Building | | papakg0 -
How much time does it takes for a backlink to get registered in Google? My basketball anime website has been live since start of this week and Google has not registered any backlink.
So my website https://www.animedhfa.com/basketball-anime/ about basketball Anime has shown no changes in DA or backlinks. It has been 5 days perhaps since it went live.
Link Building | | ahmad74750 -
Backlinks on sites that aren't relevant, how does google determine relevancy?
I have a competitor who I've talked about on here before about how they passed us in ranking for our main keywords and that they were a new site ( less than 6 months old ). Well after further digging a few things were found out: Our site seems to have a penguin penalty causing our keywords ( a group of synonyms as well ) from ranking better than rank 30. As well our competitor has been using this weird backlink tactic of using SEO sites ( a friend? ), a parent site to prop it up ( footer links and others ) as well has links inside articles that aren't relevant as in having a commercial niche page inside a lawyer site page talking about phone dialing. Then the low DA directory sites. I'm curious as to if penguin algo will catch them once it comes out, if not penguin a manual review would certainly catch their tactics, but this site is doing everything else other than proper SEO. What do you think?
Link Building | | Deacyde0 -
Reporting a Link Scheme to Google
Hi Mozzers, Two questions...
Link Building | | FDAitsupport
There is a negative article showing up in the SERPS for my boss name which we've been doing some rep management to get rid of. Well, someone started building links to that property recently, and it has pushed the result to the #2 spot. I did some research, and the property has never had a single link pointed to it until recently. There are 7 referring domains, all of which use the same theme, and have the same author for each article. Each property has over 1,000 articles in not even 2 years. All articles are based around the same topic. The property they are promoting negatively went from 0 backlinks to 55 in under 2 months. My Question is, is it okay to report this to Google? It seems like a cut and dry example of a link scheme. Second question, I have recently seen an increase of spammy links showing up in ahrefs. These links were likely built by a predecessor of mine as far back as 2010. I had been letting them fall off naturally, but now they are coming back (around the same time the above mentioned link scheme began). Do you think someone is re-indexing my links as a sort of attack? Or is it possible Google is re-indexing them? I'm going to contact the webmasters where I can, but seriously considering using disavow tool. My rankings started dropping when the links started getting indexed. And continue to drop. Negative SEO, or Googles recent "Quality Update"? Thanks for any and all input. Ryan0 -
Is ListofDomains.org a bad linking site?
I am trying to clean up/disavow bad linking domains and ListofDomains.org appears numerous times. Any idea what this site is about and should it make the disavow list?
Link Building | | khull0 -
Should I re-update Google webmaster disavow when bad neighbor republish my Feeds?
Hi all! I have a self hosted, WordPress blog. Today I accidentally found a one bad site republish my blog feeds in its sidebar. This blog has cracked software download links, software serial numbers information as well as few legal contents. I think it's is a bad neighbor. And it will cause future SEO issues. That blog hosted on Google blogspot. Then try to contact the site admin to remove my feeds from the sidebar. But I can't find any contact information. This site doesn't have any social networking profiles/pages. How do I block that site re-publishing my feeds? It uses a blogspot.com sub domain, therefore I can't find any who is information. If I use Google webmaster disavow link feature, what happen when I publish new blog posts? Then I have to re-update the webmaster tools disavow links? Thanks!
Link Building | | Godad1