Redirecting non-www to www
-
Hi all,
I recently ran my first diagnostic test with SEOmoz and was alarmed to find my company's site has over 8,000 cases of duplicate content, virtually all of which can be attributed to separate domains, www vs. non-www.
So after some research I found that this can be solved easily using .htaccess. However I found a warning on another site that if my site has already been indexed by Google without the www, there could be side effects like a loss in PR.
Can anybody tell me how to find out whether my site falls into this category? I do have access to Google Webmaster tools but I can't find anywhere that tells me how my site's been indexed.
Thanks in advance.
-
Hi Ryan, you've received some great responses here. Did they answer your question?
-
You're absolutely right, Paul. Thanks. Sometimes I forget that people's domains are more broad than the ones I work with. (I'm permitted to be lazy in this regard, but should not encourage such laziness.)
Onward!
-
Agree w/ what Jesse's saying here, but need a little tidy on his description of how to look at how Google sees the addresses differently. You'll need to Google www.whoopsee.com and then whoopsie.com (note the .com needs to be included both times). Otherwise you're doing a keyword search, not a domain name search.
In fact, the best way to do these is to do a search for site:www.whoopsie.com and then site:whoopsie.com. That will limit the search results to actual URLs from only your own site.
Paul
-
If you want to see the true effect of this "split" you can use Open Site Explorer to check the incoming links of each version of the URL. If there's a major difference, pick the version with the most incoming links as your primary (or canonical) version. Then redirect the secondary version to that URL. Like Jesse, I almost always find the www version is the better one to make primary.
There's no reason not to do this redirecting, and every reason to do it. You may find the rankings fluctuate a little for a day or 2 as the search engines update themselves. But if you don't do this, you essentially have your two sites competing against each other and splitting their value between them. Which means other sites will outrank you even though their "score" is lower, because your score has been split.
Google Webmaster Tools can also tell you this info very effectively, but to get it you're going to have to create a second site inside your GWT account. When you set up your existing GWT site, you used either the www.example.com or non-www version of your website. Whichever address you chose, that is the ONLY index data provided in that GWT site.
As further proof search engines consider them separate sites, the only way to check the other version of your URL is to actually create a whole new site (in the same GWT account) using the other URL version as the setup address.
When on your main dashboard, you'll see a red button in the top right corner for **Add a Site. **Use the URL that's different from the one you used the first time. Then set up and verify as normal. You can use the same verification method you used the first time -most often just using your Google Analytics account to verify is easiest, but if you uploaded a special file or are using the header snippet, those will work again too.
Once you've got the second site set up, you will be able to compare the indexing and incoming links reports to see the differences between the two versions as Google sees them.
Last benefit of setting up both sites - you can now use the GWT tools Configuration -> Settings to tell Google which version of the site is your Preferred Domain. (you can only do this properly if you have both site versions set up) Set the same version of the preferred domain in both versions of the site and you'll give Google a second indicator for which version of your domain is the primary.
Hope that makes sense?
Paul
-
well you can find out how it's been indexed by typing in your domain. For example, if your domain is www.whoopsee.com then google "whoopsee" and see what it returns.
Regardless, this doesn't matter. What you NEED to do is simply do a redirect. Choose one, www or non-www. I prefer www but others prefer other things. It is not going to hurt you if you perform this redirect right this second, no matter what Google has indexed. If you do NOT perform the redirect... THAT is what will hurt your site.
So.. don't delay and don't worry! You will find that things will improve. Keep this in mind - performing a 301 redirect will pass link juice. Meaning if you point domain.com - www.domain.com then all previous links pointing to domain.com will pass juice to the new permanent redirected www.domain.com
Does this make sense?
Long story short - Your site will not be worsened by this redirect. It will be benefited. Because right now, Google sees them as two different sites and they are competing against eachother and link juice is split between them. Join like Voltron and move forward!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Has anyone tested or knows whether it makes a difference to upload a disavow file to both www. and non-www. versions of your site in GWMT?
Although Google treats both as separate sites, I always assumed that uploading the disavow file to the canonical version of your site would solve the problem. Is this the case, or has anyone seen better results uploading to both versions?
Technical SEO | | CustardOnlineMarketing0 -
Www & non-www URL Issue
Hi is there any tools out there which can enable me to find pages which both serve www and non-www versions of each URL
Technical SEO | | monster990 -
Delete 301 redirected pages from server after redirect is in place?
Should I remove the redirected old pages from my site after the redirects are in place? Google is hating the redirects and we have tanked. I did over 50 redirects this week, consolidating content and making one great page our of 3-10 pages with very little content per page. But the old pages are still visible to google's bot. Also, I have not put a rel canonical to itself on the new pages. Is that necessary? Thanks! Jean
Technical SEO | | JeanYates0 -
Should I change a 301 redirect?
I recently moved all the content from an old site to a new site on a new domain. I lost a significant amount of traffic as a result. There are 301 redirects for every page on the old site. Generally, these point to the same content as was on the relevant page of the old site. However, the 301 redirect for the homepage on the old site points to the homepage on the new site, not to the content from the old site homepage. I'm wondering whether to change the 301 to point at the content from the old site homepage. Any advice would be much appreciated.
Technical SEO | | seqal0 -
Removing 301 Redirects
Is it safe to remove old 301 Redirects from an SEO standpoint and can 301s dramatically affect seo? Prior to switching our old domain over to our new domain, we had (and currently still do) tons of 301 redirects, because of optimizing our file names and structure. Then our old domain was redirected to our new domain in the same redirect file. So that being said, now that our new domain has been up and running for about 3 months, would it be safe for me to get rid of the old 301 redirects and redirect anything that was on our old domain to our new domains home page? This would clean up our redirects tremendously and I hope would help with SEO.
Technical SEO | | hfranz0 -
Redirects
Hello, My question is: how important is it to wait for the a redirect to get seen and cached before you take down the old page? More in depth: my old platform has seriously limited my ability to add sitemaps and make edits to htacces. I just want to change nameservers (which will delete everything on there) and upload the htaccess is that alright? Another way of saying it: when redirecting a page, is it necessary for google to see the old page before it is deleted? Thanks Tyler
Technical SEO | | tylerfraser0 -
Should I use www. or not in my main URL?
I have backlinks coming into my homepage, which has both a www. URL and one that's merely http://mysite.com. Which is the preferred URL for best optimization for search engines and how do I find this out?
Technical SEO | | NetPicks0 -
Duplicate Homepage: www.mysite.com/ and www.mysite.com/default.aspx
Hi, I have a question regarding our client's site, http://www.outsolve-hr.com/ on ASP.net. Google has indexed both www.outsolve-hr.com/ and www.outsolve-hr.com/default.aspx creating a duplicate content issue. We have added
Technical SEO | | flarson
to the default.aspx page. Now, because www.outsolve-hr.com/ and www.outsolve-hr.com/default.aspx are the same page on the actual backend the code is on the http://www.outsolve-hr.com/ when I view the code from the page loaded in a brower. Is this a problem? Will Google penalize the site for having the rel=canonical on the actual homepage...the canonical url. We cannot do a 301 redirect from www.outsolve-hr.com/default.aspx to www.outsolve-hr.com/ because this causes an infinite loop because on the backend they are the same page. So my question is two-fold: Will Google penalize the site for having the rel=canonical on the actual homepage...the canonical url. Is the rel="canonical" the best solution to fix the duplicate homepage issue on ASP. And lastly, if Google has not indexed duplicate pages, such as https://www.outsolve-hr.com/DEFAULT.aspx, is it a problem that they exist? Thanks in advance for your knowledge and assistance. Amy0